Review by Choice Review
Policing and race in the criminal justice system are important areas of research, discussion, and debate in schools across the US. Davis addresses these issues with this edited volume, which features the nation's foremost scholars of policing, race, and the US criminal justice system. Esteemed scholars such as Katheryn Russell-Brown, Marc Mauer, Jeremy Travis, and Bruce Western join Davis in presenting the extent of knowledge as to how race in the US relates to police, prosecution, and judicial decision-making. This book specifically discusses racial profiling, implicit bias, police accountability, prosecutorial discretion, and poverty. The contributing authors examine the experiences of black men at every stage of the criminal justice system. The book is extremely well written and could easily be used as a resource for research or as assigned reading for a graduate seminar. Each chapter contains a full bibliography and a listing of notes for further details on claims and statements made throughout the text. A valued addition to any university library collection, especially if schools have a criminal justice or criminology program. Summing Up: Highly recommended. Upper-division undergraduates and above. --Daniel Ryan Kavish, Lander University
Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by New York Times Review
BLACK PEOPLE HAVE NEVER been truly safe in America. Police brutality and the use of excessive force have been enduring features of our history. Today social media has allowed us to make our collective vulnerability newly visible to the general public. Not since the civil rights era, when images of police officers beating peaceful protesters made the nightly news, have we engaged in this level of national conversation about racial inequality. With formal segregation behind us, the racism that pervades our society has pooled in the criminal justice and law enforcement strategies that developed in the wake of Jim Crow. We police black and brown citizens and lock them in cages like no other country in the world. Three new books lay out an alternative path. In "Called to Rise," by the former Dallas police chief David O. Brown, we learn how a black law enforcement officer ascended the ranks and reformed the department, helping to make the entire city safer. "Policing the Black Man," edited by the activist and law professor Angela J. Davis, brings together 11 essays from scholars and criminal justice practitioners who offer forward-thinking policy suggestions. And in the most readable and provocative account of the consequences of the war on drugs since Michelle Alexander's "The New Jim Crow," the law professor and former federal prosecutor Paul Butler argues that our society must be completely remade in "Chokehold: Policing Black Men." Brown, who is best known for his handling of the shooting deaths of five Dallas police officers by a sniper in July 2016, believes "we will make progress only when we set aside our assumptions and really start listening to each other." He admits he didn't always think this way. When Brown was a patrol officer in the 1980s, he ascribed to the dominant approach: "Put the criminals in jail, and let God sort them out." In the 1990s, the Dallas police chief at the time assigned Brown to a community policing program. Brown had been "a cop who gloried in locking away villains," but his "instincts had slowly shifted," and he began to see the value in having police officers "connect with the people they served." In 2010, Brown became police chief, and he had his officers go door-to-door to meet the people they were charged with protecting, attending homeowners association meetings and block parties, hosting basketball games and offering counseling sessions at local schools. (He also lost his 27year-old son that year, to police gunfire. His son, who had bipolar disorder, was killed after fatally shooting a bystander and a police officer.) Brown's approach, based not on arrest numbers but on policecommunity engagement, led to a historic decline in Dallas's crime rate between 2010 and 2015. Brown retired in 2016, after he noticed an uptick in the crime rate, which he attributes to budget cuts that led to staffing shortages. Although Brown offers us one of the most impressive models for community policing, his view begins to look idealized in light of the racist practices described by Paul Butler in "Chokehold." "Cops routinely hurt and humiliate black people because that is what they are paid to do," Butler writes. "The police, as policy, treat African-Americans with contempt." Like Brown, Butler admits that he was once an active participant in this system, a prosecutor who "sent a lot of black men to prison" and "defended cops who had racially profiled or used excessive force." While Butler urges us to rethink the purpose and function of policing entirely, a number of the essays in Angela J. Davis's anthology suggest that the historical tension between low-income residents of color and the police charged with protecting them can be addressed with training programs. In one of the most popular of these programs, known as procedural justice, policemen are taught that if they treat people with dignity, respect and fairness, they will build trust and gain legitimacy. Meanwhile, implicit bias training encourages officers to recognize the set of racial assumptions they carry but do not consciously control. These measures can also save lives. As Yale Law School's Tracey Meares and Tom Tyler put it in their essay, the more trust communities have in the police, the more likely they are to report crime, provide testimony and help "to hold offenders accountable." Barring fundamental legal reforms, however, these programs can have only a limited impact. Indeed, much of the discussion in "Chokehold" and "Policing the Black Man" highlights the impact of major Supreme Court decisions of the last 50 years, including ones that supported racial profiling and deemed statistical evidence of racial disparities insufficient to prove a "discriminatory purpose" on the part of police officers or the courts. As Jin ??? Lee and Sherrilyn A. Ifill, both from the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, point out in their contribution to Davis's book, "the courts function in a distorted reality that only recognizes racial discrimination in a specific and distinct form: overt racial animus by a specific actor." The Supreme Court's interpretation of the Constitution has largely failed to extend African-American citizens protection from police abuse and sentencing disparities. Lee and Ifill suggest that hope might lie in pursuing "a more effective body of equal protection and anti-discrimination law." Butler, however, remains skeptical of incrementalist measures. "Liberal reforms, such as anti-discrimination laws, have not brought long-term change," Butler writes in "Chokehold." "Civil Rights laws have helped stigmatize discrimination but have barely blunted its effect." He demonstrates that