Last Hope Island Britain, occupied Europe, and the brotherhood that helped turn the tide of war

Lynne Olson

Book - 2017

"When the Nazi Blitzkrieg subjugated Europe in World War II, London became the safe haven for the leaders of seven occupied countries--France, Belgium, Holland, Luxembourg, Norway, Czechoslovakia and Poland--who fled there to avoid imprisonment and set up governments in exile to commandeer their resistance efforts. The lone hold-out against Hitler's offensive, Britain became a beacon of hope to the rest of Europe, as prominent European leaders like French general Charles De Gaulle, Queen Wilhelmina of Holland, and King Haakon of Norway competed for Winston Churchill's attention while trying to rule their embattled countries from the precarious safety of 'Last Hope Island'"--Provided by publisher.

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

940.5341/Olson
1 / 1 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor 940.5341/Olson Checked In
Subjects
Published
New York : Random House [2017]
Language
English
Main Author
Lynne Olson (author)
Edition
First edition
Physical Description
xviii, 553 pages : illustrations ; 25 cm
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references (pages 479-525) and index.
ISBN
9780812997354
  • Introduction
  • Part 1. Fighting on
  • 1. "Majesty, We Are at War!": Hitler Invades Norway
  • 2. "A Bold and Noble Woman": Holland Falls But its Queen Escapes
  • 3. "A Complete and Utter Shambles": The Collapse of Belgium and France
  • 4. "We Shall Conquer Together-or We Shall Die Together: The European Exodus to Britain
  • 5. "Something Called Heavy Water": The Rescue Mission that Changed the Course of the War
  • 6. "They Are Better Than Any of Us": Polish Pilots Triumph in the Battle of Britain
  • 7. "My God, This Is a Lovely Place to Be!": The Exhilaration of Wartime London
  • 8. "This Is London Calling": The BBC Brings Hope to Occupied Europe
  • 9. "An Avalanche of Vs": The First Spark of European Resistance
  • 10. Spying on the Nazis: Cracking Enigma and Other European Intelligence Coups
  • 11. "Mad Hatter's Tea Party": SOE and its Struggle to Set Europe Ablaze
  • 12. Factions, Feuds, and Infighting: The Shock of Exile
  • Part 2. Wile of the Titans
  • 13. "Rich and. Poor Relations": The European Allies' Fading Importance
  • 14. "The Ugly Reality": The Soviet Threat to Poland and Czechoslovakia
  • 15. "The England Game": Soe's Dutch Disaster
  • 16. "Be More Careful Next Time": Soe's Debacle in France
  • 17. "Heroism Beyond Anything I Can Tell You": Rescuing Allied Airmen
  • 18. A Giant jigsaw Puzzle: European Spies Prepare for D-Day
  • 19. "A Formidable Secret Army": The Resurrection of Soe
  • 20. "The Poor Little English Donkey": Stalin and Roosevelt Flex Their Muscles
  • 21. Settling the Score: Europe's Liberation Begins
  • 22. "A Tale of Two Cities": Warsaw and Paris Rise Up
  • 23. "I Was a Stranger and You Took Me In": Defeat at Arnhem
  • 24. The Hunger Winter: The Netherlands' Looming Destruction
  • 25. "There Was Never a Happier Day": Coming Home
  • 26. "Why Are You Crying, Young Man?": The West Turns its Back on Poland and Czechoslovakia
  • 27. "A Collective Fault": The Shadow of Collaboration
  • 28. "The World Could Not Possibly Be the Same": Planning for the Future
  • 29. "My Counsel to Europe ... : Unite!": Postwar Europe Bands Together
  • Author's Note
  • Notes
  • Bibliography
  • Index
Review by New York Times Review

