Nutshell A novel

Ian McEwan

Book - 2016

"Trudy has betrayed her husband, John. She's still in the marital home--a dilapidated, priceless London townhouse--but John's not here. Instead, she's with his brother, the profoundly banal Claude, and the two of them have a plan. But there is a witness to their plot: the inquisitive, nine-month-old resident of Trudy's womb. Told from a perspective unlike any other, Nutshell is a classic tale of murder and deceit from one of the world's master storytellers"--

Saved in:

1st Floor Show me where

FICTION/McEwan, Ian
1 / 1 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
1st Floor FICTION/McEwan, Ian Checked In
Subjects
Genres
Suspense fiction
Published
New York : Nan A. Talese/Doubleday [2016]
Language
English
Main Author
Ian McEwan (author)
Edition
First American edition
Physical Description
197 pages ; 22 cm
ISBN
9780385542074
Contents unavailable.
Review by New York Times Review

WE MIGHT BEGIN with Hamlet, of course, but we may also begin with Abhimanyu. Locked inside his mother's womb - as one version of the Mahabharata story runs - Abhimanyu overhears his father, Arjuna, discussing a well-known battle strategy with his wife. It involves a military formation called the "disk": A murderous rank of enemy soldiers forms around a warrior in a perfect spiral, and seven steps, carried out in precise sequence, can penetrate that deadly labyrinth, permitting escape. Abhimanyu listens intently - at times, the thrumming drone of his mother's aorta next to his tiny ear is near-deafening - but as Arjuna speaks, his mother dozes off to sleep. The conversation stops. The final route of escape - the seventh step - is left unmentioned. Ian McEwan's compact, captivating new novel, "Nutshell," is also about murderous spirals and lost messages between fathers and unborn sons, although it's the father's fate that hangs in the balance here. I promise not to give away the formidable genius of the plot - but the premise, loosely, is this: Trudy, jittery and fragile, lives in a London townhouse as dilapidated as it is valuable, where she spends hot afternoons coldly plotting the murder of her husband, John. She is heavily pregnant with John's son. They have separated, their love spent; he inspires nothing more in her than a "retinal crust of boredom." He has moved to Shoreditch (or "sewer-ditch," as it used to be known), where he scrapes out a living as a poet and publisher. John may or may not be in love with an aspiring poet named Elodie, who writes about owls, and whose name rhymes with "threnody" - a lamentation to the dead. The accomplice to this murder - "clever and dark and calculating" but also "dull to the point of brilliance, vapid beyond invention ... a man who whistles continually, not songs but TV jingles, ringtones ... whose repeated remarks are a witless, thrustless dribble" - is Claude, a real estate developer. Claude - Hamlet's Claudius - needs no literary disguise: He is John's brother, a prosperous brute of a man with whom Trudy (Gertrude) is having an affair. And the narrator of this saga? Listen carefully now: He is Trudy's son, still in her womb, who hears his mother and uncle plan and connive over lukewarm coffee in their Hamilton Terrace kitchen, and who must countenance the life-threatening ignominy of his uncle's lovemaking every night. "I grit my gums, I brace myself against the uterine walls," the fetus tells us grimly. "On every piston stroke, I dread that he'll break through and shaft my soft-boned skull and seed my thoughts with his essence, with the teeming cream of his banality. Then, brain-damaged, I'll think and speak like him. I'll be the son of Claude." Is there another writer alive who can pull off a narrative line of this sort? McEwan has experimented with the unreliable narrator - Briony Tallis, from "Atonement," comes immediately to mind. But in "Nutshell" we are confronted with an over-reliable narrator. The unborn son, squirming uncomfortably inside the amnion, knows every detail of his father's murder-to-be - the glycol-spiked smoothie from a shop on Judd Street that will stifle John with its glutinous poison; the spider-infested glove used to explain the lack of fingerprints on the bottle; the ubiquitous CCTVs, sprawled all over London, that will capture the scheme in progress. To be fair, even our unblinking witness does not always have his wits intact. He is so frequently sloshed - Trudy, in her third trimester, makes it a point to drink for two - that he can, by the tender age of 30-odd weeks, distinguish the grassy, acrid high of a New Zealand sauvignon from the tobacco-and-leather lull of the Pomerol coursing through the placental veins. But when sober, he learns to put the world together through its attenuated sights and syncopated sounds; he invents his own fuzzy, amniotic CCTV The flavorful rise in his mother's hormones - the quickening of her pulse, the drip of adrenaline in her synapses - tells him a poisonous story to which he, alone, is privy. The writing is lean and muscular, often relentlessly gorgeous. "So here I am, upside down in a woman," the novel begins. "Arms patiently crossed, waiting, waiting and wondering who I'm in, what I'm in for. My eyes close nostalgically when I remember how I once drifted in my translucent body bag, floated dreamily in the bubble of my thoughts through my private ocean in slow-motion somersaults.... I'm immersed in abstractions, and only the proliferating relations between them create the illusion of a known world. When I hear 'blue,' which I've never seen, I imagine some kind of mental event that's fairly close to 'green' - which I've never seen.... I count myself an innocent, but it seems I'm party to a plot. My mother, bless her unceasing, loudly squelching heart, seems to be involved." The literary acrobatics required to bring such a narrator-in-the-womb to life would be reason enough to admire this novel. But McEwan, aside from being one of the most accomplished craftsmen of plot and prose, also happens to be a deeply provocative writer about science. His musings are often oblique and tangential - yet he manages to penetrate the spirals of some of the most engaging quandaries in contemporary science. In "Enduring Love," the novel spins out of a rare, obsessive psychiatric syndrome - erotomania - in which one character is captivated by the delusion that another is secretly in love with him. But the real story of "Enduring Love" concerns the neuropsychiatric perception of love. What kind of "love" exists when only one person imagines it? What happens when that imagination endures a little too much? "Nutshell," too, has strange scientific questions lurking at its core - about genetics, kinship and the self. Consider the problem: The child a mother carries in her womb is not a "reproduction," as the writer Andrew Solomon has reminded us, but a production - a genetic amalgam of father and mother. The fetus shares only half its mother's genes; it is, inevitably, part self, part resident alien. "It's in me alone that my parents forever mingle, sweetly, sourly, along separate sugar-phosphate backbones, the recipe for my essential self," McEwan's narrator informs us. In "Nutshell," the genetic mingling turns more sour than sweet. As Claude and Trudy carry out their hideous scheme, the fetus hatches his own counterfoil to save his father - "my genome's other half," as he puts it. But how do we know the allegiances of our genomes? What if the two genomes within an organism are at war? Cognizant readers might recognize in "Nutshell" the influences of Richard Dawkins (about whose work McEwan has written thoughtfully) or Daniel Dennett - and a good dose of Agatha Christie - but it hardly matters: The pleasures of this tautly plotted book require no required reading. And what of Abhimanyu? Sixteen years later, as a young warrior, he is caught in the spiral labyrinth. He battles his way through the six prescribed steps that he recalls from his moment in the womb - but he falters at the final one, and is slaughtered by a circular shower of arrows. I'm not going to divulge the bone-chilling climax of "Nutshell" except to reveal this: Our narrator, recalling the final break, knows his route of escape. 'Nutshell' raises provocative questions about genetics, kinship and the self. SIDDHARTHA MUKHERJEE'S latest book is "The Gene." He won a 2011 Pulitzer for "The Emperor of All Maladies."

Copyright (c) The New York Times Company [September 18, 2016]
Review by Booklist Review

*Starred Review* Until the exciting (but, sadly, unlikely) day when McEwan (The Children Act, 2014) is awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature, his numerous and ardent fans enjoy the regular appearance of his highly intelligent and compellingly provocative novels. McEwan can be counted on to make the implausible plausible and the outrageous reasonable, and his talent in that regard is put to its consummate test in his latest novel. Startling at first but quickly acceptable and even embraced, this mesmerizing tale is narrated by an unborn, male fetus. A certain amount of suspension of disbelief is required; after all, the fetus is not only capable of hearing everything being said around his mother but also comprehending adult conversation and speaking to us in a mature voice, with mature experiences and reasoning behind it. Soon we are caught up in a situation greatly consequential not only for the fetus but also for his family. The unborn baby boy is determined to interfere with how the situation plays out. But how? For all intents and purposes, he is trapped. Nevertheless, he takes matters into his tiny little hands, which brings this ingenious tour de force to its stunning conclusion. HIGH-DEMAND BACKSTORY: Any new novel by this Booker-winning novelist will spark interest among literary-fiction readers.--Hooper, Brad Copyright 2016 Booklist

