Attention Dispatches from a land of distraction

Joshua Cohen, 1980-

Book - 2018

A collection of essays, from a selection of previously published and new nonfiction--essays, memoir, criticism, letters, diaries--covering an array of topics.

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

814.6/Cohen
1 / 1 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor 814.6/Cohen Checked In
Subjects
Genres
Essays
Published
New York : Random House, an imprint and division of Penguin Random House LLC [2018]
Language
English
Main Author
Joshua Cohen, 1980- (author)
Edition
First edition
Physical Description
xiii, 560 pages ; 24 cm
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references.
ISBN
9780399590214
  • Distraction
  • Home
  • It's a Circle (On the Closing of the Ringling Bros, and Barnum & Bailey Circus)
  • From the Diaries: Groundhog Day Protests 2017
  • The Last Last Summer (On Donald Trump and the Fall of Atlantic City)
  • Notes on the Concession
  • From the Diaries: Lecture Review; Memoir
  • Exit Bernie
  • From the Diaries: New York Signs: Last Exit for the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge; Yield; Siamese Connection; LIRR; R Trains Run Express; Stop
  • Letter to Ruth May Rivers
  • First Family, Second Life (On Thomas Pynchon)
  • Letterform, Islandform
  • From the Diaries: Meditations
  • 9/11 Blue
  • From the Diaries: Hat Lessons Gleaned from Attending a Film Noir Marathon with a Nonagenarian Ex-Milliner Who Never Stops Talking
  • Letter to Stephen Shore
  • Downtown Underground (On John Zorn)
  • From the Diaries: Meditations from the Gym
  • Editing the I (On Gordon Lish)
  • From the Diaries: Four Facts I Learned in a Bar on Staten Island; A Successful Man in Chicago Is Complimented on His Suit
  • Lip Service (On Aretha and Beyoncé)
  • WIKI: What I Know Is
  • Boundless Informant (On Greenwald's Snowden)
  • From the Diaries: Salt and Pepper Shakers; When We Stopped Saying We Were Going to Move Out of the City
  • Datasexual (On Morozov, Lanier, Johnson, and Google)
  • From the Diaries: Navajo Reservation; Medium Thoreau
  • Abroad
  • Writing About the Present (Mirror, Body, Shadow)
  • From the Diaries: Brows; Freckles
  • Zibaldone Diary
  • Zizek Press Junket
  • From the Diaries: Conversation Summary (Next Table); Why I've Never Had Sex in Hungary
  • No One Hates Him More (On Franzen's Kraus)
  • Recognized Witness (On H. G. Adler)
  • From the Diaries: What Kind of Neighborhood Is Palilula (Belgrade)?; The Hague
  • Conducting Mortality (On Henry-Louis de La Grange's Mahler)
  • Fencing for Hitler (On Helene Mayer)
  • Speak Easy (On Bohumil Hrabal)
  • From the Diaries: Museum Fad (Rijeka); Critical Typo
  • Hung like an Obelisk, Hard as an Olympian (An Abecedarium of English-Language Publishing in Paris)
  • From the Diaries: Sounds of Odessa; Sights of Odessa; Odessa Fashion; Odessa at Work; Odessa Geography; London Stumble
  • Pond Memories (On Georges Perec)
  • Auto-Flâneurism (On Tom McCarthy)
  • From the Diaries: The Only Caravaggio in Russia; My Friend's Estimation of His Grandfather, a Forgotten Hungarian Painter
  • The Death of Culture, and Other Hypocrisies (On Mario Vargas Llosa)
  • All Foison, All Abundance (On Florio's Montaigne and Shakespeare's Flotio)
  • From the Diaries: Sentences from an English-Language Workbook. Found in Sofa; A Phrase that Must Be, but Is Not, Originally Yiddish
  • Inner Syntax (On Eimear McBride)
  • Inadvertence (On Alan Turing's Centennial)
  • Her Own Asylum (On Anna Kavan)
  • From the Diaries: American Woman Complimented by Greek Man; Bucharest Hostel
  • Bibliotbanatos, or Epigraphs for a Last Book
  • Dreamlands
  • Open Sesame
  • Me, U, Baku, Quba
  • From the Diaries: Adoration of New Magi; Le Pont Mirabeau
  • On the Transit of Toledo
  • In Partial Disgrace (On Charles Newman)
  • From the Diaries: A Certain Angle: The Mind Too; A; Posterity
  • Reorientalism (On Mathias Énard)
  • The Literature of Two Easts
  • From the Diaries: Traveling
  • Israel Diary
  • Lines of Occupation (On Yitzhak Laor)
  • From the Diaries: To Think; Traveling Without You
  • Literary Animals
  • Top Ten Books About Online
  • From the Diaries: What's in the Bag?; Overnight Flight WC; Shooting
  • Impromptu Fantasias (On Benjamin De Casseres)
  • Paragraph for Liu Xiaobo
  • From the Diaries: There Should Be Words for the Following in German; Germany to Jersey for the Holidays
  • Thoughts on the Roths and Their Kaddish
  • Dream Translations from the Early Hasidic
  • Attention! A (Short) History
Review by New York Times Review

