The three lives of James Madison Genius, partisan, president

Noah Feldman, 1970-

Book - 2017

"Over the course of his life, James Madison changed the United States three times: First, he designed the Constitution, led the struggle for its adoption and ratification, then drafted the Bill of Rights. As an older, cannier politician he co-founded the original Republican party, setting the course of American political partisanship. Finally, having pioneered a foreign policy based on economic sanctions, he took the United States into a high-risk conflict, becoming the first wartime president and, despite the odds, winning. In The Three Lives of James Madison, Noah Feldman offers an intriguing portrait of this elusive genius and the constitutional republic he created--and how both evolved to meet unforeseen challenges."--Dust jac...ket.

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

BIOGRAPHY/Madison, James
1 / 1 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor BIOGRAPHY/Madison, James Checked In
Subjects
Genres
Biographies
Published
New York : Random House [2017]
Language
English
Main Author
Noah Feldman, 1970- (author)
Edition
First edition
Physical Description
xviii, 773 pages, 24 unnumbered pages of plates : illustrations (some color) ; 25 cm
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references (pages 717-730) and index.
ISBN
9780812992755
  • Preface
  • Authors Note
  • Book I. Constitution
  • Chapter 1. Friendships
  • Chapter 2. Rise
  • Chapter 3. Crisis
  • Chapter 4. Philadelphia
  • Chapter 5. Compromise
  • Chapter 6. Ratification
  • Book II. Party
  • Chapter 7. The Bill of Rights
  • Chapter 8. Debts
  • Chapter 9. Enemies
  • Chapter 10. The President and His Party
  • Chapter 11. In the Shade
  • Book III. War
  • Chapter 12. Secretary of State
  • Chapter 13. Neutrality
  • Chapter 14. President
  • Chapter 15. War
  • Chapter 16. Failure and Redemption
  • Conclusion. Legacy
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • Bibliography
  • Lndex
Review by Choice Review

Appropriately known as the Father of the Constitution, James Madison may be the most important but least-known of the Founders. He created a federal republic that balanced the extremes of anarchy and totalitarianism. An idealist in his early years, he believed people would unite for the good of all. With Alexander Hamilton, he wrote the majority of the Federalist Papers to persuade delegates the Constitution was the best instrument to extend liberty to the most people in the new country and abroad. But putting theory into practice strained friendships, leading to political adversaries and ultimately enemies. When the Constitution's implementation created political parties, the idealistic Madison became the pragmatic leader of the Democratic Republicans to counter Hamilton's Federalists. In his first life, Madison created the Constitution. In his pragmatic second life, he recognized the political realities. His deepening understanding of the need for agreement and negotiation marked his third life, including his presidency. More than just a favorable biography of Madison (Feldman acknowledges and examines Madison's less-than-exemplary treatment of Native Americans and African Americans), this is a thoroughgoing history of the period from the Founding Era to the so-called Era of Good Feelings. Summing Up: Recommended. Upper-division undergraduates through faculty --Duncan R. Jamieson, Ashland University

