Allergic Our irritated bodies in a changing world

Theresa MacPhail, 1972-

Book - 2023

"Hay fever. Peanut allergies. Eczema. Either you have a frustrating allergy, or you know someone who does. Billions of people worldwide--an estimated 30 to 40 percent of the global population--have some form of allergy; millions have one severe enough to actively endanger their health. Even more concerningly, over the last decade, the number of people diagnosed with allergy has been steadily increasing. Medical anthropologist Theresa MacPhail, herself an allergy sufferer whose father died of a bee sting, set out to understand why. This book is a holistic examination of the phenomenon of allergies from its first medical description in 1819 to the mind-bending recent development of biologics and immunotherapies that are giving the most s...everely impacted patients hope. In pursuit of this story, Theresa spent time with hundreds of experts, patients and activists: she scaled a roof with an air quality controller who diligently counts pollen by hand for hours every day; met a mother struggling to use WIC benefits for her daughter with severe food allergies; shadowed doctors at some of the finest allergy clinics in the world; and discussed the intersecting problems of climate change, pollution, and pollen with biologists who study seasonal respiratory allergies"--

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

616.973/MacPhail
2 / 2 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor 616.973/MacPhail Checked In
2nd Floor 616.973/MacPhail Checked In
Subjects
Genres
History
Published
New York : Random House [2023]
Language
English
Main Author
Theresa MacPhail, 1972- (author)
Edition
First edition
Physical Description
xx, 344 pages : illustration ; 25 cm
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references (pages 299-323) and index.
ISBN
9780593229194
  • Prologue Everything that Irritates Us
  • Part 1. Diagnosis
  • Chapter 1. What Allergy Is (And Isn't)
  • Chapter 2. How Allergy Diagnosis Works (or Doesn't)
  • Chapter 3. Our Allergic World: Measuring the Rise of Allergic Disease
  • Part 2. Theories
  • Chapter 4. Allergic Inheritance: Allergies as a "Normal" Immune Response
  • Chapter 5. Nature Out of Whack
  • Chapter 6. Are We Doing this to Ourselves? The Modern Lifestyle and Allergy
  • Part 3. Treatments
  • Chapter 7. Remedies for the Irritated: Allergy Treatments Past, Present, and Future
  • Chapter 8. The Booming Business of Allergy Treatments
  • Chapter 9. What Makes a Treatment Effective? Weighing Benefits and Risks
  • Chapter 10. Allergy is a Social Problem, Too
  • Epilogue Irritating Ourselves to Death: Allergy in the Time of Covid-19
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • Suggestions for Further Reading
  • Index
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review

Medical anthropologist MacPhail (The Viral Network) delivers an uneven overview of the science on allergies. Explaining that they likely arise from a blend of genetic and environmental factors, she discusses the genetic mutation that puts certain people at risk of anaphylaxis from bee stings and research that found air pollution leads to higher rates of asthma and respiratory allergies. MacPhail admits "we're stuck with largely unreliable data" on allergy frequency and treatment, a problem that leads to some notable inconsistencies. For instance, she questions whether evidence from surveys, insurance claims, and hospital admissions suggesting increased allergy rates merely indicate greater awareness and willingness to seek help, but later makes the contradictory claim that researchers "can all agree on one thing:... the number of allergy sufferers worldwide is likely to keep growing." Her overview of treatments also gets bogged down in contradictions, as when she posits that air filters "probably don't help, and they might actually make things worse," but later suggests they "can filter some or most of the allergens, like pollen, from the air." There are some enlightening tidbits (she outlines a damning take on how restrictive rules make federally funded food programs almost useless for many with severe food allergies), but MacPhail's clumsy navigation of uncertainties in the scientific literature will leave readers feeling lost. This doesn't come together. (May)

(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
Review by Kirkus Book Review

