On our best behavior The seven deadly sins and the price women pay to be good

Elise Loehnen

Book - 2023

"We congratulate ourselves when we resist the donut in the office breakroom. We celebrate our restraint when we hold back from sending an email in anger. We feel virtuous when we wake up at dawn to get a jump on the day. We put others' needs ahead of our own and believe this makes us exemplary. In On Our Best Behavior, journalist Elise Loehnen explains that these impulses - often lauded as unselfish, distinctly feminine instincts - are actually ingrained in us by a culture that reaps the benefits, via an extraordinarily effective collection of mores known as the Seven Deadly Sins. Since being codified by the Christian church in the fourth century, the Seven Deadly Sins-pride, greed, lust, envy, gluttony, wrath, and sloth-have exer...ted insidious power. Even today, in our largely secular, patriarchal society, they continue to circumscribe women's behavior. For example, seeing sloth as sinful leads women to deny themselves rest; a fear of gluttony drives them to ignore their appetites; and an aversion to greed prevents them from negotiating for themselves and contributes to the 55 percent gender wealth gap"--

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

248.843/Loehnen
0 / 1 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor 248.843/Loehnen Due Jan 4, 2025
Subjects
Genres
Religious materials
Published
New York : The Dial Press [2023]
Language
English
Main Author
Elise Loehnen (author)
Edition
First edition
Physical Description
xxvi, 353 pages : 24 cm
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references (pages 289-295) and index.
ISBN
9780593243039
  • Introduction: Genesis
  • A brief history of the patriarchy
  • Sloth: believing sloth to be sinful, we deny ourselves rest
  • Envy: believing envy to be sinful, we deny our own wanting
  • Pride: believing pride to be sinful, we deny our own talents
  • Gluttony: believing gluttony to be sinful, we deny our own hunger
  • Greed: believing greed to be sinful, we deny our own security
  • Lust: believing lust to be sinful, we deny our own pleasure
  • Anger: believing anger to be sinful, we deny our own needs
  • Sadness: believing sadness to be sinful, we deny our own feelings
  • Conclusion: Realignment.
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review

Pulling the Thread podcaster Loehnen debuts with a searching study of how the seven deadly sins (sloth, envy, pride, gluttony, greed, lust, and anger) developed into a web of "cultural programming" that deems women "to be inferior in every way." She traces the roots of the seven deadly sins back to fourth-century monk Evagrius Ponticus, whose list of eight "passionate thoughts" also included sadness, and notes that when Pope Gregory first preached about the "Capital Vices," he "assigned to Mary Magdalene and branded her a whore." Restoring sadness to the list and devoting a chapter to each concept, Loehnen unpacks the ways in which women contort themselves to "be good" within a system that is designed to oppress them. The section on sloth, for example, discusses the guilt felt by working mothers "that by shirking parenthood as our sole objective, we're not doing our real jobs." Associating the "energy of the feminine" with "creativity, nurturance, and care," Loehnen calls for its resurgence to "bring our culture's toxic masculinity into balance." Though Loehnen's argument can be difficult to follow, she incisively draws from the work of thinkers including Kate Manne and Gerda Lerner and weaves in poignant autobiographical reflections. It's a laudable effort to pull up the roots of patriarchy. (May)

(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
Review by Kirkus Book Review

An analysis of society's behavioral expectations for women. Drawing largely on her own experiences, Loehnen, the host of the Pulling the Thread podcast and former editorial projects director of Condé Nast Traveler, contends that women have been unwittingly programmed to behave in a certain manner in order to be accepted. "Where did this beast come from," she asks, "how did it get its power, and why was I so willing to submit? I began to trawl through history to locate the early murmurs of when good-ness and acceptability were conjoined for women." Loehnen shows that the framework for this programming arose via the Seven Deadly Sins found in Christian teachings. The author explores the origin of the sins and examines each in relation to the modern life of women. As Loehnen points out, the sins were based on the "Eight Thoughts" of a fourth-century monk named Evagrius Ponticus, which additionally included the concept of "sadness" and became a teaching tool for the church. While the concepts referenced in the book do have strong religious underpinnings, the author's language and writing style are more secular in nature and will appeal to a wide audience. "Even if you consider yourself an atheist, or agnostic, or opposed to organized religion, the moral codes directed by the Seven Deadly Sins have influenced you," she writes. "They are not solely the prove-nance of the church; the sins have permeated culture." Throughout, Loehnen demonstrates that women have limited their lives based on these artificial restrictions and must strive to break free from this "tool of oppression." For example, out of fear of appearing slothful, women frequently deny themselves rest. For fear of appearing gluttonous, women often deny their own hunger. Afraid of being deemed "unhinged," women are often apprehensive about expressing their anger. An engaging work that offers an opportunity for pause and reflection regarding our daily choices. Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

