Antkind A novel

Charlie Kaufman, 1958-

Book - 2020

"B. Rosenberger Rosenberg, neurotic and underappreciated film critic (failed academic, filmmaker, paramour, shoe salesman who sleeps in a sock drawer), stumbles upon a hitherto unseen film by an enigmatic outsider--a film he's convinced will change his career trajectory and rock the world of cinema to its core. His hands on what is possibly the greatest movie ever made, a three-month-long stop-motion masterpiece that took its reclusive auteur ninety years to complete, B. knows that it is his mission to show it to the rest of humanity. The only problem: The film is destroyed, leaving him the sole witness to its inadvertently ephemeral genius. All that's left of this work of art is a single frame from which B. must somehow atte...mpt to recall the film that just might be the last great hope of civilization. Thus begins a mind-boggling journey through the hilarious nightmarescape of a psyche as lushly Kafkaesque as it is atrophied by the relentless spew of Twitter. Desperate to impose order on an increasingly nonsensical existence, trapped in a self-imposed prison of aspirational victimhood and degeneratively inclusive language, B. scrambles to re-create the lost masterwork while attempting to keep pace with an ever-fracturing culture of "likes" and arbitrary denunciations that are simultaneously his bête noire and his raison d'être."--

Saved in:

1st Floor Show me where

FICTION/Kaufman Charlie
1 / 2 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
1st Floor FICTION/Kaufman Charlie Checked In
1st Floor FICTION/Kaufman Charlie Withdrawn
Subjects
Genres
Humorous fiction
Satire
Satirical literature
Psychological fiction
Published
New York : Random House [2020]
Language
English
Main Author
Charlie Kaufman, 1958- (author)
Edition
First edition
Physical Description
705 pages ; 25 cm
ISBN
9780399589683
Contents unavailable.
Review by Booklist Review

Celebrated screenwriter Kaufman's (Being John Malkovich, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind) debut novel is narrated by B. Rosenberger Rosenberg, an ingratiating and self-aggrandizing film critic who loathes Kaufman's films with a passion. B.'s life is transformed by the tragic loss of a three-month-long film made by a 119-year-old man over the course of 90 years that only B. has seen, and the bizarre techniques B. uses to try to remake it from memory. As B. delves ever deeper into his psyche, his life slowly unravels as he jumps from career to career and explores his various sexual proclivities. B., 58, desperately tries to be culturally aware, but manages to say and do everything slightly wrong, echoing the buffoonish bluster of Ignatius J. Reilly from A Confederacy of Dunces. While convoluted (even for Kaufman), this novel is magnificently imaginative, bringing to mind Beckett, Pynchon, and A. R. Moxon's more recent The Revisionaries (2019). With this surprisingly breezy read, given its length, Kaufman proves to be a masterful novelist, delivering a tragic, farcical, and fascinating exploration of how memory defines our lives.HIGH-DEMAND BACKSTORY: Kaufman's renown and Hollywood PR power will make this a summer must-read.

From Booklist, Copyright (c) American Library Association. Used with permission.
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review

Screenwriter/director Kaufman's debut brims with screwball satire and provocative reflections on how art shapes people's perception of the world. While visiting St. Augustine, Fla., to research a book, B. Rosenberg, a pretentious film historian and critic, crosses paths with Ingo Cutbirth, an elderly former child actor who shows B. an unnamed film created with stop-motion puppetry that was 90 years in the making and takes three months to watch. B. appraises the film ("about the artifice of fiction and the paucity of truth in our culture," among many other things), as "the greatest cinematic masterpiece of perhaps all time." After Cutbirth dies, he bequeaths the film to B., who loses it in a car fire and spends the rest of the novel consulting with therapists, desperate to reconstruct his experience of the film. Along the way, B. suffers a series of comic setbacks in his career and personal life, which leave him wondering, "Where does the movie end and my mind begin?" The Pynchonesque scope of Kaufman's novel gives him liberty to have his opinionated narrator comment on innumerable cultural touchstones, especially in cinema, where B. throws shade with tongue firmly in cheek at filmmaker Charlie Kaufman, whom he derides as "a monster unaware of his staggering ineptitude." B.'s outsized personality and his giddily freewheeling experiences make this picaresque irresistible. (May)