in September 1938, days before taking tea at Hitler's Berchtesgaden hideaway to settle the fate of Czechoslovakia, Britain's prime minister, Neville Chamberlain, shared a moment's reflection with his British countrymen. "How horrible, fantastic, incredible" it was that they should be digging trenches and donning gas masks "because of a quarrel in a faraway country between people of whom we know nothing." He meant the nearly 14 million people in the well-run multicultural state created in 1918 at the end of World War I. For "peace in our time," Chamberlain made his host a gift of the 3.5 million ethnic Germans in Sudetenland. The Czechs were even further from the mind of President Roosevelt. Hitler's 1936 march into the demilitarized Rhineland, the buffer zone between Germany and France, had been a breach not only of Versailles but of America's separate peace of 1921 and the Locarno pact of 1925. Roosevelt went fishing. When the Munich betrayal was complete, he cabled Chamberlain: "Good man!" He remained as aloof in March 1939 when Hitler devoured the rest of Czechoslovakia and the sinews for war in its coal, steel and munitions industries. Roosevelt, Lynne Olson writes, regarded all the smaller European nations "as Lilliputians." So, without a whimper of protest, ended the first democracy Central Europe had known. This is Olson's fourth book dealing with Britain and World War II, but in "Last Hope Island" she argues an arresting new thesis: that the people of occupied Europe and the expatriate leaders did far more for their own liberation than historians and the public alike recognize. Books and films have dramatized individual stories of the resistance, but the scale of the organization she describes is breathtaking. Every captive nation built escape networks. The air war against Germany was sustained by as many as 7,000 British, American and other downed Allied servicemen saved from captivity by local people, directed to a safe house, given false papers and inconspicuous clothes, warned that it would be fatal to look the "wrong" way crossing the road and spirited back to base in Britain. Having made a good case for selfliberation, Olson raises her bid on behalf of the occupied countries: "Without their help, the British might well have lost the Battle of Britain and the Battle of the Atlantic and might never have conquered the Germans' fiendishly complex Enigma code." The claim invites a challenge, but she is persuasive in dramatizing great deeds done and then forgotten or unappreciated. Neutral Norway, at peace for more than a century, had a population of fewer than three million people when invaded on April 9,1940. It made an impact out of all proportion to its size. Its ships and crews helped keep the Atlantic sea lanes open throughout the war. The path to the West's atomic dominance can be said to have started with a cheeky smuggling operation at Oslo's Fornebu Airport, organized by a Norwegian company, a French banker-spy and the British Earl of Suffolk. Under the eyes of German spies, they contrived to switch 26 canisters of heavy water to be transported on a plane bound for Amsterdam to one heading for Scotland. Two intercepting Luftwaffe fighters forced the Amsterdam plane to land in Hamburg. Its cargo was crates of crushed granite. Enigma, the German cipher machine, was every bit as important as the author suggests, and again it advances her case for the occupied countries. The exciting 2014 movie "The Imitation Game" was a fair representation of the British achievements at Bletchley Park, but how many people realize that cracking the "fiendishly complex" code began with three Poles and a Frenchman before Britain's Alan Hiring and Gordon Welchman made their breakthroughs? The Poles, secreted in a forest bunker outside Warsaw, were all in their 20 s, led by a mathematics genius by the name of Marian Rejewski. He was the first to get sense out of the German machine. The Frenchman, Gustave Bertrand, was the head of French radio intelligence who, in 1933, bribed a German in the military cipher department for four diagrams of Enigma's construction. Still fewer will know that after the war, Rejewski, who had done so much to win it, was left to rot in "liberated" Poland under constant surveillance by the Communist secret police. And that the British were shockingly slow to acknowledge the debt to the Poles. Churchill's "action this day" order accelerated the Bletchley Park operations, but he could not save Poland or Czechoslovakia from Communist tyranny. He cast a strategic eye on the smaller European countries, and always wanted to shake hands with the Russians as far east as possible. But he had little help from Roosevelt in the arguments at Tehran and Yalta. Nor did he have the support of Roosevelt in pressing Supreme Commander Dwight Eisenhower to risk marching into Prague and Berlin before the Red Army. When I interviewed Richard Nixon in 1993, he told me that Eisenhower was haunted by having forbidden Gen. George Patton from entering Prague to join the rebellious Czechs; he felt vulnerable to the possibility of Senator McCarthy blaming him for the subsequent Communist takeover. Olson's focus is on the leaders of six defeated countries who found refuge in London: Czechoslovakia, Poland, Norway, Holland, Belgium and Luxembourg, along with Gen. Charles de Gaulle, the self-appointed leader of the Free French Forces. Her descriptions of royal escapes from the Nazis are gripping. King Haakon's convoys, painted white, played hide and seek among Norway's mountains and glaciers with German bombers strafing wherever they thought the king might be. The Dutch queen, Wilhelmina, was stuck in a little airraid shelter in her palace garden while thousands of Nazi paratroopers arrived before dawn as she had predicted they would. She was cut off from her complacent ministers, who were glad to avoid the wrath they deserved for ignoring her warnings that Hitler and his "bandits" had no respect for the country's neutrality. Olson is sensitive to the traumas of the deposed in having to decide whether to stay as hostages in the hope of sparing their populations the torments of Nazi rule or risk the charge of desertion by fleeing to London. It is not as if the last-hope island was a sure sanctuary. That's hindsight. The neutral countries were stunned by the British-French betrayal of Czechoslovakia and then by their unwillingness to try to prevent Poland's dismemberment by the Nazis and the Soviets. About six million Poles were killed in the war. Churchill's appointment as prime minister on May 10,1940, ensured a warm welcome for the exiles, out of his natural human sympathies, and his recognition that Britain would need all the help it could get from the foreigners it had despised as inept or cowardly or both. This makes it all the odder that Churchill has portrayed World War II as an unalloyed American-BritishSoviet triumph. Throughout the conflict and in his histories, Olson writes, he promoted the idea of plucky little England and its united empire maintaining the struggle "single-handed" until joined by Russia and later by the United States. Olson's histories have well honored Britain's heroism. In "Last Hope Island" she justifies her toast to the exiles and their compatriots. Alas, their valor and their vision of a united Europe, purged of the lethal nationalisms that cost 60 million lives, were betrayed by the reckless Brexit referendum in June 2016 and by dishonest leaders who have learned nothing and forgotten everything. In other books, Olson hits honored Britain's heroism. Here she toasts the exiles and their compatriots. HAROLD EVANS, the author of "The American Century," is editor at large at Reuters.

