Secondhand time The last of the Soviets

Svetlana Aleksievich, 1948-

Book - 2016

"From the 2015 winner of the Nobel Prize in Literature, Svetlana Alexievich, comes the first English translation of her latest work, an oral history of the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the emergence of a new Russia. Bringing together dozens of voices in her distinctive documentary style, Secondhand Time is a monument to the collapse of the USSR, charting the decline of Soviet culture and speculating on what will rise from the ashes of communism. As in all her books, Alexievich gives voice to women and men whose stories are lost in the official narratives of nation-states, creating a powerful alternative history from the personal and private stories of individuals"--

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

947.086/Aleksievich
2 / 2 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor 947.086/Aleksievich Checked In
2nd Floor 947.086/Aleksievich Checked In
Subjects
Published
New York : Random House [2016]
Language
English
Russian
Main Author
Svetlana Aleksievich, 1948- (author)
Other Authors
Bela Shayevich (translator)
Edition
First U.S. edition
Item Description
"An oral history"--Cover.
"Originally published in Russian as Vremi︠a︡ sekond khėnd [Romanized] by Vremya Publishing House, Moscow, in 2013"--Title-page verso.
Physical Description
xiv, 470 pages ; 25 cm
ISBN
9780399588808
  • Chronology: Russia After Stalin
  • Remarks from an Accomplice
  • 1. The Consolation of Apocalypse: Snatches of Street Noise and Kitchen Conversations (1991-2001)
  • Ten Stories in a Red Interior
  • On the Beauty of Dictatorship and the Mystery of Butterflies Crushed Against the Pavement
  • On Brothers and Sisters, Victims and Executioners ... and the Electorate
  • On Cries and Whispers ... and Exhilaration
  • On the Lonely Red Marshal and Three Days of Forgotten Revolution
  • On the Mercy of Memories and the Lust for Meaning
  • On a Different Bible and a Different Kind of Believer
  • On the Cruelty of the Flames and Salvation from Above
  • On the Sweetness of Suffering and the Trick of the Russian Soul
  • On a Time When Anyone Who Kills Believes That They Are Serving God
  • On the Little Red Flag and the Smile of the Axe
  • 2. The Charms of Emptiness: Snatches of Street Noise and Kitchen Conversations (2002-2012)
  • Ten Stories in the Absence of an Interior
  • On Romeo and Juliet ... Except Their Names Were Margarita and Abulfaz
  • On People Who Instantly Transformed After the Fall of Communism
  • On a Loneliness That Resembles Happiness
  • On Wanting to Kill Them All and the Horror of Realizing That You Really Wanted to Do It
  • On the Old Crone with a Braid and the Beautiful Young Woman
  • On a Stranger's Grief That God Has Deposited on Your Doorstep
  • On Life the Bitch and One Hundred Grams of Fine Powder in a Little White Vase
  • On How Nothing Disgusts the Dead and the Silence of Dust
  • On the Darkness of the Evil One and "The Other Life We Can Build Out of This One"
  • On Courage and What Comes After
  • Notes from an Everywoman
  • Translator's Acknowledgments
Review by Choice Review

Journalist Alexievich, winner of the 2015 Nobel Prize in literature, has published an intriguing new work that examines the lives of ordinary Russians from the collapse of communism in the early 1990s into the second decade of the 21st century. Using extensive interviews, the author reveals a complex picture of post-Soviet Russia that often defies propaganda and media accounts about the new Russia. Alexievich experiments with a new style of writing that combines oral history with traditional reporting, which results in a compelling, useful account of contemporary Russia. The work also reveals what ordinary Russians think of their Soviet past. Even though communism collapsed in the Soviet Union over 25 years ago, the power of that idea and regime has continued to influence Russia in both positive and negative ways. Probably the greatest contribution of this work is the chronicling of the varied views of contemporary Russia woven into a compelling story that grips readers from beginning to end. This work will be influential for its literary and historical merit. Summing Up: Highly recommended. All levels/libraries. --William Benton Whisenhunt, College of DuPage

