How should a person be? A novel from life

Sheila Heti, 1976-

Book - 2012

Saved in:

1st Floor Show me where

FICTION/Heti, Sheila
2 / 2 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
1st Floor FICTION/Heti, Sheila Checked In
1st Floor FICTION/Heti Sheila Checked In
Subjects
Published
New York : Henry Holt and Co [2012]
Language
English
Main Author
Sheila Heti, 1976- (-)
Edition
First U.S. edition
Physical Description
306 pages ; 22 cm
ISBN
9781250032447
9780805094725
Contents unavailable.
Review by New York Times Review

THERE are a few sentences early on in "How Should a Person Be?," Sheila Heti's fifth book and second novel, that are bound to be quoted over and over. "We live in an age of some really great" fellatio artists, the narrator says. "Every era has its art form. The 19th century, I know, was tops for the novel." It's a good line, but one that makes the book sound like a satire - like some scathing and funny look at our sadly declining times by, say, Gary Shteyngart or Sam Lipsyte. Heti, though, is not a satirist. The cover of "How Should a Person Be?" proclaims it to be "A Novel From Life." As opposed to a novel from what, you might ask. "As opposed to a novel made from other novels," I suspect Heti would answer. What the phrase means to acknowledge is that the novel's (occasional) action and (incessant) dialogue are largely, though not entirely, factual. The narrator is named Sheila, and the narrator's friends share first names and occupations with Heti's real-life friends and collaborators, among them the critic and artist Sholem Krishtalka, the writer and teacher Misha Glouberman (with whom Heti wrote a book of pop philosophy, "The Chairs Are Where the People Go," published last year), and the painter and filmmaker Margaux Williamson - all of whom, like Heti, live in Toronto, where the book mostly takes place. Sheila measures herself against these friends as she tries earnestly to answer the question of her title. "Responsibility looks so good on Misha," she thinks, "and irresponsibility looks so good on Margaux. How could I know which would took best on me?" She speaks with that questing and ingenuous tone throughout the book, but neither the novel nor its heroine is precious or naïve. Sheila has an intense, sporadic and submissive sexual affair with an artist named Israel; she struggles to write a play "about women" commissioned by a feminist theater company; she travels with Margaux to Miami and without her to New York; she works at a salon, briefly sustained by the hands-on aesthetic duties of hairdressing. That's about it as far as plot is concerned. There's also an "ugly painting competition" between Margaux and Sholem, in which each tries to create the most hideous painting possible; this prompts much discussion about the nature of beauty and ugliness in art, and the way the artist's personality always creeps in. Sheila herself can be fairly ridiculous, but not in the manner typical of a comic novel's bumbling protagonist. Her occasional delusions of grandeur are familiar, perhaps. ("If with this play the oil crisis is merely averted and our standard of living maintains itself at its current level," she says of her unfinished writing project, "I will weep into my oatmeal.") But her far more egregious and unusual failing is her utter susceptibility to the ideas and desires of others. She wants to be like Margaux. She wants to be like Misha. She submits to Israel. She has been deeply shaken by a former boyfriend's vision of her future: after overhearing her admit to a crush on a New York photographer, this boyfriend stayed up all night outlining a play about their lives, in which he "rose in prestige and power" while she descended to the most degrading possible denouement, performing oral sex on a Nazi in a Dumpster and asking him, Are you mine? "What power a girl can have over a boy, to make him write such things!" Sheila says. "And what power a boy can have over a girl, to make her believe he has seen her fate." While subsequently struggling with her own play, Sheila begins to record her conversations with Margaux, and these appear in the novel as dramatic dialogue. (E-mails to Sheila from Margaux, Israel and Sheila's mother also take up a good portion of the book.) Later in Miami, where Margaux's paintings will be shown at one of the smaller art fairs orbiting the periphery of Art Basel, Sheila decides to purchase the same yellow dress as her friend. This nearly destroys their friendship. "I'm doing a lot, what with letting you tape me," Margaux says, "but - boundaries, Sheila. Barriers. We need them. They let you love someone." Heti has cited "The Hills," the bygone MTV show about young people in Los Angeles, as one of the primary influences on "How Should a Person Be?" She tried to make Margaux and Sheila more like the girls on that show "than characters in a book," she told one interviewer, and, indeed, the yellow-dress incident might have fit right into the series. More broadly, though, the novel shares with much reality television a kind of episodic aimlessness, and a focus on young, self-involved characters who spend a lot of time thinking about how they look to other people. IN the hands of another novelist, this debt to reality television might lead to a biting indictment of the shallowness of the culture. But that is not what happens here. Heti sees the silliness in the desire for fame that drives such fare, but she also knows that same desire is involved in the impulse to make art. (Andy Warhol is mentioned on Page 2.) At one point, Sheila and Margaux watch Paris Hilton's sex tape, and Sheila feels "a kinship" with the notorious heiress: "She was just another white girl going through life with her clothes off." A short note about "How Should a Person Be?" in Marie Claire declared, in classic glossy-magazine speak: "Think HBO's 'Girls' in book form." That looks at first like the sort of glib analogy inevitable in a 75-word squib about an odd, original and nearly unclassifiable book like this, but it's not far off the mark. Lena Dunham, the creator of "Girls," has called Heti one of her favorite writers, and Heti in turn has expressed her fondness for Dunham's work; what's more, the novel and the series, which are both highly autobiographical - confessional, even - share their two central subjects: becoming an artist (especially, perhaps, an artist who also happens to be a woman) and sustaining friendships (especially, perhaps, friendships between women). They also both have quite a bit of graphic sex. And they're funny. Heti, who edits and conducts interviews for The Believer, once asked the art critic Dave Hickey in that magazine whether he thought humor was "a very important element of art." "I love Serra," she added, "but he's not funny." Sheila makes the same remark, nearly verbatim, in "How Should a Person Be?" She and Margaux have just come to a shared conclusion "about what you need to know in writing and what you need to know in art," namely, that "you have to know where the funny is, and if you know where the funny is, you know everything." I do not think this novel knows everything, but Sheila Heti does know something about how many of us, right now, experience the world, and she has gotten that knowledge down on paper, in a form unlike any other novel I can think of." Heti's central themes are becoming a (female) artist and sustaining (female) friendships.

