Understanding assisted suicide Nine issues to consider

John B. Mitchell, 1944-

Book - 2007

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

179.7/Mitchell
1 / 1 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor 179.7/Mitchell Checked In
Subjects
Published
Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press c2007.
Language
English
Main Author
John B. Mitchell, 1944- (-)
Item Description
"A personal journey"--Cover.
Physical Description
x, 221 p. ; 23 cm
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references (p. 163-210) and index.
ISBN
9780472069965
9780472099962
  • Introduction
  • Issue 1. Cultural Arguments That Assisted Suicide Is Always Wrong
  • Issue 2. Religious Arguments for Maintaining That Suicide Is Morally "Wrong"
  • Issue 3. Utilitarian Arguments against Suicide
  • Issue 4. The Slippery Slope Phenomenon
  • Issue 5. My Path Turns: Looking at Autonomy and Moral Claims to the Right to Assisted Suicide
  • Issue 6. Act Utilitarianism as a Moral Basis for Justifying Assisted Suicide
  • Issue 7. The Moral Claim Justifying Physician-Assisted Suicide with the Combination of Autonomy and Mercy
  • Issue 8. Law and Assisted Suicide
  • Issue 9. The Question of Whether Legislatures Should or Should Not Legalize Physician-Assisted Suicide
  • Epilogue
  • Notes
  • Index
Review by Choice Review

Mitchell (Seattle Univ. School of Law) offers an excellent book grounded in his attempt to understand his parent's confrontation with death, euthanasia, and his own involvement. The book is extremely well argued, equally well written, and superbly documented. The author considers issues that include moral and legal questions. Do culture and religion embrace the sanctity of life and thereby forbid suicide and euthanasia? If a particular suicide is justifiable, would condoning it create a "slippery slope" that causes the involuntary deaths of the most vulnerable, doing more societal harm than good? Does the principle of autonomy give people the right to choose death? Or is the choice of suicide evidence that one is irrational, lacking autonomy? Does the right to liberty give one a constitutional right to choose death? Or does it follow from the equal protection clause of the Constitution that to prohibit euthanasia (by the intentional administration of a lethal dose) in one case while allowing it in others (by discontinuing life support or administering lethal doses of morphine to "dull pain") is a dubious and arbitrary distinction? What happens when assisted suicide is decriminalized, as in the Netherlands and in Oregon? Summing Up: Highly recommended. All levels. R. Werner Hamilton College

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.