1861 The Civil War awakening

Adam Goodheart

Book - 2011

Goodheart provides a new interpretation of what spurred the American Civil War. Here, he describes how cultural differences played surprising roles in the move toward war.

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

973.711/Goodheart
1 / 1 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor 973.711/Goodheart Checked In
Subjects
Published
New York : Alfred A. Knopf c2011.
Language
English
Main Author
Adam Goodheart (-)
Edition
1st ed
Physical Description
481 p. : ill., ports
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN
9781400040155
  • Prologue: A Banner at Daybreak: Charleston Harbor, December 1860
  • Chapter 1. Wide Awake: Boston, October 1860
  • Chapter 2. The Old Gentlemen: Washington, January 1861
  • Chapter 3. Forces of Nature: Central Ohio, February 1861
  • Chapter 4. A Shot in the Dark: Charleston Harbor, April 1861
  • Chapter 5. The Volunteer: Lower Manhattan, April 1861
  • Chapter 6. Gateways to the West: Lower Carson River, Nevada Territory, May 1861
  • Chapter 7. The Crossing: Washington, May 1861
  • Chapter 8. Freedom's Fortress: Hampton Roads, Virginia, May 1861
  • Chapter 9. Independence Day: Washington, July 1861
  • Postscripts
  • Notes
  • Bibliography
  • Acknowledgments
  • Index
Review by Choice Review

The sesquicentennial of the Civil War has resulted in a plethora of books. What more can be written that hasn't already been treated in the 60,000-plus titles about the war? Two recent books--Doris Kearns Goodwin's study of Lincoln and his cabinet (Team of Rivals, CH, Oct'06, 44-1125) and Harold Holzer's examination of Lincoln's activities between the election and the inauguration (Lincoln President-Elect, CH, Mar'09, 46-4039)--show that there is much that can be done. Those authors do not discuss anything previously unknown, but present it differently. Goodheart (Washington College, Maryland) takes a similar approach. The author looks at the period between the secession of South Carolina in December 1860 to the early summer of 1861. He addresses what was going on in both of the capitals, but also pays attention to a number of figures and places that other books usually skip over. The book's strongest point is the introduction of many of the characters from the last three months of Buchanan's presidency and the first three months of Lincoln's time in office. Among those who spring out at readers are Jessie Benton Fremont and General Benjamin Butler. A good book for most audiences. Summing Up: Recommended. All levels/libraries. I. Cohen emeritus, Illinois State University

