The death of politics How to heal our frayed republic after Trump

Peter Wehner

Book - 2019

"Peter Wehner, a New York Times opinion writer and outspoken Republican and Christian who openly opposes President Trump, and veteran of three Republican administrations, argues that Americans, in their frustration, have come to loathe politics, with disastrous results, and to heal we need to recapture and renew the unique and noble American tradition of improving ourselves through politics"--

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

320.973/Wehner
1 / 2 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor 320.973/Wehner Due Jan 3, 2024
2nd Floor 320.973/Wehner Checked In
Subjects
Published
New York, NY : HarperOne, an imprint of HarperCollinsPublishers [2019]
Language
English
Main Author
Peter Wehner (author)
Edition
First edition
Physical Description
264 pages ; 22 cm
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references (pages 241-264).
ISBN
9780062820792
  • Chapter 1. A Noble Calling
  • Chapter 2. How We Ended Up in This Mess
  • Chapter 3. What Politics Is
  • Chapter 4. Politics and Faith
  • Chapter 5. Why Words Matter
  • Chapter 6. In Praise of Moderation, Compromise, and Civility
  • Chapter 7. The Case for Hope
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
Review by Choice Review

Writing for nonspecialists, Wehner, a New York Times opinion writer who covers US politics and conservative thought, seeks to rehabilitate the faltering ways of contemporary American politics. Early on he explains the reasons for bitter partisanship and elucidates how corruption today is less than at many points in US history. In endorsing politics as a human activity, he draws on Aristotle, Locke, and Lincoln, arguing in chapter 3 ("What Politics Is") that the "power of ideas" can "shape history." His arguments for the importance of faith in politics (pp. 60--76) are particularly well rendered. Further on in the book Wehner condemns Trump's "character flaws and moral failures" (p. 80) and decries the baleful political effects of this "con man." Wehner served in the George W. Bush administration, and he is candid about its failures in Iraq (though he places ultimate blame for the Iraq reversal on Obama's peremptory withdrawal). Seeking to move readers beyond the performance art that dominates current politics, Wehner urges a frank view of domestic policy failures (which he argues are many). He remains committed to the cause of good government, arguing that it can come only from an atmosphere of civility and compromise, both now sorely lacking. Including extensive bibliographical references, this thoughtful analysis deserves a wide readership. Summing Up: Highly recommended. Lower-division undergraduates through faculty and professionals; general readers. --Steven E M Schier, emeritus, Carleton College

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Kirkus Book Review

A conservative takes aim at the Donald Trump presidency and how to move beyond it.A veteran Republican senior adviser for George W. Bush, Wehner (co-author: City of Man: Religion and Politics in a New Era, 2010, etc.) published an op-ed column in the New York Times in which he declared that he would not vote for Trump "under any circumstances. I was perhaps the first prominent Republican to have taken this position, and I did so despite having voted Republican in every presidential election since I first became eligible to vote in 1980." Here, the author explains why he considered Trump anathema as a candidate and why his presidency, if anything, has been worse than the author feared. He situates his argument within the broader context of American democracy, explaining how and why the citizenry can set right what has gone wrong. It's an extended civics lesson of sorts, one grounded in American history, the balance of powers, and presidencies good and bad. Wehner also reaches back to Aristotle for foundational philosophies of the functions of government and the body politic. "Democracy requires that we honor the culture of words," he writes, and later continues, "when words are weaponized and used merely to paint all political opponents as inherently evil, stupid, and weak, then democracy's foundations are put in peril." The author urges civility, moderation, and compromise, qualities that would seem to be at odds with the political tenor of the times, and he believes a return to a pre-polarization brand of politics would correct the course" He writes, "the task before usis how we can rediscover, refine and recalibrateand in some cases, reenvision and rethinkhow we understand politics; to disentangle what politics has become from what it can be, to clear away some of the misconceptions, and to sketch a roadmap for recovery." In response to the spirit of populist revolution, he offers a number of other "r" words to calm the waters and restore some rationality to the process.A modest contribution to the groaning bookshelves about our divisive times. Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.