Copyright (c) The New York Times Company [August 30, 2019]
Review by Booklist Review

*Starred Review* This is a history book that reads like the best thrillers. Olson, who has often written on the period before WWII (Those Angry Days, 2013), has clearly utilized her knowledge and prior research well. England, the island of the title, was home to several of Europe's exiled leaders Charles de Gaulle, King Haakon VII of Norway, Queen Wilhelmina of the Netherlands and private citizens and soldiers (the airmen of Poland, leaders of Czechoslovakia, and the Free French) during WWII. Focusing on these exiles, Olson offers a fascinating view of the war and its aftermath, less from a military than from a high-level civilian perspective. The well-demonstrated incompetence of British intelligence (especially in light of its diametrically opposite reputation) and its military and civilian leaders occasionally lends the astute writing an almost comic perspective. The narrative jumps from London to the Continent, where British cooperation with the Resistance in various countries had much to do with the Allies' victory, and this is carefully recounted. The many individuals are finely drawn, major developments (breaking of the Enigma code, D-Day, the Battle ofArnhem, the crucial contribution of the BBC) are well covered, and the book provides an unusual and very insightful angle on the war.--Levine, Mark Copyright 2017 Booklist

From Booklist, Copyright (c) American Library Association. Used with permission.
Review by Library Journal Review

In her latest offering, best-selling author Olson (Those Angry Days; Citizens of London; A Question of Honor) revisits World War II history, a topic of several of her previous works. The author once again focuses on the intersections between war and politics, this time with an emphasis on the exile governments situated in London during the conflict. Olson's main argument is that cooperative wartime exile helped many European leaders form connections and networks with one another that would not have been possible in more distant circumstances. These relationships laid the foundation for such political and economic developments as the Benelux Treaty and the European Union. Olson's work is well-researched and well-written, weaving together personal narratives of many prominent Allied leaders with political intrigue and wartime developments. VERDICT Recommended to readers with an interest in World War II, political science, European history, and 20th-century history.-Crystal Goldman, Univ. of California, San Diego Lib. © Copyright 2016. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.

(c) Copyright Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
Review by Kirkus Book Review