From Booklist, Copyright (c) American Library Association. Used with permission.
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review

McEwan's latest novel is short, smart, and narrated by an unborn baby. The narrator describes himself upside down in his mother's womb, arms crossed, doing slow motion somersaults, almost full-term, wondering about the future. His mother listens to the radio, audiobooks, and podcasts, so just from listening he has acquired knowledge of current events, music, literature, and history. From experience, he's formed opinions about wine and human behavior. What he's learned of the world has him using his umbilical cord as worry beads, but his greatest concern comes from overhearing his mother and her lover plotting to kill his father. The mother, Trudy, is separated from John, the father. John is overweight, suffers from psoriasis, and, perhaps most annoying for Trudy, loves to recite poetry. Trudy's lover, Claude, is a libidinous real estate developer who covets both John's wife and their highly marketable London home. Claude also happens to be John's brother. Echoes of Hamlet resound in the plans for fratricide, a ghost, and the baby's contemplation of shuffling off his mortal coil. The murder plot structures the novel as a crime caper, McEwan-style-that is, laced with linguistic legerdemain, cultural references, and insights into human ingenuity and pettiness. Packed with humor and tinged with suspense, this gem resembles a sonnet the narrator recalls hearing his father recite: brief, dense, bitter, suggestive of unrequited and unmanageable longing, surprising, and surprisingly affecting. 150,000-copy announced first printing. (Sept.) © Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved.