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by New York Times Review

On the morning of April 12, 1861, the newly formed Confederate States Army opened fire on the federal garrison of Fort Sumter in the harbor of Charleston, S.C. After 36 hours of shelling by Confederate cannons, United States Maj. Robert Anderson surrendered the battered fort to his former countrymen. The fall of Fort Sumter touched off four years of a civil war that would kill more than 620,000 soldiers and revolutionize American culture. More prosaically, that fateful first shot unleashed a barrage of books about the War Between the States. In 1995 one bibliographer estimated that more than 50,000 had been published, exploring every aspect of the conflict on and off the battlefield. Thousands more have appeared since then. Now, 150 years after the surrender of Fort Sumter, the journalist, travel writer and historian Adam Goodheart has let loose his own salvo in what will be a four-year firestorm of books commemorating the Civil War. Many good studies about the struggle will be published, but few will be as exhilarating as "1861: The Civil War Awakening." Like many of the best works of history, "1861" creates the uncanny illusion that the reader has stepped into a time machine. We are traveling, Goodheart writes in the prologue, to "a moment in our country's history when almost everything hung in the balance." Goodheart leads us on a journey through the frenzied, frightening months between Abraham Lincoln's election to the presidency in 1860 - followed with breakneck speed by the secession of the Confederate States and the outbreak of war - and July 4, 1861, when President Lincoln delivered his first message to Congress, laying out the case not only for the necessity of war, but for a more democratic vision of the United States. The election of Lincoln and the secession crisis is, of course, familiar terrain. But Goodheart's version is at once more panoramic and more intimate than most standard accounts, and more inspiring. This is fundamentally a history of hearts and minds, rather than of legislative bills and battles. He traces the process by which the states that did not secede evolved, in less than a year, from a deeply divided, intensely ambivalent and decidedly racist population into a genuine Union, united by the hope of creating a nation that would fulfill the promises of 1776. This is the story of the thousands of Americans who responded to the crisis, as Goodheart puts it, "not just with anger and panic but with nope and determination, people who, amid the ruins of the country they had grown up in, saw an opportunity to change history." So Goodheart turns the lens away from the usual stars of the story, the politicians, military officers, activists and editors who strove to direct the course of events. Instead, he explores the more obscure corners of antebellum America, introducing fascinating figures who loomed large at the time but have now been mostly forgotten. Many of these are young men struggling to decide what manhood requires of them when the old models of patriotism, loyalty and self-interest were rapidly dissolving. In upstate Ohio, the irrepressible future president James Garfield was an idealistic state senator whose sense of Emersonian independence was increasingly affronted by the equivocation, self-censorship and unsavory compromises required to keep the slave states from seceding. In Chicago, Goodheart introduces young Elmer Ellsworth, whose boyhood dreams of glory led him to found the dashing Fire Zouaves, a military regiment composed of roughneck New York firemen but modeled on - and dressed in the exotic style of - the elite French forces in Algeria. We glimpse the clerks and shopkeepers who organized themselves into secret political clubs called the Wide Awakes, who showed their support for candidate Lincoln by parading at night through the Northern cities in eerie silence, draped in makeshift capes of shiny black oilcloth that reflected the blaze of their flaming torches. Out in St. Louis, we visit the Forty-Eighters - reviled as the "Damned Dutch" by the Missouri secessionists - refugees from the failed revolution against the monarchs of the German Confederation, who discovered in the slaveholders "exactly what they had come here to escape: a swaggering clique of landed oligarchs, boorish aristocrats obstructing the forces of modernity and progress." And in the Union stronghold of Fortress Monroe outside Hampton, Va. (about as far south as Goodheart ventures), we witness the remarkable encounter between the Union general Benjamin Butler and three slaves - Frank Baker, Shepard Mallory, James Townsend - whose decision to liberate themselves ignited a sudden revolution in white attitudes toward emancipation. GOODHEART, the director of the C. V. Starr Center for the Study of the American Experience at Washington College and a regular contributor to NYTimes.com's Civil War blog, Disunion, combines a journalist's eye for telling detail with the rigorous research of a good historian. But he gives his far-flung journey narrative tension and suspense by religiously following two fundamental rules of the novelist: first, make the reader care about your characters, then make the reader worry about them. Goodheart excels at creating emotional empathy with his characters, encouraging us to experience the crisis as they did, in real time, without the benefit of historical hindsight. He lets the players speak for themselves and make the best case for their own motives and beliefs. Even more effective is his use of the technique of free indirect speech, subtly incorporating the distinctive language of the various characters into his own narration. For