Review by New York Times Review
A biography of the nationalist poet Gabriele d'Annunzio, whose theatrical sense of political style influenced Mussolini. As capitalism transformed European economies during the second half of the 19th century, the rise of the masses revolutionized political life. Searching for identity and purpose in a confusing and changing world, many took refuge in nationalism - a continentwide phenomenon that found its most virulent expression in newly created countries like Germany and Italy, where it soon upended culture along with everything else. Gabriele d'Annunzio was born in Abruzzi in 1863 . A prolific and charismatic writer - considered by many the greatest Italian poet since Dante - he both exemplified and promoted the most extreme strain of turn-of-the-century Italian nationalism. His poems , plays , novels and journalism conveyed a disgust and boredom with the contemporary world and a longing for a more heroic era - one in which supermen like himself, unbound by tradition, could bring art and beauty to a world desperately in need of them. The hero of his first novel, "The Child of Pleasure," learns that "one must make one's life as one makes a work of art." And that was d'Annunzio's credo too. Indeed, his fame came not merely from his prodigious and well-regarded literary output, but also from his relentless self-promotion. He hobnobbed with the rich and famous and skillfully exploited the mass media of his day, pouring out reviews and engaging in frequent publicity stunts (once going so far as to spread rumors of his own death ). As time went on, d'Annunzio increasingly turned his attention to politics. He agitated for Italy's entry into World War I, which he saw as an opportunity to reinvigorate and cleanse a feeble and decadent society. Proudly entering military service himself, he reveled in the excitement of the new flying machines, which gave him the opportunity to drop propaganda pamphlets on the crowds below . Like many others, however, he was disappointed by the war's outcome - in his case, because Italy was not given the full share of spoils from the Austro- Hungarian Empire it felt had been secretly promised by the Allies . To right this perceived wrong, d'Annunzio engaged in his bestknown stunt: In 1919 , at the head of a ragtag band of a few thousand veterans and disgruntled nationalists, he seized Fiume, a formerly Hapsburg port city on the Adriatic with a substantial Italian-speaking population . On the 150th anniversary of d'Annunzio's birth, the British cultural historian Lucy Hughes-Hallett wants to reintroduce him to an English-speaking world that has largely forgotten him, and in "Gabriele d'Annunzio: Poet, Seducer, and Preacher of War," she argues that he merits attention not only as a literary figure but also as a major political one. "D'Annunzio's story," she writes, "provides a lens" through which to examine Fascism's "cultural antecedents and the psychological and emotional needs" to which it pandered . Her book, though, is not a standard political biography, not even a standard biography. Consciously or unconsciously echoing the style of d'Annunzio's own autobiography ("a discontinuous work," a "narrative repeatedly interrupted by musings"), Hughes-Hallett makes "use of techniques commoner in fiction-writing than in biography," ignoring chronological order and alternating "legato narrative with staccato glimpses of the man and fragments of his thought." In practice, this often means lots of disconnected snippets of information thrown together with little apparent logic or context. Despite her ostensible emphasis on politics, Hughes-Hallett spends little time discussing or analyzing actual political events or trends, focusing more on d'Annunzio's admittedly remarkable personal life. The picture she paints is unedifying . He had endless sordid sexual affairs , often emotionally and socially destroying the women he slept with. He also racked up enormous debts , took lots of drugs and was fascinated by interior decorating . After a while, the reader's mind begins to swim - it is hard to understand just how d'Annunzio had time to write or agitate given how devoted he was to fornicating, attending parties, collecting clothes and bric-a-brac, and obsessing over flower arranging . He comes offless as Übermensch than as Real Housewife of Rome. The biggest problem with the book, however, is that it never really substantiates its case for d'Annunzio's extraliterary significance. He was certainly a fierce critic of Italy's political order and a vigorous nationalist, and his fame helped win him a wide audience. He also played a role in developing a particular style of politics - heavy on spectacle, pageantry and marches - that the Fascists would later embrace. For these reasons, d'Annunzio viewed himself as "Fascism's inventor," a claim Hughes-Hallett appears to accept. But a broader view would have shown that d'Annunzio was hardly the only cultural figure of his type, and was less a cause than a symptom of the larger illnesses infecting Europe at the time. There is a limit to how much culture and style can help us in understanding Fascism's rise. It's true that Fascism practiced an unusually dramatic version of politics. But what ultimately made it so appealing, not only in Italy but in the rest of Europe as well, was its success in convincing a wide range of citizens that it had plausible solutions to pressing contemporary problems. Italy after World War I was a mess: socially divided, economically devastated, politically dysfunctional, in many places anarchic and lawless. The two dominant political groups, the Catholics and the Socialists, were more devoted to protecting the interests of their own constituencies than to promoting the public good or preserving democracy. This gave Mussolini and his Fascists precisely the opening they needed. They stepped forward as the force that could restore the country's dignity, solve its social problems, re- establish law and order, and spur economic development, while curbing capitalism's excesses. In contrast to the narrow, sectarian appeals of its political competitors, Fascism was explicitly designed to appeal to all sectors of society. The Fascists' willingness to engage in the actual substance of politics - organizing, administering, developing cross-class appeals and strategies - was ultimately what made them so dangerous and so successful. But these were things d'Annunzio had neither an interest in nor the patience for. After his dramatic entry into Fiume, for example, d'Annunzio found the best hotel in town and promptly took a nap . His involvement in governance and administration hardly increased during the subsequent months of the occupation: he could be heard, in Hughes-Hallett's telling, fretting about being "confined to a stuffy meeting room when he might have been out picking violets." Naturally, conditions in Fiume soon spiraled out of control. There were lots of parades, marches and other spectacles, to be sure, but the economy crumbled, as did the city's relations with Italy and the rest of the world. Eventually the Italian government intervened, and d'Annunzio was forced to leave . Properly understood, what d'Annunzio's story has to teach about Fascism, and about extremism more generally, is that culture and style take you only so far. Political dilettantism quickly wears thin. Mussolini - a much more serious player - paid homage to d'Annunzio and was happy to accept his support. But soon the professional revolutionary pushed the amateur aside and pensioned him off, leaving him to watch from the sidelines as the Fascists seized control of the country. And in 1924, Mussolini forced the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes to give him Fiume. GABRIELE D'ANNUNZIO Poet, Seducer, and Preacher of War By Lucy Hughes-Hallett Illustrated. 589 pp. Alfred A. Knopf. $35. Political dilettante: D'Annunzio in his study in 1894. D'Annunzio carried on endless affairs, took lots of drugs and was fascinated by interior decorating. Sheri Berman, a professor of political science at Barnard College, is the author of "The Primacy of Politics: Social Democracy and the Making of Europe's Twentieth Century."
