Like, comment, subscribe Inside YouTube's chaotic rise to world domination

Mark Bergen

Book - 2022

"The definitive, deeply reported account of YouTube, the company that upended media, culture, industry, and democracy-by a leading tech journalist Across the world, people watch over a billion hours of video on YouTube every day. The sheer amount of video produced there is beyond comprehension. Every minute, over five hundred hours of footage are uploaded to the site, the equivalent of eighty-two years of video added a day. That anyone can easily access any minute of this footage-and the trillion minutes more already on YouTube-is a technical feat unmatched in the history of computing. Everyone knows YouTube. And yet virtually no one knows how it works. Like, Comment, Subscribe is the first book to explain exactly how YouTube's te...chnology and business evolved, how it works, and how it helped Google grow to unimaginable power, a narrative told through the people who created YouTube and the Google engineers and chiefs who took it over. It's the story of an industry run amok, and of how corporate greed resulted in the unraveling of truth, the spread of violence, and the corruption of the internet, all for the sake of profit. Mark Bergen, the top Google reporter at Bloomberg Businessweek, might know Google better than any other reporter in Silicon Valley, having broken numerous stories about YouTube's and Google's business and scandals. His deep access within the companies makes Like, Comment, Subscribe a thrilling, character-driven story of technological and business ingenuity and the hubris that undermined it"--

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

338.761006/Bergen
1 / 1 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor 338.761006/Bergen Checked In
Subjects
Published
[New York, NY] : Viking, an imprint of Penguin Random House LLC [2022]
Language
English
Main Author
Mark Bergen (author)
Item Description
Place of publication from publisher's website.
Physical Description
452 pages ; 24 cm
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN
9780593296349
  • Prologue: March 15, 2019
  • Part I.
  • Chapter 1. Everyday People
  • Chapter 2. Raw and Random
  • Chapter 3. Two Kings
  • Chapter 4. Stormtroopers
  • Chapter 5. Clown Co.
  • Chapter 6. The Bard of Google
  • Chapter 7. Pedal to the Metal
  • Part II.
  • Chapter 8. The Diamond Factory
  • Chapter 9. Nerdfighters
  • Chapter 10. Kitesurfing TV
  • Chapter 11. See It Now
  • Chapter 12. Will It Make the Boat Go Faster?
  • Chapter 13. Let's Play
  • Chapter 14. Disney Baby Pop-Up Pals Easter Eggs SURPRISE
  • Chapter 15. The Five Families
  • Chapter 16. Lean Back
  • Chapter 17. The Mother of Google
  • Part III.
  • Chapter 18. Down the Tubes
  • Chapter 19. True News
  • Chapter 20. Disbelief
  • Chapter 21. A Boy and His Toy
  • Chapter 22. Spotlight
  • Chapter 23. Joke, Threat, Obvious
  • Chapter 24. The Party Is Over
  • Chapter 25. Adpocalypse
  • Chapter 26. Reinforce
  • Chapter 27. Elsagate
  • Chapter 28. Bad Actors
  • Chapter 29. 901 Cherry Avenue
  • Chapter 30. Boil the Ocean
  • Chapter 31. The Master's Tools
  • Part IV.
  • Chapter 32. Roomba
  • Chapter 33. Which YouTube?
  • Epilogue
  • Acknowledgments
  • Sourcing Note
  • Notes
  • Index
Review by Booklist Review

In its less than two decades of existence, YouTube has managed to become one of the dominant forces on the internet. It is at least on par with Facebook and Google; some might argue with merit that YouTube exceeds them in terms of cultural impact. Bergen's opus follows the history of YouTube, looking at how its founders and crafters built such a behemoth, and how they dealt with the myriad of issues and problems encountered along the way--and continue to encounter. One of the things that set YouTube apart was that the service's own users provide its content, along with the revolutionary concept that they would be paid. The more popular the video, the more money was to be made. Along the way, they've had to cope with the internet's dark underside: the hate speech, the fake news, the con artistry. But their continuing success is undeniable. In extensive, and sometimes overlong, detail Bergen shows how it was done. For both YouTube's content providers and consumers, it's an interesting journey.

