Margaret Fuller A new American life

Megan Marshall

Book - 2013

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

BIOGRAPHY/Fuller, Margaret
1 / 1 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor BIOGRAPHY/Fuller, Margaret Checked In
Subjects
Published
Boston : Houghton Mifflin Harcourt 2013.
Language
English
Main Author
Megan Marshall (-)
Physical Description
474 pages
ISBN
9780547195605
Contents unavailable.
Review by New York Times Review

MARGARET FULLER died on July 19, 1850, in a shipwreck off Fire Island. In her intellectual prime and at the height of her influence as a social reformer, she was returning home from Europe with her Italian husband and their child. A major advocate for the rights of women, Fuller had left the United States in 1846, just a year after the publication of her influential book, "Woman in the Nineteenth Century," which both Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton cited as an inspiration. Having accomplished her mission, as Megan Marshall puts it in this new biography, "to meet the writers and radicals whose work she'd admired from afar and test their minds in conversation," Fuller was coming home to the United States, having flagrantly acted out the freedoms she demanded as every woman's right. "Margaret Fuller: A New American Life" returns Marshall to the Boston Brahmin salons of her earlier and deservedly praised biography, "The Peabody Sisters," whose three subjects, Elizabeth, Mary and Sophia, campaigned with Fuller against the sexist double standards that starved women's intellects and denied them agency in any but the domestic sphere. It was at Elizabeth Peabody's West Street bookstore that Fuller conducted many of her celebrated "conversations," unorthodox gatherings of female intellectuals who looked toward "a changed world, with women as powerful as men." Most of those who conversed about women's rights ended by sacrificing their noble ideals to the comforts of marriage. Not Fuller, who walked her talk, endorsing "scandalous living arrangements" over what she termed a "corrupt social contract" that, Marshall adds, "cheated wife far worse than husband." From the time he perceived his daughter's genius, Fuller's father, Timothy, a congressman from Massachusetts, determined to push his firstborn "as near perfection as possible." He lavished an education as fine as any boy's on Margaret, who was reciting in Latin by the age of 6 and who, under a "torrent of criticism," mastered her father's greatest lesson: "Mediocrity is obscurity." As Marshall observes, Fuller's success in wooing her father's attention away from her much prettier mother by gratifying his need for an "intellectual consort" inspired her later headlong rushes into one feverish cerebral consummation after another. A template for love based on a brilliant outspoken female sparring with a man of less acute intelligence was likely to yield an anguished romantic career. In the mid-19th century, even a high-minded man who supported women's rights usually opted for a domesticated wife, preferably one prettier than Fuller. Ralph Waldo Emerson, one of the pre-eminent thinkers with whom she would spend her life in discourse both on and off the page, judged her emotionally voracious, looking for an "absolute, all-confiding intimacy between her and another." A sure-footed biographer, Marshall admits to devoting disproportionate attention to a subject that was catalytic to Fuller's emotional as well as intellectual development, the "circle of young 'lovers' who were drawn to the flame of her intelligence" and were invariably left blistered, eager for gentler company. No one likes a conceited genius, and Marshall seems to know that she can't hold her readers for long without countering the arrogance Fuller's accomplishments inspired. How better to summon sympathy than to highlight the romantic disappointments that attended the bluestocking's homeliness and lack of social grace? Fuller may have been sharing the opinion of others when she observed that "there was no intellect comparable to her own" - not in the United States, anyway - but even friends who railed against the highhanded superiority of "Queen Margaret" relented in the face of her often abject loneliness. Fuller was 25 and looking forward to the freedoms of unfettered adulthood when her father died, proving as great an influence in absentia as he'd been when drilling her on the classics. Transferred, along with her immediate family, to the custody of Timothy Fuller's younger brother, Abraham, she balked at being herded from one man's control to another's. Instead, she took it upon herself to support her mother and younger siblings. She taught school, wrote and then sold what she wrote, working to the point of exhaustion and sometimes collapse. Fuller's friendships with Emerson, Thoreau, Alcott and other outspoken dissidents may have amounted to what Marshall terms "a public alliance with the members of the Transcendental Club," but by the time she was asked to be the editor of The Dial (Emerson having "claimed to be too busy for the job"), her essays and criticism had been widely discussed and praised, and she felt secure enough in her authority to steer the magazine away from its original mission to popularize Transcendentalism. For her, "aesthetic culture" was to be seen as a means toward "personal transformation," and with that agenda she wrote and published an essay that would become what Marshall calls the magazine's "most enduring contribution to American thought." "The Great Lawsuit" was a "critique of 'personal relations' among men and women" inspired by Fuller's forays into a world far from the comfortable drawing rooms of well-heeled Yankees. Her "investigations" into the lives of the local poor, including a visit to the deathbed of a young woman who had botched her own abortion, had inspired a "dark epiphany" about the "nightmarish destiny" of most married women, who lived lives of grueling, thankless servitude. The publication of "The Great Lawsuit" lifted Fuller to a new notoriety. Even an intimate like Sophia Peabody thought she had gone too far in pontificating on something she had not experienced herself: marriage. But others paid attention to Fuller's indictment of an institution she termed a "miserable mistake." Horace Greeley, the editor of The New York Tribune, not only hired her but suggested expanding "The Great Lawsuit" into what would become a groundbreaking work of American feminism, "Woman in the Nineteenth Century." With Greeley's blessing, his new literary editor - more partner than employee - undertook the task of exposing the criminal abuses rife in asylums and prisons, supported suffrage for blacks as well as women and wrote biting editorials in hopes of transforming New York into a model society. When she sailed for Europe, the journey was partly funded by Greeley's advance for her future dispatches from the Old World. Alas, the manuscript in her travel desk drowned with her, only 300 yards from land. Fuller could navigate the turbulence of public opinion, but she didn't know how to swim. "The waves" would not have been as "difficult to brave as the prejudices she would have encountered" had she arrived home safely, one mourner noted of Fuller's necessarily controversial and divisive return. In what Marshall identifies as "the most radical act of her life so far" this towering genius hadn't chosen an "intellectual consort" but an apparent sybarite dismissed by her friends as "half an idiot," a person who had most likely never read a book all the way through. She'd left America alone, a spinster, and was bringing home a penniless partner who gave her pleasure, saw to her comfort and knew better than to interrupt her at her desk: in other words, a wife who happened to be a man. The rest of the world might take its time arriving at equal rights, but Margaret Fuller had evened things up for herself. Fuller campaigned against double standards that starved women's intelligence and confined them to domesticity. Kathryn Harrison is writing a biography of Joan of Arc. Her most recent book is "Enchantments," a novel.

