A naturalist at large The best essays of Bernd Heinrich

Bernd Heinrich, 1940-

Book - 2018

"From the acclaimed scientist and writer, essays collected for the first time in book form, on ravens and other birds, insects, trees, elephants, and more: once again 'passionate observations [that] superbly mix memoir and science.'(New York Times)"--

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

508/Heinrich
1 / 1 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor 508/Heinrich Checked In
Subjects
Genres
Essays
Published
Boston : Houghton Mifflin Harcourt 2018.
Language
English
Main Author
Bernd Heinrich, 1940- (author)
Physical Description
xiii, 288 pages ; 22 cm
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN
9780544986831
  • Introduction
  • From the Earth Up
  • Life in the Soil
  • Rock-Solid Foundation
  • The Spreading Chestnut Tree
  • When the Bough Bends
  • O Tannenbaum
  • Insects
  • Reading Tree Leaves
  • Hot- and Cold-Blooded Moths
  • Woolly and Wondrous
  • Winter Guests
  • Arctic Bumblebees
  • Beating the Heat, and Killing with Heat
  • Bee-Lining vs. Bee Homing
  • Beetles and Blooms
  • Cooperative Undertaking: Teaming with Mites
  • Whirligig Beetles: Quick Paddlers
  • Ravens and Other Birds
  • Ravens on My Mind
  • A Birdbrain Nevermore
  • Ravens and the Inaccessible
  • Phoebe Diary
  • Conversation with a Sapsucker
  • Hawk Watching
  • Kinglets' Realm of Cold
  • The Diabolical Nightjar
  • Mammals
  • Hidden Sweets
  • Hibernation, Insulation, and Caffeination
  • Cohabiting with Elephants: A Browsing Relationship
  • The Hunt: A Matter of Perspective
  • Endurance Predator
  • Strategies for Life
  • Synchronicity: Amplifying the Signal
  • What Bees and Flowers Know
  • Curious Yellow: A Foray into Iris Behavior
  • Twists and Turns
  • Birds Coloring Their Eggs
  • Birds, Bees, and Beauty: Adaptive Aesthetics
  • Seeing the Light in the Forest
  • Index
Review by Library Journal Review

Heinrich (Mind of the Raven) has been observing the interconnectivity of nature since he was a boy. This latest book collects his favorite essays written for a general audience and published in magazines (most commonly Natural History) from 1974 to 2017. Essays are grouped by the subject they concern (plants, insects, mammals, birds, and evolutionary advantages) and weave together Heinrich's field observations and life story. The majority of the content concerns research conducted on Heinrich's property in Maine. The essays deeply explore their subjects and display the author's attention to detail and patient and keen observational skills. Heinrich's essays often preference data over story. While naturalists will likely find this absorbing, casual listeners may find the level of detail-for example, a thorough cataloging of how and where different trees grow on Heinrich's property-overwhelming. Narrator Rick Adamson is a good match for the material. His voice manages to imbue both authority and joy regarding the subject matter. VERDICT Recommended for collections with strengths in biology or natural science. ["This compelling collection will appeal to those interested in natural history or the environment of northern New England": LJ 3/15/18 review of the Houghton Harcourt hc.]-Julie Judkins, Univ. of North Texas, Denton © Copyright 2018. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.

(c) Copyright Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
Review by Kirkus Book Review