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by New York Times Review

SVETLANA ALEXIEVICH HAS said that when she assembles one of her remarkable collections of oral histories she is constructing a "novel in voices." In this latest book, one voice is of a woman who seems to have stepped out of a tale by Chekhov. With three children, she is married to a good man who loves her. But then, on the strength of a photograph, she decides that someone else is the man she really loves - whom she once saw in a dream. He, however, is in prison, serving a life sentence for murder. To top it off, his prison is a converted monastery, with walls five feet thick, on an island in an isolated northern lake. She divorces her husband, abandons her children, marries the prisoner, whom she is seldom allowed to see, and finds a low-paying job nearby. Then they quarrel and she disappears. But recent history has added a twist Chekhov could not have imagined. This prisoner committed his murder in what was then still the Soviet Union. If he is ever released, it will be into a radically different Russia, where, as one of Alexievich's interview subjects says, "the discovery of money hit us like an atom bomb." It is the contrast between these two countries - as felt by people living in the second but remembering the first - that is the subject of "Secondhand Time," her first book to appear in English since she won the Nobel Prize in Literature last year. (It appeared in Russia in 2013.) As in many a Chekhov story, few of the people she records are happy. "There is something in the Russian spirit," she said in her Nobel lecture, "that compels it to try to turn . . . dreams into reality." This was true of the woman who loved the prisoner, and it was also true of the Russian people as a whole, who lived, for some 70 years, in a society ostensibly based on a dream of human brotherhood that turned out to be something catastrophically different. Among believers in the dream of Soviet Communism, Alexievich finds a nostalgia for its achievements and a deep sense of loss. Quite poignantly, she zeros in from several angles (press reports, official documents, an interview with someone who knew him) on Marshal Sergey Akhromeyev, who was said to be a supporter of the 1991 coup attempt against Mikhail Gorbachev, and who hanged himself in his Kremlin office when it failed. "I cannot go on living," he wrote, "while my Fatherland is dying and everything I heretofore considered to be the meaning of my life is being destroyed." In a final humiliation, symbolic of the crass market society replacing Akhromeyev's beloved Communism, his grave was robbed and his uniform, cap and medals - all of which now fetch high prices from antique dealers - were taken. Alexievich also describes another military suicide. Anyone who spent time in the old Soviet Union will remember the immense honors lavished upon World War II veterans. One, Timeryan Zinatov, won a medal for his role in defending the famous fortress at Brest, and then fought through the rest of the war. A construction worker in Siberia, he returned to the fortress, the scene of his moment of glory, every year. In 1992, shocked by the new Russia, where brand name fashion accessories mean more than war medals, he came back one last time to Brest, which by then was in a different country, Belarus. Then he threw himself under a train, leaving a message asking to be buried in the fortress. It's more surprising that Alexievich finds similar true believers among those who suffered the very worst Soviet fury. A onetime factory director, for instance, had been arrested during Stalin's Great Purge of the late 1930s, beaten, tortured, hung "from hooks like it was the Middle Ages!" After the interrogator is done with you, he says, "you're nothing but a piece of meat . . . lying in a pool of urine." Luckier than millions, he was released after a year: "It had been a mistake." In the army in World War II, he ran into his former interrogator, who now said to him, "We share a Motherland." The Soviet dream, as much about patriotism for the Motherland as about utopia, offered a universe of certainties despite "mistakes," even to those who were its victims. For this factory director, in his retirement, tells Alexievich that he feels "surrounded by strangers" in the new Russia. "When I go into my grandchildren's room, everything in there is foreign: the shirts, the jeans, the books, the music. . . . Their shelves are lined with empty cans of Coke and Pepsi. Savages!" He finishes: "I want to die a Communist. That's my final wish." Despite their oppressive "mistakes," empires of all kinds keep a lid on things, and one of the tragedies of the post-Soviet world - as it was of post-British India and of the post-Tito former Yugoslavia-is the upwelling of long-contained ethnic and religious strife. Among those whose voices Alexievich brings us is an Armenian woman married to an Azerbaijani. In Soviet times, they lived in Azerbaijan's capital, Baku, "my favorite city . . . in spite of everything! . . . I don't remember any discussion of . . . nationalities. The world was divided up differently: Is someone a good or bad person, are they greedy or kind?" To welcome spring, everyone in her apartment building - Armenians, Azerbaijanis, Georgians, Russians, Ukrainians - would share food around a long table in the courtyard. Then, as the Soviet Union collapsed, demagogues everywhere whipped up tensions. The bodies of murdered Armenians appeared on the streets. Azerbaijanis attacked her husband, beating him with iron rods, for being married to an "enemy." She asked her mother, "Mama, did you notice that the boys in the courtyard have stopped playing war and started playing killing Armenians?" When she fled for her life to Moscow, her husband's family refused to pass on her phone messages to him - and claimed to her that he had remarried. Years later, he finally made it to Moscow too, where they now five, illegally and traumatized. I have a few minor quibbles with the way Alexievich weaves her rich tapestry of voices. Although the interviews are grouped by decades (1991-2001, 2002-12), she does not tell us whether she talked to someone in 1991, when the enfeebled Soviet Union was still alive, or in 2001, when it was 10 years dead. She uses many ellipses in each paragraph, which show how a monologue has been edited but give it a slightly spacey and disjointed feel. And unlike her distinguished American counterpart Studs Terkel, who sometimes set the scene in a head note to an interview, she gives us little or no background on her subjects, usually just something as cryptic as "Olga V., surveyor, 24." And when she does provide a rare headnote, her own editorial voice can intrude: "Sometimes I think that pain is a bridge between people, a secret connection; other times, it seems like an abyss." There is no need for this: She has successfully bridged the abyss. Alexievich finds true believers even among those who experienced Soviet fury. ADAM HOCHSCHILD'S eight books include "The Unquiet Ghost: Russians Remember Stalin."