Sensory Overload These essays by the novelist Joshua Cohen reveal a verbal prestidigitator overflowing with ideas. ATTENTION Dispatches From a Land of Distraction By Joshua Cohen 576 pp. Random House. $28. A little pruning would have helped. The only point of opening an essay collection is to spend some time with an interesting mind, and Joshua Cohen - novelist, journalist, critic; prodigy, polyglot, polymath - has one of the most interesting minds in circulation. But half as long would have been twice as good. A miscellany masquerading as a major statement, "Attention: Dispatches From a Land of Distraction" gives us sketches, musings, diaristic fragments, cultural criticism, reportage - politics, literature, music, travel; Trump, Barnum, Zizek, the internet - all capped by a titular history (of sorts) that weighs in at novella length. There are aperçus aplenty. Bernie Sanders is "a man resigned to his rage." Boke, archaic for book, is like the modern word, "but only in the past tense." With Israeli independence, " 'Zion' ceased to be a proleptic ideal or symbol and began to be an archaeological site with borders to defend." The diary entries, sprinkled throughout, are pungent morsels of observation. But sustained ideas are harder to come by. Cohen is a drive-by intellectual who moves too fast to question his conjectures - if it occurs to him, it must be true - a verbal prestidigitator who's inclined to let his language do the thinking for him. Of the collection's 70 pieces, two-thirds are less than five pages long. "Attention" has A.D.H.D. There is a certain logic to the volume's larger structure, though. As we move from a section called "Home" to one called "Abroad" and on to "Dreamlands," Cohen becomes not less in tune with his environment but more so. "Home" is the America of Thomas Pynchon, 9/11, Edward Snowden, Trump: the tyranny of normalcy, the normalization of tyranny. Cohen, born in 1980 and the product of a Hebrew day school, has laid claim to a place within the lengthening lineage of Jewish American writers. Yet the Jewish encounter with America, which may be described as a very old mind making contact with a very new civilization, can go in two directions. Figures like Philip Roth, Alfred Kazin and the younger Saul Bellow embraced American society in all its cacophonous energy. Those like Lionel Trilling, Susan Sontag and the older Saul Bellow recoiled in fastidious repugnance from its vulgar materialism and anti-intellectualism, turning back to Europe - or rather, upward, to European high culture - for refuge. Cohen pitches his tent in the second camp. An intensely bookish young man who passed his post-collegiate years in Central and Eastern Europe as a correspondent for The Jewish Daily Forward, Cohen affects a personal style, to judge from photographs - round-rimmed glasses, melancholy gaze - of a Russian Jewish intellectual circa 1910. His spiritual mood, marked by a sardonic cultural pessimism, is suited to match. Cohen is most at home, and "Attention" is at its best, in "Abroad." The section is heavy on literary criticism, the mode in which he goes deepest, because he goes slowest, and in which he is able to bring his learning, as well as his artistic experience, most fully to bear. There are actual arguments here, often brilliant ones, on the Holocaust writer H. G. Adler; the Czech novelist and raconteur Bohumil Hrabal; the French experimentalist and Oulipian Georges Perec, a collateral descendant of the Yiddish literary giant I. L. Peretz; as well as on Mahler, Shakespeare, Vargas Llosa and others. The interpolated notebook entries, meanwhile, adumbrate a serpentine journey through Poland, Budapest, Belgrade, Croatia, Odessa, Sofia and Bucharest. Cohen is working his way through, and laying claim to, a personal imaginative geography. A movement back, it is also, as the name of the following section makes clear, a movement in. Cohen's "Dreamlands" are, most prominently, Jewlands. There are the "Mountain Jews" of Azerbaijan, a closed society of semilegendary origin. There is the Hasidic tradition, with its Zenlike parables and wisdom-working rabbis. There is, at last, that waking dream turned waking nightmare, Israel. It is no coincidence that Cohen's itinerary in "Abroad" - drawn, evidently, from his years with The Forward, where his editor referred to him as the "Dead Jews correspondent" - takes him through the Ashkenazi heartland. The experience became a basis for "Witz" (2010), Cohen's most ambitious book, an epic satire of Jewish American Holocaust kitsch. In "Attention," as in his most recent novel, "Moving Kings" (2017), he takes aim at the Zionist project. If the middle pillars of Jewish American identity are Auschwitz and Israel, sainted victims and glamorized warriors, Cohen gives them both a mighty push. His solipsistic immaturity can sometimes bother me, but his truculent bravery often delights me. The volume concludes with "Attention! A (Short) History." The title is a misnomer. Cohen's real subject here (insofar as there is one, in this caffeinated ramble from Sumer to Google) is not attention, a topic that he never holds for very long, but literacy, the written - or chiseled, or linotyped, but now evanescent - word. Between "Witz" and "Moving Kings" came "Book of Numbers" (2015), an assault on Mount Tech. Boke is book, but only in the past tense. I thought that it was bad enough to love reading, the past, the traditions, the quiet of the solitary mind and to have been born in 1964. Cohen, a member of the generation that had "grown up with books," as he tells us, "only to exchange them for millennial adulthood and screens," is a young elegist for an old idea: ideas. He is a man profoundly out of step with the world in which he finds himself. Which is the only respectable place for a writer to be. WILLIAM DERESIEWICZ'S most recent book is "Excellent Sheep: The Miseducation of the American Elite and the Way to a Meaningful Life."

