Review by Choice Review
Posner (Univ. of Chicago), a legal scholar, argues that Donald Trump is the clearest and most dangerous example of a demagogue in American history. The danger, he argues, is baked into the Constitution, which created a republic that put the common people in charge but also delegated power to representatives. Robbed of a direct decision-making role, voters have become susceptible to charismatic candidates who insist that they alone will protect people's interests against entrenched elites. Rule by senators and presidents, especially, fueled the potential for a demagogue to exploit voters' discontents and claim that he would be their champion. As the author argues, Andrew Jackson, Tom Watson, Huey Long, Joseph McCarthy, and George Wallace paved the way for Trump's unprecedented personalization of executive power. The electoral college, imperial presidency, racism, and evolving mass media also provided fertile ground for Trump's opportunism. Posner minces no words, calling Trump a "political monstrosity" (p. 259), and he provides ample historical evidence to support his thesis. He minimizes traditions of nativism, racism, and anti-welfare state conservatism, which persisted without demagogic guidance and which also inspired Trump, but otherwise provides a comprehensive indictment of a major flaw in the US political system. Summing Up: Recommended. All levels. --Burton Peretti, University of Maryland University College
Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Booklist Review
In his latest book, Posner (Radical Markets: Uprooting Capitalism and Democracy for a Just Society, 2018) takes readers through a fascinating political history focused on the men (yes, no women so far) who best illustrate the manipulative power of the populist demagogue. A demagogue exploits, for self-aggrandizement, the emotions of the masses against perceived elites and undermines trust in the political and civic institutions of their eras. Posner draws many striking parallels between Donald Trump and Andrew Jackson, along with William Bryan Jennings, Joseph McCarthy, Huey Long, George Wallace, Charles Coughlin, and Richard Nixon. Many of the post-Civil War populists used nativism to unify whites against immigrants as well as religious and ethnic minorities in growing urban centers, all of them frequent targets of Donald Trump's rhetoric. By reading Posner's survey, readers will see more clearly and starkly the historical context of Trump's rise to political power and how he appeals and holds on to his base.
From Booklist, Copyright (c) American Library Association. Used with permission.
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review
University of Chicago Law School professor Posner (coauthor, Radical Markets) identifies precedents for Donald Trump's rise to power in this skillful survey of American political history. Defining a demagogue as "a charismatic leader who would gain and hold on to power by manipulating the public rather than by advancing the public good," Posner explains how the Founding Fathers envisioned and sought to protect the U.S. from such a threat, then labels Andrew Jackson the "First Demagogue"--a so-called "man of the people" who exploited the public's fear and distrust of Native Americans and immigrants, and ran a notoriously corrupt administration. Posner also examines populist uprisings, including the 19th-century Grange movement of distressed farmers, and notes that Louisiana's populist governor and senator Huey Long pushed FDR for more radical reforms in the New Deal. Declaring Trump the "Second Demagogue," Posner analyzes the social, economic, and cultural forces behind his election, and calls on voters to remember Trump "not merely as a poor choice for the presidency. as a political monstrosity who should be repudiated by the body politic." Though Posner's prose tends to be more dry and technical than vivid, he delivers a powerful argument for the need to restore constitutional safeguards against demagoguery. Trump naysayers will be enlightened. (June)
(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
Review by Kirkus Book Review
How the Founding Fathers' worst fear materialized. Well-grounded in classical precedents, the founders were worried that their experiment in republican self-government could produce a demagogue, a charismatic leader who would gain and hold on to power by manipulating the public rather than by advancing the public good. Posner, a professor of law at the University of Chicago, contends two presidents have embodied that fear: Andrew Jackson and Donald Trump. However, this book is not all about Trump; it is an almost novellike stroll through American history beginning with the founders' fear and ending with one chapter on Trump. Along the way, Posner charts the careers of such American demagogues as Huey Long, George Wallace, and Joe McCarthy and shows the similarities they share with Trump. The author argues that two things are necessary for a demagogue to rise: a propitious political condition and the right person. In Trump's case, writes Posner, the condition was that rank-and-file Republicans were blaming "elites" for such failures as the Iraq War and stagnating wages, and they wanted something new. The necessary person not only had to be an outsider--because no one inside the party was showing any hint of anything new--but also someone with significant public recognition, great wealth, or, preferably, both. And he had to be shameless. What better person than Trump? Posner checks off the characteristics of a demagogue and details how deeply each one applies to Trump. For example, they attack anyone who opposes or criticizes them; they have contempt for the truth; they despise institutions, public and private; they blame and attack elite power. As the author writes, his goal was "to persuade the reader that in electing Donald Trump to the presidency, we Americans really did choose a demagogue." He has succeeded. An insightful analysis into what went wrong with the founders' dream. Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.
Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.