when citizenship rights are extended to African-Americans, policy makers and officials at all levels of government historically used law and incarceration as proxy to exert social control in black communities. Black Codes, convict leasing and Jim Crow segregation followed Emancipation; overpolicing and mass incarceration followed the civil rights movement. "In order to halt this wretched cycle we must not think of reform - we must think of transformation," Butler writes. "The United States of America must be disrupted, and made anew." For Butler, remaking America entails abolishing both prisons and the conditions of segregated poverty that increase the likelihood of criminal justice supervision. Butler cites a study from New York University's Brennan Center for Justice estimating that 40 percent of the nation's prisoners could be released without compromising public safety. This alone would save taxpayers $200 billion over 20 years, freeing up new opportunities for resources and outcomes. He suggests those funds could be used to hire 327,000 new public-school teachers, or to create jobs for low-income citizens who often have no options for survival outside of the informal economy. And since nearly 80 percent of people in prison suffer from drug addiction or mental health issues, Butler thinks it wise to reallocate funding from police departments and correctional authorities to community health care. If the prospect of this level of structural change sounds impossible or rash, at the very least we can heed the insights the public interest lawyer Bryan Stevenson provides in "Policing the Black Man." Stevenson looks to South Africa, where a series of truth and reconciliation hearings followed the end of apartheid, and Germany, where citizens are encouraged to visit the sites of Nazi concentration camps and reflect on the history of the Holocaust, as examples of the kind of historical reckoning we must also commit to as a nation. For it is only by fully confronting the traumatic and contradictory currents of American history that we can begin to change course. Past abuses must be repaired so that safety and justice can exist for us all.
Copyright (c) The New York Times Company [July 30, 2017]
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review
"The political justice system polices black men at every step of the process," asserts Davis (Arbitrary Justice), a professor of law at American University and editor of this eye-opening assemblage of essays on racism in the American criminal justice system. The various perspectives of the contributors-all specialists in criminal law and justice-offer a kaleidoscopic view of each step. In "Boys to Men," for example, Kristin Henning, the director of the Juvenile Justice Clinic at Georgetown Law, demonstrates the devastating impact of the presence of police security officers in schools. Her essay is followed by law professor Katheryn Russell-Brown's in-depth examination of implicit bias. "The Grand Jury and Police Violence Against Black Men," by Roger Fairfax (Grand Jury 2.0), illuminates a less-discussed stage of the criminal process, as does Davis's own contribution, which considers the particular role of the prosecutor. The culmination is relentlessly informative and disturbing. (July) © Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved.
(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
Review by Library Journal Review
In the introduction to these new essays, Davis (law, American Univ.; Arbitrary Justice) states that the media has made the American public real-time witnesses to the country's chronic and systemic violence against black males. Davis, along with 13 other criminal justice experts, advance critical understanding to combat and correct structural racism and advocate for justice and peace. They suggest that, although the evidence is now readily available, targeted brutality is hardly new as it perpetuates what black people have endured and continue to live with following the legacy of slavery and the racialized criminal justice system. Policing propagates that legacy through policies and practices of racial profiling. Further, implicit bias from chronic presumption of guilt reaches beyond policing to disparate prosecuting of black males, as several contributors demonstrate. The essayists offer more than indictments, however. Almost all move beyond calls for reform to respond with practical suggestions for change to make black lives truly matter. VERDICT For general readers, students, and experts alike, these essays provide much-needed data, analysis, and insights into the disparities throughout U.S. society and its criminal justice system. [See Prepub Alert, 2/13/17.] -Thomas J. Davis, Arizona State Univ., Tempe © Copyright 2017. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
(c) Copyright Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
Review by Kirkus Book Review
Lucid perspectives on how and why the United States criminal justice system often victimizes black males.A professor at American University's Washington College of Law, Davis (Arbitrary Justice: The Power of the American Prosecutor, 2007, etc.) used her platform to pull together this collection of essays from a variety of scholars and writers. Providing useful context, the editor points out that black males have never fared well when confronted by police and prosecutors across the U.S. For a couple of centuries, in fact, black men could rarely convince white authorities of the breadth and depth of the injustices. In recent decades, new technology, including smartphones and body cameras, combined with the sounding board of social media have removed doubt about the credibility of many victims. In the introduction, Davis invokes the names of numerous dead black males, placing special emphasis on the killing of Trayvon Martin five years ago by George Zimmerman. While soliciting the essays, Davis offered an expanded definition of the word "policing," showing how much of the foundation of policing black males rests on racial profiling by law enforcement. In her powerful essay, law professor Rene McDonald Hutchins explains what the law does and does not say about racial profiling, how police agency policies are drafted in light of the law, and how the on-the-street practices of racial profiling sometimes violate both the letter and spirit of laws and policies. While many of the essays focus on the police, Davis focuses on her specialty, prosecutors, and how their untrammeled authority is a major part of the problems within the criminal justice system. While the essays lean toward narrating the problems rather than proposing comprehensive solutions, the final essay links multigenerational poverty of black males with violence and an absurd level of incarceration. Other contributors include Bryan Stevenson, Sherrilyn Ifill, and Marc Mauer. An absorbing anthology, scholarly yet approachable. Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.
Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.