The fire is upon us James Baldwin, William F. Buckley Jr., and the debate over race in America

Nicholas Buccola

Book - 2019

"In February 1965, novelist and 'poet of the Black Freedom Struggle' James Baldwin and political commentator and father of the modern American conservative movement William F. Buckley met in Cambridge Union to face-off in a televised debate. The topic was 'The American Dream is at the expense of the American Negro.' Buccola uses this momentous encounter as a lens through which to deepen our understanding of two of the most important public intellectuals in twentieth century American thought. The book begins by providing intellectual biographies of each debater. As Buckley reflected on the civil rights movement, he did so from the perspective of someone who thought the dominant norms and institutions in the United St...ates were working quite well for most people and that they would eventually work well for African-Americans. From such a perspective, any ideology, personality, or movement that seems to threaten those dominant norms and institutions must be deemed a threat. Baldwin could not bring himself to adopt such a bird's eye point of view. Instead, he focused on the 'inner lives' of those involved on all sides of the struggle. Imagine what it must be like, he told the audience at Cambridge, to have the sense that your country has not 'pledged its allegiance to you?' Buccola weaves the intellectual biographies of these two larger-than-life personalities and their fabled debate with the dramatic history of the civil rights movement that includes a supporting cast of such figures as Robert Kennedy, Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X, Lorraine Hansberry, and George Wallace. Buccola shows that the subject of their debate continues to have resonance in our own time as the social mobility of blacks remains limited and racial inequality persists"--

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

305.8/Buccola
1 / 1 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor 305.8/Buccola Checked In
Subjects
Published
Princeton : Princeton University Press [2019]
Language
English
Main Author
Nicholas Buccola (author)
Physical Description
xii, 482 pages : illustrations ; 25 cm
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references (pages [459]-476) and index.
ISBN
9780691181547
  • List of Illustrations
  • Prologue
  • Chapter 1. The Ghetto and the Mansion, 1924-46
  • Chapter 3. Disturbing the Peace, 1946-54
  • Chapter 3. Joining the Battle, 1955-61
  • Chapter 4. Taking Responsibility, 1961-62
  • Chapter 5. In the Eye of the Storm, 1963-64
  • Chapter 6. "What Concerns Me Most": Baldwin at Cambridge
  • Chapter 7. "The Faith of Our Fathers": Buckley at Cambridge
  • Chapter 8. Lighting the Fuse
  • Epilogue. The Fire Is upon Us
  • Acknowledgments
  • Appendix. Transcript of the Baldwin versus Buckley Debate at the Cambridge Union
  • Notes
  • Bibliography
  • Index
Review by Choice Review

In 1965 James Baldwin, the "poet of the Civil Rights Movement," and William F. Buckley, the new conservative's cerebral leader, met at Cambridge University to debate the resolution that "the American dream is at the expense of the American Negro." Before the largely student audience Baldwin bested Buckley by a margin greater than three to one, as tallied by audience votes. Beginning with Baldwin's impoverished upbringing in Harlem and Buckley's wealthy upbringing in Connecticut, Buccola (Linfield College) provides the back story to this debate, forcefully analyzing the divide in American society. Relative to civil rights, Baldwin clung to the belief that an open society, in which everyone could engage with one another, was needed for all to achieve "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." Conversely, Buckley staunchly supported the states' right to resist an increasingly expansive federal government in what he deemed a local issue--race relations. Further, instead of advocating for expanding voter roles, Buckley favored restricting them to only the intellectual elite. Buccola insightfully concludes that the debate was not a divide between liberals (Baldwin) and conservatives (Buckley), but rather a difference of opinion on what represents the soul of America. Summing Up: Essential. All readership levels. --Duncan R. Jamieson, Ashland University

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Kirkus Book Review

A study of two acclaimed American thinkers on opposite sides of the political spectrum that underscores the enormous race and class divisions in 1960s America, many of which still exist today.Buccola (Political Science/Linfield Coll.; The Political Thought of Frederick Douglass, 2012, etc.) grounds this engaging comparison between James Baldwin, "second in international prominence only to Martin Luther King Jr. as the voice of the black freedom struggle," and prominent conservative William F. Buckley in a debate between the two held at the Cambridge Union on Feb. 18, 1965. Taking up the agreed-upon topic of "The American Dream is at the expense of the American Negro," Baldwin addressed the packed audience "in the position of a kind of Jeremiah" (as a child, he was steeped in biblical teachings from the pulpits of Harlem storefront churches). He poured forth the litany of demoralization that African Americans suffer under white supremacy. It was a powerful, moving speech, and Buckley countered it by scolding Baldwin for "flogging our civilization' " and appealing to the audience on the importance of keeping "the rule of law" and "faith of our fathers." By a 3-1 margin, the youthful audience favored Baldwin's speech. Yet Buccola builds his well-rendered narrative by offering alternating looks at how the two American intellectuals and writers developed their arguments up to that point. Indeed, both were deeply imprinted by their different upbringings. Throughout his entire life, Baldwin wrote about the Harlem "ghetto" of economic distress and the "moral lives of those trapped within [it]." Buckley, who hailed from a wealthy Connecticut family and attended a prep school and Yale, where he was a member of Skull and Bones, stuck to the dogma, inherited from his father, of "devout Catholicism, antidemocratic individualism, hostility to collectivism in economics, and a strong devotion to hierarchyincluding racial hierarchyin the social sphere."An elucidating work that makes effective use of comparison and contrast. Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.