Viewfinder A memoir of seeing and being seen

Jon M. Chu, 1979-

Book - 2024

"Long before he directed Wicked, In The Heights, or the groundbreaking film Crazy Rich Asians, Jon M. Chu was a movie-obsessed first-generation Chinese American, helping at his parents' Chinese restaurant in Silicon Valley and forever facing the cultural identity crisis endemic to children of immigrants. Growing up on the cutting edge of 21st-century technology gave Chu the tools he needed to make his mark at USC film school, and to be discovered by Steven Spielberg, but he soon found himself struggling to understand who he was. In this book, for the first time, Chu dives deep into his life and work, telling the universal story of questioning what it means when your dreams collide with your circumstances, and showing how it's... possible to succeed even when the world changes beyond all recognition. With striking candor and unrivalled insights, Chu offers a firsthand account of the collision of Silicon Valley and Hollywood-what it's been like to watch his old world shatter and reshape his new one. Ultimately, Viewfinder is about reckoning with your own story, becoming your most creative self, and finding a path all your own"--

Saved in:
1 person waiting
1 copy ordered
Subjects
Genres
Autobiographies
autobiographies (literary genre)
Informational works
Documents d'information
Published
New York : Random House [2024]
Language
English
Main Author
Jon M. Chu, 1979- (author)
Other Authors
Jeremy McCarter, 1976- (author)
Edition
First edition
Physical Description
292 pages : illustrations ; 22 cm
ISBN
9780593448946
Contents unavailable.
Review by Booklist Review

Chu, the director of Crazy Rich Asians and In the Heights, presents (with cowriter McCarter) an introspective memoir. The youngest of five, Chu grew up in the 1980s and 1990s embracing the future-forward innovation of Silicon Valley even while struggling with his Asian identity in a largely white area. He fell in love with moviemaking early, charting a course to the University of Southern California, where his creative risks garnered the attention of none other than Steven Spielberg. At age 23, Chu was launched into the stratosphere, tapped to helm two high profile projects which both fell apart within the year. After he recovered from this massive disappointment, Chu signed on to direct Step Up 2, a commercial success that led to several subsequent hits. But it's after a project he loves bombs that Chu looks back to his parents' journey as Chinese immigrants in the U.S. and examines his complicated relationship with his cultural and racial identity. This self-reflection led him to pursue development of the hit movie Crazy Rich Asians. A thoughtful, candid, and affecting read for anyone with an interest in the impact of the tech industry on Hollywood and the Asian American experience.

From Booklist, Copyright (c) American Library Association. Used with permission.
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review

In this endearing autobiography, cowritten with journalist McCarter (Hamilton: The Revolution), Crazy Rich Asians filmmaker Chu digs into his childhood, influences, and struggles to define himself. Growing up in Silicon Valley in the 1980s and '90s, Chu--the youngest of five children--worked at his Chinese immigrant parents' restaurant and learned early to "fade into the background and simply observe, then get what I want without the drama." As he became enamored with theater and cinema, Chu took advantage of the rapid development of digital technology, running a "mini movie studio" out of his bedroom by the time he was 18, complete with high-tech cameras and top-shelf editing software. He followed his passion through film school at USC and the production of a short film that caught the attention of Steven Spielberg and led Sony to tap Chu for a remake of Bye Bye Birdie. Dizzied by the sudden success, Chu felt both devastated and relieved when the project collapsed, allowing him to regroup before breaking through with Step Up 2 the Streets in 2008. Chu and McCarter enliven the standard-issue celeb memoir beats with bits of wisdom aimed at aspiring filmmakers ("Stock Your Pantry"; "Check the Projector") and welcome humor. Film fans--especially those with hopes of working in the business--will enjoy this. Photos. Agent: Lacy Lalene Lynch, Dupree/Miller & Assoc. (July)

(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
Review by Kirkus Book Review

