Review by Booklist Review
McAfee, co-director of the MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy, examines how four facets technological progress, capitalism, responsive government, and public awareness have collaboratively enhanced economic growth by consuming the planet's natural resources. Citing sources such as government reports, economic data, scientific publications, and world news coverage, McAfee illuminates the connections among these four facets and how they affect economic activity, social capital, sustainability, and humanity's overall state of well-being. His arguments are complex at times, as he covers varying interdisciplinary fields to suggest that humans have excelled in integrating technological progress with capitalism to fulfill human needs and wants, which has also directly impacted the environment. Readers interested in environmental sciences, economics, and political economy will find McAfee's work to be deeply engaging and useful in understanding the roles of capitalism and technology in shaping humanity's future.--Raymond Pun Copyright 2010 Booklist
From Booklist, Copyright (c) American Library Association. Used with permission.
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review
Contrary to the doomsayers, humanity can grow the economy while healing the environment, according to this hopeful exploration of sustainable development by MIT business research scientist McAfee (The Second Machine Age). He spotlights efficiency trends that have allowed America and other developed countries to reduce resource consumption even as their populations and economies soar: growing more food with less land, fertilizer, and water; making soft-drink cans with 85% less aluminum; constructing homes with less building material; replacing more than a dozen old-fashioned electronic gadgets with a single smartphone. McAfee attributes these successes to "the four horsemen of the optimist"--technological innovation, capitalist competition, public awareness, and judicious government regulation--which together have enabled most people in most places to lead longer, healthier, richer lives while saving such endangered species as the American bison. (He allows that much work is needed on climate change, protecting wild areas, and reducing pollution.) McAfee synthesizes a vast literature on economics and the environment into a lucid, robust defense of technological progress, including nuclear power and GMOs. This stimulating challenge to anticapitalist alarmists is full of fascinating information and provocative insights. (Oct.)
(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
Review by Kirkus Book Review
The future may not be so bleak after all.MIT digital researcher McAfee (co-author: Machine, Platform, Crowd: Harnessing Our Digital Future, 2017, etc.) ventures that four other horsemen are riding, and perhaps outpacing the familiar apocalyptic onesnamely, "capitalism, technological progress, public awareness, and responsive government." By his lights, the Club of Rome Limits to Growth report of half a century past was overly Malthusian, and its authors "clearly underestimated both dematerialization and the endless search for new reserves." The former, the shift to a cyber-based service economy, is easy enough to understand; as McAfee notes, all you have to do is think of the many tools that a modern smartphone replaces, and certainly, fewer resources are required. Still, there are plenty of mountainsides that have gone into that phone, and as for that endless search, McAfee's enthusiasm for the mineral wealth brought by fracking seems to overlook a few unpleasant externalities. He counters that those externalities, costs that are not immediately evident on a balance sheet, have been allowed for in such market innovations as the buying and selling of rights to pollute, the so-called "cap and trade" program that initially met with great enthusiasm but that, McAfee admits, "aren't enough," particularly in an economic environment that no longer penalizes bad behavior. Even so, assuming his numbers are correct, the author offers hopeful news with the thought that greenhouse gas emissions are falling and that many developed-world economies are using smaller quantities of metals, chemicals, and the like. Given that a fundamental tenet of economics is that scarcity governs the availability and distribution of resources, McAfee's certainty that the planet is "big enough to contain" all the resources we'll need "for as long as we'll need them" might seem to some readers counterintuitive, as he allows.A cogent argument, though climate scientists may find McAfee's assumptions and faith in market solutions too rosy. Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.
Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.