The dangerous case of Donald Trump 27 psychiatrists and mental health experts assess a president

Book - 2017

Explores the consensus of more than two dozen psychiatrists and psychologists that President Donald Trump is dangerously mentally ill and that he presents a clear and present danger to the nation. --Publisher

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

973.933/Dangerous
1 / 1 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor 973.933/Dangerous Checked In
  • Foreword: Our Witness to Malignant Normality
  • Prologue: Professions and Politics
  • Introduction: Our Duty to Warn
  • Part 1. The Trump Phenomenon
  • Unbridled and Extreme Present Hedonism: How the Leader of the Free World Has Proven Time and Again He Is Unfit for Duty
  • Pathological Narcissism and Politics: A Lethal Mix
  • I Wrote The Art of the Deal with Donald Trump: His Self-Sabotage Is Rooted in His Past
  • Trump's Trust Deficit Is the Core Problem
  • Sociopathy
  • Donald Trump Is: (A) Bad, (B) Mad, (C) All of the Above
  • Why "Crazy Like a Fox" versus "Crazy Like a Crazy" Really Matters: Delusional Disorder, Admiration of Brutal Dictators, the Nuclear Codes, and Trump
  • Cognitive Impairment, Dementia, and POTUS
  • Donald J. Trump, Alleged Incapacitated Person: Mental Incapacity, the Electoral College, and the Twenty-Fifth Amendment
  • Part 2. The Trump Dilemma
  • Should Psychiatrists Refrain from Commenting on Trump's Psychology?
  • On Seeing What You See and Saying What You Know: A Psychiatrist's Responsibility
  • The Issue Is Dangerousness, Not Mental Illness
  • A Clinical Case for the Dangerousness of Donald J. Trump
  • Health, Risk, and the Duty to Protect the Community
  • New Opportunities for Therapy in the Age of Trump
  • Part 3. The Trump Effect
  • Trauma, Time, Truth, and Trump: How a President Freezes Healing and Promotes Crisis
  • Trump Anxiety Disorder: The Trump Effect on the Mental Health of Half the Nation and Special Populations
  • In Relationship with an Abusive President
  • Birtherism and the Deployment of the Trumpian Mind-Set
  • Trump's Daddy Issues: A Toxic Mix for America
  • Trump and the American Collective Psyche
  • Who Goes Trump? Tyranny as a Triumph of Narcissism
  • The Loneliness of Fateful Decisions: Social and Psychological Vulnerability
  • He's Got the World in His Hands and His Finger on the Trigger: The Twenty-Fifth Amendment Solution
  • Epilogue: Reaching Across Professions
  • Appendix: Transcript of the Yale Conference (online)
Review by Kirkus Book Review

Mental health professionals and others make the case that Donald Trump is mentally ill, dangerous, or both.Editor Lee (Law and Psychiatry/Yale School of Medicine) asked for and received submissions for this book within a three-week period, and several of them show signs of being written in haste. Many of the contributors are psychologists or psychiatrists in private practice; others include journalist Gail Sheehy, Tony Schwartz, the co-author of Trump's The Art of the Deal, and attorney and "political junkie" James A. Herb, who filed a petition in the Palm Beach County Circuit Court to determine Trump's mental incapacity in October 2016, "based on the fact that Trump's apparent lack of mental capacity to function could impact me and possibly the whole world." The volume makes no attempt to avoid bias; it's aimed strictly at demonstrating that Trump shouldn't be in office (admittedly a view held by tens of millions of other Americans) and that a panel of mental health professionals should be established to determine his lack of fitness. At the heart of many of the essays is the increasingly controversial 1973 "Goldwater rule" implemented by the American Psychiatric Association, which states that psychiatrists shouldn't diagnose public figures without personally examining them. Also frequently cited is the Tarasoff decision made by California in 1976, which states that psychiatrists should speak out when they know that "an individual is dangerous to another person or persons." Some of the essays border on self-parody: one author argues seriously that "post-Trump stress disorder" ought to be considered "as serious as PTSD." Read collectively, the essays become repetitious: the contributors lean on the same definitions of narcissism and paranoia and cite the same tweets and passages from speeches, most of which will already be familiar to readers. As with most anti-Trump books, this one will shore up the opinions of those already convinced of his lack of fitness for the job but won't change the minds of his supporters, the vast majority of whom won't read it. Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.