A filmmaker looks back at his life, from his time growing up in Silicon Valley through his direction of Crazy Rich Asians and the forthcoming film version of Wicked. Chu, a hardworking and clearly cheerful ("I [don't] have dark and brooding in me") director and screenwriter, is the youngest of five children in a family of Taiwanese immigrants, and his parents built and still run a well-known restaurant in Los Altos. With occasional inspirational and practical asides to readers, whether they're aspiring filmmakers or not, the author, writing with McCarter, details a childhood spent scrabbling together digital film equipment--often discarded by the patrons of his parents' restaurant--and working on elaborate projects with his friends. During his years at the University of Southern California, Chu cultivated a passion for freewheeling musical extravaganzas, and though he didn't always fit in, he won multiple awards. The following years included a stint as a wunderkind, during which he was temporarily taken up as a project by Steven Spielberg, the lows of unemployment and "development hell" after he was fired from his first project, many years of working on sequels, from Step Up 2 to G.I. Joe: Retaliation, and filming two Justin Bieber live concert films. As he recounts, Chu really came into his own with Crazy Rich Asians, the first full-length movie to allow him to explore his heritage, and In the Heights, which gave him a chance to do the kind of musical he had always longed to produce. Occasionally introspective, as he examines why his life and work sometimes seemed to work and sometimes didn't, and always down to earth, the author is a reliable guide through many of the less-glamorous aspects of being a director. Entertaining insights from a unique film industry insider. Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Chapter 1 The basketball players were like gods at my school. They were tall. They had swagger. My brother Larry wasn't the tallest player on the team--six-two according to him, six-one according to science--but he was definitely its leader. When I was in fifth grade, around the time that Larry and his varsity teammates were dominating the league, some of my friends admitted they hung out with me just so they could hang out with him. (Some of my friends still say that.) I didn't blame them. Larry was more than a star athlete. He had a second distinction, one that would turn out to have a formative influence on his kid brother's later life and career: He was a movie star. Before big games, the whole school would pile into the gym to watch highlight reels of the team's exploits: hitting clutch shots, hustling on defense, and generally showing their superpowers--all with flashy titles and a sick soundtrack. Today, anyone with a smartphone can make more sophisticated movies than those. But in 1990, only a handful of people around our school had the necessary tools and skills to create such wonders. Even the basketball players regarded them with awe, bestowing on them the ultimate comparison for filmmaking greatness: That's the next Steven Spielberg. Thanks in part to the popularity of the basketball rallies, a zeal for filmmaking swept the campus of Pinewood School. A few teachers even let us make videos instead of writing book reports. Larry was an enthusiastic adopter of this movies-for-homework scheme. It was fun in a way that writing a paper couldn't be, not for somebody as sociable as he was. Filmmaking did have one disadvantage compared to writing papers. You needed to lug around a heavy camcorder. In the VHS era, the battery alone was the size and weight of a brick. But Larry found a solution for that problem: his little brother. One day, he was making a video for English class, on what might have been The Canterbury Tales. It would explain my memory of Larry and his friends roaming Los Altos dressed as medieval squires. As always, I brought up the rear, toting the camera. After a long day spent mostly goofing off and occasionally filming scenes, Larry called a wrap. He and his costars headed back to "base camp," meaning our living room. That's when things started getting interesting. Larry commandeered our TV and VCR. Then he brought in another VCR from our parents' room. One of his friends--one of the savvy few who understood where videos came from--placed what I would later learn was a mixing board on our coffee table and, when that filled up, spread some other devices on the floor, patching everything together with a spiderweb of yellow, red, and white cords. I gathered that all of this gear was required for "editing." I didn't know what that word meant, but I wasn't about to draw attention to myself by asking any questions. Not while my cool big brother, the golden child, was letting me hang out with him. Eventually I figured out that "editing" meant cutting up the pictures and sounds we'd recorded, then sticking them back together. It sounds straightforward, but making even the simplest change turned out to be unbelievably complicated. The exact right buttons needed