Copyright (c) The New York Times Company [July 8, 2012]
Review by Booklist Review

With an ambitious and quirky style, Heti ponders one question in her fourth book of fiction How should a person be? which, of course, results in a mess of doubt, consternation, and confusion. As Heti, the book's author and narrator, labors doggedly to finish her commissioned play, she struggles with how to live as a free woman, lover, friend, and genius. Surrounded by other twentysomething artists, Heti's paint-drenched environment in part encourages a meaningful self-examination, thanks to best friend Margaux's inspiring brush strokes, while simultaneously her courage is inhibited by her lover Israel's prurient demands. Like the Jews, the Chosen People referenced throughout the book, Heti embarks on her own wanderings after forsaking her best friend but eventually discovers that her own promised land is close at hand and accessible. Like Kevin Wilson's The Family Fang (2011) in its inventive and comedic questioning of where life and art intersect, Heti's unrestrained novel will resonate with receptive readers confronting their own authenticity, wrestling with a life crisis, or merely curious about how others cope.--Fronk, Katharine Copyright 2010 Booklist

From Booklist, Copyright (c) American Library Association. Used with permission.
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review

With a quirky mixture of e-mails, transcribed conversations, and prose, frequent Believer contributor Heti (2004's The Middle Stories) examines her titular question by emphasizing that, like life itself, the story of protagonist Sheila; her degenerate artist boyfriend, Israel; and her best friend, Margaux, doesn't always make perfect sense. After she leaves her husband, Sheila-an aspiring Toronto playwright by night and hair salon employee by day-looks to her friends and the world at large to determine how to be. Acts divided into chapters interspersed with conversations transcribed to read like plays follow Sheila from home to New York to Atlantic City in her search for clarity. Autobiographical elements abound: like Heti's metafictional protagonist, the author studied playwriting and lives in Toronto. Heti has an artist friend named Margaux with whom she has collaborated and to whom she dedicates this novel. Original, contemplative, and often tangential, this is an unorthodox compilation of colorful characters, friendship, and sex that provides an unusual answer to Heti's question. Agent: Jim Rutman, Sterling Lord Literistic. (June) (c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved.

(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
Review by Library Journal Review

In this innovative novel, Canadian author Heti (Ticknor) invites her readers to share one woman's intensive pursuit of meaning and purpose in life. Through Sheila, who's obsessed with self-reflection, we witness the raw and sometimes painful experience of searching for the truth of one's soul. Sheila is recently divorced, and her friendships, particularly that with painter Margaux, are central to this quest for self-realization; she relies on the desires and expectations of others to determine her own worth. Interestingly, for a somewhat confused character working through the process of self-discovery, Sheila is capable of relaying sharp insights into human nature and complex emotion. The quick dialog and narrative flow make for a deceptively easy read, but to appreciate Heti's intent, readers must be willing to take their time and consider the weight of the questions at the heart of this nonconventional narrative. VERDICT Heti's book will appeal to readers who appreciate an alternative to traditional narrative style and a searing yet playful examination of self.-Catherine Tingelstad, Pitt Community Coll., Greenville, NC (c) Copyright 2012. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.