Copyright (c) The New York Times Company [August 23, 2019]
Review by Booklist Review

*Starred Review* Cohen's (Moving Kings, 2016) massive nonfiction debut collects the fiction writer and journalist's essays, memoirs, reportage, and reviews. The pieces are often as off-kilter and thought-provoking as his novels and cover a dizzying array of topics, including politics, history, music, literature, and Jewish identity, sometimes all in one essay. It's a Circle laments the final days of the Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus and highlights historical links between the circus and politics, including parallels to Trump's rise to power. Cohen eulogizes underappreciated heroes, including Thomas Pynchon and John Zorn, and critiques such cultural icons as Bernie Sanders and Gordon Lish. Lip Service compares Aretha's and Beyoncé's respective presidential inauguration performances, then turns into a sharp criticism of Obama's national security policies. One of the more compelling works is Me, U, Baku, Quba, which recounts Cohen's surreal quest to find the elusive Mountain Jews in Azerbaijan. Attention, a wry meditation on living in the age of distraction, fills the final 150 pages. Paradoxically or, perhaps, to prove its point, the book's central premise may be lost on readers who find the sprawling collection too challenging to keep them interested. But fans of David Foster Wallace and William T. Vollmann will revel in Cohen's playful erudition, versatility, and dark humor.--Jonathan Fullmer Copyright 2018 Booklist

From Booklist, Copyright (c) American Library Association. Used with permission.
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review