to be pushed in the exact right order. Pause, record, fast-forward, record, rewind, record. Slowly, cut by cut, splice by splice, the video started to improve. It gained energy and momentum, even some emotional moments. After an hour or two, a ragtag bunch of kids who had spent the day messing around started to look like committed performers, like people who actually cared about what they were doing. But that wasn't good enough for Larry. He had a vision. He wanted to punch up the video by adding footage from Monty Python and the Holy Grail: God parting the clouds and talking to the people below. Only this time, the audio would be Larry's voice. In those clunky old analog days, mixing audio and video effects this way added a fearsome layer of complexity to the editing process. It meant pushing a bunch of buttons, spinning a bunch of dials, and adjusting a bunch of sliders at the same time. For Larry to achieve his big effect, everybody would need to help. Even me. I got into my assigned position in front of our stereo. My fingertip hovered over the play button. Three . . . ​two . . . ​one . . . ​record! Fingers pushed. Dials spun. Tape began to roll. It didn't work. Our timing needed to be perfect and it was not perfect. We had to try again. And try again. With each botched attempt, the pressure increased. When you work with videotape, or any other analog technology, the quality decreases every time you record onto it. At last we thought we got it. When we watched the playback, we fell over laughing. It was ridiculous. It was genius. Thirty-five years later, I still remember the wonder I felt at that moment--the life-altering insight that flashed across my mind. Oh, I thought, so this is how you make a movie. Pinewood's willingness to let us make videos for homework shouldn't be taken as a sign of some freewheeling, anything-goes approach to education. Though the school is officially nonsectarian, it was founded by a Mormon family and was influenced by Mormon values. Forget having booze or cigarettes or drugs on campus: We couldn't even have caffeine. Some kids probably felt suffocated by all the restrictions. I felt protected. Though we were all pretty sheltered at Pinewood, I was more sheltered than most. In the six years that separated me and Larry, my parents added three whole children to the family: Christina, Howard, and Jennifer. By the time I was old enough to put on a Pinewood uniform, they had cleared a path for me. My teachers knew me before they'd even met me. Getting the various Chu kids to and from school, plus our extracurricular activities, posed a constant challenge for my parents. It didn't help that my dad worked unbelievably long hours. As in, first-to-arrive-and-last-to-leave hours. As in, miss-the-family-vacation hours. (In a Chinese restaurant, he says, management is micromanagement.) So it fell to my mom to manage our mayhem. Knowing what she was up against, I didn't take it personally when she would occasionally forget to pick me up at the end of the day. To cover the embarrassment, I'd make the teachers think I was headed for her minivan, then hide in the bushes. When everyone was gone, I'd walk to my aunt's house a few blocks away. On many Sundays during my childhood, though, there was no scattering. We moved as one. Mom would drive all five kids to San Francisco, where we had season tickets to just about everything: opera, ballet, the symphony. Because we'd been going for so many years, we eventually got great seats. At intermission, I'd wander down to the orchestra pit to check out the instruments. Eventually the conductor of the San Francisco Ballet Orchestra, Denis de Coteau, got to know me. "One day you're going to be our first violin and sit right there, right?" "Actually, I want your job." When he finished laughing, he handed me his baton and told me to keep it. I loved that baton and did indeed keep it --until my dog ate it. Mom had a sincere desire that we get to know our Beethoven and our Brahms. But as I look back on those outings now, they also seem like an act of storytelling. They were her chance to craft a narrative about our family, for an audience of everyone who happened to be nearby. Mom was invested in the idea that we were an all-American dream family. That we were as smart and as cultured as anybody else. That we had access. That we were worthy. We didn't slouch our way through the lobby on those Sunday afternoons: She made sure we looked sharp, in matching suits. This story wasn't merely by us or about us, it was for us. She wanted us to feel comfortable amid the codes and rituals of this unfamiliar place. She gave us a living example of how to move confidently through any situation. (My mother is a friendly, smiling presence until you cross her. We are almost all Scorpios, so it makes sense.) She wanted us to feel that we belonged here. That we belonged anywhere. It went as planned. Sort of. Excerpted from Viewfinder: A Memoir of Seeing and Being Seen by Jon M. Chu, Jeremy McCarter All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.