A "rich, intensely human story" of European cooperation during World War II.Early on during the war, government officials and many citizens of a host of conquered European nations fled to Britain. Bestselling historian Olson (Those Angry Days: Roosevelt, Lindbergh, and America's Fight Over World War II, 1939-1941, 2013, etc.) writes a vivid history of the war through the eyes of the exiles and compatriots left behind. She reveals inspiring tales of heroism, suffering, and sacrifice without ignoring too many incidents of betrayal, missed opportunities, and incompetence. First to arrive were the Poles and Czechs. That Britain had betrayed Czechoslovakia to Hitler in 1938 and remained passive while the Wehrmacht conquered Poland in 1939 did not lessen their commitment. Their military units fought with the Allies, and their prewar intelligence skills were far superior. The brilliant Bletchley Park decoders could not have succeeded without the earlier innovations of Polish codebreakers. In 1940, leaders from conquered Norway, Denmark, Belgium, and Holland formed exile governments. Though no significant French political figures came to Britain, Winston Churchill encouraged the obscure brigadier general Charles de Gaulle. Olson reminds readers that, until late 1942, none of this activity greatly inconvenienced Hitler or his plans. Britain's victory (really a draw) in the Battle of Britain was followed by a numbing series of blunders and defeats. Joining the resistance was suicidal; even military buffs will recoil at the murderous ineptitude of early British secret operations. By 1943, however, the Allies had gotten their act together. Their armies were advancing, and the resistance was functioning efficiently. Feel-good histories of World War II have fallen out of fashion, but Britain's sole stand against Hitler remains inspiring. Despite the title, the occupied nations that she sheltered did not "turn the tide," but Olson delivers an engrossing, sometimes-disturbing account of their energetic efforts. Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Chapter 1 "Majesty, We Are at War!" Hitler Invades Norway On a chilly April night in 1940, leading officials of the Norwegian government were invited to the German legation in Oslo for the screening of a new film. The engraved invitations, sent by German minister Curt Bräuer, directed the guests to wear "full dress and orders," which indicated a gala formal occasion. But for the white-­tie, bemedaled audience seated in the legation's drawing room, the evening turned out to be anything but festive. Horrific images filled the screen from the film's beginning: dead horses, machine-­gunned civilians, a city consumed in flames. Entitled Baptism of Fire, the movie was a documentary depicting the German conquest of Poland in September 1939; it portrayed in especially graphic detail the devastation caused by the bombing of Warsaw. This, Bräuer said after the screening, was what other countries could expect if they dared resist German attempts "to defend them from England." Appalled by the harrowing footage, Bräuer's guests were puzzled as to why the German diplomat thought it necessary to show the movie to them. What could any of this have to do with peaceful, neutral Norway? Four nights later, just after midnight, those same officials were awakened by urgent phone calls informing them that several ships of unknown origin had entered the fjord leading to Oslo. A sea fog blanketing the fjord made it impossible to identify the ghostly armada's markings. Within minutes, however, the mystery of their nationality was solved when reports of surprise German attacks on every major port in Norway and Denmark began flooding Norwegian government offices. Aboard the German heavy cruiser Blücher, General Erwin Engelbrecht, who commanded the attack force heading for Oslo, reviewed his orders with his subordinates. In just a few hours, more than a thousand troops, equipped with minutely detailed maps and photographs of the Norwegian capital, were to disembark from the Blücher in Oslo's harbor. Their assignment was to slip into the sleeping city and storm government buildings, the state radio station, and the royal palace. Before noon, King Haakon, Crown Prince Olav, and the rest of the royal family would be under arrest and the Norwegian government under German control. A band, also on board the Blücher, would play "Deutschland über Alles" in the city's center to celebrate Germany's triumph, while German military officials took over administration of the country and its two most important material assets--­its merchant marine and its gold. When a Norwegian patrol boat spotted the flotilla and had the temerity to issue a challenge, the boat was machine-­gunned and sunk. Farther up the fjord, two small island forts, alerted by the patrol boat, also fired on the ships, but the heavy fog made accurate sighting impossible and the vessels swept on untouched. Shortly before 4 a.m., the convoy approached Oscarsborg Fortress, an island stronghold built in the mid-­nineteenth century and Oslo's last major line of defense. The Blücher's captain was as unperturbed by the sight of the fortress as he had been by the pesky patrol boat. On his charts and maps, Oscarsborg was identified as a museum and its two antiquated cannons described as obsolete. The maps and charts were wrong on both counts. The fortress was operational, and so were the old cannons, fondly called "Moses" and "Aaron" by their crews. The fog lifted a bit, and as the darkened silhouettes of the ships came into view, a searchlight on the mainland suddenly illuminated the Blücher. Moses and Aaron erupted at point-­blank range, their shells crashing into the 12,000-­ton heavy cruiser. One shell smashed into the Blücher's bridge, destroying its gunnery and navigational controls, while