From Booklist, Copyright (c) American Library Association. Used with permission.
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review

Despite its cultural ubiquity, most people know nothing about what goes on at YouTube, writes Bloomberg technology reporter Bergen in his intriguing debut. He charts the company's history, starting with its founding in 2005 by graphic designer Chad Hurley and his programmer friends Jawed Karim and Steve Chen, at a moment when entertainment was shifting from broadcast TV to reality show and eventually MySpace. In its scrappy startup days, YouTube struggled to rein in pornography, violence, and illegal content, and its content moderators were often left in horror at what they'd seen. But the fact that contributors could make astonishing incomes in ad revenue kept the mainstream videos flowing in, with product unboxing videos garnering millions of views and kid stars getting rich. Bergen also suggests YouTube's 2006 acquisition by Google shielded it from some of the bad press Facebook and Twitter got for allowing misinformation to be shared on their platforms, and takes note of the legal issues, political challenges, and conspiracy theorists that the company still has to reckon with. And the idiosyncratic service has ended up as a microcosm of its own, he writes: "In a little over a decade, YouTube had evolved... into one of the most dominant, influential, and successful media businesses on the planet." Those curious about how YouTube got to be the behemoth it is should pick this up. (Sept.)

(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
Review by Kirkus Book Review

A tech journalist traces how YouTube works--or fails to. Bloomberg reporter Bergen seeks to bring the behemoth into the light. Though YouTube has billions of users and countless hours of content, the founders of the company--Steve Chen, Chad Hurley, and Jawed Karim--are largely unknown outside of the tech industry. YouTube's current CEO, Susan Wojcicki, has a low profile by the standards of the social media business. When it started in 2005, the concept of having users provide content was simple, but the mechanics were complex. Once the site was operational, the growth rate was astonishing. Videos about games, music, fashion, celebrities, and, of course, cats: There seemed to be something by--and for--everyone. When Google paid $1.65 billion for YouTube 10 months after its launch, it seemed like an incredible amount. Of course, it turned out to be an excellent investment. The massive size of YouTube, however, presents a host of managerial problems. "It's a tanker, an enormous business steered with small, careful turns," writes Bergen. "Even if she wanted to, Wojcicki probably couldn't steer it entirely in a chosen direction. She is a steward of a platform with a life of its own." A central issue has always been the proliferation of posts that were unsuitable, including fake news, pornography, conspiracy theories, and terrorist videos. They appear faster than the algorithms and moderators can deal with them. The deluge stemmed from the open-to-all business model, and constant changes to the rules have often generated more confusion than clarity. As the author shows, all this raises fundamental questions: When does content moderation become censorship? Where is the line between disinformation and a different opinion? What are the obligations of a social media platform? There are no easy answers. Bergen mostly keeps the story straight, but any account of the company is going to be a tale of barely controlled disarray. That is part of YouTube's attraction--for better or worse. Powerful insight into a ubiquitous yet still shadowy company. Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Chapter 1 Everyday People Chad Hurley wanted to create something; he just wasn't sure what. It was early 2005, and Hurley spent most of his time hunched over a computer screen in Northern California. Hurley didn't look like the brainy Poindexters around Silicon Valley. He had broad shoulders and a high forehead, a high school jock physique, and dirty-blond locks that he swept back surfer-dude style. He liked beer and the Philadelphia Eagles and considered himself an artist of sorts. With a friend, a kindred spirit, he had recently started a menswear line making laptop bags after finding most on the market ugly and dull. But Hurley, a web graphic designer, knew the real money was in computers, not bags, so that's where he and his two programmer pals, Jawed Karim and Steve Chen, hoped to strike gold. At twenty-eight, Hurley was the eldest, by a year, and de facto leader. He had a toddler son and had married into