A holistic study of how allergies continue to bewilder medical science. As a medical anthropologist, MacPhail's subject matter is both professional and personal. In 1996, her father died suddenly of anaphylaxis after a bee sting. That event prompted the author to carry an EpiPen and to launch a research project examining the "puzzle of allergies." In a deft three-part analysis, she probes the biological processes of allergens and the misconceptions surrounding them. She then examines the "confusing maze" of diagnosis and the causative theories on why allergies are proliferating, and she explores possible solutions and the progress medical science has made (outside of antihistamines) treating global allergy issues, including the development of promising new vaccines. MacPhail cites historical information from the early 1800s, when the first allergy was medically documented, and consistently attempts to nail down the ever shifting definitions of what allergies actually are, tackling the vexing question of origin with informed speculation. Whether it be the cumulative effects of environmental changes, industrial development, food additives, or genetic mutations, specific people seem more vulnerable to certain allergens. The author optimistically reflects on modern immunological advancements that have provided relief, and she presents a series of crisply rendered perspectives of people who cited severe allergies to airborne allergens, dust mites, or specific foods--all frustrated by the lack of a definitive cause or the unaffordability/unavailability of longer-term remedies. "In a capitalistic system," she writes, "a patient is akin to a customer." While the culprits responsible for the increases in allergic sufferers are debatable moving targets, MacPhail skillfully narrows down the possibilities and some of the solutions, although her contradictory advice on air purifiers may confuse readers seeking solace. Nonetheless, the author's examination of the science of immunology from a social and cultural perspective will give readers plenty of relevant, thought-provoking information. An exhaustive and accessible report. Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Chapter 1 What Allergy Is (and Isn't) Before I began researching this book, I had no idea just how massive the problem of allergy truly is. Approximately 40 percent of the entire human population already has some form of allergic condition. And by 2030, experts estimate that statistic will increase to 50 percent. But before we can dive more deeply into what these numbers might mean, and why allergies are projected to rise over the next few decades, we need to answer a more basic and fundamental question: What exactly is an allergy? When I first started talking with scientists and allergists, I assumed I knew what an allergy was. If someone had quizzed me, I would have said, confidently, that an allergy was a negative bodily response to something a person had eaten, touched, or inhaled. If pressed for more details, I probably would have trotted out what I had learned long ago from an introductory biology course--that the human immune system is similar to a defense system. It reacts to foreign substances, such as viruses, bacteria, and parasites, and helps to protect us against infection. But in people with allergies, that same immune system is triggered by something in the environment--like pollen or milk or nickel in metal jewelry--that is harmless to nonallergic people. I would have listed sneezing, runny or stuffy nose, coughing, rashes, redness, hives, swelling, and difficulty breathing as possible symptoms. Whenever I ask normal people (i.e., not scientists or biomedical experts) to explain what an allergy is, I usually hear something similar to my own initial definition. People of all ages and backgrounds tend to think of allergy and allergens as, as one young nonallergic man described them to me: "Some sort of imbalance with whatever is entering your system. It just doesn't mesh well with whatever is in your body and it causes your body to try to get rid of it." Another man described allergy as the body being "self-destructive" when it doesn't know how to handle something like pollen or a particular food. In one memorable interview, a man with several allergies who had grown up in Chihuahua, Mexico, near the Texas border, suggested that his body is in a constant defense mode--but sees this as primarily positive. He thinks of himself as well defended and described his body as more "careful" and alert than the bodies of nonallergic people. These are all more or less accurate depictions of allergic-type immune responses and they work well enough . . . until they don't. Even people who have allergies don't always understand what, in exact terms, they are or how to distinguish them from nonallergic conditions with similar symptoms. Take "Chrissie," for example, one of the first allergy patients interviewed for this book. By the time we spoke, Chrissie had been coping with respiratory allergy symptoms, hives, sporadic swelling of her eyes, and frequent stomach issues for years. She had been diagnosed with hay fever, or seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and occasionally visited an ear, nose, and throat specialist (ENT) for treatment when her symptoms changed or worsened. She also experienced gastrointestinal symptoms and skin rashes if she accidentally consumed milk or gluten. Years ago, Chrissie went to see an allergist and was tested for reactions to the most common allergens. Her skin was completely nonreactive to all food allergens, and the allergist told her that it was extremely unlikely that the symptoms she experienced were due to a food allergy. Chrissie's ENT has repeatedly encouraged her to get retested, but she hasn't; instead, she goes online to research her symptoms and crowdsource possible remedies. When asked to define what an allergy is, Chrissie said that it is what happens when the body can't handle something, especially if the body has come into contact with something too often or in too great of a quantity. Over time and with repeated exposure, she explained, the body ceases to be able to process those things, giving rise to symptoms like her own. She doesn't believe the results of her skin tests for food allergens and insists that she has a food allergy; since wheat and milk are ingredients in most foods, she posits that her body has learned to reject them over decades of consuming them. I am beginning this chapter with Chrissie's story--her misconception of what an allergy is and isn't, and her palpable confusion and frustration--to illustrate what we typically get right about allergy as well as what we typically get wrong. When it comes to her respiratory allergies, Chrissie is correct in thinking that her body is responding to something that it has had repeated exposure to, but she is wrong about her body being unable to process pollen. (As we'll soon see, it's more that her body isn't able to tolerate it or ignore it.) Chrissie likely doesn't have a true food allergy, despite having very real symptoms, because she doesn't show any sensitization to milk or gluten (as evidenced by the results of her skin-prick test). In other words, her immune system is likely not reacting to the foods she's ingesting. Her immune system is reacting to pollen, however, which causes her hay fever. What Chrissie is really confused about, then, is the difference between an intolerance (in this case, to certain foods, possibly caused by another condition like irritable bowel syndrome or a lack of the enzyme lactase that aids in breaking down the lactose in milk products) and an allergic response (to airborne allergens). And who could blame her? Even as a medical anthropologist with a decent understanding of immunology, I had to discover some of these distinctions the hard way. The deeper I waded into the scientific literature on allergy and the more conversations I had with allergists and immunologists, the murkier the definitional waters got. To my initial surprise and frustration, the more I learned about how the intricacies of our immune system function, the harder, and not easier, it was to understand allergy. It turns out that what we commonly refer to as "allergy" is actually a grab bag of various conditions. The one thing they all have in common is this: They all involve a hypersensitive immune system reaction to an otherwise innocuous substance--an allergen--that doesn't typically produce any immune response in nonallergic people. The symptoms of an allergy vary depending on how the allergen enters the body (via the skin, airway, or intestinal tract), the individual genetics of the person, and the many different "allergic pathways" the allergen can trigger. So, then, what is an allergy? It's a harmful immune-mediated hypersensitivity reaction to a harmless antigen, which is defined as any toxin or foreign substance that activates an immune response. That's the technical scientific definition, but it likely doesn't mean much to you--yet. To fully comprehend what an allergy is, we have to understand how the definition of the term itself shifted and changed over the past century. The concept of allergy is just over a century old, born out of early studies of the function of the mammalian immune system. In the end, and as you'll soon see, I learned that an allergy is perhaps best defined by what biological processes it sets in motion. Excerpted from Allergic: Our Irritated Bodies in a Changing World by Theresa MacPhail All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.