Shattered Inside Hillary Clinton's doomed campaign

Jonathan Allen

Sound recording - 2017

"It was never supposed to be this close. And of course she was supposed to win. How Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 election to Donald Trump is the tragic story of a sure thing gone off the rails. For every Comey revelation or hindsight acknowledgment about the electorate, no explanation of defeat can begin with anything other than the core problem of Hillary's campaign--the candidate herself. Through deep access to insiders from the top to the bottom of the campaign, political writers Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes have reconstructed the key decisions and unseized opportunities, the well-intentioned misfires and the hidden thorns that turned a winnable contest into a devastating loss. Drawing on the authors' deep knowledge of ...Hillary from their previous book, the acclaimed biography HRC, Shattered will offer an object lesson in how Hillary herself made victory an uphill battle, how her difficulty articulating a vision irreparably hobbled her impact with voters, and how the campaign failed to internalize the lessons of populist fury from the hard-fought primary against Bernie Sanders. Moving blow-by-blow from the campaign's difficult birth through the bewildering terror of election night, Shattered tells an unforgettable story with urgent lessons both political and personal, filled with revelations that will change the way readers understand just what happened to America on November 8, 2016"--

Saved in:
This item has been withdrawn.

2nd Floor Show me where

COMPACT DISC/324.973/Allen
All copies withdrawn
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor COMPACT DISC/324.973/Allen Withdrawn
Subjects
Published
New York, NY : Books on Tape [2017]
Language
English
Main Author
Jonathan Allen (-)
Other Authors
Amie Parnes (author), Kimberly Farr (narrator)
Edition
Unabridged
Physical Description
14 audio discs (approximately 17 hours) : CD audio, digital ; 4 3/4 in
ISBN
9781524722906
  • "Or I wouldn't have run"
  • The mercenaries and the missionaries
  • Feeling the Bern
  • The summer of the server
  • The Biden threat
  • Mrs. October
  • "I certain we were going to lose"
  • The prize and the pain
  • Base politics
  • Turning the corner
  • Canary in the auto plant
  • Damage
  • "Too easy"
  • "Hillary just can't make up her mind"
  • But it looked great
  • "It's so phony"
  • "Demeanor is the debate"
  • Red October
  • Comey
  • "I'm sorry"
  • The aftermath.
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review

For this insider look at former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign, veteran political reporters Allen and Parnes offered their sources anonymity in exchange for access; that approach yields a history with plenty of detail, but there are few insights into Clinton herself. Clinton began her campaign as "the candidate to beat" in 2014 and oversaw a collapse that put Donald Trump in the White House. "Loyalty-obsessed Clintonworld," the sphere of influence around the candidate, guarded access to her so tightly that the candidate "couldn't figure out why Americans were so angry or how she could bring the country together," and Allen and Parnes assert that this was largely responsible for creating "a campaign that was miserable even before it started": nobody was able to tell Clinton that she was "a terrible judge of how her actions could backfire and turn into full-blown scandals" and oblivious to the "massive conflicts of interest" between her public and private roles. The authors say that these flaws, combined with a data-centered approach that missed the surge of populism, led to her loss of key primaries like Michigan in an unexpectedly hard-fought campaign against Bernie Sanders, and derailed what could have been a victory march into a long, joyless slog to humiliating defeat. The insider perspective tunnels into the campaign without really illuminating the personalities involved, the broader context of the electorate, or the eventual winner. (Apr.) © Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved.


