Revolutionary George Washington at war

Robert L. O'Connell

Book - 2019

The military historian presents a reappraisal of George Washington as a young soldier of destiny whose Revolutionary War leadership came to define the American character.

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

973.41/O'Connell
1 / 1 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor 973.41/O'Connell Checked In
Subjects
Genres
Biographies
Published
New York : Random House [2019]
Language
English
Main Author
Robert L. O'Connell (author)
Edition
First edition
Physical Description
xxviii, 368 pages : illustrations, maps ; 25 cm
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN
9780812996999
  • List of Maps
  • Introduction: The Generalissimo
  • Chapter 1. The Gentrification of George
  • Chapter 2. Living Large
  • Chapter 3. Rage Militaire
  • Chapter 4. Amateur Hour
  • Chapter 5. Out in the Cold
  • Chapter 6. Dangerland
  • Chapter 7. The Long Goodbye
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • Index
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review

This idiosyncratic volume from popular historian O'Connell (Fierce Patriot: The Tangled Lives of William Tecumseh Sherman) about Washington's life before the White House takes some contrarian stances. Writing in a colloquial style (he frequently refers to Washington as GW),O'Connell declares, for example, that "the English armed forces never came close to winning, and never could." The book follows Washington from his time as a canny young aristocrat eager to climb the ladder of power in the British military, through his turn from a member of the colonial Virginia House of Burgesses to the determinedly honorable leader of the revolutionary forces, to his 1873 "victory tour" after the revolution's conclusion. In addition to including some hyperbole, this account is often more speculative than rigorous; a typical passage reads, "Washington says nothing in his diary about the brutality he might have observed , but he cannot have missed the paranoia of the place... quite possibly the initial template for his own unease with slavery." Readers seeking an entertaining yarn will find one, but those who find this kind of loose argumentation anathema will want to pass it up. (Apr.)

(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
Review by Library Journal Review

Neither a thorough biography nor a mere recap of the Revolutionary War, this work is a history of the events and experiences that shaped George -Washington's ambitions, ideologies, and character, and fueled his revolutionary zeal. Military historian O'Connell (Fierce Patriot: The Tangled Lives of William Tecumseh Sherman) argues that despite his challenges-military amateur, inexperienced army, inflated ego, elitism, explosive temper, ill-advised decisions-Washington's passion for the Glorious Cause, his restraint, humility, decency, commanding presence, and ability to inspire loyalty made him the embodiment of the revolution. Mindful that revolutions could degenerate into tyranny and chaos, Washington vehemently disallowed atrocities (though there were many beyond his control) and vigilantly shunned displays of corruption or dictatorial tendencies. O'Connell contends that the British were doomed to lose the war because they underestimated the Patriots' fervor but emphasizes that it was solely because of Washington's restraint as the military commander, high moral standards, and fervent commitment to republicanism that the United States avoided disaster during and after the conflict. VERDICT O'Connell debunks myths and explains motives, shortcomings, and misperceptions in this historical saga that will engage both general and academic readers.--Margaret Kappanadze, Elmira Coll. Lib., NY © Copyright 2019. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.

(c) Copyright Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
Review by Kirkus Book Review