example: General Anderson would be "damned if he was to surrender - even worse, perform a shabby pantomime of surrender - before a rabble of whiskey-soaked militia-men and canting politicians." This is a particularly useful sleight of hand for the Civil War historian, who must recreate the feelings and rationalizations of a wide variety of people whose beliefs we might find incomprehensible or reprehensible - without sounding anachronistic or censorious, or seeming to endorse them. That same technique allows Goodheart to suggest the characters' moral or intellectual blind spots, their failures of perception or their unpreparedness for the events to come. These moments are some of the most affecting in the book. They are also some of the funniest, as in Goodheart's depiction of the boisterous Fire Zouaves arriving in drowsy, bureaucratic Washington: "Waiting may have been the locals' favorite pastime, but the New York firemen did not share their taste. After four days en route to the capital, cooped up on the steamer and then the train, they had expected and hoped to disembark straight into the thick of battle. (You could hardly blame them - it had been weeks since their last chance for even a good street brawl.) As they tumbled out of their train, a newspaperman had heard one Zouave ask: 'Can you tell us where Jeff Davis is? We're lookin' for him.' A comrade chimed in, 'We're bound to hang his scalp in the White House before we go back.' Others squinted in perplexity, looking around for secession flags to capture but failing to discover any." The Zouaves' situation turns tragic only a few weeks later, on the night of May 23, when their leader, the ebullient Ellsworth, impetuously decides to cut down a rebel flag that is flying over a Confederate sympathizer's hotel, and is brutally killed. The young colonel was mourned as the first martyr of the war, inspiring over 200,000 men to join the Union Army. "Sumter's fall had loosed a flood of patriotic feeling," Goodheart observes, but "Ellsworth's death released a tide of hatred, of enmity and counterenmity, of sectional blood lust. . . . Indeed, it was Ellsworth's death that made Northerners ready not just to take up arms but actually to kill." Throughout "1861," Goodheart shows how such small individual choices helped to decide momentous questions. A cascade of life-and-death decisions drives the book's momentum from the beginning: Will the North elect Abraham Lincoln despite the South's threats to secede? Once Lincoln is elected, will Congress be able to keep the South from leaving without committing the nation to slavery in perpetuity? Faced with the founding of the Confederacy, will the North let the slaveholders leave peacefully, capitulate to their demands, or embrace "the ideology of Freedom"? What will the West do, after years of being checked between Southern and Northern interests? Will the men of the North take up arms against their own people? What will happen to the slaves once war has come? Will the war become a fight to end slavery, or will it simply reunite the nation as it was? The interplay of the intimate, the panoramic and the ironic reaches a heroic climax with these last two questions. The very day that Elmer Ellsworth died, General Butler encountered a dilemma in the form of the three fugitive slaves, who, before they escaped, had been helping build a Confederate artillery fortification across the harbor from Fortress Monroe. Butler's course should have been clear. Legally, he was required to return the slaves to their owner. Politically, the general was bound by Lincoln's vow that the federal government would not interfere with slavery - a position applauded by most Northerners. But when the owner's emissary arrived, waving a white flag of truce, to reclaim his runaway properties, Butler refused to turn them over. Since Virginia was no longer part of the United States, the wily general declared, and since the slaves had been aiding the rebel army, he was confiscating the men as "contraband of war." "Out of this incident seems to have grown one of the most sudden and important revolutions in popular thought which took place during the whole war," Lincoln's assistants John Hay and John Nicolay observed. The befuddling logic of the "contraband doctrine" had a clarifying effect on the North. Those who decried "emancipation" as an unconstitutional attack on property rights found no objection when it was called "confiscation.'' The impact among blacks was even more profound. Within weeks, slaves by the hundreds were flooding into "the freedom fort" and other Union bastions - without inciting a racial bloodbath, as many whites had long feared. It was the blow that sent slavery to its deathbed. Not everyone will be enamored of "1861." Some will object that it concentrates too much on the white men of the North, giving short shrift to women, blacks and Southerners. Readers hoping for a conventional war story might be put off by the book's peripatetic structure. Skeptics may look askance at Goodheart's unabashed optimism and open admiration of the Union cause in spite of the many ways it would fall short of its most noble goals. But readers who take "1861" on its own passionate, forthright terms will find it irresistible. And for those who don't like this Civil War book, well, just wait - there are plenty more to come. Members of a regiment of New York Zouaves conducting an ambulance drill. It was Elmer Ellsworth's death 'that made Northerners ready not just to take up arms but actually to kill.' Debby Applegate is the author of "The Most Famous Man in America: The Biography of Henry Ward Beecher," which won a Pulitzer Prize in 2007. She is now writing a biography of the madam Polly Adler.

