Richard III England's most controversial king

Skidmore was educated in history at Oxford and is known for his books on Tudor history. He is a member of Parliament and vice-chairman of the Conservative Party. Skidmore has produced a competent chronological account of the life of one of England's most enigmatic and controversial kings, Richard III (reigned 1483-85), who died in battle at the age of 32. Many illuminating details from contemporary sources add color to the narrative. While serving up an abundance of detail, the reader is left to sort out conclusions. The "controversial" element of the subtitle remains undetermined. There is no speculation about why Richard took his late brother's throne in 1483 when his brother left two sons. The great mystery of the disappearance of the "Princes in the Tower" remains, not unexpectedly, unresolved. Some readers will question the heavy reliance on the 16th-century accounts of Thomas More and Polydore Vergil. No firm judgment on Richard's reign is offered. The text is supported by maps, genealogical charts, illustrations, a very limited bibliography, and endnotes. Summing Up: Optional. All readership levels. --Albert Compton Reeves, emeritus, Ohio University

Skidmore (Bosworth: The Birth of the Tudors) successfully creates a balanced biography of the famously complicated last king of the Yorkist line. This well-researched chronological narrative searches for something close to the objective truth, navigating between the subsequent Tudor dynasty's once widely accepted disparagement of Richard as a deceitful, murderous man, and the smaller but fervently devoted Richard III Society's defense of him as pious and kind. Richard's sense of loyalty receives full attention; first to his brother and predecessor, Edward IV, and then to his supporters in the north of England. Notably, the recent finding and exhumation of Richard's body allows Skidmore to buttress his argument that, contrary to Shakespeare's version, the king spent his final hours fighting bravely, without hope of victory, against the forces of the man who took the throne from him, the future Henry VII. However, unlike some full-fledged Richard III apologists, Skidmore does not discount the possibility that Richard, during his reign, murdered his young nephews, Edward V and Prince Richard. While the label of "most controversial king" remains arguable, this carefully researched biography effectively captures Richard's turbulent reign and intense personality up to the violent end. (Apr.) © Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved.

A new biography of the alternately reviled and beloved king and his times.Skidmore (The Rise of the Tudors: The Family that Changed English History, 2014, etc.) draws from excellent resources, including the contemporary Croyland Chronicle, a firsthand account of Italian traveler Dominic Mancini, and The Great Chronicle of London, which was written around 1513 and "provides us with near-contemporary evidence of the reign from a London perspective." In what was a continuation of the War of the Roses, Richard's brother Edward defeated King Henry VI's forces and took the crown. Edward IV's reign could have been successful but for his favoritism toward Queen Consort Elizabeth Woodville's considerable relatives. Her family garnered titles and lands while she exalted herself as queen, demanding obeisance. Edward's partiality drove Warwick, the kingmaker, and his brother, Clarence, to rebel 10 years into his reign. Edward fled to Burgundy with Richard, gathered an army, and returned to defeat them at Tewkesbury. Warwick died in battle and Clarence famously died in the Tower of London. Edward rewarded Richard handsomely for his loyalty with lands and a palatinate in northern England and all he could conquer in Scotland. This was to become his power base, his strength, and, in the end, his downfall. With Edward's death, Richard seized his son, Edward V, and named himself protector and then king. His sister-in-law, Elizabeth, took herself into sanctuary at Westminster, but the Woodvilles' strength came from Edward, so they had no power base. Their attachment to Henry Tudor proved to be the undoing of Richard and the marriage of the two warring houses. The author properly places the characters in their 15th-century time frame, when loyalties could be bought, sold, and switched. Much of the story is well-known, but Skidmore brings a fresh approach.One of the least biased accounts of Richard III; the author acknowledges his subject's faults without justifying them.