Fellow creatures Our obligations to the other animals

Christine M. Korsgaard

Book - 2018

Christine M. Korsgaard presents a compelling new view of our moral relationships to the other animals. She offers challenging answers to such questions as: Are people superior to animals, and does it matter morally if we are? Is it all right for us to eat animals, experiment on them, make them work for us, and keep them as pets?

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

179.3/Korsgaard
1 / 1 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor 179.3/Korsgaard Checked In
Subjects
Published
Oxford : Oxford University Press 2018.
Language
English
Main Author
Christine M. Korsgaard (author)
Edition
First edition
Physical Description
xiii, 252 pages ; 24 cm
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references (pages 239-245) and index.
ISBN
9780198753858
  • Preface
  • Part I. Human Beings and the Other Animals
  • 1. Are People More Important than the Other Animals?
  • 1.1. Introduction
  • 1.2. Reasons to Treat People and Animals Differently
  • 1.3. Tethered Values
  • 1.4. Why Tethered Values and Superior Importance Are (Almost) Incompatible
  • 2. Animal Selves and the Good
  • 2.1. The Origin of the Good
  • 2.2. Objections
  • 2.3. Self-Consciousness and the Self
  • 2.4. Active and Passive Self-Constitution
  • 3. What's Different about Being Human?
  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. Rational and Instinctive Minds
  • 3.3. Evaluating Reasons and Evaluating the Self
  • 3.4. Species Being
  • 3.5. Ethics and Science
  • 4. The Case against Human Superiority
  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Does Morality Make Humans Superior to the Other Animals?
  • 4.3. The Implications of Cognitive Sophistication
  • 4.4. Are Humans Better Off than the Odier Animals?
  • 4.5. Conclusion
  • Part II. Immanuel Kant and the Animals
  • 5. Kant, Marginal Cases, and Moral Standing
  • 5.1. Human Beings as Ends in Themselves
  • 5.2. Against the Argument from Marginal Cases
  • 5.3. Atemporal Creatures
  • 5.4. What Is Moral Standing Anyway?
  • 6. Kant against the Animals, Part 1: The Indirect Duty View
  • 6.1. Animals as Mere Means
  • 6.2. How Kant Thinks We Ought to Treat Animals
  • 6.3. An Incoherent Attitude
  • 6.4. The Problem of the Moral Filter
  • 6.5. Desert and the Worthiness to Be Happy
  • 6.6. Treated Like Animals
  • 7. Kant against the Animals, Part 2: Reciprocity and the Grounds of Obligation
  • 7.1. Introduction
  • 7.2. Reciprocity Arguments
  • 7.3. Kant's Account of Moral Choice
  • 7.4. Kant on Reciprocal Legislation
  • 7.5. The Universalization Test and the Treatment of Animals
  • 8. A Kantian Case for Our Obligations to the Other Animals
  • 8.1. Introduction
  • 8.2. Kant's Copernican Revolution
  • 8.3. The Concept of an End in Itself
  • 8.4. Valuing Ourselves as Ends in Ourselves
  • 8.5. Valuing Animals as Ends in Themselves
  • 8.6. Morality as Our Way of Being Animals
  • 8.7. Different Moral Relations to People and Animals
  • 8.8. Trouble in the Kingdom of Ends
  • 9. The Role of Pleasure and Pain
  • 9.1. Rapprochement with Utilitarianism?
  • 9.2. Aggregation and Its Implications
  • 9.3. The Nature of Pleasure and Pain
  • 9.4. The Place of Pleasure and Pain in the Final Good
  • 9.5. Matters of Life and Death
  • 9.6. Kantian Naturalism
  • Part III. Consequences
  • 10. The Animal Antinomy, Part 1: Creation Ethics
  • 10.1. Eliminating Predation
  • 10.2. Abolitionism
  • 10.3. The Animal Antinomy
  • 10.4. Creation Ethics
  • 10.5. Individuals, Groups, and Species
  • 11. Species, Communities, and Habitat Loss
  • 11.1. The Value of Species
  • 11.2. The Good of a Species and the Good of Its Members
  • 11.3. What Is a Species?
  • 11.4. Does a Species Have a Good?
  • 11.5. Species as Generic Organisms
  • 11.6. How to Care about Species
  • 11.7. Eliminating Predation Again
  • 11.8. Restoring Habitat
  • 11.9. Should Humans Go Extinct?
  • 12. The Animal Antinomy, Part 2: Abolition and Apartheid
  • 12.1. Reorganizing Nature
  • 12.2. How to Treat Animals as Ends in Themselves
  • 12.3. Eating Animals
  • 12.4. Working Animals and Animals in the Military
  • 12.5. The Use of Animals in Scientific Experiments
  • 12.6. Companion Animals
  • Bibliography
  • Index
Review by Choice Review

This book offers an important defense of the claim that nonhuman animals are ends in themselves and so have moral standing--in other words, that people have moral obligations toward them. Korsgaard grounds this claim in the fact that animals, like people, have a good of their own. Their lives can go well or poorly, they can flourish or fail to do so. But she also distinguishes between two ways in which a thing can be an end in itself, such that humans' obligations to other humans and those toward animals are not symmetrical. In part 2, she suggests that Kant misunderstood how his own moral theory applied to animals. In part 3, she looks at the practical implications of her views for issues in environmental ethics and animal ethics, such as eating and hunting animals and using them as work and service animals. Korsgaard offers compelling arguments for these views. She is one of the preeminent contemporary scholars of Kantian moral theory, so this is a significant book that will need to be referenced by anyone working on these issues. It is a must have for any college or university library. Summing Up: Essential. Advanced undergraduates through faculty and professionals. --Mark A. Michael, Austin Peay State University

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.