Copyright (c) The New York Times Company [April 24, 2011]
Review by Booklist Review

In this high-quality history depicting the surge of patriotic feeling in the North between the summers of 1860 and 1861, Goodheart presents personalities critical to the course of events. Tracking their various routes to supporting the Union, routes proceeding from the many differences of opinion about its nature, Goodheart focuses on their characters and motivations, creatively yielding an active narrative with much stylistic vibrancy. Pro-Lincoln marchers in the North, the Wide Awakes and the Zouaves, furnish him with colorful material as he plumbs the stirrings of Northern resolve to preserve the Union; those organizations eventually transformed into militias active in the Civil War's initial fracases (save Fort Sumter) at St. Louis and Washington. Following a glance at California, held fast by one Unionist's oratory, Goodheart represents the issue causing sectional discord--slavery--through several blacks whose escapes from bondage forced Northern leaders to squarely face whether the war was solely to save the Union or for some greater cause. Goodheart's intelligent, literate book captures the emotions and enthusiasms that imbued the start of the Civil War.--Taylor, Gilber. Copyright 2010 Booklist

From Booklist, Copyright (c) American Library Association. Used with permission.
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review

Goodhart, a historian and journalist who will be writing a column on the Civil War for the New York Times online, makes sophisticated use of a broad spectrum of sources for an evocative reinterpretation of the Civil War's beginnings. Wanting to retrieve the war from recent critics who dismiss the importance of slavery in the Union's aims, he reframes the war as "not just a Southern rebellion but a nationwide revolution" to free the country of slavery and end paralyzing attempts to compromise over it. The revolution began long before the war's first shots were fired. But it worked on the minds and hearts of average whites and blacks, slaves and free men. By 1861 it had attained an irresistible momentum. Goodheart shifts focus away from the power centers of Washington and Charleston to look at the actions and reactions of citizens from Boston to New York City, from Hampton Roads, Va., to St. Louis, Mo., and San Francisco, emphasizing the cultural, rather than military, clash between those wanting the country to move forward and those clinging to the old ways. War would be waged for four bitter years, with enduring seriousness, intensity, and great heroism, Goodheart emphasizes. 15 illus. (Apr.) (c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved.

(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
Review by Library Journal Review

On the sesquicentennial of the Civil War's start, Goodheart (director, C.V. Starr Ctr. for the Study of the American Experience, Washington Coll.) takes a fresh look at the dawning of that transformative conflict. He draws upon a diverse selection of papers, memoirs, and collected records from both the well known (e.g., President Lincoln) and the unknown (e.g., the anonymous contrabands at Fortress Monroe, VA) to craft this engrossing examination. Focusing on the motivations for war, he rejects the often repeated assumption that at the beginning emancipation was far from the minds of those who fought, citing convincing material that the new birth of freedom was in the air from the earliest days of the conflict. Verdict This riveting and thought-provoking narrative is sure to teach something new to even the most seasoned Civil War researcher. Recommended for all interested readers and libraries of all sizes even if they are also purchasing Emory Thomas's fine The Dogs of War: 1861.-Theresa McDevitt, Indiana Univ. of Pennsylvania Libs. (c) Copyright 2011. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.

(c) Copyright Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
Review by Kirkus Book Review