Copyright (c) The New York Times Company [May 29, 2016]
Review by Booklist Review

*Starred Review* Alexievich (Voices from Chernobyl, 2005), winner of the 2015 Nobel Prize in Literature, was born in the Ukraine and has lived periodically in Russia and Belarus. Her previous works focused on Soviet history in the post-Stalinist period. Here she concentrates primarily on the period from the emergence of Gorbachev to the current pseudo-democracy under the Russian state and Putin. Once again, she uses a plethora of short remarks, complaints, regrets, and other observations by one-time Soviet citizens who now must adjust to life in a non-Communist Russian nation. Her hope is that this jigsaw of micro histories will provide a larger insight into the present and future of Russian society. Some of those who came of age before Gorbachev and his liberal reforms express longing for the lost glories of socialism and the Soviet Empire. Despite the endless lines at stores and material deprivation, life apparently had more certainty and a sense of devotion to an ideal. Those who were just entering adulthood recall the sense of exhilaration as the casting off of Soviet restrictions promised a more normal future. There is also great cynicism and disappointment expressed here, as modern Russia is viewed as both materialistic and repressive. Those who wish to understand this important nation will find Alexievich's inquiry to be absorbing and important.--Freeman, Jay Copyright 2016 Booklist

From Booklist, Copyright (c) American Library Association. Used with permission.
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review

Alexievich (Voices from Chernobyl), a Ukrainian-born Belarusian writer and winner of the 2015 Nobel Prize for Literature, documents the last days of the Soviet Union and the transition to capitalism in a soul-wrenching "oral history" that reveals the very different sides of the Russian experience. Revealing the interior life of "Homo sovieticus" and giving horror-laden reports of life under capitalist oligarchy, Alexievich's work turns Solzhenitsyn inside out and overpowers recent journalistic accounts of the era. Readers must possess steely nerves and a strong desire to get inside the Soviet psyche in order to handle the blood, gore, and raw emotion. For more than 30 years Alexievich has interviewed then-Soviets and ex-Soviets for this and previous books, encountering her subjects on public squares, in lines, on trains, and in their kitchens over tea. She spends hours recording conversations, sometimes returning years later, and always trying to go beyond the battered and distrusted communal pravda to seek the truths hidden within individuals. Her subjects argue with and lie to themselves; nearly everyone talks about love and loss in the context of war, hunger, betrayal, financial ruin, and emotional collapse. Yet with little intrusion from Alexievich and Shayevich's heroic translation, each voice stands on its own, joining the tragic polyphony that unfolds chapter by chapter and gives expression to intense pain and inner chaos. (June) © Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved.