Copyright (c) The New York Times Company [April 21, 2013]
Review by Booklist Review

*Starred Review* The mind has a light of its own, wrote Margaret Fuller, and the radiance of her inner world vitalizes Marshall's profoundly simpatico portrait of this path-breaking feminist and courageous journalist and writer. Marshall encountered Fuller while working on her acclaimed first book, The Peabody Sisters (2005), and she inhabits Fuller's dramatic, oft-told story with unique intimacy by virtue of her fluency in and judicious quoting of Fuller's extraordinarily vivid letters. Marshall conveys Fuller's passionate intensity, unusual intellect and outsized personality, expansive sympathy, and extraordinary valor as she illuminates family struggles, social obstacles, and private heartache in conjunction with each phase of Fuller's phenomenal achievements as an innovative teacher, lecturer, and editor. Marshall brings stirring historical and psychological insights to Fuller's complicated relationship with Emerson and the other transcendentalists, her journey west and response to the horrific plight of Native Americans, her gripping dispatches on social ills as a front-page columnist for Horace Greeley's New York Tribune, and her triumphs in Europe as America's first female foreign correspondent. How spectacularly detailed and compassionate Marshall's chronicle is of Fuller's scandalous love for an Italian soldier, the birth of their son, her heroic coverage of the 1849 siege of Rome, and her and her family's tragic deaths when their ship wrecks in sight of the American coast. A magnificent biography of a revolutionary thinker, witness, and writer.--Seaman, Donna Copyright 2010 Booklist

From Booklist, Copyright (c) American Library Association. Used with permission.
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review

Pulitzer Prize finalist Marshall (The Peabody Sisters) takes on the life of a lesser-known American writer in this biography of Margaret Fuller, whose book Women in the Nineteenth Century was merely the most successful among those she produced during a lifetime of impassioned intellectual discourse, both public and private. Marshall sticks closely to the primary documents of Fuller's life. Though the biography reads as a narrative, the text is peppered with quotations from Fuller's letters, essays, fiction, and personal diaries. This abundance of detail sometimes descends into tedium. Though organized around places Fuller lived, the book's real driving force is her relationships, from the perfectionist father who gave her a thirst for education early on to the circle of academics and radicals over whom Fuller exerted her influence, among them Ralph Waldo Emerson. Marshall can't avoid the romantic scandal of Fuller's life-her accidental pregnancy by and secret marriage to the noble-born Giovanni Ossoli. The couple died in a shipwreck along with their newborn son soon after. But this scandal isn't the focus of the book. Instead, Marshall seeks to render the plight of a female intellectual struggling to balance societal expectations with her lofty ambitions and ideals. The book's success comes from the way that Marshall allows the reader to understand and empathize with Fuller in her plight. Agent: Katinka Matson, Brockman Agency. (Mar.) (c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved.