another slammed into a storeroom filled with aviation fuel. Shore batteries also began firing. Within seconds, the Blücher was ablaze, the flames leaping high into the air, burning off the fog, and lighting up the snow-­covered banks of the fjord. With a great roar, the ship's torpedo magazine exploded, and less than an hour later, the Blücher, commissioned only seven months before, rolled over on its side and sank. Nearly one thousand men went down with her, including most of the elite troops assigned to capture the royal family and government officials. General Engelbrecht was one of the several hundred survivors who escaped the burning oil covering the fjord's surface and swam frantically to shore. Throughout that day--­April 9, 1940--­Hitler's audacious, meticulously planned invasion of Denmark and Norway had gone almost exactly as planned. By early afternoon, virtually all the Führer's major objectives along the 1,500 miles of Norwegian coastline had been taken--­all, that is, except Oslo, the political, economic, and communications center of Norway and the key to the operation's eventual success. At 1:30 a.m. on April 9, the man atop Germany's most wanted list of Norwegians was awakened by his aide-­de-­camp. "Majesty," the aide said urgently, "we are at war!" The news came as no surprise to King Haakon VII. He had been expecting--­and dreading--­it for years. In 1932, he had told the British admiral Sir John Kelly, "If Hitler comes to power in Germany and manages to hold on to it, then we shall have a war in Europe before another decade is over." Hitler had come to power, but Norway's political leaders had ignored the king's repeated urging to strengthen the country's shockingly weak defenses. Like other Scandinavian nations, Norway had long since abandoned its bellicose Viking heritage: peace, not war, was deeply rooted in its psyche. Norwegians had little admiration for military heroes, of whom their country, in any case, had few. Much more esteemed were the winners of the Nobel Peace Prize, chosen annually by the Norwegian parliament. "It was very difficult to be a military man in prewar Norway," noted one of the few army officers on active duty in April 1940. In the late 1930s, this seagoing country's navy had only seventy ships: its two largest were the oldest ironclads in the world, affectionately called "my old bathtubs" by the naval chief of staff. The tiny Norwegian army, armed with vintage rifles and cannons, had no submachine or antiaircraft guns. The cavalry was supposed to be equipped with tanks, but the money appropriated by the government was so infinitesimal that only one tank had been purchased, "so that Norwegian soldiers could at least see one sample in their lifetime." Field maneuvers had not been held for years--­they had been abolished as a way of saving money--­and many brigade commanders had never even met their men. Norway's military vulnerability, however, was of little concern to its government leaders. The country had been at peace for well over a century, had successfully maintained its neutrality during World War I, and intended to remain neutral in the future. Money should be spent on social reforms, Norway's leaders believed, not on building up the military. In the view of most Norwegians, "war was the kind of thing that happened in other parts of the world," noted Sigrid Undset, a Norwegian novelist who won the 1928 Nobel Prize in Literature. "How many of us had ever seriously believed it could happen in Norway?" Having made a close study of Hitler, including reading Mein Kampf in the early 1930s, the sixty-­seven-­year-­old king was far less sanguine. If war broke out, his peaceable northern kingdom, though militarily defenseless, would have great strategic importance. Facing Britain to the west, it provided a gateway to the North Atlantic. To the south, it had access to the Baltic Sea and the German coast. Not least, it controlled the northwest sea route through which iron ore from Sweden was shipped to Germany, the ore's main customer. And then there was Norway's far-­flung merchant marine fleet, a glittering prize for Hitler or any other belligerent. But whenever Haakon raised these and other points, government leaders disregarded them--­and him. Most Norwegian officials scorned the monarchy as a useless relic of a bygone age and believed it should have no influence in government matters. Many thought there should be no monarchy at all. As much as he loved Norway, Haakon sometimes felt unwelcome there, at least in government circles. Not infrequently, he felt like the foreigner he once had been. Until he became king of Norway, Haakon VII, the second son of the crown prince of Denmark, had barely set foot in the country. He did not learn to speak Norwegian until the age of thirty-­three, shortly before his reign began. Known as Prince Carl in Denmark, he had been a modest, unassuming young royal who grew up believing he would never be king of anything, for which he was profoundly grateful. His mother had reportedly pressured him to marry the young Queen Wilhelmina of the Netherlands, but he had resisted, wanting nothing to do with the pomp and formality of official court life. Instead, he wooed and won his first cousin Maud, the sports-­mad daughter of King Edward VII of Britain, who was as anxious for a quiet life, out of the limelight, as he was. At the time of his marriage, Carl, who sported a tattoo of an anchor on his arm, was an officer in the Danish navy and planned to make it his career. But in 1905, Norway's declaration of independence from Sweden turned the life of the sailor prince upside down. The century-­old union between the two countries had never been an equal one: Sweden, whose kings ruled both nations, had been the dominant partner from the beginning, and Norway had been growing increasingly