(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
Review by Library Journal Review

Journalist Alexievich (Voices from Chernobyl), who won the 2015 Nobel Prize in Literature, captures the heartache, excitement, and harsh realities of life at the end of the Soviet era and the birth of modern Russia. A collection of oral histories linked by topic, theme, and the author's own musings, this impassioned and critical study, originally published in Russian in 2013, documents the immense changes the Russian people underwent in the 1990s and 2000s. Alexievich poses clear, pointed questions and is faithful in her transcriptions of the conversations that span 1991 to 2012, creating a riveting look at everyday culture, even as people recount their experiences through difficult economic and political transitions. Other oral histories have relied on a blended structure whereby the individual stories form the supporting elements to the historians' larger narrative; the grace and power of Alexievich's work is the focus on intimate accounts, which set the stage for a more eloquent and nuanced investigation. VERDICT A must for historians, lay readers, and anyone who enjoys well-curated personal narratives. All readers will appreciate the revelations about Russia's turbulent transition and present cultural and political status. [See Prepub Alert, 2/21/16.]--Elizabeth Zeitz, Otterbein Univ. Lib., Westerville, OH © Copyright 2016. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.

(c) Copyright Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
Review by Kirkus Book Review

A lively, deeply moving cacophony of Russian voices for whom the Soviet era was as essential as their nature. Nobel Prize-winning (2015) Russian writer Alexievich (Voices from Chernobyl, 2005, etc.) presents a rich kaleidoscope of voices from all regions of the former Soviet Union who reveal through long tortuous monologues what living under communism really was like. For a new generation of Russians born after World War II, the era of Mikhail Gorbachev, perestroika and glasnost, the attempted putsch of the government, collapse of the Soviet Union, and subsequent economic crises of the 1990s under Boris Yeltsin heralded a sense of freedom and new possibility, yet many Russians were left disillusioned and angry. What was socialism now supposed to mean for the former Homo sovieticus, now derogatively called a sovok ("dustbin")? Indeed, how to reconcile 70-plus years of official lies, murder, misery, and oppression? In segments she calls "Snatches of Street Noise and Kitchen Conversations," Alexievich transcribes these (apparently) recorded monologues and conversations in sinuous stream-of-consciousness prose. People of all ages delineate events with bewilderment and furye.g., those who had taken to the barricades during the putsch of 1991 hoping for another utopia ("They buried Sovietdom to the music of Tchaikovsky") and ending up with a scary new world where capitalism was suddenly good and "money became synonymous with freedom." The older generation had lived through the era of Stalin, the KGB and arbitrary arrests, betrayal by neighbors and friends, imprisonment, torture, and the gulag, and these remembrances are particularly haunting to read. One horrifying example is an older neighbor and friend of a man who burned himself alive in his vegetable patch because he had nothing left to live for. The suicides Alexievich emphasizes are heart-wrenching, as is the reiterated sense of the people's "naivete" in the face of ceaseless official deception, the endurance of anti-Semitism, war in the former Soviet republics, famine, and the most appalling living conditions. The author captures these voices in a priceless time capsule. Profoundly significant literature as history. Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