A collection of essays on plants and animal biology and behavior by a scientist who is also a prolific, prize-winning author.Heinrich (Emeritus, Biology/Univ. of Vermont; One Wild Bird at a Time: Portraits of Individual Lives, 2016, etc.) writes engagingly about soil, trees, insects, birds, and mammals, all of which he has observed closely for years. All the included essays, ranging in date from 1974 to 2017, have been previously published, many in Natural History magazine and Orion. The author is no casual observer of the world around him. When something catches his eye, he studies it intensely, counting, measuring, and dissecting. Many of his observations are made inside and outside his cabin in the Maine woods, where he now lives. However, during his long career, he has also studied trees, elephants, and predators in Africa, bees in the Arctic, flowers in Israel, and caterpillars in California. Among other tidbits, readers will learn how red squirrels tap maple trees, how a raven notifies other ravens of the location of a dead animal, and how beetles cooperate to bury a mouse. Heinrich wants to know how vines twist and turn, why trees have certain shapes, and how animals survive fierce heat and intense cold. At times, the author provides more detail than many general readers will require--e.g., a comparison between Thoreau's bean- patch expenses and his own. More often, however, he illustrates just what the work of a dedicated biologist entails. Where necessary, he appends codas to bring certain essays up to date. To accompany his investigations into the natural world, the author also provides includes two -dozen appealing line drawings revealing structural details of plants and close-ups of insects and tiny creatures that would escape most casual observers.Heinrich's personal touch and breadth of knowledge make this a satisfying outing for armchair naturalists.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Life in the Soil (Adapted from "Life in the Soil," Natural History Magazine (NHM) , November 2014, pp. 13-15) Papa, Mamusha, and my sisters Ulla and Marianne, and I (the latter two of us age five and almost eleven) were quartered in a one-room hut in a dark forest in northern Germany right after World War II. Towering pines, spruce, and beech shaded the ground except for a small sloping patch in front of the cabin. Light snow had recently covered the ground, and now, after a warm spring rain, it had become black, and that made me notice something marvelous by our doorstep. From one day to the next, I saw a small patch of the dirt turning a luminous green. Perhaps the next day or so after that, the patch of dirt had expanded over the black ground: I was mesmerized by this verdant, magically spreading circle of grass blades. This was, as far as I can remember, my earliest moment of wonder. Had grass been underfoot before, I would have hardly noticed it, from seeing it all the time. But watching that single patch expand from one day to the next was a moment of magic and mystery, maybe even of ecstasy, forever stamped into my memory. Even so, for a long time the dirt the grass had spawned from remained for me merely something crumbly under the soles of my feet and between my toes. It was the sand on a mile or so of the wooded road between our hut and the village school. Shiny green beetles flashed in front of me on my walks, and after a brief zigzagging flight, where they glinted like jewels in the sun, they landed a few yards ahead. We called them "sand beetles," and later I knew them as tiger beetles. Although I couldn't fly, I could run, and it felt good to be on par with such gorgeous company. Tiger beetles (of the family Cicindelidae) are related to carabids, which are commonly called ground beetles, or Laufkäfer. " Ground beetles do not fly, but they all run (which is reflected in their German name, derived from laufen, "to run"). These earthbound beetles soon became my passion, to have and to hold. It came through the influence of my father, a biologist. In order to get some cash he was now digging tree stumps out of the ground that had been left by the occupying British soldiers who had harvested the trees. He earned a few pfennigs selling the wood. But he decided the pits he was digging might be adapted to serve as traps to catch mice and shrews. It was exciting for me to accompany him, ever more so because ground beetles fell into the pits too, and he showed me how to preserve and thus to collect them like some other kids then collected stamps. He gave me a field guide to identify those that I had and those I might someday find. I soon knew them by name: the giant black Carabus coriaceus , the dark-bluish C. intricatus , the shiny copper C. cancellatus (and its look-alike, C. concolor ), and the deep-green C. auratus . The merit of those intricately sculpted beetles was not simply that they were beautiful, but also that I could find them merely by scanning the ground wherever I walked. Even more merrily, I could catch them. I