Debussy A painter in sound

Stephen Walsh, 1942-

Book - 2018

Claude Debussy was that rare creature, a composer who reinvented the language of music without alienating the majority of music lovers. He is the modernist everyone loves. How did he manage this? Was it through the association of his music with visual images, or was it simply that, by throwing out the rule book of the Paris Conservatoire where he studied, his music put beauty of sound above the spiritual ambitions of the German tradition from which those rules derived. Stephen Walsh's thought-provoking biography, told partly through the events of Debussy's life, and partly through a critical discussion of his music, addresses these and other questions about one of the most influential composers of the early twentieth century.

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

780.92/Debussy
1 / 1 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor 780.92/Debussy Checked In
Subjects
Published
New York : Alfred A. Knopf 2018.
Language
English
Main Author
Stephen Walsh, 1942- (author)
Edition
First United States edition
Item Description
"This is a Borzoi book published by Alfred A. Knopf"--Title page verso.
Physical Description
ix, 323 pages, 8 unnumbered pages of plates : illustrations, portraits ; 25 cm
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references (pages 309-311) and index.
ISBN
9781524731922
  • Author's Note
  • Prelude A Biography of Sorts
  • 1. The Prisoner and the Prodigy
  • 2. Songs for Marie
  • 3. Up at the Villa
  • 4. New Rules, Old Morals
  • 5. Mallarmé and Maeterlinck
  • 6. Bilitis and Other Women
  • 7. Lilly Versus the Piano
  • 8. Taking to the Water
  • 9. Images in Name as Well as Fact
  • 10. A Crumbling House and a Sunken Cathedral
  • 11. Theatres of the Body and the Mind
  • 12. War in Black and White
  • 13. Indian Summer, Stygian Winter
  • 14. What the Modern Made of Him
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Select Bibliography
  • Index
Review by Choice Review

One hundred years after Claude Debussy's death, Walsh (emer., Cardiff Univ., UK) presents a fresh look at the life and music of the early French modernist composer, whose music challenged the compositional norms of his time. Debussy: A Painter in Sound offers much more than what one might expect of a typical biography of this timeless composer. Walsh juxtaposes the complicated, often tortuous private life of Debussy with his grand importance in French culture and society, interspersing throughout analyses of musical works. The author offers valuable new perspectives on the composer's life, and at the same time provides historical context for Debussy's works and their harmonic language, artistic ethos, and creative interplay of music and poetry. Photographs of Debussy and his contemporaries provide a fascinating visual glimpse into his life. Students, performers, scholars, and music aficionados will welcome this new resource on Debussy. Summing Up: Essential. Lower-division undergraduates through faculty and professionals; general readers. --Jacqueline Jean Leary-Warsaw, The Catholic University of America