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by New York Times Review

IN APRIL 1789, James Madison, a member of the House of Representatives and a trusted friend of George Washington, ghostwrote the new president's opening message to Congress. Then he drafted the House's official response to the president. As if that wasn't head-spinning enough, Washington then asked him to compose his response to the response. Madison was truly "in dialogue with himself," as the editors of the Madison Papers put it. But the congressman was also in conflict with himself. Engaging in that dialogue violated his own carefully crafted blueprint for the separation of powers. As the Harvard Law School professor Noah Feldman demonstrates in his illuminating and absorbing political biography, "The Three Lives of James Madison," Madison would remain in ongoing dialogue and conflict with himself for the rest of his life. Feldman explores Madison's reactive and improvisational thinking as it played out in the three uniquely consequential roles, or "lives," he had - as constitutional architect and co-author with Alexander Hamilton and John Jay of the "Federalist Papers," political partisan and wartime president. The new nation, an idea still in progress, would inevitably call for reassessment, flexibility and innovation, and Feldman skillfully navigates the zigzag path of Madison's recalibrations. Except for his position on the issue of slavery, which Madison's allegiance to his planter class would cause him to consistently blur in a fog of words, he adjusted his theoretical ideas and practice of politics to the continuous flux of events. Madison's first life was as a proponent of an enduring constitution for a consolidated, centralized republic to replace the loose and dysfunctional alliance of states created under the Articles of Confederation. The Virginia Plan he brought to Philadelphia in 1787 became the basis for the convention's agenda. The delegates, however, would not always go as far as he wanted, especially when it came to his wish to clearly establish the sovereignty of the national government over the states. His proposal for a congressional veto over state laws in order to control, as he argued, "the centrifugal tendency of the states" was overwhelmingly rejected, leaving him fearful that the Constitution might codify a constant tension and conflict between the national government and the states. Madison's adaptive genius was on full display with the Bill of Rights. Much of the opposition to the Constitution turned on its lack of a guarantee of individual rights. Thomas Jefferson also lamented this absence, but Madison initially failed to see the need for such assurances, which he described as mere "parchment barriers," easy for "overbearing majorities" to override. But less than a year later, Madison, now a representative fulfilling a campaign promise to his constituents, introduced a series of such amendments in the House. "Without Madison, the bill of rights would not have been enacted," Feldman writes. "The entire episode showcased Madison's unique combination of theoretical brilliance and practical political flexibility. Although theory had told him a bill of rights was not necessary, political controversy and the need to get elected had shown that it was." The sharp differences between Madison's vision of the new republic and Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton's triggered Madison's second life as a partisan politician. He was taken aback by Hamilton's Federalist blueprint for transforming the new United States into an economic powerhouse. The first phase was to be financial centralization through the national government's assumption of state debts. At a dinner in June 1790, Madison and Jefferson negotiated a compromise with Hamilton, and the mostly satisfied Virginians came away with their own concession, an agreement to locate the new national capital along the Potomac. But a few months later Hamilton raised the stakes once more with a proposal to create a national bank. Once the full scope of Hamilton's ambitions was revealed, Madison accused him, as he wrote in a newspaper article in 1792, of trying "to pervert the limited government of the Union, into a government of unlimited discretion." In a move to halt the Federalists and their Hamiltonian agenda, Madison and Jefferson organized the nation's first political party, the Republicans - even though the notion of party politics ran against Madison's constitutional design to dampen the effect of factions. His shift away from total national sovereignty over states' rights became complete in 1798 after Congress passed and President John Adams signed the Sedition Act, targeting Republicans and their newspapers by restricting First Amendment rights. In reaction, an incensed Jefferson wrote his Kentucky Resolutions, arguing fatefully that the states had the power to nullify federal laws and even threatening "revolution and blood." Troubled by Jefferson's intemperate radicalism, Madison offered a moderate alternative in his Virginia Resolutions, contending that the states had the right "to interpose" against federal legislation they viewed as unconstitutional. Although the man who had once championed a national veto over state laws now seemed to assert the right of states to reject acts of Congress, Madison insisted that interposition meant only an appeal to public opinion. How exactly that was to happen remained conveniently obscure. IN MADISON'S third life as secretary of state under President Jefferson and then as president himself, he was forced to reassess repeatedly his own foreign policy positions. As secretary of state, he had preferred to maintain neutrality with regard to the burgeoning conflict between Britain and France. Britain, however, was determined to bring its former colonies to heel by harassing American commercial shipping and impressing American seamen. Madison turned to the tactic of economic coercion with a ban on trade with Britain. "The efficacy of an embargo," he confidently remarked to President Jefferson in 1805, "cannot be doubted." But while it crippled the American economy, the embargo did virtually nothing to curb the British, and in June 1812, President Madison backed into war. The nation, he declared, could not remain "passive under these progressive usurpations, and these accumulating wrongs." After two years of fruitless conflict, both parties were ready for compromise. The signing of the Treaty of Ghent at the end of 1814 re-established the prewar status quo. By claiming that the American effort "cannot fail to command the respect" of all other nations, Madison "set an influential precedent," Feldman astutely comments, "for subsequent American unwillingness to shine harsh light on wars that produced mixed results," a precedent that resonates today in Iraq and Afghanistan. Feldman does not discuss the elder statesman's role in the fraught nullification crisis of the late 1820s and early 1830s, but it's only a further example of Madison's political flexibility. South Carolina, furious about federal tariffs, cited Madison's Virginia Resolutions to argue that every state had the constitutional right to nullify federal laws and even withdraw from the union. For the rest of his life Madison rejected such an extreme interpretation of his Resolutions. The last of the founding fathers beseeched Americans to cherish and perpetuate their union, but the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions along with Madison's unwillingness to call for the abolition of slavery would continue to imperil the republic he so treasured. By the time of his death in 1836, the political order that Madison the dazzling political theorist had helped to design had been transformed by the partisan cofounder of the Republican Party, and had then barely survived a war under the executive leadership of the same man. Feldman's deeply thoughtful study shows that the three identities of James Madison constituted one exceptional life, which effectively mirrored the evolving identity of the American republic in its most formative phase. In Feldman's capable hands, Madison becomes the original embodiment of our "living Constitution."