SNATCHES OF STREET NOISE AND KITCHEN CONVERSATIONS (1991-2001) ON IVANUSHKA THE FOOL AND THE MAGIC GOLDFISH --What have I learned? I learned that the heroes of one era aren't likely to be the heroes of the next. Except Ivanushka the Fool. And Emelya. The beloved heroes of Russian folklore. Our stories are all about good fortune and strokes of luck; divine intervention that makes everything fall right into our laps. Having it all without having to get up from your bed on the stove.1 The stove will cook the bliny, the magic goldfish will grant your every wish. I want this and I want that . . . I want the fair Tsarevna! I want to live in a different kingdom, where the rivers run with milk and their banks are heaped with jam . . . We're dreamers, of course. Our souls strain and suffer, but not much gets done--there's no strength left over after all that ardor. Nothing ever gets done. The mysterious Russian soul . . . Everyone wants to understand it. They read Dostoevsky: What's behind that soul of theirs? Well, behind our soul there's just more soul. We like to have a chat in the kitchen, read a book. "Reader" is our primary occupation. "Viewer." All the while, we consider ourselves a special, exceptional people even though there are no grounds for this besides our oil and natural gas. On one hand, this is what stands in the way of progress; on the other hand, it provides something like meaning. Russia always seems to be on the verge of giving rise to something important, demonstrating something completely extraordinary to the world. The chosen people. The special Russian path. Our country is full of Oblomovs,2 lying around on their couches, awaiting miracles. There are no Stoltzes. The industrious, savvy Stoltzes are despised for chopping down the beloved birch grove, the cherry orchard. They build their factories, make money . . . They're foreign to us . . . --The Russian kitchen . . . The pitiful Khrushchyovka3 kitchenette, nine to twelve square meters (if you're lucky!), and on the other side of a flimsy wall, the toilet. Your typical Soviet floorplan. Onions sprouting in old mayonnaise jars on the windowsill and a potted aloe for fighting colds. For us, the kitchen is not just where we cook, it's a dining room, a guest room, an office, a soapbox. A space for group therapy sessions. In the nineteenth century, all of Russian culture was concentrated on aristocratic estates; in the twentieth century, it lived on in our kitchens. That's where perestroika really took place. 1960s dissident life is the kitchen life. Thanks, Khrushchev! He's the one who led us out of the communal apartments; under his rule, we got our own private kitchens where we could criticize the government and, most importantly, not be afraid, because in the kitchen you were always among friends. It's where ideas were whipped up from scratch, fantastical projects concocted. We made jokes--it was a golden age for jokes! "A communist is someone who's read Marx, an anticommunist is someone who's understood him." We grew up in kitchens, and our children did, too; they listened to Galich and Okudzhava along with us. We played Vysotsky,4 tuned in to illegal BBC broadcasts. We talked about everything: how shitty things were, the meaning of life, whether everyone could all be happy. I remember a funny story . . . We'd stayed up past midnight, and our daughter, she was twelve, had fallen asleep on the kitchen couch. We'd gotten into some heated argument, and suddenly she started yelling at us in her sleep: "Enough about politics! Again with your Sakharov, Solzhenitsyn, and Stalin!" [Laughs.] Endlessly drinking tea. Coffee. Vodka. In the seventies, we had Cuban rum. Everyone was in love with Fidel! With the Cuban revolution. Che in his beret. A Hollywood star! We talked nonstop, afraid that they were listening in, thinking they must be listening. There'd always be someone who'd halt in mid-conversation and point to the ceiling light or the power outlet with a little grin, "Did you hear that, Comrade Lieutenant?" It felt a little dangerous, a little bit like a game. We got a certain satisfaction out of leading these double lives. A tiny handful of people resisted openly, but many more of us were "kitchen dissidents," going about our daily lives with our fingers crossed behind our backs . . . --Today, it's shameful being poor and unathletic--it's a sign that you're not making it. I come from the generation of janitors and security guards. Getting a job like that was a form of internal emigration. You lived your life and didn't pay any attention to what was going on around you, like it was all just the view out the window. My wife and I graduated from the Philosophy Faculty of St. Petersburg (back then, it was Leningrad) State University, then she got a job as a janitor, and I was a stoker in a boiler plant. You'd work one twenty-four-hour shift and then