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by New York Times Review

In 1890, the 28-year-old Claude Debussy felt forced to write the archetypal starving-artist letter to a friend. "Forgive me, but could you lend me 20 francs until the end of the month." he pleaded. "I'm very ashamed at writing to you, but I'm desperately hungry," Yhgis was teh same Debussy who within the next dozen years would produce some of the most radically original, influential and popular of all European art music. Hungry he may well have been (according to another friend, the composer could afford neither to eat nor to clothe himself), but "desperate" is a word almost impossible to associate with this most fastidious and discriminating of composers. Perhaps, as Stephen Walsh muses in his new biographical study, "Debussy: A Painter in Sound," he was merely resorting to his skills as "an adept borrower." Money and the practical necessities of life would remain a lifelong torment for him, an artist forever locked into his own internal world of sounds and images. His was a creative voice so subtle and so thankfully free of histrionics and emotional excess that he is for us by now the quintessential French composer. Yet in gauging the seismic shifts in the evolution of Western classical music, convention tends to consign him to the much too confining role of "Impressionist." His achievement, especially when one considers the mediocrity into which French music had declined in the years before his birth, was sui generis miraculous. And it is all the more impressive for having been wrought in an era when the imposing figure of Richard Wagner cast an almost suffocating spell not only upon music, but on almost all aspects of European culture. Born in 1862, Debussy came of age around the time of the 1882 premiere of "Parsifal." A superb pianist - "He had a soft, deep touch which evoked full, rich, many-shaded sonorities," according to one friend - Debussy played all the major Wagner operas at the keyboard, and in his 20 s he made a modest income accompanying lectures about "The Ring" for amateur listeners. Eventually he grew to become the anti-Wagner. Where the German master's expressive world is that of titanic wills in collision and of greed, redemption and the agon of scorching human passions, the Frenchman's voice is that of the natural world, of water and wind, of light and shadow, and of the most subtle gradations of sonority and color. "Debussy's music never bullies," Walsh says. Whereas Wagner's default position is loud - not just acoustically loud, but emotionally and psychologically loud - Debussy's is soft. Perhaps because of this natural intimacy of voice and its aversion to theatricality and exhibitionism (think Richard Strauss's "Elektra" or Gustav Mahler's "Symphony of a Thousand"), Debussy's importance is easy to overlook. This book reminds us just how astonishing the radicalism of this composer's creations really is. Walsh, whose two-volume biography of Stravinsky brought both human scale and deep musical understanding to that composer's long and complex life, treats Debussy both as a creature of his own time and as a harbinger of 20th-century modernism. His France was the France of la Belle Époque; of the Eiffel Tower, the Folies Bergere and the Dreyfus Affair; of Impressionist painting, Mallarmé's poetry and the novels of Proust. His life story is bracketed on the one end by the Franco-Prussian War of 1870 and on the other by the Great War. He died, yet again under financial duress, in 1918 just months before the Armistice after suffering years of an excruciating rectal cancer. He was a notoriously stubborn man, a perfectionist indifferent to deadlines. "I write solely for myself, and other people's impatience doesn't concern me," Debussy responded when queried about delivering on time. As a youth he was unwilling to yield to the rigid orthodoxies of French musical education. His teachers scolded him for his willful bucking of the rules while still acknowledging his keen ear and his exceptional sensitivity to sound and musical gesture. A classmate described him seated at the piano when class was over "producing monstrous successions of weird, barbarous chords - that is to say, chords that were not classified in the official treatises of the Conservatoire." These provocations turned out to be much more than mere student hubris. Rather, they were the genesis of his greatest contribution to classical music: the liberation of harmony from the straitjacket of tonic-dominant attraction. Conventional tonal music, whether it's a Bach fugue or a Beatles song, is bound together by the magnetic attraction of chords, which, reduced to their essence, function as question-and-answer, the "grammar" of music, as it were. If we think of the first two phrases of the song "Happy Birthday," we experience the first as the "question," and the second as the "answer." Almost every familiar musical motto obeys that polarity. What Debussy did was to pull apart the epoxy-strength attachment those chords share and allow them to float, not entirely free from each other, but in a more polyvalent, even ambiguous relation to each other. The result, especially when combined with his use of whole-tone scales, produced a music that felt exceptionally free of the angst and highly charged emotionalism of most of the Romantic repertoire. No surprise, then, that so many of his signature pieces embody or evoke nature, and that, as with many of the Impressionist paintings by his contemporaries, there are often no humans in the frame. A Debussy title is more often than not an image of a natural event: a warm sirocco moving across a plain; a seascape at dawn or at noon; dead leaves rustling in the breeze; early morning mists; moonlight reflecting off the surface of an old ruin. Walsh's subtitle, "A Painter in Sound," amplifies those features that Debussy's aesthetic shared with seminal 19thcentury painters, not only his French countrymen, but also the American James McNeill Whistler and the Englishman J. M. W. Türner, who may have had the most in common with his painterly approach to composing. "Lit from behind," Debussy's description of what struck him about the scoring of "Parsifal," is an apt way to understand his delicately luminous