How elites ate the social justice movement

Fredrik deBoer

Book - 2023

"An eye-opening exploration of American policy reform, or lack thereof, in the wake of the murder of George Floyd and the Black Lives Matter movement and how the country can do better in the future. In 2020, while the Covid-19 pandemic raged, the United States was hit by a ripple of political discontent the likes of which had not been seen since the 1960s. The spark was the viral video of the horrific police murder of an unarmed Black man in Minneapolis. The killing of George Floyd galvanized a nation already reeling from Covid and a toxic political cycle. Tens of thousands poured into the streets to protest. Major corporations and large nonprofit groups-institutions that are usually resolutely apolitical-raced to join in. The fervor f...or racial justice intersected with the already simmering demands for change from the #MeToo movement and for economic justice from Gen Z. The entire country suddenly seemed to be roaring for change in one voice. Then nothing much happened. In How Elites Ate the Social Justice Movement, Fredrik deBoer explores why these passionate movements failed and how they could succeed in the future. In the digital age, social movements flare up but then lose steam through a lack of tangible goals, the inherent moderating effects of our established institutions and political parties, and the lack of any real grassroots movement in contemporary America. Hidden beneath the rhetoric of the oppressed and the symbolism of the downtrodden lies the inconvenient fact that those doing the organizing, messaging, protesting, and campaigning are predominantly drawn from this country's more upwardly mobile educated classes. Poses are more important than policies. DeBoer lays out an alternative vision for how society's winners can contribute to social justice movements without taking them over, and how activists and their organizations can become more resistant to the influence of elites, nonprofits, corporations, and political parties. Only by organizing around class rather than empty gestures can we begin the hard work of changing minds and driving policy"--

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

303.372/deBoer
2 / 2 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor 303.372/deBoer Checked In
2nd Floor 303.372/deBoer Checked In
Subjects
Published
New York : Simon & Schuster 2023.
Language
English
Main Author
Fredrik deBoer (author)
Edition
First Simon & Schuster hardcover edition
Physical Description
vii, 244 pages ; 24 cm
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references (pages 219-234) and index.
ISBN
9781668016015
9781668016022
  • Introduction
  • 1. Whatever Happened to 2020?
  • 2. BPMCLM: Black Lives Matter and the Inevitability of Elite Capture
  • 3. My Protest, Your Riot
  • 4. The Nonprofit Industrial Complex
  • 5. #MemeToo
  • 6. Meet the Goodies: Why Are Liberals the Way They Are?
  • 7. Why Is Class First?
  • 8. To Fight for Everyone
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • Index
Review by Choice Review

Who are the "elites" and what was the historical process by which they "ate the social justice movement"? These questions are never answered by deBoer, who describes himself as a Marxist academic and organizer. In his introduction he promises to identify "how we got to the heady days of 2020," "outline the differences between effective and ineffective Left social movements," and "spell out why a class-focused approach is appropriate" (p. 11). Unfortunately, this is not a scholarly work that reviews relevant literature, approaches its topic fairly from multiple sides, or considers historical evidence to make solid arguments. What could have been an interesting study of 21st-century Left social movements is more an angry memoir, replete with complaints and axes to grind. How Elites Ate the Social Justice Movement is thinly sourced and insufficiently cited, relying on familiar generalizations, anecdotes, tropes, and straw-man arguments on subjects like Black Lives Matter, identity politics, nonprofits, and liberals (though it is more evenhanded on #MeToo). Even DeBoer's suggested future movement blueprint is historically decontextualized. Ironically, in this book published by a major trade press, deBoer rants against those "obsessed with white people interrogating their privilege" (p. 72). Summing Up: Not recommended. --Philip F. Rubio, North Carolina A&T State University

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Kirkus Book Review

A wide-ranging critique of leftist politics as not being left enough. Continuing his examination of progressive reform movements begun with The Cult of Smart, Marxist analyst deBoer takes on a left wing that, like all political movements, is subject to "the inertia of established systems." The great moment for the left, he suggests, ought to have been the summer of 2020, when the murder of George Floyd and the accumulated crimes of Donald Trump should have led to more than a minor upheaval. In Minneapolis, he writes, first came the call from the city council to abolish the police, then make reforms, then cut the budget; the grace note was "an increase in funding to the very department it had recently set about to dissolve." What happened? The author answers with the observation that it is largely those who can afford it who populate the ranks of the progressive movement, and they find other things to do after a while, even as those who stand to benefit most from progressive reform "lack the cultural capital and economic stability to have a presence in our national media and politics." The resulting "elite capture" explains why the Democratic Party is so ineffectual in truly representing minority and working-class constituents. Dispirited, deBoer writes, "no great American revolution is coming in the early twenty-first century." Accommodation to gradualism was once counted heresy among doctrinaire Marxists, but deBoer holds that it's likely the only truly available path toward even small-scale gains. Meanwhile, he scourges nonprofits for diluting the tax base. It would be better, he argues, to tax those who can afford it rather than allowing deductible donations and "reducing the availability of public funds for public uses." Usefully, the author also argues that identity politics centering on difference will never build a left movement, which instead must find common cause against conservatism and fascism. Deliberately provocative, with much for left-inclined activists to ponder. Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.