get two days off. Back then, an engineer made 130 rubles a month, while in the boiler room, I was getting 90, which is to say that if you were willing to give up 40 rubles a month, you could buy yourself absolute freedom. We read, we went through tons of books. We talked. We thought that we were coming up with new ideas. We dreamt of revolution, but we were scared we'd never live to see it. In reality, we were completely sheltered, we didn't know a thing about what was actually going on in the world. We were like houseplants. We made everything up, and, as it later turned out, everything we thought we knew was nothing but figments of our imaginations: the West. Capitalism. The Russian people. We lived in a world of mirages. The Russia of our books and kitchens never existed. It was all in our heads. With perestroika, everything came crashing down. Capitalism -descended . . . 90 rubles became 10 dollars. It wasn't enough to live on anymore. We stepped out of our kitchens and onto the streets, where we soon discovered that we hadn't had any ideas after all--that whole time, we'd just been talking. Completely new people appeared, these young guys in gold rings and magenta blazers. There were new rules: If you have money, you count--no money, you're nothing. Who cares if you've read all of Hegel? "Humanities" started sounding like a disease. "All you people are capable of is carrying around a volume of Mandelstam."5 Many unfamiliar horizons unfurled before us. The intelligentsia grew calamitously poor. On weekends, at the park by our house, Hare Krishnas would set up a mobile kitchen serving soup and something simple for a second course. The line of the dignified elderly was so long, just thinking about it is enough to give you a lump in your throat. Some of them hid their faces. By then, we'd had two children. We were literally starving. My wife and I became peddlers. We'd pick up four or six cases of ice cream at the factory and take them down to the market, to the most crowded spot. We had no refrigeration, so a few hours in, all the ice cream would be melting. At that point, we'd give it away to hungry kids. They were so happy! My wife did the selling. I'd deliver it, haul it--I was willing to do anything but actually make sales. It felt uncomfortable for a long time. There was a time when I'd often reminisce about our kitchen days . . . There was so much love! What women! Those women hated the rich. You couldn't buy them. Today, no one has time for feelings, they're all out making money. The discovery of money hit us like an atom bomb . . . ON HOW WE FELL IN AND THEN OUT OF LOVE WITH GORBY --The Gorbachev era . . . Huge crowds of people with radiant faces. Freedom! It was the air we breathed. Everyone hungrily devoured the newspapers. It was a time of great hope--at any moment, we might find ourselves in paradise. Democracy was an exotic beast. Like madmen, we'd run around to every rally: Now we'd learn the truth about Stalin, the gulag. We'd read Anatoly Rybakov's forbidden Children of the Arbat6 and other good books; finally, we'd all become democrats. How wrong we were! A single message rang out from every loudspeaker: Hurry! Hurry! Read! Listen! Not everyone was prepared for all this. Most people were not anti-Soviet; they only wanted to live well. They really wanted blue jeans, VCRs, and most of all, cars. Nice clothes and good food. When I came home with a copy of The Gulag Archipelago, my mother was horrified. "If you don't get that book out of my house immediately, I'm kicking you out." Before the war, my grandmother's husband had been shot, but she would say, "I don't feel sorry for Vaska. They were right to arrest him. He had a big mouth." "Grandma, why didn't you tell me before?" I'd ask her. "I hope that my life dies along with me so none of you will have to suffer the consequences." That's how our parents lived, and their parents before them. Then it was all bulldozed over. Perestroika wasn't created by the people, it was created by a single person: Gorbachev. Gorbachev and a handful of intellectuals . . . --Gorbachev is an American secret agent . . . a freemason . . . He betrayed communism. "All communists to the trash heap, all Komsomol members to the dump!" I hate Gorbachev because he stole my Motherland. I treasure my Soviet passport like it's my most precious possession. Yes, we stood in line for discolored chicken and rotting potatoes, but it was our Motherland. I loved it. You lived in a third world country with missiles, but for me, it was a great nation. The West has always seen Russia as an enemy, a looming threat. It's a thorn in their side. Nobody wants a strong Russia, with or without the communists. The world sees us as a storehouse that they can raid for oil, natural gas, timber, and base metals. We trade our oil for underpants. But we used to be a civilization without rags and