(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
Review by Kirkus Book Review

Always centrifugal screenwriter Kaufman delivers a terrific debut novel that makes Gravity's Rainbow read like a Dr. Seuss story. You know you're in for strange times when a young fast-food cashier cites an anecdote about Jean Cocteau ("They once asked him what he would take from a burning house") while offhandedly observing that the vehicle you're driving is on fire. So it is with B. (for Balaam) Rosenberg, a film historian who, visiting Florida, falls in with a curious African American man of impossibly old age. That swampy state is the setting for Kaufman's screenplay Adaptation, mysterious, humid, full of weird critters, just as we find it in the opening pages of Kaufman's shaggy ant story. (As for the ants, once our strange kind does itself in, they'll remain: "Only ants now. And fungus." But that's long in the future, as time begins to reverse itself like a film reel being rewound.) Rosenberg, who insists throughout that he's not Jewish, finds and loses a film that our Methuselah has been making for 90 years and that takes three months to view. It's Rosenberg's brief to reconstruct the thing via a single remaining frame and a weird hypnotist. Back in New York, he wows an HR rep and lands a job at an online shoe-delivery company, which lands him in the clown-shoe business, which leads to impure thoughts ("I picture her naked but with clown makeup on, and instantly I realize a new fetish has been born") and eventually his dismissal from said conglomerate. He also falls in with a certain Donald Trump--beg pardon, Trunk, as obnoxious in robotic as in human form. Inside jokes abound, with digs at the likes of Judd Apatow, Quentin Tarantino, and Wes Anderson, along with a ringing denunciation of one Charlie Kaufman ("a poseur of the most odious sort"). It's a splendid, spectacular mess, much like Kaufman's Being John Malkovich, commanding attention from start to finish for its ingenuity and narrative dazzle. Film, speculative fiction, and outright eccentricity collide in a wonderfully inventive yarn--and a masterwork of postmodern storytelling. Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Chapter 1 My beard is a wonder. It is the beard of Whitman, of Rasputin, of Darwin, yet it is uniquely mine. It's a salt-­and-pepper, steel-­wool, cotton-­candy confection, much too long, wispy, and unruly to be fashionable. And it is this, its very unfashionability, that makes the strongest statement. It says, I don't care a whit (a Whit man!) about fashion. I don't care about attractiveness. This beard is too big for my narrow face. This beard is too wide. This beard is too bottom-­heavy for my bald head. It is off-­putting. So if you come to me, you come to me on my terms. As I've been bearded thusly for three decades now, I like to think that my beard has contributed to the resurgence of beardedness, but in truth, the beards of today are a different animal, most so fastidious they require more grooming than would a simple clean shave. Or if they are full, they are full on conventionally handsome faces, the faces of faux woodsmen, the faces of home brewers of beer. The ladies like this look, these urban swells, men in masculine drag. Mine is not that. Mine is defiantly heterosexual, unkempt, rabbinical, intellectual, revolutionary. It lets you know I am not interested in fashion, that I am eccentric, that I am serious. It affords me the opportunity to judge you on your judgment of me. Do you shun me? You are shallow. Do you mock me? You are a philistine. Are you repulsed? You are . . . conventional. That it conceals a port-­wine stain stretching from my upper lip to my sternum is tertiary, secondary at most. This beard is my calling card. It is the thing that makes me memorable in a sea of sameness. It is the feature in concert with my owlish wire-­rim glasses, my hawkish nose, my sunken blackbird eyes, and my bald-­eagle pate that makes me caricaturable, both as a bird and as a human. Several framed examples from various small but prestigious film criticism publications (I refuse to be photographed for philosophical, ethical, personal, and scheduling reasons) adorn the wall of my home office. My favorite is an example of what is commonly known as the inversion illusion. When hung upside down, I appear to be a Caucasian Don King. As an inveterate boxing enthusiast and scholar, I am amused by this visual pun and indeed used the inverted version of this illustration as the author photo for my book The Lost Religion of Masculinity: Joyce Carol Oates, George Plimpton, Norman Mailer, A. J. Liebling, and the Sometimes Combative History of