Review by Kirkus Book Review

An in-depth dissection of Hillary Clinton's second campaign for the presidency, a failure on many countsexcept, of course, that of the popular vote.Why did Clinton, arguably the most capable presidential candidate fielded by any of the parties, not take the White House? The reasons are many, and they combined in a perfect storm. At least that's one takeaway from this readable, endlessly fascinating autopsy by Roll Call columnist Allen and The Hill White House correspondent Parnes, who co-authored HRC: State Secrets and the Rebirth of Hillary Clinton (2014). One spoiler was Bernie Sanders, who entered the race somewhat reluctantly as a Democrat. Another was that pesky business of email sent and received from a private server while Clinton was secretary of state, a matter that, Allen and Parnes note, bothered Barack Obama much more than he ever let on: "It was a classic unforced Clinton error, and he couldn't believe that she and the people around her had let it happen." It didn't help that the director of the FBI raised the matter of the email just before the election, a move that could not help but cost her votes. Another was the choice of a vice presidential candidate who had all the personality of a brick, a choice dictated mostly by political calculus. Still another was the rising tide of screw-it populism that saw Donald Trumpthe favorite of very few voters, as it turns outinto office and which Bill Clinton, by the authors' account, correctly foretold in looking at the Brexit vote in the U.K. And why didn't Bill, more popular after his presidency than just about any other executive, do more to pitch in and campaign for his wife? In part because, the authors write, Hillary wanted to avoid the perception that she was riding his coattails, while he wanted to keep face-saving distance just in case she lost. A top-notch campaign examination. If, like so many others, you wonder what on earth happened in November 2016, this is all the explanation you need. Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Chapter 1 "Or I Wouldn't Have Run" Hillary clinton had a new rendezvous with destiny on her mind. Her motorcade sped toward Roosevelt Island on the morning of June 13, 2015. In a little more than an hour, she would officially kick off what she hoped would be a trailblazing, glass-ceiling-shattering campaign for the presidency. For most of the previous forty-eight hours, she had been trying to give a feel of historic importance to her first major address. It just wasn't there yet. She picked up the phone and called her chief speechwriter, Dan Schwerin. After two days of trading drafts with Hillary, after waiting through the delay of a power outage at her Chappaqua, New York, home, the bearded thirty-two-year-old with a signature chestnut pompadour was just about to board the tram connecting Manhattan to the East River island. He had stayed up all night, pulling together tweaks to the 3:30 a.m. version of the speech, and he looked hungover. Now, battling exhaustion and the sweltering heat, Schwerin pulled out his laptop one more time and sat down on the platform so that Hillary could dictate her final edits. The key passage of the speech was an explanation of why she was running for president: "to make our economy work for you and for every American." In the middle of that run--about how she would do it and who she would fight for--Hillary wanted to connect herself and her campaign to Franklin Roosevelt, the president who defined the aspirations of the Democratic Party and much of the nation for generations. "Here on Roosevelt Island," she said to Schwerin, "I believe we have a continuing rendezvous with destiny." He tapped the echo of FDR's 1936 Democratic convention speech into his computer at 11 a.m. and took the next cable car to the island. Few would notice the last-minute change. The cluttered speech had become a testament to the aimlessness and passive-aggressive infighting that plagued the early stages of Hillary's campaign. Hillary had tried to put together a team this time that would feature far less internal drama than her failed 2008 bid. Back then, big personalities had clashed openly, aired dirty laundry and strategy details in the press, and sometimes pursued their own goals at the expense of hers. In the intervening years, she'd assigned a lot of the blame for her loss to the warring inside her campaign. But that was hardly the only ailment from 2008 that she hoped to remedy. She hadn't sold a vision for the country. She'd run away from being a woman instead of leaning into the unique aspect of her political story. To manage her campaign, she'd tapped a friend rather than the top pro. She'd let her husband run wild on the trail. And she had failed to take advantage of the latest technology to build a movement of grassroots supporters and donors. From a strategic standpoint, she'd dumped millions of dollars into Iowa, the first-in-the-nation caucus, even though that only elevated the importance of her devastating third-place finish there. She'd gone on the attack against a better-liked rival whose platform more closely mirrored the values of the party's base, creating a boomerang effect on her personal standing. Perhaps worst of all, she'd obsessed over winning the popular vote in big states rather than targeting the all-important delegates and superdelegates whose votes at the Democratic convention determined the party's nominee. But the idea burned into her mind as much as anything else was that she had lost because she'd hired people who put their own interests above