Black-and-white thinking The burden of a binary brain in a complex world

Kevin Dutton, 1967-

Book - 2021

"How the evolutionary history of the human brain explains our tendency to sort the world into black-and-white categories"--

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

150.195/Dutton
1 / 1 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor 150.195/Dutton Checked In
Subjects
Genres
Instructional and educational works
Creative nonfiction
Published
New York : Farrar, Straus and Giroux 2021.
Language
English
Main Author
Kevin Dutton, 1967- (author)
Edition
First American edition
Item Description
"Originally published in 2020 by Bantam Press, Great Britain"--Title page verso.
Physical Description
viii, 386 pages : illustrations ; 24 cm
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references (pages 331-362) and index.
ISBN
9780374110345
  • Introduction
  • 1. The Categorization Instinct
  • 2. A Heap of Trouble
  • 3. When Categories Collide
  • 4. The Dark Side of Black and White
  • 5. The Viewfinder Principle
  • 6. The Complexity of Simplicity
  • 7. The Rainbow That Might Have Been
  • 8. The Frame Game
  • 9. Where There's a Why There's a Way
  • 10. Supersuasion
  • 11. Undercover Influence: The Secret Science of Getting What You Want
  • 12. Redrawing the Lines
  • Postscript: The Wisdom of Radicals
  • Appendix I. The linguistics and perception of colour
  • Appendix II. Assess your own need for cognitive closure
  • Appendix III. A brief history of frames
  • Appendix IV. Berinmo versus English colour space
  • Appendix V. The three evolutionary stages of black-and-white thinking
  • Appendix VI. Black-and-white thinking through the centuries
  • Appendix VII. The essentials of essentialism
  • References
  • Acknowledgements
  • Index
Review by Kirkus Book Review

Why do we think in binary terms like "us versus them"? Research psychologist Dutton finds an answer in how our brains have--and haven't--evolved. Intentionally or not, the author, who has spent the last 20 years teaching at Oxford and Cambridge, puts his own spin on Malcolm Gladwell's crowd-pleasing approach to pop psychology: dusting off scientific research, gathering anecdotes, reaching counterintuitive conclusions, and tossing in a dash of self-help. Dutton asserts that millions of years ago, the fight-or-flight response arose in response to perceived threats, and while the world has grown infinitely more complex, we're still "programmed to think in black and white." In order to navigate life, we mentally divide our experiences into manageable categories, giving them handy "frames." Dutton argues that some cognitive "super-frames" are especially important. Along with "fight versus flight," they include "us versus them" and "right versus wrong." This cognitive trinity, he believes, helps to explain a vast range of polarizing events--e.g., Brexit, Trumpism, the rise of the Islamic State group. Those "super-frames" also hold the key to "supersuasion," or "the secret science of getting what you want" from others. Casting a wide net, Dutton makes his case by drawing on research in neuroscience and other fields as well as on interviews with Tony Blair, Olympic gold medalist Sebastian Coe, transgender boxing manager Kellie Maloney, and others. That journalistic approach keeps the book from becoming dauntingly wonky but also serves as a substitute for a more rigorously scientific treatment that might have lent more plausibility to the author's broad arguments and more weight to theories of "supersuasion," which are no more compelling than those in many sales and marketing bestsellers. Gladwell's detractors have often praised his storytelling and deft phrase-turning while faulting his tendency to oversell his theories and cherry-pick his academic studies. In Dutton's book, many readers will find the same virtues and limits. A theory about why people hold either/or views that's more colorful than convincing. Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.