A provocative biography arguing that George Washington's greatest accomplishment was guiding a rare revolution that turned out well for the revolutionaries.Veteran historian O'Connell (Fierce Patriot: The Tangled Lives of William Tecumseh Sherman, 2014, etc.) reminds readers that most subsequent revolutions featured mass murder and ended in tyranny. In the first half of the book, the author travels familiar ground but does it with insight and wit. An unapologetic patrician, Washington yearned to scale Virginia's aristocracy and Britain's military. He succeeded in the first, becoming a leading figure in the French and Indian War and marrying Virginia's richest widow. His failure, despite aggressive lobbying, to receive a royal commission was Britain's first great mistake. A member of Virginia's House of Burgesses, he dutifully supported opposition to Britain's clumsy attempts to tax the colonists. By the time fighting broke out in 1775, everyone knew that Washington wanted to lead the army because he arrived at the Continental Congress in full dress uniform. Modern historians snicker, but it resonated with contemporaries, already impressed by his dignity, modesty, and reputation. He was the unanimous choice. O'Connell points out that Britain had long been crushing rebellions in Ireland and Scotland and saw no reason to change tactics in America. Even discounting patriot propaganda, looting and rape were common, prisoners were treated badly, and commanders known for cruelty were mostly British. Scholars wonder at his deference to the ineffectual Continental Congress. As generalissimo with a loyal cadre, he could have taken charge at any time but never did and expressed outrage when others suggested it. "He fervently believed in his own high-mindedness and was determined to conduct himself accordingly," writes the author. "Nothing compromises morality like a long, violent revolution, and George Washingtonremained a bulwark of decency, a remarkable achievement and possibly his greatest contribution to the Glorious Cause."A delightfully convincing case that Washington was history's least ruthless and most successful revolutionary. Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Chapter 1 The Gentrification of George George Washington was born on February 22, 1732, a time when the great British colonization project of the North American continent was really taking off--at least in terms of population and space occupied, if not exactly in imperial profits. The Washingtons characterized that fecundity and, especially, land hunger. They were fourth-generation transplants, solid but definitely lower-rung members of the gentry class that ran things in Virginia, and by extension across the British Empire. The original American Washington, John, came over in 1657, and was sufficiently land hungry to be remembered by nearby Indians as "Caunotocarious," roughly translated as "devourer of Villages." GW's father, Augustine, was similarly inclined, remembered for his relentless land speculation, love of farming, and reproductive success, siring nine offspring, including one amazing genetic bull's-eye, George, the first son of his second wife, Mary Ball Washington. There is no record of Augustine having had any inkling that he ­really nailed it with young George, or much of anything about their interaction. His plain favorite and the apparent star of the family was George's half brother Lawrence, who was English educated, debonair, and soon to be a commissioned officer in the British Army. He must have seemed like a shimmering image of success to little GW, fourteen years his junior. And he was. For if it was George, not Lawrence, who was destined to prove the family's rocket to the top, it was the older brother, not the father, who undeniably acted as the first stage. In 1743, when he was eleven, everything changed for George Washington. In April, Augustine, apparently in good health, rode into a storm, sickened, and died, leaving Mary with six children to raise and a plantation, Ferry Farm, to run. The Washingtons were far from wealthy--their family assemblage of "plate" silver was worth only slightly more than £25. By all accounts, this flinty, determined woman rose to the challenge, managing the 276 acres of Ferry Farm and its attendant slaves with an iron hand. By necessity, her oldest son, George, had to be part of the process, her right-hand man--at least in her eyes. As time passed, the responsibilities she placed on those slender but growing shoulders gradually evolved into a comprehensive plan for George's future: manage Ferry Farm and take care of her. George Washington, homeboy: The concept was as ridiculous as it sounds. But she held fast to it, boycotting his wedding and refusing to acknowledge his accomplishments in the French and Indian War and the American Revolution on the firm grounds that his time would have been better spent in her service. For George, young or old, since he supported her for much of his life, Mary Washington emerges not as an idealized figure of Mom, but as a vindictive dependency, a quality to be avoided, especially in a mate. On the other hand, Mary must have known her boy pretty well, or at least an early version of him. One reason she was so vociferous about his duties to her was likely an early recognition that he had no such intentions. What evidence there is indicates young George's eyes and ambitions were already locked on to something far above and beyond her and Ferry Farm. And this was not just an adolescent fantasy. It was a real possibility. There had been a stunning turn for the better in the fortunes of the Washington clan, and in particular Lawrence's. When Britain and imperial rival Spain were drawn into conflict, today graphically remembered as the War of Jenkins' Ear, Lawrence had secured one of eighty-eight blank king's commissions and participated in the notoriously futile and disease-ridden siege of Cartagena, where malaria and yellow fever killed ten thousand of the fourteen thousand British. By the time the fiasco was called off in 1742, Lawrence had distinguished himself in a skirmish and had had the good fortune to command marines kept in ships offshore, largely away from contagion. He returned to Virginia more or less a war hero; he would name Mount Vernon, which he owned before George, after his admiral, maybe to celebrate his good luck. And it only got better. For single Lawrence promptly struck the matrimonial jackpot.  In July 1743, three months after Augustine's death and just seven months after returning to Virginia, Lawrence married Anne Fairfax, daughter of Colonel William Fairfax, American agent for the vast Virginia land-grant acreage of Thomas Fairfax, the sixth Baron Fairfax of Cameron. It amounted to a whole lot of Fairfax. Lawrence had wed his way into one of approximately two hundred families who made up the titled nobility who largely controlled Britain and its empire, and in this case several million acres of Virginia. Exactly why the Fairfaxes so rapidly embraced Lawrence, given his relatively modest pedigree, has never really been explained, but the marriage seems to have worked well enough, and it certainly launched him into the absolute upper reaches of the Old Dominion's power structure. Meanwhile, he never forgot George. He became, more or less, George's surrogate father; more, in that he generously opened the Fairfax path to potential power and influence, and less, in that he never sent his promising half brother to school in England as he had been sent, or even to William and Mary for college locally. Instead, the plan for George was a solid, though somewhat intermittent, preliminary education, emphasizing useful skills with numbers, basic literacy, and, it appears, character development. Excerpted from Revolutionary: George Washington at War by Robert L. O'Connell All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.