Silicon Valley royalty-his father-in-law was Jim Clark, a famed internet entrepreneur. Hurley began dreaming of his own company at the dawn of Web 2.0-websites filled with the work of regular folk, not professionals. Web surfers rushed to post online diaries, photo albums, poems, recipes, screeds, whatever they liked. "Everyday people," Hurley would call them. For months, Hurley and his pals had batted around proposals for a new internet business, meeting at his house in Menlo Park or a cafZ nearby, where they discussed popular Web 2.0 fixtures to emulate, like Friendster, a social network, and the blogging websites growing like weeds. More often they talked about Hot or Not, a skeletal site that let people upload photographs of a face and vote on its attractiveness. Crude, but so popular. The trio knew one of Hot or Not's creators from a coffee shop they frequented at their old jobs, and they knew he was making decent money. That was cool. The three finally settled on an idea for a website to let people share and watch video. On Valentine's Day they had stayed up way too late, crammed in Hurley's garage with his dog, and settled on a name for their idea. Hurley tried words that evoked personal television, riffing on old slang for the medium, "the boob tube." A tube for you. They typed it into Google. No results. That evening, they bought the web domain YouTube.com, a first step on solid ground. Eight days later Hurley opened an email from Karim with the subject line "Strategy: please comment." The site should look good, but not too professional. It should look like it was thrown together by a couple of guys. Note that hotornot and friendster, while easy to use, don't look professional, and yet they've had enormous success. We don't want to look too professional because it scares people off . . . The most important aspect of the design is ease of use. Our moms should be able to use this site easily. Timing/Competition: I think our timing is perfect. Digital video recording just became commonplace last year since this is now supported by most digital cameras. There is one site I'm aware of: stupidvideos.com, that also hosts videos and allows viewers to rate them. Luckily the site hasn't caught on very much. We should discuss why this is the case, and why we expect our site to gain more traction. Hurley read on. Site Focus: Our focus should implicitly be dating, just like hotornot. Note that hotornot is a dating site without seeming too much like one. This puts people at ease. I believe that a dating-focused video site will draw much more attention than stupidvideos. Why? Because dating and finding girls is what most people who are not married are primarily occupied with. There are only so many stupid videos you can watch. Hurley was married but agreed that dating could motivate people to make and watch videos. "People want to see and be seen," he would write weeks later. Karim's email ended with a target date for YouTube's launch less than three months away: May 15, 2005. They set to work. Hurley tinkered with the way YouTube.com would look to a visitor. Chen and Karim engineered the code to bring the site to life. Then, on March 20, Yahoo announced it was buying Flickr. Yahoo was a web titan, a valuable "portal" for online activity that raked in billions a year. Flickr, a sleek Web 2.0 service, let people upload digital photos. The press reported that Yahoo had paid as much as $25 million for the acquisition. The Flickr deal lit a fire. Karim sent another email, with the subject line "new direction": Chad and I were discussing today that the focus of the site should be more like flickr. Basically a repository for all kinds of personal videos on the internet. In the coming weeks Hurley, Chen, and Karim doubled down and debated anew how their site should work. Like the dating site or the photo site? Hot or Not appealed to "hip college kids with raging hormones," Chen wrote in one email, while Flickr reached "designers, artists, and creative folks." Who would use YouTube? Should they make two sites? Hurley wavered on the Flickr model, concerned that video was more difficult to upload and edit online, but he also didn't want to pigeonhole the site. Late on Sunday, April 3, Hurley emailed the others that they should just get their site out into the world; they could "figure out where we are going down the road. "Ten days later an obstacle appeared on the road. Google put out a call online for people to submit amateur videos, which the company might then post for the world to see. Hurley would later recall his reaction: "Ah, fuck." Google was scarier than Yahoo. When Google started, it was one of many