Old in art school A memoir of starting over

Nell Irvin Painter

Book - 2018

Following her retirement from Princeton University, celebrated historian Dr. Nell Irvin Painter surprised everyone in her life by returning to school--in her sixties--to earn a BFA and MFA in painting. In Old in Art School, she travels from her beloved Newark to the prestigious Rhode Island School of Design; finds meaning in the artists she loves, even as she comes to understand how they may be undervalued; and struggles with the unstable balance between the pursuit of art and the inevitable, sometimes painful demands of a life fully lived. How are women and artists seen and judged by their age, looks, and race? What does it mean when someone says, "You will never be an artist"? Who defines what "An Artist" is and all th...at goes with such an identity?--from publisher's description.

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

700.92/Painter
0 / 3 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor 700.92/Painter Due Jan 4, 2025
2nd Floor 700.92/Painter Due Jan 2, 2025
2nd Floor 700.92/Painter Due Jan 2, 2025
Subjects
Genres
Autobiographies
Published
Berkeley, California : Counterpoint Press 2018.
Language
English
Main Author
Nell Irvin Painter (author)
Edition
First hardcover edition
Physical Description
xvi, 331 pages : illustrations ; 24 cm
ISBN
9781640090613
  • Prologue: You'll Never Be an Artist
  • 1. How Old Are You?
  • 2. Leaving My Former Life
  • 3. Getting There
  • 4. So Much to Learn
  • 5. Familiar Artists, New Ways
  • 6. Illustration Versus the Context of Art
  • 7. Transcription
  • 8. Look Like an Artist
  • 9. Drawing
  • 10. I Could Not Draw My Mother Dying
  • 11. A Bad Decision
  • 12. Euphoria
  • 13. Grief
  • 14. Peers
  • 15. Crit
  • 16. Art School + History History
  • 17. You'll Never Be an Artist
  • 18. Discovery
  • 19. MFA Thesis
  • 20. And Now?
  • 21. Newark Artist
  • 22. Art History by Nell Painter
  • Coda Happy Ending
  • Acknowledgments
  • List of Images
Review by Booklist Review

In her midsixties, Painter was a professor at Princeton and an acclaimed historian and writer. Yet, nearly finished with what became a best-seller, The History of White People (2010), she decided to end her prestigious academic career and enroll as an undergraduate art major at Rutgers. Culture shock ensued. Well versed in discrimination as a woman and an African American, Painter found herself confronting ageism. More confounding was the need to learn to think visually instead of narratively. She also had to care for her elderly parents. But Painter persevered, ultimately earning an MFA at the Rhode Island School of Design. Bracingly candid in her vividly analytical chronicling of her challenging adventure and its emotional, intellectual, and creative demands, she astutely critiques the way art is taught and charts her quest to figure out if her passion for history was detrimental or essential to her visual explorations. With her art displayed throughout this deeply inquisitive, involving memoir of transformation enriched by art history, Painter funny, furious, brilliant, and mesmerizing celebrates the hard work art requires and the profound freedom it engenders.--Seaman, Donna Copyright 2010 Booklist

From Booklist, Copyright (c) American Library Association. Used with permission.
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review

A history professor in her 60s takes a break from teaching at Princeton University to go to art school in this witty and perceptive memoir. After enrolling at Rutgers University in the fall of 2007, Painter (The History of White People), quickly immerses herself in her drawing and painting classes as she wryly observes her younger classmates "upholding art-school sartorial drama in bright yellow hair and piercings." She notes that her fellow students, who know far less of the world than she does, are better painters, and she explores how her thinking as a historian hobbles her as an artist. Her "20th century eyes favored craft... narrative and meaning" while her 21st century classmates and teachers preferred the "DIY aesthetic" and appropriation from popular culture (e.g., cartoons, pornography). Painter goes on to attend graduate school at the Rhode Island School of Design, where she feels like a misfit as the oldest-and only black-student in her class, and is also unappreciated for her intellectual sophistication, though she ultimately develops her own aesthetic and confidence in her work. This is a courageous, intellectually stimulating, and wholly entertaining story of one woman reconciling two worlds and being open to the possibilities and changes life offers. (June) © Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved.

(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
Review by Kirkus Book Review