Copyright (c) The New York Times Company [August 30, 2019]
Review by Booklist Review

James Madison and his ideas about individual liberty and republican government are Feldman's topics in this intellectual biography. Feldman opens with Madison's first political appearance, as a 25-year-old member of Virginia's 1776 convention to draft a state constitution. Making an impression as erudite and rational, Madison persuaded the body to disentangle religion from the state. His subsequent study of historical confederations made Madison one of the best prepared members of the Constitutional Convention of 1787. Relying on Madison's record of the proceeding, Feldman outlines the extent to which Madison's political principles were embodied in the new federal constitution. On to the 1790s, when Madison and Thomas Jefferson formed a party to battle Alexander Hamilton and the Federalists. Triumphant in 1800, the political duo's dilemmas between their constitutional conscientiousness and the exigencies of exercising power animate Feldman's discussions of their presidencies. Not neglecting the discord between Madison's political theories and his actuality as a slave owner, Feldman identifies Madison's lasting legacies in this important contribution to the history of the early republic.--Taylor, Gilbert Copyright 2017 Booklist

From Booklist, Copyright (c) American Library Association. Used with permission.
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review

Richly detailed and propelled by clear, thoughtful analysis, this comprehensive biography by Harvard constitutional-law scholar Feldman (Cool War) traces the arc of Madison's career from his early influence on the Constitution through his role as cofounder of the Democratic-Republican Party to his tenure as America's fourth president. In addressing each of Madison's distinct "public lives," Feldman situates his subject within a particular historical moment, while also attending to his complex relationships with Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton, and other key thinkers of the early republic. Madison emerges as an intense, introverted figure: his social awkwardness hardly endeared him to the public and his strongly held political beliefs often pushed him into conflict with former allies. Yet as Feldman shows, Madison's deep concern for liberty and the potential danger of faction also enabled him to change his mind on crucial issues, including the power of a centralized government. In addition to his well-developed portrait of Madison, Feldman offers lucid readings of founding documents such as The Federalist papers, reinterpreting these texts with a fresh perspective informed by close attention to language and the law. With its lively prose and political acumen, this biography will be of interest to general-history readers and scholars alike. Agent: Andrew Wylie, Wylie Agency. (Nov.) © Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved.

(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
Review by Library Journal Review

James Madison (1751-1836) was instrumental in framing the constitutional government that serves the American people today, with his efforts at the Philadelphia Convention of 1787. Madison ended the "Genius" phase of his political life, as Feldman (law, Harvard Univ.; Cool War) labels it, by successfully persuading his fellow Virginians to ratify the new form of government at a critical point in the process. The politician was prepared to retire until he saw his concept of republican government threatened; he entered the second phase of his political life as a partisan, representing a Virginia district in the First Congress. Here, he became increasingly adept at practicing politics while becoming political enemies with Alexander Hamilton, a former partner in ratifying the U.S. Constitution. Madison viewed Hamilton's political ideas as threats to true republican government. It led him, along with Thomas Jefferson, to form the first political party (Democratic-Republican). In his third political life, as Jefferson's secretary of state and later as president, Madison tried to remain faithful to his ideals. -VERDICT Based on primary and secondary sources, this is an insightful examination on how theories and ideals are applied and changed by real-life circumstances. [See Prepub Alert, 4/17/17.]-Glen Edward Taul, formerly with Campbellsville Univ., KY © Copyright 2017. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.

(c) Copyright Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
Review by Kirkus Book Review