treatment of the orchestra in works like "La Mer," "Prelude a lapres-midi dun faune," "Trois Nocturnes" and especially his enigmatic late ballet "Jeux," a work written in 1913 that languished in obscurity until it was championed a half-century later by Pierre Boulez, who found in it an entirely new invention of "irreversible" musical form. The young Debussy's penchant for unorthodox harmonies was given an unexpected shock stimulant when he encountered a Javanese gamelan at the Paris Exposition Universelle of 1889. He described his delight with this strange and wonderful music as containing "every nuance, even those one can no longer name, in which tonic and dominant were no longer anything but empty ghosts for use on naughty little children." He responded to these exotic sounds in evocative piano pieces like "Pagodes," which imitate the sonorous and stately movement of that music from a faraway culture he could only imagine in his mind's eye. Debussy revitalized and radicalized almost every musical form he wrote in. He composed songs to texts by Baudelaire, Verlaine, Mallarmé and other French poets throughout his life. His one full-length opera, the epochal "Pelléas et Mélisande," that moody chiaroscuro drama of spiritual impotence, made him, at the age of 40, suddenly famous. His catalog of orchestra works is small but canonic. "La Mer" and "Faune" in particular enjoy a popularity that has never diminished. But the true revelation of his imaginative range rests with his piano music. Here, in piece after piece, most no longer than a few minutes, his pictorial and sensorial powers were truly liberated. "It seems that in contact with the piano Debussy could write freely, exploring the implications of his unique idThis iom in a completely uninhibited way," Walsh writes. Two books of "Preludes," each with a cryptic title affixed to the final bar, range from slow, graceful dances to sultry nocturnal serenades to images of footsteps in snow, gardens in the rain, and to the evocation of a mythic underwater cathedral. These alternate with witty, puckish character sketches and the occasional virtuoso breakout piece that explodes like dazzling fireworks in the night sky. It is said of Debussy that he "orchestrated with the pedal down." In other words, he made the orchestra resonate with the same sense of depth and glow that one obtains by playing with the sustain pedal engaged, allowing the tones to decay naturally rather than arbitrarily cutting them off. Hence his sound world echoes and shimmers and vibrates, expanding outward like the rippling waves of a pool when a pebble has been dropped into it, an image that he sought to depict in another piano piece, "Reflets dans l'eau." It is not easy to write meaningfully about music without resorting to technical terminology, and the list of those authors who can find accessible language to convey its subtleties to the nonspecialist is depressingly short. Walsh is a deep reader of Debussy's music with an uncommon ability to translate complex details into words that are precise yet evocative and that are refreshingly free of academic jargon. His discussion of "Pelléas" is exemplary in this sense, focusing on the composer's treatment of text, particularly in his determination to make the vocal lines reflect the contours of everyday speech. How this adoption of extreme simplicity of utterance contrasts with Germanic vocal writing Walsh underscores by wryly quipping, "Only the clinically insane talk in the jagged lines of Parsifal and Kundry ... or of the patently disturbed heroines of Strauss's 'Salome' or Schoenberg's 'Erwartung.'" The women in Debussy's life suffered from his difficult, at times depressive personality. While acknowledging the composer's "unsatisfactory treatment" of them, Walsh is hard put to find reasons any of them are quite deserving of the great composer's (or our) respect, often referring to them in cringeworthy descriptions. One soprano with whom the composer was involved Walsh refers to as "a bird of the air in need of a perch." Gaby Dupont, Debussy's first serious love, had been "a not particularly stylish cocotte." Lilly Texier, Debussy's first wife, is "sexy but intellectually limited," while Maud Allan, the Canadian dancer who commissioned "Khamma," his "dance legend," "was a new kind of fish in Debussy's aquarium": "He had never written music" for a woman "of doubtful reputation." And his second wife, Emma Bardac, who endured unimaginable stress during their years of marriage, was, when they first met, in Walsh's words, "an attractive, well-kept 40-yearold" who "had no qualms about making herself available... to one of France's leading composers." Even worse, he analyzes the composer's behavior by applying the old-school "genius card" myth, to wit, that behind this bad treatment "lay the instinctive feeling - which ordinary men usually manage to suppress - that emotional ties are a nuisance unless kept firmly in the drawer marked 'when I need them.' " Walsh's study is focused on the music, less so on the historical and cultural setting. As an exposition of this unique and original music it does great service to the composer. Nonetheless, a casual classical music fan may find it daunting, as most of it is devoted to analyses of a lifetime of compositions. Reading the discussions of the various works without having the printed music and a recording at hand will limit understanding of the brilliance of Walsh's insights. Nor is this, quite frankly, as entertaining a read as the author's Stravinsky biography. But then, Stravinsky, the ultimate cosmopolitan bon vivant, lived a life outwardly far more exciting and colorful, becoming a virtual superstar celebrity in his old age. Debussy, a nearrecluse who had only a small circle of friends, hated to travel, preferring the solitude of his piano and, as he said only half in jest to a friend, his small "75-centimeter table for writing things that have without fail to revolutionize the world." book reminds us just how astonishing the radicalism of this composer's creations really is. JOHN ADAMS'S newest work, "Must the Devil Have All the Good Tunes?," will receive its world premiere performed by the pianist Yuja Wang with the Los Angeles Philharmonic under Gustavo Dudáméi in March 2019.