junk. The Soviet civilization! Someone felt the need to put an end to it. The CIA . . . We're already being controlled by the Americans . . . They must have paid Gorbachev a tidy sum. Sooner or later, he'll see his day in court. I just hope that that Judas lives to feel the brunt of his nation's rage. I would gladly take him out to the Butovo Firing Range7 and shoot him in the back of the skull myself. [Slams his fist down on the table.] Happiness is here, huh? Sure, there's salami and bananas. We're rolling around in shit and eating foreign food. Instead of a Motherland, we live in a huge supermarket. If this is freedom, I don't need it. To hell with it! The people are on their knees. We're a nation of slaves. Slaves! Under communism, in the words of Lenin, the cook ran the state; workers, dairymaids, and weavers were in charge. Now our parliament is lousy with criminals. Dollar-rich millionaires. They should all be in prison, not parliament. They really duped us with their perestroika! I was born in the USSR, and I liked it there. My father was a communist. He taught me how to read with Pravda. Every holiday, we'd go to the parades. With tears in our eyes. I was a Young Pioneer, I wore the red kerchief around my neck. Then Gorbachev came, and I never got the chance to join the Komsomol, which I'm still sad about. I'm a sovok, huh? And my parents are sovoks, and my grandparents, too? My grandfather the sovok died defending Moscow in '41 . . . My sovok grandmother fought with the partisans . . . The liberals are working off their piece of the pie. They want us to think of our history as a black hole. I hate them all: gorbachev, shevardnadze, yakovlev8--don't capitalize their names, that's how much I hate them all. I don't want to live in America, I want to live in the USSR . . . --Those were wonderful, naïve years . . . We had faith in Gorbachev like we'll never have faith in anyone ever again. Many Russians were returning from emigration, coming back to their Motherland. There was so much joy in the air! We thought that we'd tear down these barracks and build something new in their place. I got my degree from the Philology Faculty of Moscow State University and started graduate school. I dreamed of working in academia. In those years, I idolized Averintsev,9 all of enlightened Moscow sat in on his lectures. We would meet and reinforce one another's delusions that soon, we would find ourselves in a completely different country, and that this was what we were fighting for. I was very surprised when I learned that one of my classmates was moving to Israel. "Aren't you sorry to leave at a time like this? Things are just starting to get good." 1 The Russian stove is a large masonry stove that, to this day, serves as the central and most important feature of rural Russian houses. Stoves are used not only for cooking and heating, they are large enough to accommodate people sleeping on top of them--and they are always the warmest place in the house. 2 Hero of the eponymous novel written by Ivan Goncharov published in 1859, Oblomov is an idle aristocrat whose extreme laziness and apathy gave rise to the expression "oblomovism." Stoltz, his friend, is an active and energetic young man. 3 Khrushchyovkas are cheap, prefabricated concrete panel or brick apartment blocks that started being built in the 1950s, during the administration of their namesake, Nikita Khrushchev. Though they are cramped and shoddy, they provided many families with their first-ever private apartments. 4 Alexander Galich (1918 - 1977), Bulat Okudzhava (1924 - 1997), and Vladimir Vyso-tsky (1938 - 1990) were singer--songwriters who rose to popularity in the 1960s, primarily among the Soviet intelligentsia. Their songs were known for being anti-Soviet. 5 Osip Mandelstam (1891 - 1938) was a Russian and Soviet poet and essayist who died in the gulag. 6 Anatoly Rybakov (1911 - 1998) was a Soviet writer most famous for his anti-Stalinist Children of the Arbat tetralogy. 7 Between 1936 and 1953, over twenty thousand political prisoners were executed on the Butovo Firing Range as victims of Stalin's purges. It is located just outside of Moscow. 8 As the minister of foreign affairs from 1985 to 1991, Eduard Shevardnadze (1928 - 2014) was responsible for many important foreign policy decisions in Gorbachev's administration. He was the president of Georgia from 1992 to 2003. Alexander Yakovlev (1923 - 2005) was a Soviet politician and historian, sometimes called the "godfather of glasnost." He was one of the main theoreticians behind perestroika. 9 Sergey Averintsev (1937 - 2004) was a philologist, cultural historian, translator, poet, and specialist on antiquity and Byzantine culture. He lectured on Russian spiritual traditions. Excerpted from Secondhand Time: The Last of the Soviets by Svetlana Alexievich All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.