St. Petersburg Architecture of the tsars

D. O. Shvidkovskiĭ

Book - 1996

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

720.947/Shvidkovskii
1 / 1 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor 720.947/Shvidkovskii Checked In
Subjects
Published
New York : Abbeville Press Publishers 1996.
Language
English
French
Main Author
D. O. Shvidkovskiĭ (-)
Other Authors
Alexander Orloff (-)
Edition
1st ed
Physical Description
360 p. : col. ill., maps (some col.) ; 33 cm
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN
9780789202178
Contents unavailable.
Review by Choice Review

St. Petersburg has long been considered one of the greatest examples of the city as a work of art, and this volume is the latest of numerous books to pay homage to its imperial beauty. The emphasis here is pictorial, with reproductions of 18th- and 19th-century views of the city and a few hundred color photographs by Orloff, who receives top billing on the title page. Orloff is also the author of the acknowledgments, from which one learns that he had the support of the city's cultural and political establishment. Although some of the photographs are poorly reproduced, the results of this collaboration are impressive and include views of the suburban palaces, as well as major architectural monuments within St. Petersburg itself. The accompanying text surveys the architecture during two centuries of imperial rule. There is no attention to the development of the city after the fall of the Romanov dynasty in 1917. Shvidkovsky's grasp of the historical background is occasionally uncertain and references to research sources are lacking, but no one would mistake this for a scholarly work. It is a lavish, visually satisfying gift for the coffee table. General. W. C. Brumfield Tulane University

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Library Journal Review

St. Petersburg is one of the most beautiful and architecturally imposing cities in the world. Photographer Orloff, whose work has appeared in major magazines, and Shvidkovsky, a member of the Russian Federation's Academy of Fine Arts, have produced a handsome study of the buildings constructed during the reigns of the Russian tsars since Peter the Great. The text is informative, and the photos maintain a good balance between exterior and interior views. Like Washington, D.C., St. Petersburg is a planned city, decreed and dictated, with marvelous results in the case of the former Russian capital. A commission established by Catherine the Great to plan the development of the city ordered that "Three rules must be honored in the construction of the [city's] houses: solidity, utility, and beauty." Readers will see that the rules were followed indeed. Recommended for both architecture and travel collections.‘Edward B. Cone, New York City (c) Copyright 2010. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.

(c) Copyright Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.