In this debut nonfiction collection, novelist Cohen (Moving Kings) muses on a variety of subjects, including politics, linguistics, history, and religion. Though the opening essay-a lament on the shallow state of societal discourse in a world crowded with distractions-is a bit stale, Cohen picks up steam in the second selection, an excoriating look at his native Atlantic City's economic decline as an extended metaphor for President Trump's failings, both personal and professional. In book reviews and literary essays, Cohen gives careful consideration to the work of Jonathan Franzen, Gordon Lish, and Thomas Pynchon, among others. A fascinating piece on German-Jewish fencer Helene Mayer, who competed for Germany at the 1936 Olympics, is filled with gems of historical insight, such as how European Jews had long used fencing as a "formal, relatively nonviolent way to respond to anti-Semitic provocations." Cohen can be pretentious or obtuse, particularly in the random diary entries sprinkled throughout: "Avoid imagination," he instructs, since "it is merely the plagiarism of your inexperience or ignorance." At its best, Cohen's work evokes comparisons to Gore Vidal in tone and purview, but the author lacks consistency. (Aug.) © Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved.

(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
Review by Kirkus Book Review

Cohen (Moving Kings, 2017, etc.), selected as a Granta Best Young American Novelist, has been turning out big, daunting novels, and this collection of his journalistic pieces rivals them in scope and density.As he writes in a short preface, people today are way too distracted: "We're becoming too disparate, too dissociatedsearching for porn one moment, searching for genocide the nextleaving behind stray data that cohere only in the mnemotech of our surveillance." It's time to pay attention, and reading these often challenging and acute essays is a start. Cohen opens with a nostalgic piece on the demise of the Ringling Bros. and Barnum Bailey Circus, which felt like the "death of jazz, or the death of the blues." Then, it's off to Atlantic City, where he once had a summer job in a casino, and a "cotton-candy-haired clown who crashed the AC party late and left it early and ugly"Donald Trump. Next up is a piece critical of Bernie Sanders, soon followed by one on a favorite writer of Cohen's, Thomas Pynchon, and news of a new book by him. Then Cohen discusses the "deliriously acquisitive music of John Zorn," Aretha Franklin ("like Annie Oakley, she could hit anything"), Beyonc, and Glenn Greenwald's "decent" Edward Snowden, who "excoriated the surveillance state." Throughout the collection, Cohen displays impressive range. He's equally comfortable discussing philosophy, politics, German metaphysics, Anna Kavan, Georges Perec, Mario Vargas Llosa, the internet, and Googlenot to mention creating an abecedarium honoring Paris' rogue English-language publisher Obelisk. Jewishness, so prevalent in Cohen's fiction, is generously represented here as well. Sometimes overly stylistically pyrotechnic, the author refuses to wear his learning lightly, which occasionally stifles and snuffs out the good stuff.Some readers will find Cohen's writing too disparate and snarky, but for those comfortable with the Vollmann/Gass/Eggers school of writing, these essays are the cat's meow. Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

