Review by Choice Review
Schultz (psychology, Pacific Univ.) uses a method called "psychobiography.. Psychobiography interprets the "why," not the "who" or the "what.. Why did early experiences govern Capote's life. How do biographical facts translate into characters and themes in the works he produced. Making respectful use of George Clarke's biography Capote (1988) and of Capote's letters, Too Brief a Treat, ed. by Clarke (CH, Feb'05, 42-3261), Schultz examines Other Voices, Other Rooms (1948), Breakfast at Tiffany's (1958), In Cold Blood (1965), and Answered Prayers (1987, posthumously), the unfinished novel in which Capote savaged his jet-set friends. What were the subjective origins of such an attack. What led to such a change in authorial behavior. In the chapter on In Cold Blood, Schultz reports that the book was the result of Capote's self-challenge "to refine and expand his powers, to test what he was capable of.. Capote shared with Perry Smith, one of the condemned killers, childhood situations and father hate-love. The "psycho" is never far from the "biographical" in this chapter. Schultz acknowledges an unavoidable overall problem: the possibility that new facts would verify or contradict facts already known. And Schultz, of necessity, must repeatedly return to the same experiences. Summing Up: Recommended. Graduate students, writers of biography. A. Hirsh emeritus, Central Connecticut State University
Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Library Journal Review
In this amalgam of literary criticism and psychological insight on the life and work of Truman Capote, Schultz (psychology, Pacific University; editor, Handbook of Psychobiography) focuses on Capote's last, unfinished novel, Answered Prayers, a searing roman a clef, which, after Capote authorized excerpts to be published in Esquire magazine, left him estranged from his "swans"-the high-society women who were formerly his most loyal friends and supporters. Using the technique of psychobiography, i.e., referring to selected biographical details to look at the why rather than the who and what, Schultz draws convincing evidence from Capote's life and written work to form a plausible theory of why he would create such a vindictive and self-destructive work of art. VERDICT This book will be most useful to those with academic and or historical interests in American literature, psychology, queer studies, or popular culture. There may also be a more general secondary audience among readers of Capote's fiction.-Alison M. Lewis, Coll. of Information Science & Technology, Drexel Univ., Philadelphia (c) Copyright 2011. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
(c) Copyright Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
Review by Kirkus Book Review
Schultz (Psychology/Pacific Univ.; editor: Handbook of Psychobiography, 2005) plumbs the machinations behind Truman Capote's literary self-sabotage.In this slim, potent second installment in the publisher's Inner Lives series, the author eschews the delivery of straightforward biographical facts. Rather, he astutely dissects the inspirations behind Capote's last, unfinished roman clef,Answered Prayers, a scorching, sensationalistic tell-all about his "filthy rich" friends, whom he dubbed "swans." Schultz considers these scathing chapters (several were published in Esquire magazine in 19756) as Capote's final self-defining moments, in which he deliberately "bit down hard on the smooth, socialite hands that fed him." Curiously, the author acknowledges that the whereabouts of the complete manuscript has become the stuff of legend, if Capote did indeed finish it at all. But "why tattle on trillionaires?" Schultz ponders, as he mines the conception and execution of the author's literary accomplishments: the ill-fated Answered Prayers, the "homosexual fantasia" of his debut Other Voices, Other Rooms, Breakfast at Tiffany's and his controversial blockbuster masterpiece of American crime, In Cold Blood. He questions why such a hardworking, respected writer would denigrate and systematically betray the privileged circles with which he'd become so ingrained. Was it Capote's "insecurely attached" childhood, the effects of personal deterioration brought on by a dependence on drugs and alcohol, or had these social luminaries truly slighted him? In contemplating Capote's many behavioral motivations, Schultz's lucid academic discourse never shames the author for penning such "pseudonym-free, scorching dismissals" that skewered folks like Jackie and Joe Kennedy, Cole Porter and Ann Woodward, but instead paints the author with compassion as a troubled literary burnout bent on vengeance, lashing out at whomever came closest to him.A fascinating, erudite deliberation.]] Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.
Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.