(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved

1 ONE So here I am, upside down in a woman. Arms patiently crossed, waiting, waiting and wondering who I'm in, what I'm in for. My eyes close nostalgically when I remember how I once drifted in my translucent body bag, floated dreamily in the bubble of my thoughts through my private ocean in slow-motion somersaults, colliding gently against the trans­parent bounds of my confinement, the confiding membrane that vibrated with, even as it muffled, the voices of con­spirators in a vile enterprise. That was in my careless youth. Now, fully inverted, not an inch of space to myself, knees crammed against belly, my thoughts as well as my head are fully engaged. I've no choice, my ear is pressed all day and night against the bloody walls. I listen, make mental notes, and I'm troubled. I'm hearing pillow talk of deadly intent and I'm terrified by what awaits me, by what might draw me in.   I'm immersed in abstractions, and only the proliferating relations between them create the illusion of a known world. When I hear "blue," which I've never seen, I imagine some kind of mental event that's fairly close to "green"--which I've never seen. I count myself an innocent, unburdened by allegiances and obligations, a free spirit, despite my meagre living room. No one to contradict or reprimand me, no name or previous address, no religion, no debts, no enemies. My appointment diary, if it existed, notes only my forthcoming birthday. I am, or I was, despite what the geneticists are now saying, a blank slate. But a slippery, porous slate no school­room or cottage roof could find use for, a slate that writes upon itself as it grows by the day and becomes less blank. I count myself an innocent, but it seems I'm party to a plot. My mother, bless her unceasing, loudly squelching heart, seems to be involved.   Seems, Mother? No, it is . You are. You are involved. I've known from my beginning. Let me summon it, that moment of creation that arrived with my first concept. Long ago, many weeks ago, my neural groove closed upon itself to become my spine and my many million young neurons, busy as silkworms, spun and wove from their trailing axons the gorgeous golden fabric of my first idea, a notion so simple it partly eludes me now. Was it me ? Too self-loving. Was it now ? Overly dramatic. Then something antecedent to both, containing both, a single word mediated by a mental sigh or swoon of acceptance, of pure being, something like-- this ?   Too precious. So, getting closer, my idea was To be . Or if not that, its grammatical variant, is . This was my aboriginal notion and here's the crux-- is . Just that. In the spirit of Es muss sein . The beginning of conscious life was the end of illusion, the illusion of non-being, and the eruption of the real. The triumph of realism over magic, of is over seems . My mother is involved in a plot, and therefore I am too, even if my role might be to foil it. Or if I, reluctant fool, come to term too late, then to avenge it.   But I don't whine in the face of good fortune. I knew from the start, when I unwrapped from its cloth of gold my gift of consciousness, that I could have arrived in a worse place in a far worse time. The generalities are already clear, against which my domestic troubles are, or should be, negligible. There's much to celebrate. I'll inherit a condition of moder­nity (hygiene, holidays, anaesthetics, reading lamps, oranges in winter) and inhabit a privileged corner of the planet--well-fed, plague-free western Europe. Ancient Europa, scle­rotic, relatively kind, tormented by its ghosts, vulnerable to bullies, unsure of herself, destination of choice for unfor­tunate millions. My immediate neighbourhood will not be palmy Norway--my first choice on account of its gigantic sovereign fund and generous social provision; nor my second, Italy, on grounds of regional cuisine and sun-blessed decay; and not even my third, France, for its Pinot Noir and jaunty self-regard. Instead I'll inherit a less than united kingdom ruled by an esteemed elderly queen, where a businessman-prince, famed for his good works, his elixirs (cauliflower essence to purify the blood) and unconstitutional meddling, waits restively for his crown. This will be my home, and it will do. I might have emerged in North Korea, where succes­sion is also uncontested but freedom and food are wanting.   How is it that I, not even young, not even born yesterday, could know so much, or know enough to be wrong about so much? I have my sources, I listen . My mother, Trudy, when she isn't with her friend Claude, likes the radio and pre­fers talk to music. Who, at the Internet's inception, would have foreseen the rise and rise of radio, or the renaissance of that archaic word, "wireless"? I hear, above the launder­ette din of stomach and bowels, the news, wellspring of all bad dreams. Driven by a self-harming compulsion, I listen closely to analysis and dissent. Repeats on the hour, regu­lar half-hourly summaries don't bore me. I even tolerate the BBC World Service and its puerile blasts of synthetic trum­pets and xylophone to separate the items. In the middle of a long, quiet night I might give my mother a sharp kick. She'll wake, become insomniac, reach for the radio. Cruel sport, I know, but we are both better informed by the morning.   And she likes podcast lectures, and self-improving audio books-- Know Your Wine in fifteen parts, biographies of seventeenth-century playwrights, and various world classics. James Joyce's Ulysses sends her to sleep, even as it thrills me.   When, in the early days, she inserted her earbuds, I heard clearly, so efficiently did sound waves travel through jawbone and clavicle, down through her skeletal structure, swiftly through the nourishing amniotic. Even television conveys most of its meagre utility by sound. Also, when my mother and Claude meet, they occasionally discuss the state of the world, usually in terms of lament, even as they scheme to make it worse. Lodged where I am, nothing to do but grow my body and mind, I take in everything, even the trivia--of which there is much.   For Claude is a man who prefers to repeat himself. A man of riffs. On shaking hands with a stranger--I've heard this twice--he'll say, "Claude, as in Debussy." How wrong he is. This is Claude as in property developer who composes nothing, invents nothing. He enjoys a thought, speaks it aloud, then later has it again, and--why not?