(c) Copyright Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
Review by Kirkus Book Review

Toronto-based Heti (Ticknor, 2006, etc.) and her real-life friends, including Misha Glouberman with whom she wrote a previous book (Where the Chairs Are Where the People Go, 2011), are central characters in this meandering novel that attempts to erase the line between fact and fiction. Sheila is a recently divorced playwright--the marriage ended at her request for no clearly spelled out reason--attempting to finish a commissioned play while working part time in a beauty salon where her boss Uri is a kind of guru preaching beauty in balance. She claims what she desires is a simple life of fame without having to change her life. She also talks quite a bit about her search for a sense of self. She spends time with her friend Margaux, an artist who lives with Misha and has entered an ugly painting contest with another painter friend of Heti's named Sholem. Heti buys a digital tape recorder and the novel includes actual taped conversations with Margaux, to whom the novel is dedicated, as well as emails between the two. Margaux and Heti have a falling-out because Margaux feels Heti has invaded her private boundaries, both by taping her and, more egregiously, by buying the same yellow dress while they are at an art festival in Miami. Meanwhile, Sheila has met Israel, who works in a bakery. He considers himself a painter, but Sheila recognizes his real art lies in the sex department. She describes their sadomasochistic antics in explicit, though untitillating detail. For a while, Sheila and Margaux fall into a pattern of heavy partying and druggy debauchery until Margaux pulls away. Sheila worries she's a narcissist, not without good reason perhaps. Claiming imperfect wanderer Moses rather than sinless Jesus as spiritual guide, she leaves Toronto for New York, but she's no happier there. After a gambling jaunt to Atlantic City, she returns to Toronto in time for the conclusion of the ugly painting contest. Pretentious navel-gazing without the humor of HBO's Girls, which covers similar terrain.]] Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