A noted historian tells about her daring career move to become an artist.At the age of 64, Painter (American History, Emerita, Princeton Univ.; The History of White People, 2010, etc.), president of the prestigious Organization of American Historians, former director of the Association of Black Women Historians, and author of seven books, enrolled as an undergraduate at Mason Gross School of the Arts of Rutgers University. In a candid, captivating memoir, the author recounts her experiences at Rutgers and in a Master of Fine Arts Program at the Rhode Island School of Design, which raised for her salient questions about identity, creativity, ageism, and racism. Some teachers proclaimed that she would never become an Artist because she "lacked an essential component, some ineffable inner quality." Although as a professor she believed heartily that skills could be learned through seriousness, persistence, discipline, and hard work, she felt her teachers' condemnation "piercing my student's psyche," causing her to question her ability and the quality of her work. Often discouraged, still she defiantly pursued two goals: "to make work that engaged the eye" and to celebrate, in portraits, her "intellectual women friends." One teacher dismissed her second goal as mere "illustration." As to the first, she discovered throughout her art education the vagaries of criteria used to assess quality. During her first year at RISD, she felt reduced to a "pathetic, insecure little stump," unsure whether her teachers and classmates "were critiquing me, old-black-woman-totally-out-of-place, or critiquing my work, which was not good enough." Painter admits having felt like a misfit in art school, which leads her to reflect about ageism and racism (both rampant in the rarefied art world). Awarded studio residencies, including an artist-scholar residency at Yale, she proved her worth. The author offers perceptive insights about the meaning of art: the difference between thinking like a historian and an artist; the "contented concentration" she feels when making art; and the works of many black artists.A spirited chronicle of transformation and personal triumph. Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