Copyright (c) The New York Times Company [November 25, 2018]
Review by Booklist Review

*Starred Review* In Fryderyk Chopin (2018), Alan Walker gave us a life and times. In Schumann (2018), Judith Chernaik presented a life and works. In the equally outstanding Debussy, Walsh offers yet another kind of book about a composer, a work-life with just enough extramusical detail to claim being a biography. More than most other composers a singularly nose-to-the-grindstone professional fellowship Debussy lived music. He did not come from a musical or well-to-do family, studied at the Conservatoire de Paris by dint of virtuosity on the piano, wasn't otherwise well educated, and lived with his parents until he was pushing 30. Very early, however, he transformed a disinclination to discipline into determination to re-create composition, which led him to dump concert pianism and concentrate on writing music. To realize his musical radicalism, Debussy became a perfectionist, spending as much time as he needed to meet his own standards. Fortunately, from early on, his music was popular with concertgoers if not with the musical establishment, enabling him to maintain, often precariously, the comfortable, cultured lifestyle he desired. Walsh discusses nearly every one of Debussy's compositions and points out their innovations and their narratives, so to speak and speak pertinently, for Debussy was as concerned with literature as any great musician ever has been.--Ray Olson Copyright 2018 Booklist

From Booklist, Copyright (c) American Library Association. Used with permission.
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review

Walsh (Stravinsky) uses the musical compositions of French composer Achille-Claude Debussy (1862-1918) as a framework to tell the story of his short life in this richly descriptive biography. Debussy was often referred to as an impressionist composer, as he was influenced by the works of impressionist artists Claude Monet and StAcphane MallarmAc, and Walsh gives a thorough history of Debussy's artistic growth. Working against a rigid, conservative musical tradition, Debussy nevertheless created a radical body of work where visual expression or "painting in sound" was paramount. Walsh writes accessibly about his music: "''Le SoirAce dans Greande' is a street scene; atmosphere with passersby. The C sharp ostinato at the start hangs expectantly in the air and soon a distant voice intones one of those laments." In the chapter "Songs for Marie," Walsh describes the affair Debussy had with Marie-Rosalie Texier, who would later become his wife and for whom he wrote several songs in which "one can hear her voice almost as if she were in the room singing them." Throughout, Walsh wonderfully underscores Debussy's importance as a composer. (Oct.) © Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved.


Review by Library Journal Review

Most classical music aficionados would agree that Claude Debussy (1862-1918) is one of the world's greatest composers. Walsh (emeritus professor of music, Cardiff Univ.) likens Debussy to a "painter," though, curiously, he makes more references here to literature than painting. A central theme of this work is Debussy's rebellion against established musical forms, specifically, those of the Paris Conservatoire, which he attended. With detailed descriptions of Debussy's compositions, the author leads us through the evolution of his music to impressionism (a term Debussy rejected) and beyond. His recounting of the musician's personal life reveals a touchy individual who made frequent use of friends, especially women, without much regard for their well-being in his quest to perfect his work. Walsh's language is frequently quite technical; one would almost have to know what he's writing about to understand him properly. Unlike other biographies this year (e.g., of Chopin, Schumann, and Beethoven), this work, despite its detailed text and numerous references, provides no musical examples. -VERDICT Though the book shines a welcome light on the composer, his music, and his times, it is best suited for specialists and classically trained pianists. [See Prepub Alert, 4/9/18.]-Edward B. Cone, New York © Copyright 2018. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.