A penetrating look at the crowded moment when the antebellum world began to turn.Thezeitgeistis by definition ephemeral and difficult to recapturethink, for example, of a period as recent as America before 9/11but that's the neat trick splendidly accomplished here by journalist and historian Goodheart, now director of Washington College's C.V. Starr Center for the Study of the American Experience. History, he reminds us, is composed not merely of the momentous judgments of government ministers and generals, but also of the countless decisions of ordinary people. These responses to unexpected challenges are complicated, not always predictable and, taken together, have the power to shift events decisively. Such a time was 1861, when the "Old Gentlemen" (the likes of Buchanan, Tyler and Crittenden) gave way to the self-made men (exemplified by Lincoln, multiplied by a still younger generation of strivers like James Garfield and Elmer Ellsworth); when the Republican marching clubs, the Wide Awakes, and the exotic Zouave drill team became something more than quasi-military; when the transcontinental telegraph replaced the Pony Express; when trolley-car executive William Sherman and shop clerk Ulysses Grant looked on as two unsavory men preserved Missouri for the Union; when fugitive slaves suddenly became "contrabands"; when a general in San Francisco and a major at Fort Sumter, notwithstanding their Southern sympathies, remained faithful to their military oath; when surging patriotism and romantic notions of war turned to hatred and bloodlust; when an unfolding national crisis required people to choose sides, sweep away old assumptions and rattle categories long deemed unshakeable, and bring forth something new. Whether limning the likes of Benjamin "Spoons" Butler, abolitionist Abby Kelley Foster or the young Abner Doubleday, explaining something as seemingly inconsequential as the fashion for men's beards or unpacking Lincoln's profound understanding of the nature and unacceptable consequences of the rebellion, Goodheart's sure grasp never falters.Beautifully written and thoroughly originalquite unlike any other Civil War book out there.]] Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Lower Manhattan, April 1861   It was a day unlike any the city had known before. Half a million people, or so the newspapers would report, crowded the streets between Battery Park and Fourteenth Street. If you were there among them that day, the thing that you would never forget-- not even if you lived to see the next century-- was the flags. The Stars and Stripes flew above the doors of department stores and town houses, from Bowery taverns and from the spire of Trinity Church, while Broadway, the New York Herald reported, "was almost hidden in a cloud of flaggery." P. T. Barnum, not to be outdone, especially when he sensed an opportunity for attention, had strung an entire panoply of oversize banners across the thoroughfare. The national ensign even fl uttered, in miniature, on the heads of the horses straining to pull overloaded omnibuses through the throngs on Fifth Avenue. The one flag that everyone wanted to see -- needed to see-- was in Union Square itself, the unattainable point toward which all the shoving and sweating and jostling bodies strove. No fewer than five separate speakers' platforms had been hastily erected there, and every so often, above the ceaseless din, you could catch a phrase or two: "that handful of loyal men . . . their gallant commander . . . the honor of their country . . ."               If you managed somehow to clamber up onto the base of a beleaguered lamppost and emerge for a moment above the hats and bonnets of the multitude, you might glimpse what was propped up on the monument in the center of the square: cradled in General Washington's bronze arms, a torn and soot- stained flag on a splintered staff. (One hundred forty years later, in an eerie echo of that long- forgotten day, a later generation would gather around the same statue with candles and flowers in the aftermath of another attack on the nation.) Nearby, waving a bit stiffly to acknowledge the cheers, was a lean, gray-haired officer.1 But then you lost your tenuous foothold, the gray- haired officer and his flag vanished from sight, and you were down off the lamppost again, buffeted this way and that by the odorous masses of New Yorkers, ripened by exertion and by the sunny spring day: Wall Street bankers in black broadcloth; pale, flushed shopgirls; grimy men from the Fulton docks, more pungent than anyone else, smelling of fish. It was hard to imagine anybody swaggering through such a crowd, but here came someone doing just that-- and not just one man but three abreast, nonchalant young toughs all dressed in identical, baggy red shirts. One had a fat plug of tobacco in his cheek and looked ready to spit where he pleased; another fellow none too surreptitiously pinched the prettiest of the shopgirls as he passed. Somehow, by common consent, the pressing throngs parted to let them through. They all knew exactly who these superior beings were: the fire b'hoys. And as of today, no longer simply that, either-- for these b'hoys had signed their enlistment papers yesterday, and were very shortly to be sworn in as soldiers of the First New York Fire Zouaves.             On the way home after the great Union rally, you might have seen many more of them, over a thousand red- shirted recruits, crowding a park just off Fourteenth Street, arrayed in rough military formation. Uncharacteristically quiet, even subdued, they raised their brawny right arms as their colonel, the man they had just unanimously elected to lead them into war--for such was the custom still, in those early months of 1861--administered the oath.             