1. How old are you? "How old are you?" she asked from a small face, a small body, a little dress, and Uggs; neutrality words. It took a moment for me to detach her from the mass of Rutgers students. Me sweltering at the bus stop on George Street in New Brunswick, anxiously scanning the herd of busses arriving, loading up, and departing, systematically, confusingly. Had she not spoken, I wouldn't have noticed her, not yet remarking students' individual differences. They in private ear bud worlds, historicizing into their or friends' tiny phones, grinning over Tweets or miniscule videos. They roared over towering dramas and hysterically funny incidents. She carried a cell phone, too, but something pulled her out of it and into seeing me. She turned to me to query, How old are you? She took a step towards me as if there were simply something she needed to know. She was upholding art school sartorial drama in bright yellow hair and piercings, art school fashion statements I was seeing for the first time. My fashion statement said, "comfort." Plain white tee-shirt, black pants (I was the only one in long pants) sturdy white New Balance walking shoes, and a baseball cap. Today's cap said New York Sheep and Wool Festival. I may not have been the only knitter in that crowd, but I was the only one wearing it, on this, my second day as a BFA student at Mason Gross School of the Arts of Rutgers-the State University of New Jersey. How old are you? interrupted the befuddlement of my first encounter with the herds of Rutgers students and busses, red, white, and black. She blurted out her question, no euphemism, no beating around the bush, no aggression, just naked curiosity before telling me her name was Tina: How old are you? Sixty-four, I answered. I've never lied about my age, but I'd never been confronted with so naked a need to know. Tina gasped, mouth open--actually taking a step backwards away from me, eyes all amazed, not hostile, just stunned. Sixty-four had turned me into a phantasm, a creature from another planet. Her gleeful next act documented her sighting from the planet of the old: I've gotta tell my mom about this! And she did so right then. It's a wonder she didn't take a selfie with me. Here was my first experience as an exotic in art school, an exotic on account of age, the exotic old person. This kid, this girl, made me see myself through her eyes. She had recognized me from the previous day's Mason Gross orientation. Me, then, in the little auditorium among two hundred or more new freshmen, all but two straight out of high school. At Rutgers I stuck out more on account of age than race or quality of attention or personal apparel. Other students were black and brown; other students wore tee shirts, shorts, tiny little skirts, the hijab, or preprofessional uniforms. Rutgers isn't like those lame mid-western universities that need Photoshop to multiculturalize their image. Rutgers in its multifariousness is lovable New Jersey. Rutgers is in New Jersey, with everyone from everywhere. The next day I met the other older student from orientation, a man in his 40s from South Jersey with tattoos smaller than the kids' and jeans not so skinny. He came out to smoke a cigarette among all the other smokers--every single person but me was smoking--and joined 5 me on the patio in front of the Civic Square Building. We sat to the side of Alice Aycock's The Tuning Fork Oracle, a giant steel sculpture--a tipped up, floating metal table covered with a white marble table cloth (white-ish, actually, on account of New Jersey rain stain), several smoked glass spheres and arrows, a tuning fork in the middle. It's stood there safely since 1997, but you don't feel safe under it so huge and crazily angled. We chatted Jersey talk: where are you from? What roads do you take to get here, what exit? And he asked, How old are you? The question still took me by surprise. Once again, sixty-four. He said, I hope I look that good when I'm that old. The crucial fact of my age emerged, not as an incidental, but as my defining characteristic, of how others saw me as a demand to see myself through their eyes. It was as though being old summed me up, not all the things I had done to become a historian--a goddam distinguished historian--not the singular family I come from, not even my fascinating, beleaguered city of Newark in my eternally dissed state of New Jersey. Being seen as an old woman added a new way of seeing myself as reflected in the eyes of others. I was used to juggling my self-perception and other people's views of me as a black person and as a woman, from within and without. But now what I took as me seemed almost inconsequential as my essence shriveled to my age. This was something new. I'm accustomed to being seen/not seen as a black person and as a woman, to the various ways strangers would and would not see me. Some positively refused to see me, the youth who ostentatiously looked away. I knew the pleasant enough half-smile of women I 6 didn't know in mostly white places, and the co-conspirator's wink-smile of other black women approving my presence and my natural hair, the crinkle-eyed acknowledgment of a sister on the street. There was also the respectful recognition on the bus or light rail in Newark to say we're all in the same space, but I'm according you both confirmation and privacy. On the street in places as disparate as Newark and Princeton, as Cambridge and Oakland, there was the closedin-on-itself-ness of people going their own ways. And there was the approach of the person who has to greet you in some smallish gathering of picked people but who wants to by-pass you for a really important person, not you. I was accustomed to all these greetings and un-greetings, of dismissals of me as not sufficiently consequential and of addressing me as someone who might turn out to be useful. I was used to crossing paths with all sorts of people I did not know. I knew standing out on account of sex-race, not because I'm extraordinary in my own right. And I knew disappearing entirely when disappearance isn't appropriate, as in a place where Nell Irvin Painter ought to be seen but she's not wearing her name badge with Princeton on it. This is part of what it means to be a black woman in my country, and I had adjusted to it. Yet I always miss feeling at home. I cherish the times when I'm as one with the people around me--with family, in familiar gatherings, with friends, even with strangers on a train. Solidarity is a feeling I hug when I can feel it. I knew encounters from the context of race in America. A passage by W. E. B. Du Bois is said often enough to become widely known (like the proverbial literary phrase quoted to you by someone assuming you had never heard it before), but always circumscribed within racial 7 identity. Speaking about black people in America, Du Bois said we see ourselves not only from inside, as ourselves, but additionally, from outside, as objects of other people's disdain. It is a peculiar sensation, this double-consciousness, this sense of always looking at one's self through the eyes of others, of measuring one's soul by the tape of a world that looks on in amused contempt and pity. One ever feels his two-ness,--an American, a Negro; two souls, two thoughts, two unreconciled strivings; two warring ideals in one dark body . . . I knew this from blackness, but it really does apply elsewhere, and so now it was with my age, with me as an old woman. It wasn't that I stopped being my individual self or stopped being black or stopped being female, but that old, now linked to my sex, obscured everything else beyond old lady. Such was other people's gaze turned on me as a query. They didn't know what to make of me as a phenomenon. There is so much more to me than age. And that so much more got me to art school in the first place. With my energy and excellent health, I routinely refute expectations of the older woman, just as over the years I have grown accustomed to soaring above what was expected of me--me as a black person, me as a woman, me as a person of my generation. Why wouldn't I be able to go to art school at sixty-four? Being able to go to art school at sixty-four was one thing. Why I would want to go to art school was another. Answer: The pursuit of pleasure. Concentrating on what I could see gave me intense pleasure, and seeing what I could make with my own hand and according to my own eye was even more satisfying. Mark making and mixing and applying color contented me deeply, just the very processes of putting line on paper, brush on canvas. Art stopped time. Art exiled hunger. Art held off fatigue for what would have been hours as though hours hadn't really passed. Pleasure. Satisfaction. Contentment. Part of it was freedom from Truth. I wanted to create images, to make art that expressed my own mixed up character, to forge a truer me than one confined by existing categories of sex-race and circulating widely as necessarily true. Yes, yes, I loved all the steps entailed in scholarship, but I reached for more, to take other steps, additional steps, call them side steps, for freedom from evidence based knowledge of things I could know for sure, beyond and around the truths of the archive. Fiction. Visual fictions. I wanted to make art. Seriously. And to make serious art. Contradiction crouched between my search for freedom and my bent towards serious art. My instincts, my past, drew me towards formal study. And decades in the Ivy League had taught me institutions' role in gate keeping and networking. I knew all too well that the same artifact, the same utterance, would meet widely disparate receptions according to the institutions attached to them. Institutions conferred not simply knowledge, but also the means to be seen. On one level, I fancied my pleasure in drawing and painting would not require other people's approval. I was at a place in my life beyond regard for approval. Or so I thought. Somehow I overlooked the contradiction between my yearning for artistic freedom and my urge to work seriously, that is, on a professional level. Seriously. On a professional level. What weighted terms. Seriously and on a professional level would mean art school, not merely taking a class here or there and making art for myself and my friends. Art school would mean more than 9 following my own inclinations. It would entail evaluation according to already existing criteria. Whose criteria? Other people's criteria. An awful disaccord between freedom and otherdefined seriousness that I could not yet see. I had little understanding of the potency of good and better as applied obsessively to art schools and to art and my own art in particular. I had no inkling of how thoroughly art school would instruct me--teach me, challenge my abilities, and question my sanity. I didn't know how much I would learn from the young art students beside me. I just knew I wanted to make art and make art seriously. Excerpted from Old in Art School: A Memoir of Starting Over by Nell Painter All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.