(c) Copyright Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
Review by Kirkus Book Review

A musicologist offers a sensuous portrait of an iconic composer.Drawing on many fine studies of Claude Debussy (1862-1918) Walsh (Emeritus, Music/Cardiff Univ.; Musorgsky and His Circle, 2013, etc.) focuses on the composer's musicdaring and often misunderstoodto create a perceptive and authoritative new biography. A precociously gifted pianist, Debussy had achieved near-adult virtuosity by the age of 10, though he lacked "practical, or even moral, discipline," rebelling against the narrow teachings at the Paris Conservatoire and the "rabid vocationalism of the average music student." By the time he was 17, he decided to abandon the goal of becoming a concert pianist and, instead, become a composer. In 1885, he pursued that goal in Rome, where, again, he bristled against the "hated specifications and stereotyped criteria" at the Academy. His assessors deemed his compositions strange: He was preoccupied, they believed, with "the bizarre, the incomprehensible, the unperformable," and warned him to "be on guard against that vague impressionism which is one of the most dangerous enemies of truth in works of art." Undaunted, over the next few years, he honed a unique style, "subtle and resonant," inspired by "the astoundingly rich and suggestive imagery" of poems of Verlaine and Baudelaire. Walsh sees 1890 as a breakthrough year for Debussy, in which he met the Symbolist poet Stphane Mallarm, who invited him to write incidental music for a stage performance. Mallarm, writes the author, "opened doorsthat would broaden his literary and artistic horizons." Soon, he mastered orchestral music. Walsh praises Nuages for its "refined juxtapositions of colours, melodic, harmonic and instrumental" and Ftes, for its "deftness and athleticism." The ambitious Le Mer, Walsh writes, most clearly reflects Debussy's "inflexibly meticulous, hyper-perfectionist approach to composition." Perennially in debt and embroiled in domestic problems, Debussy felt, he explained, an "invincible need to escape into myself," unable to abide "strict observance of traditions, laws, and other obstacles." He was dedicated to creating, and redefining, beauty, and as Walsh amply demonstrates, he brilliantly succeeded.A richly detailed life of a modernist master. Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Prelude He rejects all heritages and is repelled by those construction kits that so often turn the composer into a make-believe architect; for him, form is never given; he was constantly in search of the unanalysable, of a development in the course of which surprise and imagination retained their rights; he had nothing but mistrust for architectural monuments, preferring structures in which rigour and free will intermingle: with him words, keys, all the paraphernalia of scholarship, lose their sense and relevance; the usual categories of an outworn tradition are inapplicable to his work, even if we extend their meaning. -Pierre Boulez Pierre Boulez's image of Debussy as a composer in constant rebellion against musical tradition has to be understood in the light of his own rejection of the past. But it's by no means a distorted picture. The one thing it lacks, perhaps inevitably, is any clear sense of what Debussy took from the musical environment in which he grew up: what he accepted as well as what he rejected. I spent the first dozen years of my money-earning life as a freelance music critic, an activity that positively forbids specialisation but forces you to confront and find words to describe whatever the repertoire and your editor is pleased to throw your way. There was already a great deal of Debussy about in those days, the 1960s and 1970s; but there was plenty of other French music as well, the music of the world into which Debussy was born and against which, in his student years especially, he fought. Of course there was Pelléas et Mélisande , but you could also catch a production at the St Pancras Festival without the extended interludes (the form in which it was composed, but never played in Debussy's lifetime). There were operas by Gounod (not only Faust ) and Bizet (not only Carmen and Les Pêcheurs de perles ); there was Massenet (not just Werther and Manon ) and Chabrier ( Le Roi malgré lui, L'Étoile ), and Lalo ( Le Roi d'Ys ), and Dukas ( Ariane et Barbe-bleue ), Chausson, Fauré (especially his chamber music and songs), wall-to-wall Berlioz after his centenary in 1969, but also Alkan and Franck, Saint-Saëns, even d'Indy, and plenty of the earlier French music - Rameau, François Couperin, Destouches - that Debussy complained was neglected in the Paris of his youth. It was easy even then to identify all these composers as in one way or another French (with due allowance for the Belgian Franck), much harder to put one's finger on what it was that they had in common. In the introduction to his book on French music, Martin Cooper had provided a lucid explanation of the differences between the French and, for example, German views of art. After quoting a remark of the critic W. J. Turner that 'it is the sublimity of the soul that makes the music of Beethoven and Bach so immeasurably greater than that of Wagner and Debussy', he pointed out that 'to seek in French music primarily for a revelation of the composer's soul or for marks of the sublime is to look for something