chapter 1   SHOLEM PAINTS     We were having brunch together. It was Sunday. I got there first, then Misha and Margaux arrived, then Sholem and his boyfriend, Jon. A few weeks earlier, the owners had repainted the diner walls from a grease-splattered beige to a thicky pastel blue and had spray-painted giant pictures of scrambled eggs and strips of bacon and pancakes with syrup. It ruined the place somewhat, but the food was cheap, it was never crowded, and they always had a place for us. I shared a breakfast special and a grilled cheese with Margaux. Jon asked for our fries. I don't remember what we started off talking about, or who was the funniest that day. I remember none of the details of our conversation until the subject turned to ugliness. I said that a few years ago I had looked around at my life and realized that all the ugly people had been weeded out. Sholem said he couldn't enjoy a friendship with someone he wasn't attracted to. Margaux said it was impossible for her to picture an ugly person, and Misha remarked that ugly people tend to stay at home. These are a few of the sordid fruits that led to the Ugly Painting Competition. *   *   * When Sholem was a teenager, he had dreamed of being a theater actor, but his parents didn't want him to go to theater school. They didn't think it was practical, and encouraged him to go to art school instead. So he went, and his first year there, up late one night painting, as the sun began rising with the morning, a sudden and strong feeling came up inside him that said, I must be an artist. I must paint for the rest of my life. I will not settle for anything else. No other future is acceptable to me. It was an epiphany and a decision both, from which there would be no turning back--the first and most serious vow of his life. So this past spring, he completed his M.F.A. thesis and graduated. *   *   * Who came up with the idea for the Ugly Painting Competition? I don't remember, but once I got enthusiastic, suddenly we all were. The idea was that Margaux and Sholem would compete to see who could make the uglier painting. I really hoped it would happen. I was curious to see what the results would be, and secretly I envied them. I wanted to be a painter suddenly. I wanted to make an ugly painting--pit mine against theirs and see whose would win. What would my painting look like? How would I proceed? I thought it would be a simple, interesting thing to do. I had spent so much time trying to make the play I was writing--and my life, and my self--into an object of beauty. It was exhausting and all that I knew. Margaux agreed to the competition right away, but Sholem was reluctant. He didn't see the point. The premise turned him off so much--that one should intentionally make something ugly. Why? But I egged him on, pleading, and finally he gave in. As soon as Sholem returned home after brunch, he set about making his entry--so he wouldn't have to think about it anymore, he explained to me later, or have looming before him the prospect of having to make something ugly. He went straight into his studio, having already decided what he would do. He imagined it would be like this intellectual exercise that he could sort of approach in a cold fashion. He would just do everything he hated when his students did it. He started the composition smack-dab in the middle of a piece of paper, since paper is uglier than canvas. Then he painted a weird, cartoonish man in profile with fried-egg eyes, and he outlined things instead of shading them, delineating each individual eyelash. Instead of making a nostril, he sort of drew a hole. In the background he painted fluffy white clouds over orange triangular mountains. He made the background a gross pinkish-brownish gray, using mineral sediment dug up from the bottom of the jar in which he washed his brushes. For skin tone he just mixed red and white, and for the shadows he used blue. Though he thought in the end there would be some salvageable qualities to the painting, it just kept getting more and more disgusting until finally he began to feel so awful that he finished it off quickly. Dipping a thick brush in black paint, he wrote at the bottom, really carelessly, The sun will come out tomorrow . Then he stepped back and looked at the result, and found it so revolting that he had to get it out of his studio, and left it on the kitchen table to dry. Sholem went out to get some groceries for dinner, but the entire time he was gone he felt nauseous. Returning home and setting the bags on the counter, he saw the painting lying there and thought, I cannot see that thing every time I walk into the kitchen . So he took it to the basement and left it near the washer and dryer. From there, the day just got worse. Making the painting had set off a train of really depressing and terrible thoughts, so that by the time evening came, he was fully plunged in despair. Jon returned home, and Sholem started following him around the apartment, whining and complaining about everything. Even after Jon had gone into the bathroom and shut the door behind him, Sholem still stood on the other side, moaning about what a failure he was, saying that nothing good would ever happen to him, indeed that nothing good ever had; his life had been a waste. It's like you work so hard to train a dog to be good! he called through the door. And the dog is your hand! Then one day you're forced to beat all the goodness out of that dog in order to make it cruel. That day was today! Jon grunted. Then Sholem plodded into the living room and sent an email to the group of us, saying, This project fills me with shame and self-loathing. I just did my ugly painting, and I feel like I raped myself. How's yours, Margaux? Margaux, the better artist, wrote back: i spent all day on my bed island reading the new york times. *   *   * Fifteen years ago, there lived a painter in our town named Eli Langer. When he was twenty-six, an artist-run center presented his first show. The paintings were gorgeous and troubled, very masterful, all done in rich browns and reds. They were moody and shadowy with old men, girls, and plush chairs, windows, and naked laps. A sadness clouded the few faces, which were obscured by darkness and lit only by faint moonlight. The canvases were very large, and they seemed like the work of someone with great assurance and freedom. After the show had been up for only a week, it was shut down by the police. People claimed that the pictures were child pornography. The canvases were confiscated, and they were sentenced to be destroyed by the court. The story was reported in newspapers all across the country, and the trial played on TV for an entire year. Prominent artists and intellectuals became involved and spoke publicly and wrote editorials about artistic freedom. In the end, the judge ruled in Eli's favor, partly; the paintings were returned to him, but on the condition that no one ever see them again. He left them in a corner of his mother's attic, where they remain, covered in soot and mold, today. After