The young colonel--he seemed, from a distance, barely more than a boy--was, unlike all his thousand-odd comrades, not a New York City fireman. He was not even a New Yorker, unless one counted his childhood far upstate. He was different in almost every way from the strapping men of his regiment, with their loose limbs and salty tongues: a small man, neat and self- contained, who never drank, or smoked, or swore. He thrilled to poetry as much as to the tattoo of drums; he had dined at the White House more often than in taverns or mess halls; and he had come not from the teeming wards of Brooklyn but from the West.             He was also one of those occasional American figures whose death, even more than his life, seemed to mark the passing away of one era and the beginning of another. He would be, briefly, the war's most famous man. And for that moment, the entire conflict, the irreconcilable forces that set state against state and brother against brother, would seem distilled into--as one who knew him well would write--"the dark mystery of how Ellsworth died."             Like so m any Americans of his generation, Elmer Ellsworth seemed to emerge out of nowhere. This wasn't quite true, but almost. In later years, some would swear they had roomed with him in a cheap boardinghouse in Washington, long before he was famous; or been his classmate at a high school in Kenosha before he suddenly dropped out and disappeared; or known him living up among the Ottawa Indians near Muskegon, where the tribe had adopted him as its chief. But no one was ever quite sure.             Odd remnants of his diaries would eventually turn up. And his parents, at least, who would long outlive him, eventually shared everything they could recall of his boyhood. He had left home early, though. There were few enough opportunities for him there.             Ellsworth was born in the year of the country's first great financial depression, 1837, in the small village of Malta in Saratoga County, New York. His ancestors had settled nearby before the Revolution, but the family was poor. Ephraim Ellsworth, the boy's father, had struggled as a tailor until the Panic ruined him, forcing him to eke out a living doing odd jobs, netting wild passenger pigeons to sell for their meat, and peddling kegs of pickled oysters door- to- door on commission. His son, serious- minded and small for his age, was sent off at the age of nine to work for a man who owned a general store and saloon. Scrupulously, the boy refused to handle liquor or even--as his master expected--to rinse out the customers' whiskey glasses. In a world where drunkenness was common (among children, too), he had already resolved to be different.             His early life, Ellsworth would write as an adult, seemed to him nothing but "a jumble of strange incidents." He was a child who seemed to live half in the gritty reality of his physical surroundings, half in a dream world of his own creation. Sometimes he cadged paint from a wagon shop in the village and daubed scenes onto a scrap of board or an old window shade. One of these has survived; it shows a forest- fringed river that might have been the nearby Hudson but for the turrets and spires of Arthurian castles rising along its banks. In summer, he wandered among the "green old hills" above the actual river, and in winter, he skated on the Champlain Canal, perhaps developing there the ease of movement that would later mature into a kind of balletic grace. His schooling must have been intermittent, and when he did attend, he was often teased; the other children nicknamed him "Oyster Keg," on account of both his size and his father's ignominious occupation. The boy learned to defend his honor with his fists.             Occasionally, though, the larger world offered glimpses of a reality nearly as glamorous as his painted fantasies. Malta lay astride the road to Saratoga Springs, a watering place popular with the officers and cadets of West Point, and in summer, the sprucely uniformed soldiers (with fine young women at their sides) must have passed through the village in hired carriages on their way to the nearby resort. For the watchful boy, the sight must have seemed a visitation from an imagined country. Many years later, Ellsworth's aunt would recall him making forts out of loose bricks and shaping mud into breastworks; wooden blocks represented American soldiers and enemy redcoats.             His grandfather, George Ellsworth, had been a teenage militiaman in the Revolution, and although George's pension application from the 1830s reveals that he was illiterate--he signed the document with a quavering X-- it also shows that in old age he could still recount vivid tales of battling Tories and Indians along the Hudson Valley.6 Elmer's grandfather died when the boy was not yet three, but the old veteran's widow survived him by many years, and probably shared the stories she knew. The rocky slopes and tidy Dutch towns above the Hudson seemed themselves to tell tales of the many famous deeds they had witnessed. A boy with Ellsworth's active imagination, looking out over the placid landscape of fields and pastures, must sometimes have felt as if the cannons were still booming and the tomahawks still flying in the forests, somewhere over the next line of hills.             When the boy was about eleven, his family moved to Mechanicville, a larger town with its own railroad station. Peddling the New York papers through the aisles of the crowded passenger cars, he must have scanned reports of the Mexican War and its aftermath, and of the liberal, nationalist revolutions in Europe, some of them sparked by student agitators not much older than he.             