which the French consider a by-product . . . The French composer is consciously concerned with the two data which no one can question - his intelligence and his senses.' And Cooper added, 'The regarding of a piece of music as an artefact - a thing of planned shape, dimensions, colour and consistency - rather than as an expression of an emotion whose end is in itself, brings the French composer nearer than any other to the plastic artist.' This strikes me as a perfect description of the attitude of Debussy to his work, and indeed of the work itself. But it doesn't exactly fit the other composers listed above. Or rather it fits them only in part, and it is precisely this hybrid character of so much nineteenth-century French music - its partial fulfilment of the aspirations that, in Cooper's analysis, would make it truly French - that explains the context against which Debussy, first as a student, then as a composer and music critic, found himself rebelling. The problem, in two words, was German music. From Gluck to Wagner, the German influence on French composers had been irresistible and, in Debussy's view, profoundly damaging. 'The influence of Gluck on French music,' he wrote in Gil Blas after a performance of Rameau's Castor et Pollux , 'is well known, an influence that could only have manifested itself thanks to the intervention of the Dauphine Marie-Antoinette (an Austrian)'. Rameau's music, he goes on, is compounded of a delicate and charming tenderness, precise accentuation, strict declamation in recitative, without that German affectation of profundity or the need to double underline everything or explain everything with a breathless 'you're a collection of particular idiots who understand nothing unless forced to have the wool pulled over your eyes'. Gluck had famously pontificated about the nature of opera, and aspired to turn what, in Lully and Rameau, had been an essentially artificial, hybrid spectacle into an integrated, high-minded moral allegory of life and death. And Gluck had been one of the favourite composers of Berlioz, whom Debussy, in turn, called 'the favourite musician of those who knew little about music'. In an early letter he called him 'a prodigious fraud who came to believe in his own hoaxes', and he later accused him of 'aiming madly at effects, which is what makes a lot of his music so intolerable'. Berlioz, he remarked in Gil Blas, is 'so in love with romantic colour that he sometimes forgets the music'. So it turns out that, from the start, French music of the nineteenth century had been deflected from its true path by the influence of German grandiloquence and the Germanic soul. Berlioz had in fact been a cul-de-sac, at least as far as French music was concerned. But something far worse had befallen French music, and that was Wagner. In some ways, the extent of Wagner's influence on French music is curious, not least because it reached its height in the decades after the disaster of the Franco-Prussian War, when one might have expected there to be a serious reaction in France against anything remotely Germanic. It was almost as if there was some conscious self-abasement before the master race. The Wagnerian origins of French Symbolist literature had preceded the war in the person of Baudelaire, and were in any case highly selective, a matter of philosophy and aesthetic atmosphere, and without specific technical consequences. But for composers it was something altogether wider-ranging and, in Debussy's view, correspondingly damaging. French musicians flocked to Bayreuth for the first festival in 1876 and the several festivals of the 1880s. In Paris the short-lived Revue wagnérienne started up in 1885, with predominantly literary contributors; but the influence of Wagner was everywhere apparent in French music in the 1880s, especially, though not exclusively, in opera, which in France had always been the touchstone of musical excellence. Composers struggled to absorb Wagner's technical prescriptions without being able to match his control of scale and continuity or his orchestral brilliance. Devices such as the leitmotif, the long-breathed chromatic harmony, the heavy mythical, quasi-symbolic subject matter, were adopted like costumes out of a dressing-up cupboard, without ever working their way into the essence of the musical or dramatic thinking. For the young Debussy, as a student at the Paris Conservatoire in the late 1870s and early 1880s, there was another crucial aspect of musical life that had effectively been appropriated by the German way of thinking. The teaching of harmony and counterpoint ( solfège ) and of form was deeply rooted, as it still is, in the music of Bach and the classical Viennese masters. True, the elements of counterpoint were derived from Palestrina, but the author of the system - the Gradus ad Parnassum - was an eighteenth-century Austrian, Johann Joseph Fux. To add insult to injury, the teaching of piano, from the ground up, was dominated by the method of yet another Viennese (admittedly of Czech parentage), the Beethoven pupil Carl Czerny. All this pedagogy was imbued with concepts of system and logic that Debussy made up his mind were alien to French ways of thinking and feeling, though it's fairly clear that what he actually objected to was the connection between the theoretical apparatus and the great monuments of German music, culminating in the overpowering music dramas