web search engines, but it quickly pulverized all its competitors. Now Google was starting to reveal its true ambition. On April Fools' Day 2004, it launched an email service, Gmail, with so much unheard-of free data storage that people assumed it was a joke. Then it announced a massive, free digital map of the planet. And now Google, spigot of cash, hoarder of brilliant programmers, was coming for YouTube. When Hurley and his pals next met, a new agenda item appeared: Should we give up? á á á Chad Hurley grew up in Reading, Pennsylvania, and had landed in California the customary way: on a living room floor. After college, a small school in Pennsylvania where he took odd jobs cobbling together websites, Hurley had moved back in with his parents. He was aimless and a little bored. One day he was leafing through an issue of Wired magazine and came upon an article on Confinity, a California company trying to move currency through early handheld computers called PalmPilots. Confinity needed a designer. On a whim Hurley sent a rZsumZ. He heard back the next day. Could he come for an interview tomorrow? This was 1999, when Silicon Valley was flush with cash and desperate for warm bodies. Confinity asked Hurley to design a logo for their new payments service, PayPal, and hired him quickly. He flew to Northern California, the new epicenter of innovation and commercial success, and slept on a mattress pad on the floor. His host, Erik Klein, a programmer from Illinois, had also started in California this way. Practically all the rookie hires at Confinity initially crashed on pads or couches near the office; with little job and life experience, the twentysomethings waited for a broker they knew who rented apartments without checking references. At Confinity, Hurley soon met another new hire, a young coder named Steve Chen who had round cheeks, spiky black hair, and an easy laugh. Chen had arrived on a one-way ticket from Chicago, deserting college one semester before graduation, a shock to his parents. Born in Taipei, Chen moved to the United States with his family at the age of eight. On the flight over he didn't know how to ask the stewardess for water in English. Much of his youth in suburban Chicago was devoted to learning the language. Then, at fifteen, he went off to boarding school, the Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy, where he found his real fluent tongue: computer-speak. Chen got his own hulking desktop machine, and with no parents around he stayed up late, downing coffee, toying with code that animated screens. He went on to study computer science at the University of Illinois but frequently skipped classes. Assignments asked for outcomes from code-a program or an algorithm optimized to perform a task. If this, then that. Chen could figure that out with just a book and a keyboard. And he already had a contact in the industry. One of Confinity's founders, Max Levchin, a University of Illinois alum, liked to recruit from Chen's high school; Levchin once told a reporter that the Illinois academy churned out "hard-core smart, hardworking, non-spoiled" coders, perfect for a start-up. Chen started at Confinity on a Sunday, walking into its office to find four other coders playing video games. Heaven. Chen liked to work late, fueled on cappuccinos and cigarettes, sometimes stumbling into the office past noon. Colleagues teased him for being a mischievous joker; he took frequent smoke breaks and frequent programming "shortcuts," inelegant technical work-arounds others avoided. Chen loved writing code in Python, an obscure computing language nobody else used. He liked it because it was open source, built and maintained by contributors around the world with an unrestrained spirit he saw in himself. Occasionally, he worked alongside Jawed Karim, another gifted, mischievous immigrant from the University of Illinois. Karim also loved the internet for its rule-bending openness. In college Karim had invented MP3 Voyeur, a file-sharing service tech-savvy college students used to rip music online, months before another named Napster debuted. Chen, Karim, and Hurley lived through turbulent years at Confinity. Start-ups back then were sharks circling for blood, willing to turn on a dime at the smell of money. Confinity ditched its first idea, security software, for another-mobile payments. It managed to survive the dot-com crash, when bursting markets demolished young internet businesses, and changed its name to PayPal. Emerging from the rubble, PayPal went public and, in 2002, sold itself to the auction site eBay. PayPal's early staff were a tight-knit group of type A overachievers, and after