thought of these, my old carabids, with a start, with a nostalgic recognition, when recently ​-- ​now in Maine, on a new continent ​-- ​I dug out the pit for my privy. There, several feet down in the dirt, I unearthed a Carabus . It was metallic black, sculpted in lines and pits, and its edges glistened deep purple. Not having collected these beetles for a long time, I did not know the name of this species nor what it was doing underground, but I captured it in a photograph. Perhaps as a larva it had burrowed in that spot and metamorphosed to become an adult, or maybe it had hibernated there in the winter, or was attempting to escape heat or drought. But in any case, it had likely fed on snails, and the snails on grass. It was of the soil, which I was preparing to receive my wastes. And this same receptive soil would also receive all of me, eventually, to convert me to grass, tress, flowers, and more. For the time being, though, an American chestnut tree I had planted years earlier, as well as nearby sugar maples, would grow well because of their proximity to the privy. I used the dirt from the pit excavation to make a raised garden bed in which I planted potatoes. I stuck several of them into this dirt, and presto, come fall ​-- ​it seemed too good to be true ​-- ​there were perfect and delicious Yukon Golds. My partner, Lynn, saw the magic, and before I knew it we had an even bigger bed of potatoes, beans claiming a pole, snap peas growing on a chicken-wire fence, and little green sprouts of kale, carrots, and lettuce. We watched with eager participation as the emerging green dots in the dark dirt first turned into shoots, and we would harvest potatoes in August for eating in winter. There is more to be had from dirt than food. I think Thoreau knew this well and maybe said it better 175 years ago. Old Henry (if he'd excuse me for being familiar) was "determined to know beans," and having made himself a two-and-a-half acre bean field, he tended and hoed it daily from "five o'clock in the morning till noon." He came to "love" and "cherish" his beans and wrote, "they attached me to the earth, and so I got strength like Antaeus." Working alone and with his hands, he became, as he said, "much more intimate with my beans than usual." Along the way he concluded that "labor of the hands, even when pursued to the verge of drudgery, is perhaps never the worst form of idleness." And he told the reasons why. When tending his bean field, Thoreau was "attracted by the passage of wild pigeons"; he sometimes "watched a pair of hen-hawks circling high in the sky," heard the brown thrasher sing, and with his hoe "turned up a sluggish portentous and outlandish spotted salamander." His enterprise was "not that I wanted beans to eat," nor was it likely for "leaving a pecuniary profit." I'm in rapport with his romantic ideal and with his statement that when he "paused to lean on my hoe, these sounds and sights I heard and saw anywhere in the row became part of the inexhaustible entertainment which the country offers" ​-- ​as opposed, I suppose, to those summer days "which some of my contemporaries devoted to the fine arts in Boston and Rome" as entertainment, instead. Perhaps this vibrant "idleness" is what Thoreau cherished most. Most would, however, want to "get real" when it comes to dirt and work. We do not generally hoe beans in order to hear the brown thrasher, or to exhume a spotted salamander as an end in itself. Thoreau gets real by giving an exact economic enumeration of his work. He itemizes monetary costs and profits, in which overall bean-patch costs added up in his accounting to $14.72 and 1/2 cent, with a profit of $8.71 and 1/2 cent. To our ears now, old Henry pretty much worked that summer in his two-and-a-half-acre bean patch for nothing. The garden patch that Lynn and I worked on sporadically our first summer, making a garden from what was before only a brushy rock-filled field, allows for some comparisons. We saw no passenger pigeons but we got pleasures from our garden similar to what Henry got from his. Plus, we enjoy companionship, which old Henry did not appear to pursue. So for us it was a win-win situation with the dirt, in more ways than two. But I also suspect our dirt will before the start of winter become a winning economic proposition as well. And so was Henry's, despite what he may have implied, and we inferred. Our dirt patch is sixteen hundred square feet (0.037 acres); his was about 70 times larger. He spent $3.12 on seed, and we spent $94. Thus, overall, in terms of our money, he paid about 30 times less overall, but on a per-acre basis, in dollar amount, he paid 2,100 times less. Take outside labor: his "ploughing/harrowing/farrowing" cost him $7.50. (This amount irked him, because in Walden , he added a comment ​-- ​"Too much" ​-- ​for emphasis next to it.) How much is his "Too much"?   Excerpted from A Naturalist at Large: The Best of Bernd Heinrich by Bernd Heinrich All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.