the Literature of Boxing, the Sweet Science, and Why. The uncanny thing is that the Don King illusion works in reality as well. Many's the time, after I perform sirsasana in yoga class, that the hens circle, clucking that I look just like that "awful boxing man." It's their way of flirting, I imagine, these middle-­aged, frivolous creatures, who traipse, yoga mat rolled under arm or in shoulder-­holster, announcing their spiritual discipline to an uncaring world--­from yoga to lunch to shopping to loveless marriage bed. But I am there only for the workout. I don't wear a special outfit or listen to the mishmash Eastern religion sermon the instructor blathers beforehand. I don't even wear shorts and a T-­shirt. Gray dress pants and a white button-­down shirt for me. Belt. Black oxfords on feet. Wallet packed thickly into rear right pocket. I believe this makes my point. I am not a sheep. I am not a faddist. It's the same outfit I wear if on some odd occasion I find myself riding a bicycle in the park for relaxation. No spandex suit with logos all over it for me. I don't need anyone thinking I am a serious bicycle rider. I don't need anyone thinking anything of me. I am riding a bike. That is it. If you want to think something about that, have at it, but I don't care. I will admit that my girlfriend is the one who has gotten me on a bike and into the yoga classroom. She is a well-­known TV actress, famous for her role as a wholesome but sexy mom in a 1990s sitcom and many television movies. You would certainly know who she is. You might say I, as an older, intellectual writer, am not "in her league," but you'd be mistaken. Certainly when we met at a book signing of my prestigious small-press critical biography of--­ Something (deer?) dashes in front of my car. Wait! Are there deer here? I feel like I've read that there are deer here. I need to look it up. The ones with fangs? Are there deer with fangs? I think there is such a thing--­a deer with fangs--­but I don't know if I've imagined it, and if I haven't, I don't know why I associate them with Florida. I need to look it up when I arrive. Whatever it was, it is long gone. I am driving through blackness toward St. Augustine. My mind has wandered into the beard monologue, as it so often does on long car trips. Trips of any kind. I've delivered it at book signings, at a lecture on Jean-­Luc Godard at the 92nd Street Y Student Residence Dining Hall Overflow Room. People seem to enjoy it. I don't care that they do, but they do. I'm just sharing that piece of trivia because it's true. Truth is my master in all things, if I can be said to have a master, which I cannot. Ninety degrees, according to the outside temperature gauge on my car. Eighty-nine percent humidity, according to the perspiratory sheen on my forehead (at Harvard, I was affectionately known as the Human Hygrometer). A storm of bugs in the headlights, slapping the windshield, smeared by my wipers. My semiprofessional guess is a swarm of the aptly named lovebug--­ Plecia nearctica--­ the honeymoon fly, the double-­headed bug, so called because they fly conjoined, even after the mating is complete. It is this kind of postcoital cuddling I find so enjoyable with my African American girlfriend. You would recognize her name. If the two of us could fly through the Florida night together thusly, I would in a second agree to it, even at the risk of splattering against some giant's windshield. I find myself momentarily lost in that sensual and fatal scenario. An audible splat wakes me from this diversional road trip reverie, and I see that a particularly large and bizarre insect has smashed into the glass, smack in the center of what I estimate is the northwest quadrant of the windshield. The highway is empty, the nothingness on either side of me interrupted by an occasional fluorescent fast-­food joint, open but without customers. No cars in the parking lots. The names are unfamiliar: Slammy's. The Jack Knife. Mick Burger. Something sinister about these places isolated in the middle of nothing. Who are they feeding? How do they get their supplies? Do frozen-­patty trucks come here from some Slammy's warehouse somewhere? Hard to imagine. Probably a mistake to drive here from New York. I thought it would be meditative, would give me time to think about the book, about Marla, about Daisy, about Grace, about how far I seem to be from anything I'd ever envisioned for myself. How does that happen? Can I even know who I was before the world got its hands on me and turned me against myself into this . . . thing? Excerpted from Antkind: A Novel by Charlie Kaufman All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.