It's a Circle On the Closing of the Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus Johnathan Lee Iverson, Ringmaster I'm the first person you hear in the circus. I give the circus a language. Nothing happens until I say it. Nothing matters until I say it. I take you in. I bring you across. Because people have to be told, they don't always know how to act in the face of the extraordinary. . . . I don't know what I'm doing next. I mean, I just lost my job and now I'm getting interviewed. I think I'll write a book, not a tell-­all. Try and do some hosting, some voicework. People are always bugging me about getting into politics. . . . The "grandstanding" is over, the "platform" is in splinters, the "bandwagon" has left town. The "tentpole" issues? Forget them. The inclusive "tent"? Without a pole, forget that too. No rings remain into which to throw your hat: The circus is shutting down. On January 14, 2017, Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus (henceforth RBandB&BC)--­America's oldest and best circus, America's last true touring circus--­announced that it was closing, and six days later the country mourned, with an exit parade, a grand-­finale funeral: the inauguration of Donald J. Trump. From its very inception, which was coeval with this country's inception, the American circus has been the imaginative grounds of American politics; its touring circuits became campaign circuits; its audiences became constituencies; its capacities for fame became convertible to power. And so the fact of its folding, especially now, can seem like a tragedy: equivalent to the tragedy of Trump, or even entwined. At the very least, the shuttering of America's top big top represents the shuttering of a substantial American culture: a medium, an aesthetics, a way of life, which has been dragging itself around this country, and around the world, under some merged, acquired, or freestanding variation of RBandB&BC's moniker almost continuously for the last 146 years--­ever since the presidency of Ulysses S. Grant. The circus: No other art form has ever been so vulnerable. No other art form has so swiftly become endangered and gone extinct. You can't, after all, bring about the end of the novel. You can't, try as you might, suspend the poem. But Feld Entertainment (the circus's sole proprietor) can drop and--­with a proper display of fanfare, hesitancy, and remorse--­has dropped the curtain on the three-­ring lions-­and-­tigers-­and-­bears-­oh-­my Greatest Show on Earth®, and ladies, gentlemen, and kids of all ages, the loss feels as fundamental, but also as fundamentally contentious, as the death of jazz, or the death of the blues. Because just like old black music was "appropriated" into newer, whiter pop, the American circus comes to a close having been gutted of nearly all of its major technical innovations, attractions, and acts, which have since gone on--­as if in a descent into an antiseptic ­afterlife--­to become the baseline components of contemporary performance, especially of contemporary recorded or mediated performance. Not to be a joss (circus-­people slang for noncircus people) by spelling this out, but: The circus was how acrobatics and juggling got to the Super Bowl halftime; it was how magic got to Vegas. The circus trained the animals to sit, stay, and roll over for TV and Holly­wood, and pioneered the stunt work involved with leaping out of a conflagrant speeding vehicle and landing safely, way back in the dinosaur days before CGI. The chief genius of the circus, of course, was to have staged all this spectacle and more, always more, all at once, and for one low price of admission--­not merely live, but so precariously, proximately live that we the glutted audience were forced to contemplate the mortal risks being undertaken for our entertainment. The earliest modern "circi" were glorified riding demonstrations, single-­ring answers to that most ancient of questions: What do you do with your soldiers in peacetime? In 1768, on the eve of what the British call the American War of Independence, Philip Astley and his fellow cavalrymen of the Fifteenth Light Dragoons opened an outdoor "riding school" at a track outside London. What made their presentation a circus, in the sense that we'd know it, was that it combined the displays of equestrian prowess--­including trick-­riding, jumping, and military maneuvers in the styles of the Prussians and Hessian hussars--­with interludes of clowning that allowed the riders and horses to rest, and were thought to appeal to women and children. Astley's most popular routine was, at heart, a lampooning of democracy. It involved a clown, cast as the folk hero Billy Buttons, an everyman tailor who keeps trying to mount a horse to ride to the polls to vote in an election, but can't quite get his act together: His saddle slips; his boot becomes stuck in a stirrup and he's dragged; finally, he sits up in the saddle, but in the wrong direction, ass-­facing; he spurs the horse into motion, only to fall. In January 2016, almost exactly a year before RBandB&BC's end was announced, almost exactly a year before Trump swore his oath, the following exchange occurred on Meet the Press: CHUCK TODD: As