(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
Review by Kirkus Book Review

A deeply sympathetic life of an exceptional mind, protofeminist and revolutionary. Embedded in the Emersonian milieu as biographer (The Peabody Sisters: Three Women Who Ignited American Romanticism, 2005) and professor (Emerson Coll.), Pulitzer finalist Marshall is perfectly suited to her material, so much so that she frequently takes on the highhanded, emotive tone of her subject. Margaret Fuller (18101850) was the close colleague of Ralph Waldo Emerson, fellow editor of the transcendentalist journal The Dial, teacher and author of the groundbreaking feminist study Woman in the Nineteenth Century. The oldest daughter of a tyrannical lawyer and congressman in Massachusetts, Fuller demonstrated early on her abundant intellectual gifts. However, instead of attending Harvard, she had to sublimate her "unfocused striving and rankling frustration over family obligations" and teach her smaller siblings. When her father died in 1835, it fell on Fuller to take care of her mother and siblings, as a teacher and fledgling writer, yet his death also freed her to pursue her personal journey. Initiated into reformist ideas while teaching at Bronson Alcott's Temple School and plunged into Emerson's circle, Fuller moved from Providence to Boston to New York, working on translations, leading a series of conversation classes with women and assuming editorship of the transcendentalist organ, before restlessly moving on to Horace Greeley's New-York Tribune. Marshall's discovery of a late-life journal reveals Fuller's last beatific years in Rome as a correspondent, when she met the younger Giovanni Angelo Ossoli during the perilous revolutionary era of 1848. Bound home with their young son, the family perished together in the wreck of the Elizabeth off the coast of Fire Island in 1850. Friend of intellectual lights of the day, cultural emissary and author in her own right, Fuller had finally attained her own destiny. Lively, intuitive study of a remarkable American character.]] Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Dear father it is a heavy storm i hope you will not have to come home in it." So begins the record of a life that will end on a homeward journey in another heavy storm, a life unusually full of words, both spoken and written. Sarah Margaret Fuller is six years old when she writes this brief letter on a half-sheet of paper saved by the devoted and exacting father who receives it, next by his widow, then by their descendants. Which one of them thinks to label it " First letter"? All of her survivors understand that there are, or will be, biographers, historians, students of literature who care to know. But first it is the father who treasures his daughter's message of concern, this lurching unpunctuated parade of runes, from the moment he unfolds the page -- a father nearing forty and eager to set his young daughter, already an apt pupil, to a "severe though kind" education. And the mother, just twenty-one at her daughter's birth, only twenty-seven now: she is known to find any words her firstborn child scribbles on bits of paper " original ," worthy of preservation. At seven, the little girl -- a tall little girl with plain looks and auburn hair, whose height and imperious manner set her apart from her age mates -- writes again to her father, Timothy Fuller, a brash and for the moment successful lawyer in Cambridge, Massachusetts, a U.S. congressman whose career in politics takes him away to Washington half the year, in winter and spring. It is January of 1818. In the new year, the girl's concern for her father has transmuted into the desire to earn his good opinion -- and so into more words, into the wish to show off her inquiring mind. "I have learned all the rules of Musick but one," she writes now in a fine spidery script, and "I have been reviewing Valpy's Chronology" (a verse narrative of ancient and English history). And: "I should have liked to have been with you to have seen the pictures gallery at NYork." Sarah Margaret's claims of accomplishment, her carefully worded wish to join Timothy in New York, are meant to forestall what she has already come to expect from her overbearing father: the torrent of criticism -- of her penmanship, of her rate of progress through his curriculum, of her " stile " of expression, as he prefers to spell the word -- all intended to bring his precocious daughter "as near perfection as possible." Timothy, proud to have been a "high scholar" at Harvard, has been her only teacher, starting her on Latin at age six, requiring that she recite her lessons only to him during his months at home, insisting she be kept awake until his return from work to stand before him on his study carpet late at night, her nerves "on the stretch" until she has finished repeating to him what she had learned that day. Already she has experienced more severity than kindness in her father's pedagogy. And so the anxious, eager-to-please seven-year-old Sarah Margaret Fuller apologizes to her father, a man with "absolutely no patience" for mistakes, as she will to no one else in the voluminous correspondence that follows after this second letter: "I do not write well at all," and "I have written every day a little but have made but little improvement." And: "I hope to make greater proficiency in my Studies." But the verbs tell all -- she has learned and reviewed , she would like to see and to make improvement . These verbs are hers. The nouns also: music, art, chronology (the unfolding of world events, the progress of society). These are her concerns, her aims, her occupations at age seven. And they will remain so for the girl who, to her father's and her own dismay, struggles through years of singing lessons, unable to shine at this one accomplishment. "To excel in all things should be your constant aim; mediocrity is obscurity," Timothy will prod when he offers