of Wagner himself. After all, logic as such was just as much a French (Cartesian) purview as it was German (Kantian-Hegelian). The difference was largely one of atmosphere and, if truth be told, amour propre . Debussy's changing attitude to Wagner is bound to be a recurrent topic of a musical biography such as this. Almost alone among French composers, he managed both to love Wagner's music and to escape the more pernicious aspects of its influence, while pinching from it all sorts of isolated musical images - chords, fragmentary progressions, what one might call musical situations - and recycling them in a way that expressed his personal idea of sensual beauty. Partly for the same kinds of reason, he tended as a young man to avoid the company and conversation of fellow musicians, and to prefer that of poets, writers, cabaret artists and, to some extent, painters. He was one of the few musicians at Mallarmé's Tuesdays. There was a brief, intense friendship with the composer Ernest Chausson, himself a somewhat detached figure musically, but an artistic connoisseur with a house full of beautiful pictures and strong artistic connections through his painter brother-in-law Henry Lerolle. Chausson had been a keen Wagnerite and an early visitor to Munich and Bayreuth for Wagner performances. But Debussy's greatest Wagnerian friends were not musicians but writers, notably Pierre Louÿs and the Swiss journalist Robert Godet, one of the founding committee members of the Revue wagnérienne . In rejecting Wagner, Debussy was thinking a kind of music that prioritised what he saw as the virtues of French art, 'its clarity of expression, its precision and compactness of form, the particular and specific qualities of French genius'. In fact he achieved a great deal more than that. He might after all simply have followed Nietzsche's (insincere) injunction to 'méditerraniser la musique' in the spirit of Bizet's Carmen , a masterpiece that breathes freshness and vitality but hardly reinvents the language. Instead he not only discarded the heavy northern gloom of The Ring and Tristan , he threw out most of the grammatical infrastructure that had supported Wagner's immense narrative frameworks. Suddenly there is a concentration, a focus on particular ideas and images that is, as Cooper implies, somewhat painterly. This is not a question of taking sides in the whole tormented issue of whether Debussy can or cannot be called an Impressionist. It has more to do with the way in which any painter handles the motif within the limits of the picture frame. In much of his music, Debussy seems to work like this with motifs and frames, rather than with the evolving, novelistic discourse, not only of Wagnerian opera, but of the whole symphonic tradition of nineteenth-century music. He was perhaps vaguely aware that, working in this way, he was proposing a significant change in the language that would have consequences in the work of other composers. Or maybe he was simply joking when he told Louis Laloy, 'I've at last got a 75-centimetre table for writing things that have without fail to revolutionise the world.'8 He was in a hotel by the sea near Dieppe in August 1906, trying to work on the second book of Images , pieces such as Cloches à travers les feuilles and Et la lune descend sur le temple qui fut , which really do, in their quiet way, turn the language of music upside down. What follows is a biography of sorts, but it is a biography with the difference that it sets out to treat Debussy's music as the crucial expression of his intellectual life, rather than, as one finds in many Lives of Composers, a slightly annoying series of incidents that hold up the story without adding much of narrative interest. This approach inevitably involves a certain amount of musical talk, though I hope nothing impenetrable to a willing non-specialist. The existing literature on Debussy is rich and extensive; there are straight biographies and there are studies of the music, either in whole or in part. Much of it is on a high level of excellence, and there is work of real brilliance. Obviously I have depended to a considerable extent on much of it, always I hope adequately acknowledged. But I am not aware of any book that adopts a strategy quite like mine.  Working on Debussy, his life and his music, has been the greatest pleasure imaginable. Few composers ever had so precise an image of the music they wanted to write, and even fewer have been so ruthlessly meticulous in the search for the exact expression of that image. Nineteenth-century composers (to say nothing of their predecessors) had worked with a set of routine procedures that would theoretically have enabled them to produce music by the yard with barely a thought, though needless to say that isn't a fair description of what they actually did. It is, nevertheless, more or less what conservatory students were taught to do, and it is what Debussy rebelled against. In the end he was having to formulate every detail of his music as he went along, judging sequence and continuity, structural design and balance, more or less afresh for each piece. In the twentieth century this way of working became more and more the norm. But Debussy did it first, and nobody since has done it so skilfully or with such beautiful results. Excerpted from Debussy: A Painter in Sound by Stephen Walsh All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.