you know, people call you a lot of names. Some of it's positive, some of it's negative. I want to throw some by you. Let's see. Some people are calling you the Music Man of this race. Kim Kardashian. Biff, from Back to the Future. George Costanza. P. T. Barnum. What's--­any of those do you consider a compliment? Or do you--­ DONALD TRUMP: P. T. Barnum. TODD: You'll take the P. T. Barnum? TRUMP: P. T. Barnum. Look, people call you names. We need P. T. Barnum, a little bit, because we have to build up the image of our country. Racism, misogyny, poor-­hating, know-­nothingism--­by that point in the campaign, Trump had conditioned the public to expect anything, everything, from him, except this: insight. This introspection that most of America--­that most of even Trump's America--­had simultaneously been hoping for, yet hoping against. Here was a Trump who not only appeared to understand Barnum, but also appeared to understand himself. Either that or he was just repeating the last thing he'd heard. A year later, however, it's tempting to wonder whether now-­President Trump has changed his mind--­which is to say, with the end of RBandB&BC, might Trump regard its founder as a FAILURE . . . a LOSER . . . SAD? Or might he still admire Barnum, because though the business is perished, the name yet survives? The name or, as Trump put it on Meet the Press, the "image": a conceit for which Barnum, who had the benefit of Gilded Age lexical niceties, tended to use terms like "public opinion," "reputation," and "character." Also "appearance," as in Barnum's nostrum: "Put on the appearance of business, and generally the reality will follow." Generally: but not in the case of the circus. In 1782, one of Astley's former riders, Charles Hughes, founded his own clown-­and-­pony show, which he called--­in a mingling of Roman imperial and British monarchial gravities--­the Royal Circus, and, in 1793, one of Hughes's former riders, John Bill Ricketts, brought a rowdier version to America, taking over a hippodrome in Philadelphia, where President Washington was among the first visitors. According to legend, Washington so enjoyed himself that he agreed to sell Ricketts his favorite white battle charger, Old Jack, for $150, and, in 1797, when Ricketts opened a circus in New York City, Old Jack hobbled along, and spent its retirement on exhibition, being fed lump sugar and petted by patriotic strangers. On the surface, at least, which is where all vain fame addicts are happiest, Phineas Taylor Barnum (b. 1810) and Donald John Trump (b. 1946) might seem to share some traits in common: obsessions with pachydermatous size and promotional hype, along with a manic drive to project themselves, or their wishful selves, for profit. Both entered politics only later in life, capitalizing on their earlier careers as showmen. Both had lucrative sidelines in land speculation and development and mortifying dalliances with bankruptcy; both married significantly younger women (Trump and Melania Knauss: twenty-­four-­year age gap; Barnum and Nancy Fish: forty), inveighed against smoking and alcohol, and wrote or "wrote" volumes of self-­aggrandizing self-­help (The Art of the Deal is basically Barnum's The Art of Money Getting, just with cruder prose and monetary sums adjusted for inflation by roundabout 200 percent). Both achieved notoriety through making unfulfillable promises to their countrymen who lived in the interior, far from the coasts they called home, and, above all, both amassed their fortunes by lying and then by proprietizing their lies through licensing or "branding," which in Barnum's day was more usually performed upon the bodies of livestock and slaves. That said, Barnum--­who became more liberal as he aged, or just more of a fervent Unionist during the Civil War--­never got any further in politics than two terms in the Connecticut General Assembly (where his big issue, as the owner of an itinerant circus, was the breaking of the railroad trusts) and one term as the mayor of Bridgeport (where his big issue, as the head of a circus that wintered in Bridgeport, was utilities modernization). Trump, by contrast, has by the time of this writing already managed (among much else) to drop the largest nonnuclear bomb in the American arsenal on Afghanistan. That the first hundred days of Trump's presidency coincided with the last hundred days of Barnum's circus seemed a sign. It seemed to represent a final "appropriation"--­not of any circus routine this time, but of a basic circus principle: Chaos, or the artful manipulation of the image of chaos, was now being staged not in the center ring but in the Oval Office. Kenneth Feld, CEO, Feld Entertainment, owner and operator of RBandB&BC The biggest resentment I have is when they say Washington is run like a circus. If only it was so disciplined and organized. Here's the provenance, the tangled line of succession: In 1870, Barnum and William Cameron Coup established P. T. Barnum's Grand Traveling Museum, Menagerie, Caravan & Hippodrome, which met with great acclaim, and train derailments, collisions, labor disputes, and fires, until, in 1881, it hitched itself to a rival circus run by two Jameses: Bailey and Hutchinson. After Barnum's death in 1891, Bailey--­formerly the ringmaster--­assumed control, and after Bailey's death in 1906, five of the seven Ringling Bros. of Baraboo, Wisconsin--­the sons of a German immigrant (Rüngeling), who'd been running their own circuses since the 1880s--­purchased the remnants of Barnum & Bailey's, and presented it as a separate enterprise until 1919, when they consolidated all their properties into a lone extravaganza. John Ringling North, a Ringling Bros. nephew, spent most of the '50s partnering with, and in 1967 finally sold his family's show to, a man named Irvin Feld, a son of Russian Jews who'd parlayed the success of his Washington, D.C.