getting her elected. The absence of palace intrigue on her opponent's side--the "no drama Obama" campaign--was the kind of purpose-driven loyalty she pined for. Over the next seven years, Hillary would rebuild her political organization while working at the State Department and the Clinton Foundation, punish those who had been disloyal to her, and prepare herself to mount a second bid for the most powerful job on the planet. When she conceded to Obama in 2008, she'd thanked voters for putting "18 million cracks" in the glass ceiling of the presidency. By the time she finished the 2016 campaign, she believed, that glass ceiling would lay shattered beneath her feet. And yet what Hillary couldn't quite see is that no matter how she recast the supporting roles in this production, or emphasized different parts of the script, the main character hadn't changed. Huddled around a white table in the conference room of the Clintons' midtown Manhattan personal office in the early spring of 2015, months before she would go to Roosevelt Island to deliver her first major address, the first hires of Hillary's worst-kept-secret campaign outlined a plan to fly her to Iowa. They had pegged the Hawkeye State, where caucus-goers had doomed her first bid for the Oval Office, as the best spot for her kickoff speech. But Hillary didn't like what she was hearing. She didn't want to go big, at least not yet. And she didn't want the first major address of what could be a history-making campaign to be set against a minimalistic backdrop like some farmer's back porch. To the chagrin of campaign manager Robby Mook, who would have to build a billion-dollar apparatus, Hillary had been dragging her feet about making things official. She understood that her team needed to start raising funds, hire more staff, and begin recruiting volunteers. But she also knew she had to be fully prepared for this battle. And she just wasn't ready. Mook, clean-cut with close-cropped brown hair and lively hazel eyes, was antsy. At one point, there was even discussion of his starring in a campaign-launching video announcing the formation of an "exploratory" committee. But Hillary was wary of repeating some of the major mistakes of her 2008 bid. She had rushed into her announcement that year to compete with Obama, and she had made it all about her: "I'm in it to win," she'd said in her campaign-opening video. This time, she wanted to show she was listening to voters--talking with them one-on-one or in small groups and in informal settings (all with the knowledge that everything she did would be dutifully reported by a press corps hungry for nuggets from the trail). "We've come so far under President Obama, but we have so many problems," she told her advisers. "I want to make sure I'm the right person." Given that everyone in the room had ostensibly been hired to run her campaign, and that some of them had been in on earlier discussions about the timing and logistics of her launch, no one believed she was really so ambivalent. But, sitting by a bank of three windows, twenty-seven floors above the bustle of Seventh Avenue, Hillary rendered a clear verdict on the Iowa kickoff plan: "No." She would go to Iowa in April, she said, but not to deliver a launch speech--and not in a private jet. She would drive, in a van, and try to find people along the way who weren't expecting to run into her. After a quarter of a century locked inside the political bubble of the New York-to-Washington stretch of the Acela corridor, Hillary was eager to find out what people thought about the state of the country--and about her. She didn't want to officially kick off the campaign until she'd had a chance to repeat what she'd done when she first ran for a New York Senate seat: gather information from voters. "She wanted to do that before giving a big speech and having a big event and saying 'I have all this figured out,' " said one aide. "We didn't have it all figured out." Her big opening address would come at a location with more historic consequence, but for now, a "soft" launch could go forward--an upbeat video followed by the road trip. The time would come for her to speak into the winds of history, but, as much as she knew Iowa wasn't the place, she also knew that her moment hadn't yet come. She'd been off the political battlefield for seven years. As secretary of state, she'd worked to win concessions in diplomatic back rooms across the world, but she didn't have to worry about securing millions of votes. Barack Obama had been elected president and the Tea Party had risen in the time since she'd last been on the campaign trail as a candidate. The nation's political bearings had shifted. And, if her 2014 book tour had taught her anything, it was that she was rusty as hell. Talking to voters, she hoped, would help her sharpen her political skills and develop her vision for the country's future. Obama had been relentlessly superb at telling voters why he was running for president and giving them a window into how he would govern. He was confident, cocky even, about his vision. Hillary, a modest, midwestern Methodist with a love of minutiae, was unshakably focused on the trees rather than the forest. This campaign would test the A student's ability to adapt--to subordinate her nature to her need to win. In preparing to campaign again, she studied Obama's February 2007 launch speech in Springfield, the one he delivered on the steps of the Old State Capitol--the one that connected him with fellow Illinois state legislator Abraham Lincoln, who had freed the slaves in an act that set the first