Disputing disaster A sextet on the Great War

Perry Anderson

Book - 2024

"Perry Anderson picks from the highly charged historiography of the First World War one leading historian from each of the major powers that survived the conflagration: Fritz Fischer, famous historian of German war-guilt; Pierre Renouvin, a disabled serviceman and preeminent authority on the conflict in France; Luigi Albertini, the Italian newspaper tycoon who unlike any other scholar on the Grear War was himself a leading actor in pitching his country into it; Paul W. Schroeder, the American expert on the system of European interstate relations and its breakdown in 1914; Keith Wilson, the one radical deviant from a patriotic consensus in Britain about the country's role in the outbreak of the fighting; and, from Australia (a domi...nion dragooned into the Great War by the British), the acclaimed Christopher Clark"--

Saved in:
1 person waiting
1 copy ordered
Subjects
Genres
History
Published
London : Verso Books 2024.
Language
English
Main Author
Perry Anderson (author)
Physical Description
xvi, 373 pages ; 22 cm
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN
9781804297674
  • Foreword
  • 1. Pierre Renouvin
  • 2. Luigi Albertini
  • 3. Fritz Fischer
  • 4. Keith Wilson
  • 5. Christopher Clark
  • 6. Paul Schroeder
  • Acknowledgements
  • Index
Review by Kirkus Book Review

An examination of the many approaches historians have taken to understanding the origins of the First World War. As British historian Anderson notes, thousands on thousands of books have been devoted to World War I. Yet only a small number concern the history of history--historiography, that is. Anderson considers six major historians whose work even well-read students of the Great War may not know. While many historians have viewed the war as inevitable, others as the result of a chain of errors, Anderson's sextet took a far more nuanced view and delivered far more intriguing interpretations of events. Some suggested, for instance, a causal chain that traces the war to England's arrangement with Russia that the czar could do much as he pleased in Central Asia as long as Russia left British India, the keystone of its empire, alone. In the view of conservative American historian Paul Schroeder, the war was at least in part due to the major European powers' undisguised desire to bring down the Habsburg Empire: "No actor in the system gave any thought to what the consequences of the deletion of Austro-Hungary from it were likely to be," Anderson writes. "Sensing this, Austro-Hungary rebelled against the system, only to bring itself down with the system." And it took plenty of lives down with it: Italian journalist and historian Luigi Albertini examined the reluctance of Italy, initially an ally of Germany and Austro-Hungary, to join in the war, only to do so 10 months after the outbreak in order to take part in the spoils; the result, thanks to the blusteringly inept chief of staff Luigi Cadorna, was the slaughter of the Italian army at Caporetto, "the most ignominious single defeat of any belligerent in the First World War." Provocative exploration of overlooked causes of a war that may or may not have been a historical inevitability. Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.