Acting naturally The magic in great performances

David Thomson, 1941-

Book - 2023

"From the celebrated film critic and author of The Biographical Dictionary of Film comes an essential work on some of the cinema's finest actors and how they have approached their craft"--

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

791.43028/Thomson
1 / 1 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor 791.43028/Thomson Checked In
Subjects
Published
New York : Alfred A. Knopf 2023.
Language
English
Main Author
David Thomson, 1941- (author)
Edition
First edition
Item Description
"This is a Borzoi book." -- title page verso.
Physical Description
270 pages : illustrations ; 22 cm
ISBN
9780593319291
  • Introduction: Belated Thanks
  • 1. A Séance Is Arranged
  • 2. Watching Carey Mulligan
  • 3. Hopkins in His Flat
  • 4. In the Kitchen
  • 5. Companions Being Watched
  • 6. Close-Up Enclosure
  • 7. Facing Us
  • 8. Casting
  • 9. Starring the Screen
  • 10. In Support
  • 11. I Am Ordinary, Therefore I Might Be
  • 12. Waiting for James Dean
  • 13. Astonishing Things
  • 14. Marlon and Meryl
  • 15. For the Unknown Actor
  • 16. Barefoot
  • Acknowledgments
Review by Library Journal Review

How can a movie performance be handled best? That's the question film critic Thomson (A Biographical Dictionary of Film) asks in these essays about actors acting. First up is Carey Mulligan, on her considerable strengths and on what, with the exception of her performance in 2020's Promising Young Woman, is her reluctance to ditch restraint and go all out. An essay on faces focuses on Louise Brooks's performance in 1928's Pandora's Box. Thomson compares her face work to Buster Keaton's. A chapter on casting leads to the observation that actors ruthlessly study everyone they meet, to mine their tics for future performance. Some names appear frequently--Streep, Brando, Dean, Hopkins--but Thomson's scope is wide. Writing of Bernardo Bertolucci's great directing in 1972's Last Tango in Paris, the author speculates how different the movie would be if instead of Maria Schneider, the young 23-year-old Meryl Streep had played the role. The author believes that an actor's performance changes depending on whom they play against, and he proves that point in this well-argued book. VERDICT An intriguing book by one of the greatest living writers about film.--David Keymer

(c) Copyright Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
Review by Kirkus Book Review

A passionate, personal look at a subjective subject. Early on, acclaimed film critic Thomson declares, "I like or love all actors." Throughout the narrative, the author nimbly ambles his joyful way through his extensive film knowledge and his reflective attitude toward the people who act in them. Ever since he was a child, he "held these screen phantoms in total trust." So, readers may ask, what is good acting? According to Thomson, "it is making us watch very closely, as if we were doing it ourselves." The author admired the performances of Carey Mulligan, a work in progress, but was waiting for her to "burst out." Finally, the "wounding but exhilarating experience" of Promising Young Woman (2020) let her "go wild." As a young moviegoer, he could feel James Dean's "mastery." Anthony Hopkins is a "majestic player…with an endless appetite for work," and Thomson loves that "he will try anything." Meanwhile, Denzel Washington strides through Déjà Vu "as if crossing the Potomac, certain of a place in history." Meryl Streep, Thomson proclaims, "will be a mainstay in this book, our godmother and a genius, too." On the Waterfront is a "sonata for a great actor pretending to be dumb." In addition to assessing the performances of individual actors, the author is excellent on close-ups, a "window on the possibility of soul or mind." He is also convincing in his arguments for the crucial importance of casting, and he presents fascinating hypotheticals. What if two key actors in a certain movie were cast in the opposite roles? While examining an entire "universe of film stars, those iconic, axiomatic presences"--e.g., Gary Cooper, Cary Grant, Gregory Peck--Thomson delves into another intriguing area: Can an ordinary, nonactor act? He offers Bicycle Thieves and A Man Escaped as evidence in the affirmative. Throughout, the author provides movie suggestions, many of which readers will want to seek out immediately. An informative, "wild party" for movie fans and actors, veterans and newbies alike. Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