to buy her a piano. But she continues to write every day that she has paper and pen to hand, except in times of sickness, until she becomes a woman. And then too, when she will write of music, art, literature, politics, and travel for a nation of readers. She takes her father's cue, embraces the discipline: she refuses to be mediocre, to be obscure. The seven-year-old girl must stop writing this second letter, however, a letter that announces her intellect to her father even by way of apology, because her mother -- Margarett Crane Fuller -- has asked her to "hold the baby," a new little brother, William Henry, the second after brother Eugene. Three-year-old Eugene "speaks of you sometimes," the girl tells her father, but he is not old enough to write -- or to hold the baby, which he would not have been asked to do anyway, as a boy. Sarah Margaret must hold the baby while her mother, Margarett -- a head taller than her bluff, domineering husband, with a slender, elfin beauty; sweet-tempered, but not a woman of letters  -- writes her own letter to Timothy. Baby, little brother, elder sister, mother, all crowd around a writing desk with the absent Timothy foremost in their minds -- his demanding presence felt across the miles. Missing from this tableau is Julia Adelaide, the "soft, graceful and lively" much-adored second-born daughter who died four years ago, just past her first birthday, when Sarah Margaret was three years old. The abrupt loss, the never-forgotten moment when the baby's nurse, tears streaming, pulled Sarah Margaret into the nursery to view her sister's tiny corpse in all its "severe sweetness," shocked the older girl into consciousness. "My first experience of life was one of death," she will write years later -- so that even now, as she takes her infant brother in her arms and cedes the pen to her mother, she feels alone. "She who would have been the companion of my life" was "severed from me": Julia Adelaide might have been Sarah Margaret's ally in their father's more "severe" than "kind" school. Julia Adelaide's death too was far more "severe" than "sweet," for in the following months Margarett was also severed -- or withdrew -- from Sarah Margaret, growing "delicate" in health as her grief turned to depression. The sorrowing mother spent hours in her garden, working the flower beds or simply sitting among the fragrant roses, fruit trees, and clematis vines, turned away from her living daughter. And then the brothers came, first Eugene and then William Henry. In dreams, Sarah Margaret sees herself joining a procession of mourners "in their black clothes and dreary faces," following her mother to her grave as she already has her sister. She has been told, but does not remember, that she begged "with loud cries" that Julia Adelaide not be put into the ground. She wakes to find her pillow wet with tears. Two years later, Sarah Margaret starts again: "My dear father." By now, January 16, 1820, she has written many more letters to Timothy, signed them "Your affectionate daughter, Sarah M Fuller" or "S M Fuller" or "Sarah-Margaret Fuller." She has sent him compositions in which "I assure you I . . . made almost as many corrections as your critical self would were you at home." Obedient to Timothy alone (her mother finds her difficult, "opinionative"), she has let him know she is translating Oliver Goldsmith's long poem of rural decline, The Deserted Village , into Latin, as he has asked; she is pushing herself through the Aeneid in answer to his challenge -- wasn't she yet " profoundly into" the work? Within six months she will have puzzled out the entire savage-heroic tale in the original Latin. It is a greater pleasure, almost easy, for the girl to accomplish such intellectual feats during the half-year her father is away. Even though she quarrels with Margarett, is unable to feel her love, she will at times, whether to imitate her mother or to seek her mother's distilled essence or simply to please herself, sit alone in the garden, at ease among the violets, lilies, and roses: "my mother's hand had planted them, and they bloomed for me." Like Persephone, she is free above ground during the two seasons her father is away, when her mother's "flower-like nature" prevails, when she need answer only to Timothy's exhorting letters. In this third letter she begins to test Timothy's strictures. Twice before she has written asking his permission to read an Italian thriller, Zeluco , and twice she has recommended for his own reading a novel -- "Do not let the name novel make you think it is either trifling or silly," she urges -- called Hesitation: or, To Marry, or Not to Marry? In the pages of Hesitation she has encountered, along with the novel's pair of indecisive lovers, the extraordinary comtesse de Pologne, a witty conversationalist, happily single, with the "power to disengage herself from the shackles of custom, without losing one attribute of modesty": a woman whose personal magnetism draws both men and women to her circle. Does she hope Timothy will find the comtesse too and approve? Sarah Margaret is writing fiction herself, "a new tale called The young satirist," she tells her father, in the loose rolling hand she has acquired only recently, which will be recognizably hers from now on. Despite Timothy's criticisms, she is beginning to feel how bright she is, even brilliant, a commanding presence in her mind's eye, if not in daily life -- the tall girl will soon reach five feet two inches and stop growing, becoming short, plump, and awkward as an adolescent. She too can play the critic, the provocateur, the "young satirist," when she wishes. She is nine years old. Her mother, Margarett, just thirty, is newly pregnant with a fifth child. She closes her letter: P S I do not like Sarah, call me Margaret alone, pray do! Excerpted from Margaret Fuller: A New American Life by Megan Marshall All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.