Review by Choice Review
Though it runs fewer than 130 pages of text, Chomsky's most recent--not surprisingly, provocative--volume touches on multiple topics, including language, cognition, evolutionary biology, and social/political philosophy. In answer to the question in the book's title, Chomsky (emer., MIT) claims that humans are innately linguistic and computationally cognitive beings, but also social, communal beings. He argues that although some other species have sign systems and capacities, only humans have language, which emerged via "some slight re-wiring of the brain" millennia ago, resulting in humans' unique place in the biological world. At its core, language is a biological property, not a tool. Its use as a tool for communication is secondary and not constitutive of its nature. As cognitive beings--with limits that are generated and constrained by biology--humans can solve some problems, but there are also mysteries that are beyond human grasp. Finally, Chomsky asks: What is the common good? His answer is a version of libertarian anarchism. He responds, "No god, no master," while identifying--and criticizing--modern political systems as having economic masters who mostly do not function for the common good. Summing Up: Recommended. Upper-division undergraduates through faculty. --David B. Boersema, Pacific University
Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Library Journal Review
In a very short space, Chomsky (emeritus linguistics, Massachusetts Inst. of Technology) develops a well-defined political theory (centered on the question: "What is the common good?") seemingly from scratch. He does this by first defending a particular theory of language that will be identifiable by anyone familiar with Chomsky's work, namely that generative grammar-concepts frame language as a feature of our biology. Out of an understanding of language, the philosopher develops a new theory of meaning and understanding, with an emphasis on the evolutionary development of our cognitive capacities. Finally, since we have developed language and understanding as social creatures, Chomsky argues, we are in a position to comment on the distinctively dissonant social theory in America that is at once both libertarian in its ideals and socialist in its structure. VERDICT This small book offers an engaging if superficial introduction for readers interested in Chomsky's voluminous scholarship on the topics of linguistics and political theory. At the same time, readers familiar with Chomsky's work will find fresh ideas and criticisms based on recent discoveries about language and neuroscience.-Robert C. Robinson, CUNY © Copyright 2016. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
(c) Copyright Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
Review by Kirkus Book Review
Chomsky (Emeritus, Linguistics and Philosophy/MIT; Because We Say So, 2015, etc.) reflects broadly on the nature of language, the limits of human cognition, and our role as social creatures in furthering the common good. This book collects lectures delivered by the author at Columbia University, spanning the fields of theoretical linguistics, cognitive science, political philosophy, and more. In the first chapter, Chomsky proposes that, despite a general feeling to the contrary, language evolved primarily as an instrument of thought, and he labels its externalization in speech and sign language as ancillary. Reframing language as a part of our biology, much like the eye, the author touches on generative grammar concepts that he developed in the 1950s. Chomsky delves next into philosophy of mind, specifically "the new mysterianism," a philosophy that proposes the existence of "problems," questions human beings are able to solve, and "mysteries," the solutions to which lie outside the bounds of human cognition. He uncovers examples in scientific history, returning repeatedly to Isaac Newton's unwillingness to speculate on the specific nature of gravity, the mysterious force with which objects appear to act upon one another at a distance. Turning his attention to social matters, Chomsky indicts the systems that profess social truisms in theory but reject them in practice. He cites American participation in the repression, torture, and execution of political dissenters in Latin America during the late 20th century before locating the seeds of American plutocracy in the intentions of the Founding Fathers and ending this chapter with a discussion of libertarian ideals. The writing is academic in its tenor, referencing throughout the work of philosophical luminaries such as David Hume, John Locke, Joseph Priestley, and many more. As such, general readers may find the text opaque and the narrative flow disconnected. Comprising lectures on distinctly separate topics, this short volume skims the surface of the diversity and complexity of Chomsky's expertise. Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.
Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.