Perhaps because of these colorful stories in the penny papers, or perhaps from his boyhood sightings of West Point cadets, Ellsworth's dreams had early on taken a military cast. He organized the local boys into a militia company and somewhat grandiosely dubbed it the Black-Plumed Riflemen of Stillwater, the name stolen from a pulp novel he'd read about the Revolutionary War.             Soon he was absent from home with increasing frequency, until finally, latching onto a prosperous- looking elderly gentleman who'd taken an interest in him one day on the train, he followed the stranger off to New York City to work in his linen shop. This is where the biographical record suddenly stops.             But we do know that he turned up eventually--as perhaps he was bound to--in Chicago. That town was in its restless adolescence in the 1850s, a half- wild place where patches of prairie still showed like blank canvas among the two- and three- story office buildings, and the occasional wolf still strayed in from the forested shores along Lake Michigan, to prowl the muddy streets and plank sidewalks.             Restless, too, were the young men who roamed lean and hungry along those avenues of flimsy buildings. From villages in Ohio and western Pennsylvania, from New York and the stony farms of New England, from Germany and Ireland and Sweden, they crowded into the rising metropolis of the great West. Some found work in the sawmills that ran incessantly, gnawing virgin timber into clapboard and railroad ties; others amid the stench of the stockyards. Sometimes the tideless river ran viscous with the blood of slaughtered beasts.             A year or two before the outbreak of the war, Elmer Ellsworth was one of these thousands of young men, clerking and copying papers in a law office for meager pay, living on dry biscuits and water, sleeping on the bare wooden floor. It was a life so spartan that when he could get a pound or two of salted crackers to vary his diet, the occasion was worthy of note in his diary: "Am living like a King." It was a statement of characteristic, wildly unrealistic, optimism. Through all the years of roving, wherever they had taken him, he had never lost his boyhood dreams of glory. In his free time, Ellsworth pored over volumes on military tactics and drill formations until he knew some of them by heart. Not long after his arrival in Chicago, he also joined a local militia, the Cadets of the National Guard, one of many such groups that drew in young men far from home and family, worn thin from hard work and striving, looking for anything solid to which they could fasten themselves.             Today, in an era of full-time, highly professionalized national armed forces, it is hard to appreciate the vastly different culture of the nineteenth century, when for most Americans, volunteering for military service was more like joining a weekend bowling league than enlisting in the army as we know it. The colonial militia companies, which had provided the rank and file during the Revolution, had faded away in the succeeding decades, especially after the War of 1812 had proven them no match for the British army's hardened veterans of the Napoleonic campaigns. But the Founding Fathers' old vision of a United States without standing armies, in which citizen- soldiers were the first line of defense, still beckoned. In both cities and towns, men formed military companies that stood ready-- at least in theory-- to answer their country's call in case of emergency. In practice, most of these units were scarcely trained and haphazardly equipped; some marched with sticks or cornstalks instead of muskets. Members paraded on the village green every Fourth of July, unfurling tattered banners that had been stitched by local maidens who were now wrinkled grandmothers. The last serious mobilization had been the one back in 1812. Each month or two throughout the year, the boys gathered for "drills" that were often simply excuses to get away from home and do some hard drinking. Larger towns and cities had rival companies: one militia for the Democrats and another for the Whigs; one for the Methodists and another for the Presbyterians; one for the Irishmen and another for the Germans. New York City even had several all-Jewish units.             In the 1850s, however, Americans started becoming a bit more serious about their militias, marching in drills and parades with fresh ardor, and even making sporadic attempts at professionalism. The Mexican War, the nation's most dramatic military victory since the Revolution, had just been fought and won. From Europe came reports of the glorious charges and sieges of the Crimean War, and of the nationalist struggles for independence. And closer to home, some Americans were sensing the approach of civil war and beginning to sharpen their swords--in both the North and the South.             Elmer Ellsworth does not appear to have been one of these. None of his surviving writings suggests much thought about slavery and abolitionism, about the bloody struggles in Kansas or the wild- eyed prophecies of John Brown. He seems, rather, to have approached military drills with the enthusiasm and relentless discipline of an athlete pushing himself toward the big leagues.             And, like a basketball genius from the mean streets of the Bronx, or a home- run hitter sprouting amid the cornfields of Iowa, the oyster peddler's son from upstate New York turned out to be a natural. Quite soon-- by the time he was nineteen, if not earlier-- the Cadets had elected him their major. What was more, he quickly found himself in demand to serve as drillmaster for regiments throughout Chicago's environs. A photograph probably dating to around this time shows him in the resplendent but queerly antiquated garb of a militia officer, a remnant of the previous century: plumed cocked hat, tight breeches, and swallowtail coat with white facings.             