stone on Obama's improbable path to the presidency. "She kept harkening back to Obama in Springfield," said one of Hillary's top advisers. "She had gone back to read that speech and how important it was for people as a marker of what he would do in the presidency. She viewed it as an important kind of road map for her governing principles and her actual plans to be president." In her mind, the first landmark address of what she hoped and believed would be a historic campaign couldn't be about the politics of the moment, about tipping a few Iowa caucus-goers in her direction. It had to be about how she could reshape the nation from the Oval Office. For Hillary, a wonk in the best and worst senses of the word, that meant devising her policy agenda before she ever stepped to the podium. Most politicians understand that voters are looking for big, bold principles--easy-to-grasp concepts--and that the details can be filled in to fit them. For Hillary, policy is vision, and she would try to build a platform, program by program, into a blueprint for the country. This prospect was actually a relief. It was more comfortable for her to sit in four-hour meetings at the conference table with her policy chief--the reedy, whip-smart Jake Sullivan--than to define herself by a small set of guiding principles and shape her policy ideas to fit them. Hillary adored the thirty-eight-year-old Sullivan, enough to joke publicly about her confidence that he would someday be president of the United States. He had served Hillary as deputy chief of staff at State, a position from which he gradually vacuumed up all or parts of the jobs of several senior colleagues. Hillary appreciated both his competence and his ambition. His instincts on policy and politics matched hers. So she turned to him to run what she thought was the most important part of the campaign: the substance. That's what bonded Hillary to her young protégé--they geeked out over policy--and it's what she wanted at the heart of her first address to the voting public. "This is her deeply held thing: elections should be about policy," said one senior Hillary adviser. "There's a textbook quality to her articulation of things." That would make every step of narrative building its own form of excruciating drudgery. But it would soon seem like a minor nuisance for a campaign that was miserable even before it started. In early March, just as she was planning to reintroduce herself to a nation that felt it knew her all too well with a video announcement of her campaign, the New York Times reported that Hillary had used an e‑mail address tied to a personal server at her family home in Chappaqua, to conduct official State Department business. The e‑mail story would bedevil her straight through Election Day, robbing her of the ability to create a positive narrative for her candidacy and, as one top adviser put it, returning to her like a cold sore. "You never know when it's going to pop up," this adviser said. "You think you're over it and then [it pops]up again." At the time, it was impossible to know how long the e‑mail story would last and just how badly it would damage the campaign. "Did you have any idea of the depth of this story?" campaign chairman John Podesta asked Mook when it broke. "Nope," Mook replied. "We brought up the existence of emails in research this summer but were told that everything was taken care of." "That's reassuring," Podesta shot back. "Yikes." "Yeah," Mook responded. "This is going to be an interesting campaign. I'm in this zen place now where I'm focusing on the website and telling myself this is all background noise!" For those who couldn't bury their heads, praying for divine intervention was an attractive alternative. "I'm lighting candles in church all the time," pollster John Anzalone told Mook. When the e‑mail story first hit, Hillary's aides were still trying to get a feel for one another. The crisis acted as a catalyst for infighting. Publicly, she was running a no-drama campaign. But behind the scenes, Hillary's brain trust broke into tribes: *The Mook Mafia, led by Mook; Marlon Marshall, his top lieutenant; Elan Kriegel, the data analytics chief; and Oren Shur, the paid media director *The State Crew, led on the inside by Huma Abedin, the vice chairwoman; Jake Sullivan; Nick Merrill, the traveling press secretary; and Dan Schwerin, the chief speechwriter; with longtime Clinton advisers Cheryl Mills and Philippe Reines invisibly guiding Hillary behind the scenes *The Consultants, led by Joel Benenson, the chief strategist; Jim Margolis, the ad-maker; and Mandy Grunwald, the longtime Clinton message maven *The Communications Shop, led by Jennifer Palmieri, the communications director; Kristina Schake, her deputy; and Christina Reynolds, the research director, who had worked with Palmieri on the John Edwards campaign At the start, Podesta was seen as a high-level troubleshooter. Short, wiry, and in his midsixties, the marathon-running former top aide to Presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama had deep ties to every power center in the Democratic Party. He was supposed to play an adult-in-the-room role on the campaign, coordinating with Bill's office, the White House, Democratic interest groups, and major donors. In theory, Podesta would provide air cover in Clintonworld, lessening the burden on Mook and allowing the campaign manager to focus on executing. Excerpted from Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton's Doomed Campaign by Jonathan Allen, Amie Parnes All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.