Feldman (Law/Harvard Univ.; Cool War: The Future of Global Competition, 2013, etc.) returns with a substantial biography of our fourth president.The title's "three lives" refer to distinct phases in the career of James Madison (1751-1836). He appears first as the primary architect of the Constitution at the Philadelphia convention in 1787 and a major proponent of its ratification, accomplishments which alone would have cemented his place in history. There followed a bleak period leading the opposition in the House of Representatives during the Federalist ascendancy in the 1790s. Finally, Madison returned to executive power as Thomas Jefferson's secretary of state and then as president. Introverted and bookish, Madison was inclined to grand political theories and a nave expectation that people and nations would act rationally. He crafted a political system intended to accommodate the clash of disagreement while maintaining personal amity, and he went to great lengths to maintain friendships with his opponents. Ironically, he nevertheless became a leading partisan in a system he had designed to render parties unnecessary, and he began the unfortunate practice of labeling policies he disagreed with as unconstitutional, leading to breaks with former friends George Washington and Alexander Hamilton. Feldman's scholarly yet accessible account emphasizes the evolution of Madison's views on the Constitution and his hard-earned flexibility as well as the maturation of his viewpoints and skills as he learned to adapt pure theories of government to political realities and then to make public virtues of the practical necessities. The richly detailed narrative, while occasionally lacking fire, is suitable for general readers; Feldman's presentation of Madison's adventures when the British burned the capital in 1814 is particularly rousing. The author skates over some setbacks and controversial decisions, like the rejection of a British armistice offer early in the War of 1812, and makes a brave job of harmonizing Madison's lifelong devotion to personal liberty with his status as a slaveholder. A timely biography presenting a valuable counterbalance to the current enthusiasm for Hamilton. Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