INTRODUCTION Russia was a part of Europe for two centuries and fourteen years: from 1703, the year St. Petersburg was founded, to 1917, the year of the Bolshevik victory. Before the eighteenth century, however, Russia had quite another historical destiny. It maintained closer ties with the Asian steppes and Byzantium than with Europe. The country was open to the south, the north, and the east rather than the west. After the Revolution of 1917, Russia in many respects reverted to its past, to the time before the reforms of Peter the Great. Thus the years of communism were an anomaly, and perhaps the greatest, strangest, and most absurd error in the history of humanity, but one from which Russia is now extricating herself. Her 214 European years remain firmly inscribed in her history. They were sometimes troubled, it is true, but by and large they were happy, triumphant, and victorious. St. Petersburg is their principal witness and monument. IT is the city of imperial culture, the capital city, the city of the court: Rome and Versailles rolled into one and set within a cityscape resembling a Baltic Amsterdam or Finnish Venice--the "Palmyra of the North," as poets dubbed it. This allusion to antiquity is a fitting one, for St. Petersburg has always been a classical city, whether the brand of classicism in question was romantic or decadent, marked by the baroque or by the Enlightenment. This characteristic is indelibly engraved on its architecture. In this volume we trace the evolution of St. Petersburg over the course of these two centuries. One after the other, all the periods of life in St. Petersburg will be examined through the lens of its historical monuments. We have divided its architectural history by reigns. In organizing the illustrations, however, we have often adhered to geographic criteria to facilitate a unified presentation of architectural ensembles. In the Russia of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, as in France, each change of ruler was accompanied by a change of style. This is almost a law of stylistic evolution, and it was the basic premise of Igor Grabar's important history of Russian art, which dates from the early twentieth century. We have decided to follow his approach, which is consistent with historical reality. St. Petersburg of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries cannot be thought of without its environs, just as one could not imagine London without its parks or Paris without Versailles. The great events in the history of Russian architecture of the period often took place at Tsarkoe Selo, Oranienbaum, Gatchina, Pavlovsk, and Peterhof--outlying estates that, along with the city proper, constituted an immense, unique, and superb domain saturated with historical monuments. These monuments are so numerous and so diverse that we can describe each of them only briefly. But we have attempted to restore these architectural achievements to their proper role in Russian imperial history. PETER THE GREAT The founding of St. Petersburg. St. Petersburg was founded on May 27, 1703. Prince Vladimir Odoyevsky, one of the best-known Russian Romantic writers of the early nineteenth century, described the establishment of the city by Peter the Great: "Construction of the city had begun, but the marsh swallowed all the stone; a great many had already been piled on, block after block, but all had disappeared and nothing remained on the surface but swamp. Meanwhile, the tsar...took a turn around the site: he looked and saw that this was still not his city. 'You don't know how to do anything,' he told his people, and with these words he began to lift block after block and assemble them in mid-air. In this manner he constructed the entire city, and when it was complete he let it fall to earth." There is a grain of truth in this fantastic legend, which derives from an ancient Eastern fairy tale but is now part of the mythology of St. Petersburg. The new imperial capital of Russia sprang up at the country's northwestern extremity so unexpectedly and became a great city with such dizzying speed that it made sense to say that it had "fallen from the sky" onto the narrow, swampy islands at the delta of the Neva River. The history of the site prior to the city's founding has long since been established by historians. The earliest Russian chronicler, Nestor, writes that in his time the route linking the Varangians to the Greeks went from Scandinavia to Byzantium by way of the Neva, Lake Ladoga, and the rivers of Russia. In the ninth, tenth, and eleventh centuries this was one of the vital communication corridors of Europe. It was along this route that the structure of the Russian state evolved, and this same passage provided Russia with a tentative link to the West. St. Petersburg might well have been established then, but this did not happen. In truth, we are not even sure that the site of the future city existed at the time, for the delta of the Neva changed form quickly and the islands did not assume their present form until relatively recently. It is known that in the ninth century the Normans settled in a village situated a hundred kilometers from Lake Ladoga, before proceeding farther to the south, deep into Russia as far as Novgorod and Kiev. In the mid-thirteenth century the Tatar invasion cut off the river route between Scandinavia and Byzantium, but this did not lessen the determination of the Scandinavians and the Russians to establish themselves in the Neva delta. Throughout the medieval period the area belonged to the mercantile republic of Great Novgorod. The Swedes tried to conquer it but failed. Grand Prince Alexander Yaroslavich defeated the Swedish army there in 1240, which merited him a prominent place in Russian history as Alexander Nevsky, which means Alexander of Neva. All the grand princes and tears of Moscow were descended from him. The fortress of Landskron ("crown of the earth") was built there in 1300 by an Italian would-be engineer traveling with the Swedish armies; the Russians soon destroyed it, but at the beginning of the seventeenth century the Swedes erected a new fortress on roughly the same spot, which they called Nienshantz ("fortification on the Neva"). According to the terms of the peace of 1617, the northeastern seaboard of the Baltic Sea reverted to Sweden. She retained control until the beginning of the eighteenth century and the Northern War, in which Russia, Sweden, Poland, Denmark, Saxony, and some of the other German principalities took part. This conflict completely transformed the balance of power in the region, to Russia's advantage. Hitherto the prehistory of St. Petersburg was one of scarcely populated and impoverished territorial frontiers. Now all that changed. The Northern War began badly for Russia. Peter the Great's troops invaded Sweden by way of the southern Baltic coast but were cruelly defeated by young Charles XII, who then proceeded to conquer Poland, chasing from the Polish throne the Russian-allied Augustus the Strong, elector of Saxony, and installing in his place Stanishaw Leszczynski, the future father-in-law of Louis XV. In the meantime Peter the Great reorganized the Russian army on the European model. Profiting from the absence of Charles XII from the Baltic Sea, he went on the offensive. In the middle of 1702 his troops headed toward the Neva, and on May 1 the Russians took the fortress of Nienshantz and occupied the current site of St. Petersburg. Three weeks later Peter founded a fortress there that he called, after his patron saint, the city of Saint Peter--or, in Dutch transcribed in Cyrillic, "Sankt-Piterburkh." Excerpted from St. Petersburg: Architecture of the Tsars by Dmitri Shvidkovsky All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.