Fair shake Women and the fight to build a just economy

Even before COVID, women were stumbling further behind in the economy, and the coauthors--all law professors--blame an unhealthily competitive business environment ruled by what they call the Triple Bind: Women lose whether or not they compete on the same terms as men, and when they do, they often remove themselves from the workplace--or get pushed out. So far, they show, laws have failed to protect women at work.

An account of the search for economic justice for women. Legal scholars Cahn, Carbone, and Levit argue persuasively that the persistent wage gap between men and women is a result of a "winner take all" (WTA) economy, in which workplaces offer increased rewards for top executives while pitting employees against each other. Those "calling the shots," the authors attest, "engineer results that may not be in the collective interests of the workers themselves, the long-term health of the company, or the social order." In a WTA economy, businesses may welcome women in entry-level positions and promote them, but the women "disappear as they move up the corporate ranks." They often are marginalized, receive smaller bonuses, and suffer harassment. By examining women's lawsuits against their employers for sex discrimination or retaliation for whistleblowing, the authors conclude that women are trapped in a "triple bind." They may not see the invisible rules by which men play; when they try to play by those rules, they are more likely to be fired; and when they see the unscrupulous things they are required to do, they take themselves out of the running. Among the companies the authors discuss are Tesla, Walmart, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Uber. They also consider women's disadvantages as gig workers, without benefits or protections. The authors see the same toxic environments that blight businesses taking over politics. Calling for a new set of values that prioritize collaboration, inclusion, and productivity rather than competition, amorality, and self-interest, the authors advocate for significant actions, such as mobilizing public outrage, continuing to take legal action, capping the accumulation of power at the top, promoting diversity, providing adequate and affordable child care, raising the minimum wage and instituting income guarantees, and investing in children's education and communities. Robust evidence for the need for systemic change. Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.