chapter one Friendships The Argument: In college, Madison forms the pattern of intense friendship that will come to shape his political vision of the constitutional republic. ¶As a southerner and an Anglican at mid-­Atlantic, Presbyterian Princeton, Madison develops the interest that will bring him into public life and give him an almost accidental public career: religious liberty. As fervor for independence grows, Madison develops a distinction between religious dissent among Protestants who share common commitments, which should be protected as an absolute good, and Loyalist opposition to independence, which deserves to be suppressed because it threatens the political commitment to independence. ¶The Revolution gives Madison the chance to participate in writing the Virginia state constitution when he is just twenty-­five. There Madison makes his first public mark, an improvement of the religious liberty provision. His career as a constitution designer and public official is launched. He came to New Jersey for the air. Arriving at Princeton in the autumn of 1769, James Madison, Jr., found something unique in the North America of the time: a college offering both entrée into the European republic of letters and the ideas of the Enlightenment and a close-­knit community of smart, ambitious young men intent on forming lasting friendships and getting ahead in the world. For the eldest son of a wealthy Virginia plantation owner, educated privately by tutors, this was the true start of his life. Madison's eyes were a clear green, his hair was dark, and he was perhaps five feet five inches tall. Neat and tidy, he looked younger than his eighteen years. Like his peers, he thought of himself as a British subject. Yet Madison was different. His classmates mostly came from the mid-­Atlantic colonies of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York. Madison was a Virginian from the Piedmont. The college was a Presbyterian institution teaching students from a range of dissenting Protestant denominations. Madison was a member of the Church of England. The students, who rarely had independent means, aspired to careers in law, medicine, and the ministry. Madison, heir to four thousand acres and well over a hundred slaves, was a gentleman by birth. Indeed, he came up to Princeton accompanied by a slave named Sawney, whom his maternal grandmother had left to him in her will. What made Madison most unusual was his profound sense of intellectual purpose. For many students, friendship was the most important focus of college life. Educated young men in late eighteenth-­century America often spoke and wrote to each other of their great mutual affection. Declarations of passionate friendship, even love, were not considered unmanly. Madison had come to Princeton to learn, and his friendships reflected that priority. In his first year at the college, he formed a close bond with a Philadelphian named Joseph Ross, who had arrived the year before. Attracted to the challenge of intense study together, they decided to try to accomplish the next two years of required coursework in just one year. Together, Madison and Ross experimented with how little they could sleep--­and got themselves down to five hours a night for weeks at a time. Constantly in each other's company, and constantly reading, the young men succeeded. Madison received his degree as bachelor of arts after just two years. This total commitment to a common project formed a paradigm for Madison's friendships that would persist throughout his life. Sixty years later, he would downplay the accomplishment. But he still remembered Ross. And he was proud enough of what they had done together to say they had learned more in one year than they would have in the more usual two or even three years' study. Madison also became seriously ill in the process--­a result, he believed, of the exertion. At commencement in 1771, Ross gave an English oration entitled "The Power of Eloquence." Madison was too sick to attend. He did not leave Princeton early, but ended up spending his third year there convalescing, reading, and studying according to his own interests, not for a degree. Alongside his studies, Madison allowed himself to have a little fun. He belonged to the Whig Society, a debating-­club-­cum-­fraternity of which Ross was a founding member. The Whigs engaged in "paper wars" with another club, the Cliosophic Society. Madison himself wrote three long, humorously insulting poems in one such war. The poems include sophomoric rhymes involving scatological humor ("Urania threw a chamber pot / Which from beneath her bed she brought / And struck my eyes and ears and nose / Repeating it with lusty blows") and sex ("[She] took me to her private room / And straight an Eunuch out I come"). Yet despite humorous references to friends' whoring, pimping, drinking, and swearing, Madison was well behaved and mainly serious. The president of the college, John Witherspoon, Presbyterian minister, philosopher, signer of the Declaration of Independence, and someone whose own seriousness was beyond question, told Thomas Jefferson a few years later that "in the whole career of Mr. Madison at Princeton, he had never known him to say or do an indiscreet thing." Jefferson considered the comment so funny that he liked to tease Madison about it. What Madison learned in college, much of it from Witherspoon himself, would influence the course of his thinking for the rest of his life. The students lived together in Nassau Hall, a massive structure that was the largest stone building in North America. Above the great hall, two stories high, used for prayer and lectures, were a library and forty rooms for students. The kitchen and dining room were just below ground. Although the hall would have been dwarfed by even the more modest university colleges of Oxford and Cambridge, by American standards, it was something special. Madison arrived with strong Latin and workable Greek, both of which he continued to study in college. He had also been taught French by a Scottish tutor in Virginia. Except for Witherspoon, no one else at the college knew French, and it was not a subject of instruction. As Madison later recalled, one day a French visitor arrived at Princeton to see the president. Witherspoon was not at home, and Madison, the only other French speaker, was called to the president's house to entertain the visitor. On meeting the Frenchman, Madison discovered, to his intense embarrassment, that he could neither understand spoken French nor make understood in it. Fortunately, instruction at Princeton went well beyond language. Witherspoon and the tutors he employed started with the classics and works of contemporary theology that dominated the curriculum elsewhere. But Witherspoon's lectures and assigned readings took the students into the heart of the most exciting intellectual event of the time: the Scottish Enlightenment. Witherspoon came by this knowledge firsthand. A conservative, he made his academic reputation in his native Scotland by criticizing the philosopher Francis Hutcheson, who had himself taught Adam Smith and influenced David Hume. Remarkably, Witherspoon's critical attitude toward the Enlightenment, without which he would never have been made president of Princeton, did not mean he neglected the importance of the movement. In his lectures on moral philosophy, which all Princeton students attended, Witherspoon quoted Hutcheson more than any other thinker. He never mentioned the towering philosopher and skeptic Hume without reproach, and Hume appeared not on the assigned reading list but on a list of outsider readings. Yet Witherspoon did discuss Hume's views, and it would have been obvious to any student hearing the lectures that this was a figure whose work he had better read. As a result of Witherspoon's leadership, Princeton for outstripped Harvard and Yale, at the time more parochial in their teaching. It was Madison's good luck that