restive. To lessen the chance of forceful Swedish opposition to their peaceful rebellion, Norwegian leaders said they would welcome a junior member of Sweden's royal family as the country's new monarch. Prince Carl, whose maternal grandfather was the king of Sweden and Norway, was the obvious choice. The prince, however, was appalled at the idea. Not only did he want to remain in the Danish navy, he knew virtually nothing about Norway and its people. He was also acutely aware that many citizens of Norway, which had abolished its aristocracy in the nineteenth century, were in favor of a republic, not a monarchy. Under heavy pressure from his father-­in-­law, Edward VII, among others, he finally agreed--­but only if Norway held a referendum on the issue. When 88 percent of the electorate voted for a monarchy, Carl was crowned, taking the ancient Norwegian royal name of Haakon. (His wife, English to the core, refused to renounce her given name: she was known as Queen Maud until the day she died in 1938. She continued, as she always had done, to address her husband as Charles, the Anglified version of Carl. "I actually have plans to make him completely English," she confided to her diary early in their courtship.) With Haakon as monarch, Norway boasted the most egalitarian kingdom in the world. Sir Frederick Ponsonby, an aide to Queen Maud's father, once said that Norway was "so socialistic that a King and Queen seemed out of place." After a visit to Oslo in 1911, Theodore Roosevelt wrote to an acquaintance that the insertion of a royal family into the most democratic society in Europe was like "Vermont offhandedly trying the experiment of having a King." Haakon, who frequently described his position as that of "a very democratic president for life," was known to his people as "Herre Konge" ("Mr. King") rather than "Your Majesty." The royal family lived simply, with Queen Maud often doing her own shopping. In his frequent tours of the country and travels abroad, Haakon impressed those he met with his friendliness and wry sense of humor. Once, at a gathering of the British royal family at Windsor, he noticed a youthful distant cousin of his, Lord Frederick Cambridge, standing awkwardly by himself in a corner. He marched over and vigorously shook the young peer's hand. "You don't know me," he said. "Let me introduce myself. I'm old Norway." As close as he was to his British relatives and as much as he loved their country, Haakon was horrified by the refusal of Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain's government to confront Hitler over his repeated aggressions in the 1930s. After World War II began in September 1939, Norway, like other neutral European countries, made clear that it wanted no part of a military alliance with a nation that, along with France, had handed over much of Czechoslovakia to the Führer and then, having declared war against Germany for invading Poland, had failed to do anything to aid the Poles. "All the small nations now understand that we in the future have to look after ourselves," Haakon wrote chidingly to his nephew, Britain's King George VI. Until the spring of 1940, the war was a conflict in name only. Chamberlain and most officials in his government had no interest in and no intention of fighting a real war. They had imposed an economic blockade against Hitler and seemed to think that this would be enough to bring him to his knees. Winston Churchill, Chamberlain's first lord of the admiralty and the British Cabinet's only bellicose member, strongly disagreed with Chamberlain's "phony war" strategy. From the war's first day, he demanded that Britain take the offensive against Germany--­but not on German soil. The confrontation, he said, should come in the waters of Norway. He repeatedly urged the British government to stop the shipment of Swedish iron ore, vital to Germany's armament industry, along Norway's coastline. When both Norway and Sweden protested that idea, Churchill was infuriated by their reluctance to become battlefields for the warring powers. "We are fighting to re-­establish the reign of law and to protect the liberties of small countries," he told the War Cabinet (a claim that both Poland and Czechoslovakia might have found hard to stomach). "Small nations must not tie our hands when we are fighting for their rights and freedoms. . . . Humanity, rather than legality, must be our guide." After hesitating for months, Chamberlain finally gave in to Churchill's pressure. At dawn on April 8, 1940, British ships began sowing mines along the Norwegian coast. Hitler, who weeks earlier had said he would forestall any British move on Norway, had already ordered his high command to implement carefully prepared plans for the following day's surprise attack and occupation of both Norway and Denmark. In most respects, Germany's land, sea, and air assault on the two Scandinavian countries was a brilliant success. Before it began, Hitler had decreed that the kings of Norway and Denmark must be prevented from escaping "at all costs." In Copenhagen, the Germans had no trouble finding King Christian X of Denmark, Haakon's sixty-­nine-­year-­old brother, who capitulated as ordered. But bad weather and the sinking of the Blücher had upset the split-­second timing of the assault on Oslo. When German troops finally entered the royal palace, government buildings, and the Bank of Norway that afternoon, they found only frightened low-­level government employees and piles of papers burning in furnaces and fireplaces. The bank vaults lay empty, with no trace of the country's gold bullion. The king and government leaders had vanished, too. Excerpted from Last Hope Island: Britain, Occupied Europe, and the Brotherhood That Helped Turn the Tide of War by Lynne Olson All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.