Metawritings Toward a theory of nonfiction

Book - 2012

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

808.02/Metawritings
0 / 1 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor 808.02/Metawritings On Holdshelf
+1 Hold
Subjects
Published
Iowa City : University of Iowa Press [2012]
Language
English
Other Authors
Jill Lynn Talbot (-)
Physical Description
xxix, 217 pages ; 23 cm
Bibliography
Includes index.
ISBN
9781609380892
  • Acknowledgments
  • Prologue: Corn Maze
  • Meta-Introduction
  • I Was There
  • Interview with Ryan Van Meter
  • Genesis; or the Day Adam Killed the Snakes
  • Interview with Cathy Day
  • The Facts of the Matter
  • Interview with Anonymous
  • The Girl is a Fiction
  • Interview with Sarah Blackman
  • On Dating
  • Interview with David Lazar
  • The Dog at the Edge of the World
  • Interview with Brenda Miller
  • Facing the Monolith
  • Interview with Ander Monson
  • The Pickpocket Project
  • Interview with Robin Hemley
  • Excerpts from Creative Nonfiction
  • Interview with Lena Dunham
  • Winner Take Nothing
  • Interview with Bernard Cooper
  • Adventure Island
  • Interview with Brian Oliu
  • How to Be Tough in Creative Nonfiction
  • Interview with Kristen Iversen
  • Contributors
  • Permissions
  • Index
Review by Choice Review

Despite its title, this collection serves not as traditional theoretical treatise but instead as a collection of prose pieces that circle around a question: what are the differences among fiction, nonfiction, and metafiction? Most of the contributions--which are by newer writers as well as well-known authors, e.g., Bernard Cooper and Lena Dunham--might be considered creative nonfiction, and each breaks the fourth wall, referring to itself as writing, or as being written, thus moving into the genre of metawriting. The variety of the voices and Talbot's brief interviews with the authors create a tangle of ideas about how much material in nonfiction can be made up, where the line is between fiction and memoir, and what truth is. The book resists the linear structure of scholarly argument: it opens with a fragmented memoir by Pam Houston, followed by a "meta-introduction" in which Talbot (St. Lawrence Univ.) highlights her central questions in short, meandering paragraphs. Writing about writing about writing cannot avoid moments of self-consciousness and preciousness, but here the passages that make one cringe also highlight provocative tensions. Summing Up: Recommended. With the above considerations. All readers. C. A. Bily Macomb Community College

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.