4 In the Kitchen I had scarcely drafted the chapter on Anthony Hopkins, and settled on the word "fun," when that very thing hit me, and I felt the coincidence had to become a short chapter, an interlude. You may say this addition is whimsical and not germane. But it features a man who had done so much acting professionally for so long that it could have taken him over. So what I'm going to tell you here could be a documentary, a moment from life; or it could be as artfully constructed as a Sondheim song. The wonder of it is in not knowing. No one is alone, the master sang: we are forever watching ourselves. A friend sent me one of those small filmed items from the internet that mean so much these days. It's not a movie, but it's so much quicker and only opens up the prospect of movies a minute long. Why not, if it works? We are in a kitchen, quite a good kitchen--the whole thing will be only one shot, a kind of surveillance. Two men are there talking. One seems more at ease than the other. The comfortable one is David Blaine, an accomplished professional magician and a would-be Houdini. The other is Harrison Ford, and it becomes apparent that we are in Ford's own kitchen, which feels privileged. But Ford seems intimi- dated, as if this smooth, groomed Blaine has invaded his home. Are the two men friends or has Mr. Blaine just arrived, as if Scottie has beamed him up? Ford is seventy-eight, and while he looks good enough, he is a touch derelict, a scrawny geezer in a faded brown T-shirt, with hair just combed after a shower. And wearing spectacles. Yes, you know he is the actor, and you may be aware that Ford has made more fulsomely successful films than any other actor of his time. His work has earned billions of dollars without sweet- ening his wry sourness. For years, his authority was axiomatic. That age included the Star Wars films, the Indiana Jones films, Blade Runner , Witness, Working Girl, Presumed Innocent, Pa- triot Games, The Fugitive, Air Force One, and so many others. It's not that he's foolproof--he has made several flops. But he has never responded to the need to be anyone other than Har- rison Ford, an essentially decent but world-weary fellow who can be a little grumpy. He is instantly recognizable yet elusive, and that puts him in the class of many iconic male stars--like Gary Cooper, Henry Fonda, or William Holden. These are presences so secure that no one is going to expect them to act (as in being someone different). They can get on with pretend- ing to be themselves. And now, at seventy-eight, here he is in his kitchen, just a touch unnerved by Blaine but willing to wait for a stick of talk or action to be thrown so that he can retrieve it. A dog in his own kitchen? Blaine holds a deck of cards and asks Ford to think of a card; not pick it out, just think of it. Ford has reason to anticipate a trickster. It's all part of a conjuring setup. And a part of that is how Ford understands we are there watching. Not that he looks at the camera; he learned that protocol decades ago. The magician hands Ford the deck. "You're thinking of the card?" Blaine asks. Ford gives the curtest affirmative nod. He is too old to act this out in full, and too suspicious. It's clear he's never had this scene before. In having no script or tradition, he wonders about being fooled. So he is considering being angry or disgruntled. A man's kitchen ought to be a sacred place. "Do I know what card you're thinking of ?" asks Blaine. A brief negative headshake from Harrison. Then Blaine asks the actor to look through the deck, to discover that the card he thought of--not named yet--is not there. "Your card just left the deck," the magician tells him. I am describing this as tightly as I can. But what is going on? Do you feel some suspense? Blaine then shifts the focus. He asks Ford to choose a piece of fruit from ten or so on the kitchen counter. Harrison picks an orange. The magician asks the actor to say what card he was thinking of. There is a pause, a wondering whether to make the call. This could be the last chance for sanity or dignity. Then, "Nine of hearts," sighs Ford, as if they are the final words he will utter having come across a dry desert. It's not that he is being difficult or reluctant. But he is as guarded as most of us would be if we sensed magic in the air about to descend or suck us away. So Blaine asks him to hold the orange while he cuts it open, and the actor obeys as if in a trance, and Blaine makes the deci- sive cut. He asks the actor is there a card inside the orange--the fruit that Harrison selected. There it is, rolled up inside, like a cheroot or a reefer. "No way!" calls out a female voice in the kitchen. We never see who that is. Harrison Ford extracts the card and unwinds it so that the camera and that woman can see it. You know what it is: there is a principle of narrative inevitability in all things being shown on film. It is then that Ford looks at Blaine. He is smiling faintly but not without menace. And he whispers, "Get the fuck out of my house," as if knowing that something sinister has infiltrated his kitchen. I don't know how the trick is done; not every jot of me is sure it was a trick--as if that word is easily defined. I have no reason to believe Ford was in on any subterfuge. His stooge is so odd and off-guard, and I'm not sure he is enough of an actor to be dishonest. But I believe this is the most natural and touching piece of playing in his long career. Ford has never won an Oscar (he was nominated for Witness and he has lifetime achievement awards) but he deserves something modest yet grand (a copper orange?) for this one-shot wonder in his kitchen and its humble evidence that, by seventy-eight, even in unscripted surprise, an actor can seem to be his own franchise as forty seconds pass by. Why do I have this fragment in the book? Because I can't stop thinking about it, or trying to distinguish delight from something darker. This could be a party trick, ending in hoots of laughter, or it might be the first act in the breakdown of Har- rison Ford. The kitchen has a delicious impromptu air, but so much tells me it was created. I feel there must be a Vizier some- where, some mentor from my childhood. And I don't mind that. It's essential to the fun. What is good acting? It is making us watch very closely, as if we were doing it ourselves. And it is a way of making us feel that our precious spontaneity may be written Now, just imagine the look on Ford's face. Excerpted from Acting Naturally: The Magic in Great Performances by David Thomson All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.