--says it again. Vibrating the air a second time with this thought is integral to his pleasure. He knows you know he's repeating himself. What he can't know is that you don't enjoy it the way he does. This, I've learned from a Reith lecture, is what is known as a problem of reference.   Here's an example both of Claude's discourse and of how I gather information. He and my mother have arranged by telephone (I hear both sides) to meet in the evening. Dis­counting me, as they tend to--a candlelit dinner for two. How do I know about the lighting? Because when the hour comes and they are shown to their seats I hear my mother complain. The candles are lit at every table but ours.   There follows in sequence Claude's irritated gasp, an imperious snapping of dry fingers, the kind of obsequious murmur that emanates, so I would guess, from a waiter bent at the waist, the rasp of a lighter. It's theirs, a candlelit dinner. All they lack is the food. But they have the weighty menus on their laps--I feel the bottom edge of Trudy's across the small of my back. Now I must listen again to Claude's set piece on menu terms, as if he's the first ever to spot these unimportant absurdities. He lingers on "pan-fried." What is pan but a deceitful benediction on the vulgar and unhealthy fried ? Where else might one fry his scallops with chilli and lime juice? In an egg timer? Before moving on, he repeats some of this with a variation of emphasis. Then, his second favourite, an American import, "steel-cut." I'm silently mouthing his exposition even before he's begun when a slight tilt in my vertical orientation tells me that my mother is leaning forwards to place a restraining finger on his wrist and say, sweetly, divertingly, "Choose the wine, darling. Something splendid."   I like to share a glass with my mother. You may never have experienced, or you will have forgotten, a good bur­gundy (her favourite) or a good Sancerre (also her favourite) decanted through a healthy placenta. Even before the wine arrives--tonight, a Jean-Max Roger Sancerre--at the sound of a drawn cork, I feel it on my face like the caress of a sum­mer breeze. I know that alcohol will lower my intelligence. It lowers everybody's intelligence. But oh, a joyous, blushful Pinot Noir, or a gooseberried Sauvignon, sets me turning and tumbling across my secret sea, reeling off the walls of my castle, the bouncy castle that is my home. Or so it did when I had more space. Now I take my pleasures sedately, and by the second glass my speculations bloom with that licence whose name is poetry. My thoughts unspool in well-sprung pen­tameters, end-stopped and run‑on lines in pleasing variation. But she never takes a third, and it wounds me.   "I have to think of baby," I hear her say as she covers her glass with a priggish hand. That's when I have it in mind to reach for my oily cord, as one might a velvet rope in a well-staffed country house, and pull sharply for service. What ho! Another round here for us friends!   But no, she restrains herself for love of me. And I love her--how could I not? The mother I have yet to meet, whom I know only from the inside. Not enough! I long for her exter­nal self. Surfaces are everything. I know her hair is "straw fair," that it tumbles in "coins of wild curls" to her "shoulders the white of apple flesh," because my father has read aloud to her his poem about it in my presence. Claude too has referred to her hair, in less inventive terms. When she's in the mood, she'll make tight braids to wind around her head, in the style, my father says, of Yulia Tymoshenko. I also know that my mother's eyes are green, that her nose is a "pearly button," that she wishes she had more of one, that separately both men adore it as it is and have tried to reassure her. She's been told many times that she's beautiful, but she remains scepti­cal, which confers on her an innocent power over men, so my father told her one afternoon in the library. She replied that if this was true, it was a power she'd never looked for and didn't want. This was an unusual conversation for them and I listened intently. My father, whose name is John, said that if he had such a power over her or women in general, he couldn't imagine giving it up. I guessed, from the sympa­thetic wave motion which briefly lifted my ear from the wall, that my mother had emphatically shrugged, as if to say, So men are different. Who cares? Besides, she told him out loud, whatever power she was supposed to have was only what men conferred in their fantasies. Then the phone rang, my father walked away to take the call, and this rare and interesting conversation about those that have power was never resumed.   But back to my mother, my untrue Trudy, whose apple-flesh arms and breasts and green regard I long for, whose inexplicable need for Claude pre-dates my first awareness, my primal is , and who often speaks to him, and he to her, in pillow whispers, restaurant whispers, kitchen whispers, as if both suspect that wombs have ears.   I used to think that their discretion was no more than ordinary, amorous intimacy. But now I'm certain. They airily bypass their vocal cords because they're planning a dreadful event. Should it go wrong, I've heard them say, their lives will be ruined. They believe that if they're to proceed, they should act quickly, and soon. They tell each other to be calm and patient, remind each other of the cost of their plan's miscarriage, that there are several stages, that each must interlock, that if any single one fails, then all must fail "like old-fashioned Christmas tree lights"--this impenetrable simile from Claude, who rarely says anything obscure. What they intend sickens and frightens them, and they can never speak of it directly. Instead, wrapped in whispers are ellipses, euphemisms, mumbled aporia followed by throat-clearing and a brisk change of subject.   One hot, restless night last week, when I thought both were long asleep, my mother said suddenly into the darkness, two hours before dawn by the clock downstairs in my father's study, "We can't do it."   And straight away Claude said flatly, "We can." And then, after a moment's reflection, "We can ." Excerpted from Nutshell by Ian McEwan All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.