Copyright (c) The New York Times Company [September 1, 2013]
Review by Booklist Review
*Starred Review* The subject of this long, busy biography kept notebooks from early on and extraordinarily faithfully. D'Annunzio (1863-1938) also deliberately became one of the first modern celebrities, hard on the heels of Oscar Wilde, and as such he was voluminously documented. Add his many volumes of verse, best-selling novels, and very popular plays, and he offers his chronicler an embarrassment of source material. Hughes-Hallett paints a richly detailed portrait of an eminently civilized sociopath, incapable of restraining his appetites for sex, excitement, and the most exquisite furnishings and utterly insensible to the emotional and financial damage he caused. He went through houses, furnishings, clothes, jewelry, artworks, horses, cars, and airplanes (not boats he never could conquer seasickness) as if they were water, almost never fully paying for any of them. His mistresses were legion, and among them were some of the era's most famous performers. And then there were his one-night (or shorter) stands, all recorded, often obscenely, in his notebooks. A national chauvinist who lauded unending warfare and violence, he spearheaded the drive to get Italy into WWI and for 15 months of 1919-20 was the dictator of the Italian-majority Yugoslavian city, Fiume. In the process, he inspired the rising Mussolini, of whom he seldom approved but didn't criticize because Il Duce paid for every extravagance of his last 15 years. D'Annunzio is appalling but, as Hughes-Hallett presents him, completely enthralling.--Olson, Ray Copyright 2010 Booklist
From Booklist, Copyright (c) American Library Association. Used with permission.
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review
The Italian modernist writer and demagogue embodies some of the most dynamic-and sinister-impulses of the early 20th century, according to this dazzling biography. Historian and critic Hughes-Hallett (Cleopatra: Histories, Dreams, and Distortions) delves into D'Annunzio's lurid contradictions: he was a brilliant, scandalous literary celebrity whose works embraced medieval archaisms and machine-age futurism; a ruthless seducer of women; an avowed Nietzschean superman and an effeminate voluptuary who loved fashion, furnishings, and flowers; and a blood-thirsty militarist who helped propel Italy into World War I with his pro-war oratory and reveled in the carnage he witnessed at the front. The book climaxes with a captivating account of D'Annunzio's 1919 seizure of power in the city of Fiume, a febrile episode part Summer of Love and part Nuremberg rally that pioneered the politics and aesthetics of later Fascist regimes. Hughes-Hallet tells the story through vignettes that unfold in intimate, novelistic detail; her patchwork narrative spotlights the raucously entertaining soap opera of D'Annunzio's life, but gels into a shrewd, challenging analysis that links his sadomasochistic psyche to his pitiless ideology. The result is a resonant study of the themes of power, masculinity, violence, and desire that made D'Annunzio such a striking emblem of his age. 53 illus. & 1 map. Agent: Felicity Rubenstein, Lutyens & Rubenstein. (Aug. 20) (c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved.
(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
Review by Kirkus Book Review
A dexterous delineation of the celebrated Italian writer Gabriele D'Annunzio (18631938), who mastered poetry, drama, fiction, nonfiction, women and war but stumbled elsewhere. A journalist, critic, cultural historian and biographer, Hughes-Hallett (Heroes: A History of Hero Worship, 2004, etc.) crafts an appealing combination of genres, blending elements of biography, fiction, and cultural, social and military history to create about as complete an image as possible of this most protean personality. The more we read of this man's accomplishments, failures, ambitions, weaknesses and obsessions, the more remarkable it is that he can be imprisoned in print. But the author manages to simultaneously incarcerate and liberate him in her pages. She begins with a 1919 military mutiny led by D'Annunzio (she returns to these events 400 pages later for a more thorough treatment): He and his followers took over and occupied the city of Fiume (now the Croatian seaport Rijeka). It didn't last. At times, the author's narrative technique resembles a photo album: She continually pauses to offer snapshots of her subject's life, career and enormous sexual appetite. Moreover, she grasps time by the throat, bends it to her purposes, often advancing thematically rather than chronologically. By the end, however, we have learned about her subject's background, his writing career (some have called him the greatest Italian writer since Dante), his war exploits (he was a fearless pilot in World War I, earning citations for bravery), his choreography with the fascists (he met several times with Mussolini), his profligacy (in every sense) and his astonishing literary productivity. Due to the volume's design, some will not find it useful as a standard reference book (we must search for dates), but most readers will delight in touring the deep, tangled wood of a most astonishing life with a most engaging and learned guide.]] Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.
Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.