1 A Brief History of the Patriarchy in Twenty-one Pages To understand how the Seven Deadly Sins influence our lives, even to this day (even if we don't consider ourselves religious), we must understand the system that produced them: the patriarchy, which has defined Western culture for millennia. Its forefathers adopted and shaped early Christianity to enforce behavior in ways that continue to affect us. I struggled to understand how someone like me, even with all my privileges--white, cis, heterosexual, upper middle class, agnostic/spiritual--still feels prisoner to these Judeo-Christian ideas of "goodness." Why do I feel bound to keep from committing these "sins"? To answer that question, I'd need to examine the story about who we are, a story we've been telling each other through history. A warning: This chapter is the book's densest and most academic--skip it if you're inclined--but to imagine something new, it's important to understand where we've been. Originally Partners While we tend to think of the patriarchy as an inevitable reality, this conception is wrong. For most of human existence--from 2.5 million years ago to 10,000 b.c.--we were nomads, ranging across the planet in small collectives that were partnership societies, dependent on what many disparate bands thought of as the "Great Mother," the creative force behind all life. In these partnership societies, women were revered for their generative powers--after all, birth is a miracle. This is not to say early tribes were matriarchies--that would have still insisted on an arbitrary hierarchy, where women were perceived as superior to men. Paleolithic societies were primarily affiliation based, rather than predicated on continual oppression. In these first millions of years of our existence, there was no private property in the way we'd define it today--no resources to hoard, no generational wealth to sock away under the mattress, no land or titles to pass to biological children. Our ancestors were focused on the collective--a "we" rather than an "I," where all would have been dependent on the group, and nature, for survival. Throughout the Stone Age, our ancestors planted small gardens and foraged for fruit, vegetables, and small animals like snails and frogs, with only the occasional big game prize; anthropologists assert we were gatherer/hunters, not the opposite. As much as 80 percent of our food supply was generated, and processed, by women. And though hunting has been significantly overstated as the way of life, where it did occur, some women participated. In settlements like central Turkey's Çatalhöyük (7500-6400 b.c.), men and women were the same size, received equivalent calories, and spent an equal amount of time inside. I can't be the only one who was startled to read in The New York Times that a recent examination of nine-thousand-year-old graves in the Andes revealed that ten of the twenty-six bodies buried with hunting tools were the bodies of women, or when I discovered that a recent reassessment of prehistoric cave drawings, long held to be hunting scenes painted by men, concluded that the handprints were primarily female. There are many theories for what changed some ten thousand to twelve thousand years ago, when we started practicing agriculture on a wider scale, and between 8000 and 3000 b.c., when farming became the norm. Most historians seem to agree that resource scarcity or opportunity--changing temperatures around 5000 b.c. revealed uber-fertile lands around rivers throughout Eurasia--pushed humans to migrate, bringing discrete groups into conflict with each other. Waves of Proto-Europeans invaded the existing "Old Europe" planting culture--overwhelmingly male Indo-Europeans from the North and Akkadian and Semitic tribes from the Syro-Arabian desert in the South. These warring tribes raped, pillaged, and subordinated those they conquered, creating hierarchical cultures that elevated some and oppressed others. While Paleolithic and Neolithic societies had acknowledged their dependence on nature, those in agrarian society thought of nature as something to dominate, control, and order. When we became agrarian--over a protracted period, variably around the globe--everything changed, particularly for women, children, domesticable animals, and whoever and whatever could be marginalized, co-opted, and enslaved for the benefit of others. If conflict begat chaos, the fallout demanded a reorganization of society into structures through which order could be imposed. Between 3000 b.c. and 1300 b.c. we see the advent of such systems; a broader array of rules and laws became essential as society became more complex. Yet power almost always perverts, particularly when scarcity and security are in play. Women as First Property Women and children conquered in conflict and taken as slaves, servants, and concubines were the first property of the patriarchy: Men practiced their dominance on them and learned its possibilities. This became the foundation of slavery, the economic engine for many cultures. Over time, the oppression of women came to seem natural, normal, the way it had always been. "Otherization," creating socially acceptable power distinctions, has been used broadly since--against Jews, Muslims, Black people. Women simply went first. One of the mechanisms of the patriarchy was to force adherence to a vertical family structure. Because strong, even primary bonds between women had persisted over time in communal-living cultures, the push toward vertical family structures was intended to shift women from interdependence among each other to dependence on men. Even married women were essentially enslaved. While we think of marriage now as a mutually elective (and ideally romantic) partnership, that's a very modern interpretation. In marriage's earliest incarnations, women connected families, concentrated assets and status, and produced children; effectively, women were owned by their husbands, purchased through marriage or sold into the arrangement. Before monotheism became standard (it appeared first in 1300 b.c. in Egypt, though millennia later in the Greco-Roman world), women did maintain active roles in temple life as priestesses, prophets, and healers--the goddess, and her power to give life, continued to be worshipped among other deities, perhaps as primary. But in civil society, day-to-day, there was little reverence for mortal women. Even women who were more proximate to power were in permanently tenuous positions: A wife could easily, without warrant or reason, be demoted to concubine or slave. This ever-present threat coerced dependence and good behavior and ultimately was codified into law. Excerpted from On Our Best Behavior: The Seven Deadly Sins and the Price Women Pay to Be Good by Elise Loehnen All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.