-­area record emporium into the then-­novel field of concert promotion, primarily packaging black artists for majority white audiences: Chuck Berry, Fats Domino, the Platters, the Drifters. America under Eisenhower was in the midst of a building boom, fueled by its large labor force of veterans. To be considered a city in this country--­a true destination city--­you had to have an amphitheater: a War Memorial Stadium or Soldiers' Arena. This was the last age in which public buildings were still named after public servants or epochal events, and not yet banks or cable companies. But with only eight teams in the NBA and six teams in the NHL, there wasn't much happening inside them. Irvin Feld, more than anyone else in '50s and '60s America, developed and promoted the "content," whatever would fill the seats. And so the circus: It was Feld's innovation to ditch the tent and bring the American circus indoors, and he announced this grand-­scale relaunch with a purchasing ceremony at the Coliseum: not the one in Nassau County, Long Island, where the circus held its last show on Memorial Day Weekend this year, but the one in Rome. By promoting a relatively luxurious circus experience--­a circus roofed, and amenitized with A/C and upholstered seating--­Feld gave RBandB&BC another half century of life, but also changed the nature of the spectacle. The show, now, had to get bigger by the season, not just to impress in bigger surroundings, but also to reimpress itself on younger generations weaned on screens. What followed was an increasingly unsustainable balancing act, between the circus's constant adaptation to impatient if not childish tastes and the maintenance of the slower-­paced traditional elements preferred by the paying adults, who yearned for RBandB&BC as it used to be, or as they imagined it used to be: Americana, not America. But by the time Irvin Feld died, in 1984, and his son, Kenneth, took over, running a circus in this country meant hiring the preponderance of your performers from overseas. The best strongmen were Bulgarian; the best trampolinists were Romanian; the foremost equilibrists were from Russia and Ukraine (often alumni of the USSR Olympic gymnastics program), while most of the horse talent was sourced from Central Asia. In the Soviet sphere, the "circus arts" were always considered official national arts, on par with academic painting and sculpture, and so were supported with state money at state circus schools connected to state circuses. Kenneth Feld would fly behind the Iron Curtain almost annually, seeking performers to sign to twelve-­week stints (the maximum that they were permitted to travel and work in America), and though defections were common, his access was never completely curtailed, because the governments--­acting as talent agents to Feld's talent scout--­would take a percentage on all contracts, and RBandB&BC deals were reliable sources of hard cash. With the USSR in collapse, RBandB&BC began hiring a rising number of Chinese performers--­who, along with the current ample contingent of South and Central American performers, helped to put on this most North American, this most proudly American-­American, of shows. These immigrant or, more precisely, these wandering-­migrant performers were doing the jobs that most natural-­born Americans now just can't or won't do: hanging upside-­down and executing multiple somersaults between trapezes. The circus, like the Circus Americanus--­aka America at large--­is and has always been about foreigners and the otherwise Othered putting themselves in harm's way for the delectation of paying natives. But while both madcap enterprises are decidedly capitalistic, RBandB&BC functions internally like a planned economy, a heterogeneous mobile welfare state governed in toto by a single family (Kenneth Feld's three daughters are company executives). Due to the logistics of touring, all circus employees receive, in addition to their salaries, full room and board. They eat with the circus, they sleep with the circus. Most of what they casually wear, at least most of their casual outerwear, appears to be circus-­branded. Their children, both the children who perform and the children who don't, learn with circus teachers and go to circus dentists and circus doctors. Their pets, like the animal performers, go to circus veterinarians. This bizarre but constitutive expenditure is one reason, but only one, why the circus is failing. Excerpted from Attention by Joshua Cohen All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.