the eBay purchase several of them went on to join blue-chip investment firms and start marquee companies: Yelp, LinkedIn, SpaceX. The press would christen this cadre (of mostly men) "the PayPal Mafia." At PayPal, the YouTube founders had a reputation as more of the B team. Hurley had left soon after the eBay acquisition, chafing at its stuffy corporate culture. Chen worked on PayPal's expansion into China but grew to hate the culture too, believing that it valued financial gain over programming gusto. When the pair started talking up their new idea for a video website in early 2005, few took them that seriously. In April, Chen sent over their test website to an old colleague. "Nice," the PayPal alum wrote back, "it works really well. how you gonna keep out the parn?" (He mistyped "porn.") Chen reassured him that they would, then asked, "Want to put a video in??????" The internet was not yet an enormous public stage, not yet the automatic place for people to share and overshare. Posting unpolished personal stuff felt weird. Chen's ex-colleague wrote back, "I'm not sure I have any." á á á Ultimately, a lukewarm reception didn't deter the YouTube dudes. Neither did Google's entrance into amateur web video. Google wasn't the only one after all. Microsoft had a video site and so did a litany of start-ups, like Revver and Metacafe, and crass shock portals, like Big Boys and eBaum's World. Each featured footage on their own websites or applications, but they lacked a way to let videos play everywhere else on the web. YouTube had found a way. Jawed Karim showed it off to a PayPal coder he knew, Yu Pan, at a house party. "It's Flash," Karim explained. With Flash, a software system for rendering text, audio, and video graphics, YouTube could embed its video player box on other websites. That would ultimately be the trio's most brilliant move, an innovation that enabled YouTube to leapfrog all its competitors. At the party Karim pulled up a test video for Pan, who had toyed with Flash at PayPal and grasped its technical potential. On-screen Hurley had sketched a simple rectangle and tiny triangular Play button in pixels, a miniature TV that could plonk down anywhere online. Getting videos to play in Flash was easy. Getting them to sync with sound was not. Chen made countless four-second films of himself just talking, going back each time into the code to make sure his lips and words moved together. Once the dudes were confident it worked, Karim published their site's first proper video, an eighteen-second clip with a crude wink. jawed: "Me at the zoo." April 23, 2005. 0:18. Karim is in a black ski jacket at the San Diego Zoo. Kids chattering in the background nearly drown out his voice, but his mouth moves in sync. "All right, so here we are in front of the elephants," he says, looking straight at the camera. "The cool thing about these guys is that they have really, really, really"-pause-"long trunks. And that's pretty much all there is to say. To populate the site, Karim uploaded clips of 747s taking off and landing. Chen posted clips of his cat, PJ, with his handle, tunafat. But they needed more material. They were still toying with the dating idea, and for that to work, they had to have plenty of videos of women. "YouTube is in need of creative content!" Chen wrote in a Craigslist post. "If you are a female or an extremely creative male between the ages of 18 to 45 and if you have a digital camera that can create short video clips, please follow these steps to earn $20." Instructions followed: visit YouTube.com, start an account, upload three videos of yourself. Visitors could pick from a drop-down menu: "I'm a FEMALE seeking MALES between 18 to 45." They posted these listings around Las Vegas and Los Angeles. No one responded. Back at the drawing board, Hurley decided these calls for creativity were too daunting, arguing that they should encourage "real personal clips that are taken by everyday people." For him the site's handicap was that it lacked a clear purpose. Was it a place to flaunt your opinions or your sex appeal? "I keep getting mixed signals from both of you," he wrote in one email, exasperated. "Are we moving towards blogging or dating?" Karim wrote back, "Screw blogging. we should just be a site where you can post videos of yourself. Broadcast yourself. That's it." An early slogan the three had used for their site-"Tune In, Hook Up"-was a dud. Karim now proposed that phrase-"broadcast yourself"-as the site's motto, and it stuck. Excerpted from Like, Comment, Subscribe: Inside YouTube's Chaotic Rise to World Domination by Mark Bergen All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.