On writing well The classic guide to writing nonfiction

William Knowlton Zinsser

Book - 2006

Warns against common errors in structure, style, and diction, and explains the fundamentals of conducting interviews and writing travel, scientific, sports, critical, and humorous articles.

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

808.042/Zinsser
2 / 2 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor 808.042/Zinsser Checked In
2nd Floor 808.042/Zinsser Checked In
Subjects
Published
New York : HarperCollins c2006.
Language
English
Main Author
William Knowlton Zinsser (author)
Edition
30th anniversary ed., 7th ed., rev. and updated
Physical Description
xiii, 321 p. : facsim. ; 21 cm
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references (p. [305]-309) and index.
ISBN
9780060891541
  • Principles: The transaction
  • Simplicity
  • Clutter
  • Style
  • The audience
  • Words
  • Usage
  • Methods: Unity
  • The lead and the ending
  • Bits & pieces
  • Forms: Nonfiction as literature
  • Writing about people: the interview
  • Writing about places: the travel article
  • Writing about yourself: the memoir
  • Science and technology
  • Business writing: Writing in your job
  • Sports
  • Writing about the arts: Critics and columnists
  • Humor
  • Attitudes: The sound of your voice
  • Enjoyment, fear and confidence
  • The tyranny of the final product
  • A writer's decisions
  • Writing family history and memoir
  • Write as well as you can.

On Writing Well, 30th Anniversary Edition The Classic Guide to Writing Nonfiction Chapter One The Transaction A school in Connecticut once held "a day devoted to the arts," and I was asked if I would come and talk about writing as a vocation. When I arrived I found that a second speaker had been invited -- Dr. Brock (as I'll call him), a surgeon who had recently begun to write and had sold some stories to magazines. He was going to talk about writing as an avocation. That made us a panel, and we sat down to face a crowd of students and teachers and parents, all eager to learn the secrets of our glamorous work. Dr. Brock was dressed in a bright red jacket, looking vaguely bohemian, as authors are supposed to look, and the first question went to him. What was it like to be a writer? He said it was tremendous fun. Coming home from an arduous day at the hospital, he would go straight to his yellow pad and write his tensions away. The words just flowed. It was easy. I then said that writing wasn't easy and wasn't fun. It was hard and lonely, and the words seldom just flowed. Next Dr. Brock was asked if it was important to rewrite. Absolutely not, he said. "Let it all hang out," he told us, and whatever form the sentences take will reflect the writer at his most natural. I then said that rewriting is the essence of writing. I pointed out that professional writers rewrite their sentences over and over and then rewrite what they have rewritten. "What do you do on days when it isn't going well?" Dr. Brock was asked. He said he just stopped writing and put the work aside for a day when it would go better. I then said that the professional writer must establish a daily schedule and stick to it. I said that writing is a craft, not an art, and that the man who runs away from his craft because he lacks inspiration is fooling himself. He is also going broke. "What if you're feeling depressed or unhappy?" a student asked. "Won't that affect your writing?" Probably it will, Dr. Brock replied. Go fishing. Take a walk. Probably it won't, I said. If your job is to write every day, you learn to do it like any other job. A student asked if we found it useful to circulate in the literary world. Dr. Brock said he was greatly enjoying his new life as a man of letters, and he told several stories of being taken to lunch by his publisher and his agent at Manhattan restaurants where writers and editors gather. I said that professional writers are solitary drudges who seldom see other writers. "Do you put symbolism in your writing?" a student asked me. "Not if I can help it," I replied. I have an unbroken record of missing the deeper meaning in any story, play or movie, and as for dance and mime, I have never had any idea of what is being conveyed. "I love symbols!" Dr. Brock exclaimed, and he described with gusto the joys of weaving them through his work. So the morning went, and it was a revelation to all of us. At the end Dr. Brock told me he was enormously interested in my answers -- it had never occurred to him that writing could be hard. I told him I was just as interested in his answers -- it had never occurred to me that writing could be easy. Maybe I should take up surgery on the side. As for the students, anyone might think we left them bewildered. But in fact we gave them a broader glimpse of the writing process than if only one of us had talked. For there isn't any "right" way to do such personal work. There are all kinds of writers and all kinds of methods, and any method that helps you to say what you want to say is the right method for you. Some people write by day, others by night. Some people need silence, others turn on the radio. Some write by hand, some by word processor, some by talking into a tape recorder. Some people write their first draft in one long burst and then revise; others can't write the second paragraph until they have fiddled endlessly with the first. But all of them are vulnerable and all of them are tense. They are driven by a compulsion to put some part of themselves on paper, and yet they don't just write what comes naturally. They sit down to commit an act of literature, and the self who emerges on paper is far stiffer than the person who sat down to write. The problem is to find the real man or woman behind the tension. Ultimately the product that any writer has to sell is not the subject being written about, but who he or she is. I often find myself reading with interest about a topic I never thought would interest me -- some scientific quest, perhaps. What holds me is the enthusiasm of the writer for his field. How was he drawn into it? What emotional baggage did he bring along? How did it change his life? It's not necessary to want to spend a year alone at Walden Pond to become involved with a writer who did. This is the personal transaction that's at the heart of good nonfiction writing. Out of it come two of the most important qualities that this book will go in search of humanity and warmth. Good writing has an aliveness that keeps the reader reading from one paragraph to the next, and it's not a question of gimmicks to "personalize" the author. It's a question of using the English language in a way that it will achieve the greatest clarity and strength. Can such principles be taught? Maybe not. But most of them can be learned. On Writing Well, 30th Anniversary Edition The Classic Guide to Writing Nonfiction . Copyright © by William Zinsser. Reprinted by permission of HarperCollins Publishers, Inc. All rights reserved. Available now wherever books are sold. Excerpted from On Writing Well: The Classic Guide to Writing Nonfiction by William K. Zinsser All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.