he happened into Princeton and Witherspoon's intellectual orbit. Ordinarily, a young man of Madison's origin and wealth would have gone to the College of William and Mary in Williamsburg, Virginia, where Jefferson had studied a decade earlier. In a brief autobiographical sketch written many years later, Madison gave two explanations for why he had instead been sent to New Jersey. One was that his private tutor during his teens, the Reverend Thomas Martin, had studied at Princeton, as had his brother Alexander Martin. They recommended their alma mater for Madison. The other was the climate. Madison's Virginia was not the Tidewater region in the eastern part of the state, already famous for its tobacco plantations, but the hills of the Piedmont farther west. In the era before germ theory or the recognition of mosquitoes as vectors of disease, explanations for illness depended heavily on geography. Hot, humid air was thought to be dangerous. Madison explained that the air of Tidewater Williamsburg "was unhealthy for persons going from a mountainous region" like the Piedmont, who were presumed more likely to become ill in an unaccustomed environment--­and may conceivably have had less immunity to some diseases by virtue of less exposure. Throughout his life, Madison felt he had a propensity for getting sick. As a result, he protected himself as much as possible from places and activities thought to produce disease. The care he took would sometimes have negative effects, chiefly in convincing Madison that he should not travel abroad. In the choice of Princeton, however, this concern had only fortunate consequences. It opened broader intellectual vistas than he would otherwise have encountered so early in his life. Perhaps most important, the fact that Madison, baptized an Anglican, received his education from Presbyterian ministers at a Presbyterian institution awakened in him an early and enduring interest in the protection of religious dissent. An Obscure Corner After commencement in March 1772, Madison was called home to Virginia to serve as a tutor for his younger siblings Nelly, William, and Sarah, ages twelve, ten, and eight, respectively. His brothers Francis and Ambrose, then nineteen and seventeen, had not gone to college, and were not suitable for the role. Madison had tried to find a classmate who would be willing to assume the post of live-­in tutor while he was at college, but no one would take it. Without any definite professional plan, and with his family's educational needs unmet, Madison had no reason or excuse to remain at Princeton, or for his father to support him there. Going back to Virginia meant leaving a world of intellectualism and camaraderie for what Madison called, in a letter to a close Princeton friend, William Bradford, "an obscure corner." The family farm in the Piedmont, not yet called Montpelier, featured a large, comfortable brick house with a fine view of the Blue Ridge Mountains. But Orange County, Virginia, was a backwater compared to Bradford's Philadelphia, which Madison rightly called "the fountain-­head of political and literary intelligence" in North America. Life proceeded according to the regular rhythms of agriculture. The plantation, administered by James Madison, Sr., produced barley, wheat, and corn. Slaves did the field work, performed domestic duties around the house, and participated in the gradual expansion of the buildings on the property. The forms of slavery were well established from the standpoint of the slaveholders, and Madison did not then have much occasion to question them. There were no active local newspapers in the county. Religion consisted primarily of the established Church of England. The nearest parish church was some seven miles away. Madison's father was a vestryman, a wholly respectable, well-­off member of the local society. Deference to such men was normal in the Virginia of the day. Madison himself, despite his youth, expected and received similar deference from the family's neighbors. Apart from educating his brothers and sisters, Madison's primary responsibility once home was to figure out what to do with his life. Not that the task was pressing. It would have been perfectly acceptable for Madison to continue in his father's place, running the plantation, time reading as he might want to read, and eventually starting a family of his own: in short, following the quiet life favored by many Virginia gentlemen. Madison missed college--­and his letters from when he came home in 1772 until 1774 suggest a kind of post-­graduation ennui. In a letter to Bradford, Madison spoke nostalgically of the days when they "were under the same roof" and Bradford "found it a recreation and release from business and books to come and chat an hour or two" with Madison. By contrast, Bradford's letters to Madison are full of energetic, detailed analysis of whether Bradford should pursue law, medicine, or business. Bradford wanted his older friend's advice as he evaluated his own character, intelligence, strengths, and weaknesses. He eventually chose law, which had been his preference from the start. In commercial Philadelphia with its culture of Quaker usefulness, there was no question of Bradford's simply doing nothing. On Madison's side, no such soul-­searching appeared. He told Bradford that he himself intended "to read law occasionally," and that he would welcome any recommended readings on the topic because they would doubtless afford "entertainment and instruction." He explained that "the principles and modes of government are too important to be disregarded by an inquisitive mind" and, he thought, "are well worthy [of] a critical examination by all students that have health and leisure." Madison, in other words, had a general intellectual interest in law and legal institutions, but little desire to become a lawyer. He made no mention of medicine or business, each of which would have been an unusual choice for a Virginian of his class. He spoke highly of a career in the church, though without any indication that he thought of becoming a minister himself. Madison did express a religious point of view in telling Bradford about his dissatisfaction with the London book reviews. He read them to keep up with the world of letters, but he found "them loose in their principles [and] encourage[r]s of free enquiry even such as destroys the most essential truths." The reviews were also "enemies to serious religion," he added. This moralizing tone, conspicuously absent from Madison's later writings, provides an important clue to the single subject that actually seems to have excited Madison in the course of his readings. The young Madison took religion seriously. This interest would eventually blossom into a career that would shape the nation. Religious Liberty The subject that most animated James Madison was the freedom of religion and the question of its official establishment. On December 1, 1773, after numerous letters in which he had asked William Bradford for nothing except news of his friends and information about the latest interesting books, Madison finally requested something specific. Once Bradford had sufficiently studied "the constitution" of his "country"--­meaning the organizing laws of Pennsylvania--­Madison wanted him to send "a draft of its origin and fundamental principles of legislation; particularly the extent" of the colony's "religious toleration." Pointed questions followed: "Is an ecclesiastical establishment absolutely necessary to support civil society in a supreme government? And how far it is hurtful to a dependent state?" Although he insisted that he was not asking "for an immediate answer," Madison told Bradford that when he had "satisfied" himself "in these points," Madison "should listen with pleasure to the result of" his research. Excerpted from The Three Lives of James Madison: Genius, Partisan, President by Noah Feldman All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.