the trial was done, Eli felt exhausted and shaken. Now when he stepped before a canvas, brush in hand, he found that the spirit lay dead in him. He left Toronto for L.A., where he thought he might be able to feel more free, but the images still did not come as they had before. Crushed with a new insecurity and inhibition, he applied to his now-tiny canvases only hesitant whites, or whites muddled with pink, or a bit of yellow, or the most apologetic blue--so that even if you stepped really close to the paintings, you could barely make out a thing. For the few solo shows he managed to complete in the years following the trial, he created only deeply abstract work, not anything even remotely figurative. Several times a year, Eli would return to Toronto for a week or so, and would go to art parties and talk about painters and the importance of painting, and would speak confidently about brushstroke and color and line, and would do coke and be sensitive and brutish. On his forearms were tattooed twelve-point letters--the initials of local women artists he had loved, none of whom would speak to him anymore. The male painters embraced him like he was a prodigal son, and word always got around: Have you seen Eli Langer? Eli's back in town! Late last winter, Margaux talked with him for the first time. They sat on an iron bench behind a gallery after an opening, surrounded by snow, warmed by a fire burning in a can. Margaux worked harder at art and was more skeptical of its effects than any artist I knew. Though she was happier in her studio than anywhere else, I never heard her claim that painting mattered. She hoped it could be meaningful, but had her doubts, so worked doubly hard to make her choice of being a painter as meaningful as it could be. She never talked about galleries or went on about which brands of paint were best. Sometimes she felt bad and confused that she had not gone into politics--which seemed more straightforwardly useful, and which she thought she was probably well suited for, having something of the dictator inside, or something of the dictator's terrible certainty. Her first feeling every morning was shame about all the things wrong in the world that she wasn't trying to fix. And so it embarrassed her when people remarked on her distinctive brushstrokes, or when people called her work beautiful , a word she claimed not to understand. Then that night, around a fire burning in a can, she and Eli spent several hours talking about color and brushstroke and line. They went on to email for several months, and she was briefly converted into the sort of painter he was--a painter who respected painting in itself. But after two months, her art crush dematerialized. "He's just another man who wants to teach me something," she said. *   *   * Misha and I had planned to take a walk that afternoon, so I went to the apartment he and Margaux shared. When I arrived, he was in his study, at his computer, worrying over his life by checking his email. We left together and walked north through the neighborhood. It was one of the few genuinely hot days we'd had that summer. As the sky went dark with dusk, I asked him whether Margaux had begun her ugly painting yet. He said he thought not. I said I was really eager to see the results. Misha said, "It'll be really good for Sholem. He's so afraid of anything hippie." "Is making an ugly painting hippie?" I asked him. "It kind of is," he said. "There's, like, experimentation to no clearly valuable end. It's certainly more hippie than making a painting that you know is going to be good." "Why should Sholem make a painting that he doesn't know is going to be good?" "I don't know," he said. "But I do think Sholem has a fear of being bad, or of doing the wrong thing. He seems really afraid to take a wrong step at any moment, in any direction. And if what you're afraid of is to take a wrong step at any moment in any direction, that can be limiting. It's good for an artist to try things. It's good for an artist to be ridiculous. Sholem should be a hippie, because with him there's always a tremendous amount of caution." "What's wrong with caution?" "Well, there's a misunderstanding, isn't there? Isn't that what was happening over brunch? Sholem was saying that freedom, for him, is having the technical facility to be able to execute whatever he wants, just whatever image he has in his mind. But that's not freedom! That's control, or power. Whereas I think Margaux understands freedom to be the freedom to take risks, the freedom to do something bad or to appear foolish. To not recognize that difference is a pretty big thing." I said nothing, feeling tense. I wanted to defend Sholem, but I wasn't sure how. "It's like with improv," Misha said. "True improv is about surprising yourself--but most people won't improvise truthfully. They're afraid. What they do is pull from their bag of tricks. They take what they already know how to do and apply it to the present situation. But that's cheating! And cheating's bad for an artist. It's bad in life--but it's really bad in art." We had circled ten blocks and the sun had gone down as we were talking. The houses and trees were now painted a dark, dusky blue. Misha said he had a phone meeting, so we started back toward his apartment. His work life was strange and I didn't quite understand it, but neither did he, and it sometimes perplexed and saddened him. There seemed to be no structure or cohesion to it at all. He did only the things he was good at, and the things that gave him pleasure. Sometimes he taught improv classes to nonactors, sometimes he tried to keep nightclubs out of the Portuguese neighborhood where we lived, sometimes he hosted shows. There was no name you could give to it all. In the short biography he had submitted to Harvard--for what would become a dense, leather-bound volume for distribution at his fifteen-year college reunion--his classmates wrote lengthy entries about their worldly success, their children, and their spouses. Misha's entry had simply stated: Does anyone else feel really weird about having gone to Harvard, given the life they're living now? I live in a two-bedroom apartment above a bikini store in Toronto with my girlfriend, Margaux. "Good night," I said. "Good night." *   *   * Several years ago, when I was engaged to be married but afraid to go through with it--afraid that I would end up divorced like my parents, and not wanting to make a big mistake--I had gone to Misha with my concerns. We were drinking at a party and left to take a walk through the night, our feet brushing gently through the lightly fallen snow. As we walked, I told Misha my fears. Then, after listening for a long while, he finally said, "The only thing I ever understood is that everyone should make the big mistakes." So I took what he said to heart and got married. Three years later I was divorced.   Copyright (c) 2012 by Sheila Heti Excerpted from How Should a Person Be?: A Novel from Life by Sheila Heti All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.