It is easy to picture this confident young man putting the even younger privates through their paces, lifting his sword to bark the commands: Attention! Squad forward! Double quick--march! More difficult is imagining the splendid major returning each night to his hard lodgings and meager supper. Ellsworth hid his poverty from all but his closest friends; he would later tell of sitting in a restaurant with acquaintances and watching them feast on oyster stew, as he pretended that he had just dined so he could avoid buying a meal. Such reticence fed the aura of mystery around him. His Hudson Valley origins and military prowess fueled whispers that he had attended West Point and been expelled for some mysterious infraction, rumors that Ellsworth may or may not have disclaimed.             Sometime in the late 1850s, however, Ellsworth had an encounter that rivaled any romantic tale he might have dreamt up. It happened, improbably enough, in a Chicago gymnasium. There he met one Charles DeVilliers, a French fencing instructor recently arrived in the city. Back in Europe, DeVilliers had served as an officer in the Zouaves, an elite fighting force named for a band of Algerian tribesmen renowned for their ferocity in battle. The French Zouaves copied the North Africans' uniform--fez, baggy pants, and a loose jacket, "suited to rapid movement and fierce daring"--and developed a reputation both for their dashing appearance and for their fearsome use of the bayonet. Newspapers and illustrated magazines worldwide, America included, covered the Zouaves' exploits in the Crimea (where DeVilliers had served) and in Italy's war of unifi cation. How a French Zouave ended up in Chicago is still a mystery, except that all sorts of people ended up in Chicago in those days. In any event, it is no surprise that the young militiaman gravitated toward the older officer and insisted on learning the Zouaves' distinctive tactics. Somehow, over the course of just months-- in a miraculous transformation that Hollywood, had it existed yet, might have invented--the threadbare clerk became an expert fencer, gymnast, and drill instructor.             Before long, he was teaching those skills to others. The cadets' regiment was a militia unit "of the old school," one member recalled many years later, composed of young men who drilled in old- fashioned uniforms and bearskin hats, "ponderous, slow, and heavy." It was also on the verge of bankruptcy; membership had been dwindling, perhaps due to competition from newer and more glamorous organizations. Ellsworth saw an opportunity. When he showed the militiamen the Zouave moves he had learned from DeVilliers, they were fascinated. Within a month or two, he was drilling them six nights a week, for hours at a time, and the unit had renamed itself the U.S. Zouave Cadets.             The cadets' devotion to their new commandant was all the more remarkable in light of the strictures he imposed. The new company, he told them, was to be not merely a military organization but "a source of improvement morally as well as physically." No member was allowed to enter any drinking saloon, gambling hall, or "house of ill- fame," on pain of immediate expulsion. Even playing billiards was off- limits, on the grounds that it might "naturally lead to drinking." The preamble to these rules explained that while many militia groups existed "with no higher object than the mere pursuit of pleasure," this one would be different. And remarkably, the more rigid Ellsworth's strictures became, the more the men seemed to thrive under them. "The clerk from behind the counter, the law student from the books, the young man of leisure from his loiterings around town-- all have lived under strict military discipline, self- imposed," wrote one impressed visitor to the regimental armory.             And so it was that on July Fourth of the following year, Chicagoans lined the shore of Lake Michigan to observe a wholly unanticipated spectacle. Some forty cadets in the traditional blue- and- buff uniforms of the eighteenth- century militias--Algerian Zouave--style attire had been ordered but didn't arrive in time--gave a performance that was more like a gymnastics event (or a nineteenth-century version of Cirque du Soleil) than any military drill the onlookers had ever seen. Instead of forming neat lines, shouldering their guns, and marching straight ahead, these militiamen leapt and rolled and yelled, loaded muskets while lying on their backs, jumped up to fire them and then fell again, thrust and twirled their bayonets like drum majors' batons--all with a beautiful and precise synchrony. "The cadets are not large in stature, but athletes in agility and strength, moving at the word of command with the quickness and precision of steam men," one newspaper editor marveled.             On the day before the Zouaves' first performance, on the far side of the Appalachians-- and unknown but to a few others-- John Brown arrived, incognito, at Harper's Ferry. His deeds in the months to come would electrify the country and the world. But so, too, would the sensation born that Independence Day beside Lake Michigan and soon to be sweeping beyond Chicago, across the Midwestern prairies and then past them, throughout an unquiet land. Excerpted from 1861: The Civil War Awakening by Adam Goodheart All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.