The O. Henry prize stories

Book - 2013

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

813.08/Prize 2019
2017: 0 / 1 copies available
2018: 1 / 1 copies available
2019: 0 / 1 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor 813.08/Prize 2019 2019 Due May 1, 2024
2nd Floor 813.08/Prize 2018 2018 Checked In
2nd Floor 813.08/Prize 2017 2017 Due May 11, 2024
Subjects
Genres
Short stories
Published
New York : Anchor Books, a division of Random House LLC [2013-2019]
Language
English
Item Description
Relaunched in 2021 under the title The best short stories.
Physical Description
7 volumes ; 21 cm
Publication Frequency
Annual
ISBN
9780525565536
9780525436584
9780525432500
9781101971116
9781101872314
ISSN
24725455
21518157
Contents unavailable.
Review by Library Journal Review

Since 1918, the O. Henry Awards have celebrated the best short fiction published in North American periodicals each year. As with previous collections in the series, this 100th anniversary edition is less concerned with setting standards for a short story canon than showcasing a range of up-to-the-minute fiction and offering a look at subjects that interest contemporary writers. The majority of the 20 featured stories build on how identity--social, racial, cultural, familial, sexual, and otherwise--forms and shifts. While works in translation are not eligible for inclusion, the stories chosen by editor Furman (founding editor, American Short Fiction), with novelist judges Lynn Freed, Elizabeth Strout, and Lara Vapnyar, explore a range of cultures, eras, and experience. From John Edgar Wideman's "Maps and Ledgers," an intergenerational tale of code switching pinned to a young black professor's memories of his grandmother's elegant handwriting, to adolescent Jem's intrepid attempts to puzzle out the world of adults in Sarah Hall's "Goodnight Nobody," to the subtle navigation of race and relationship over dinner in Weike Wang's "Omakase," this eclectic anthology is sometimes uneven but intriguing throughout. VERDICT A solid inclusion for libraries with strong contemporary fiction collections.--Lisa Peet, Library Journal

(c) Copyright Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
Review by Kirkus Book Review

Centenary volume of the esteemed short fiction annual, filled with standouts.As the publisher writes, with welcome transparency, in an opening note, the choices in this volume are made by series editor and novelist/memoirist Furman (Ordinary Paradise, 1998, etc.); the jurorsin this case, Lara Vapnyar, Lynn Freed, and Elizabeth Stroutpick and comment on their favorite submission among the 20 Furman proffers. That understood, Furman appears to have broad tastes and no fear of sudden violence, something many of the stories exhibit. Perhaps the bestas with most prize volumes, especially those of limited scope, there's not really a bad story in the bunch, but some are naturally enough better than othersis Canadian author Alexander MacLeod's searing "Lagomorph," whose title commemorates an unusually long-lived rabbit whose days are nearly ended by an unwonted visit outdoors and an encounter there with a hungry snake. The metaphor could be obvious in a story whose guiding arc is the deterioration of a long marriage, but MacLeod keeps his eye on the rabbit and firm control over a story packed with meaning: "I couldn't feel anything out of place, and couldn't tell if there was something else wrong, something broken deeper inside of him." Speaking of control, Souvankham Thammavongsa turns the tables nicely with her story "Slingshot," depicting a 70-year-old woman whose relationship with a 32-year-old man is sexual and sensual but whose terms she sets, quietly rebuking the noisy and nosy: "Old is a thing that happened outside," thinks her narrator when one bore reminds her of the age difference. The violence returns in John Edgar Wideman's self-assured "Maps and Ledgers," concerning a rising African American academic whose daily burden is by no means lessened when his father kills a man, while Rachel Kondo's "Girl of Few Seasons" lays a memorable foundation for the reasons why a Vietnam-bound Hawaiian man must kill his flock of homing pigeons, "a steady heartbeat in his hands."Essential, as always, for buffs and students of the modern short story. Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

A Century of the O. Henry Prize   A hundred years ago, when O. Henry's friends and admirers created an annual book of short stories in his honor, they surely had a different idea than we do today of what constitutes a good story. O. Henry was famous for his twist at the end of a tale, the unexpected turn or ironic revelation that made the insoluble problems and puzzles in his plot disappear in a puff of laughter or a few tears. Plots were generally more ornate in the early twentieth century, and so too was literary language. Furthermore, stories such as O. Henry's weren't expected to be ambivalent. The story's meaning, often spelled out as a lesson for the reader, was a natural part of the ending. Today, stories come in a greater variety of voices and forms. A story can be written in any tense; in first, second, or third person; composed entirely of dialogue or with no dialogue at all; in one paragraph; in play form; with footnotes; and so on. Sometimes the past of the characters is spelled out and sometimes it is nonexistent, an effort on the writer's part to create an unending present. As for meaning, that's left up to the reader. The short story is now an open field for writers, and some of the results might be unrecognizable to an early-twentieth-century reader. Still, elements of the form persist: a certain relationship between different pieces of the story, in particular, the passionate desire of the beginning and ending for reunion. So, too, the inner workings of the collection have changed. The earliest O. Henry Prize stories were chosen by several committees of readers who started with six hundred stories and passed them on in smaller and smaller batches until the final three judges whittled the remaining contenders down to seventeen finalists. Among those seventeen, the judges then ranked three as first-, second-, and third-prize winners. The process is much simplified now and fairer to writer and reader. Instead of the cascading sets of readers of the early years, the series editor alone chooses the stories, and while past volumes could contain sixteen, seventeen, eighteen, or twenty-one stories, the number has settled at twenty. Starting in 1997, a jury of three writers was convened by the series editor to determine the first-, second-, and third-prize winners, but in 2003, the rankings were eliminated and all the winners are now equally honored. The three jurors now read a blind manuscript separately; each chooses a single favorite and writes about it. This avoids decisions by committee and also makes the process more fun for the jurors since they don't know who wrote the story or where it was published. Only twice in sixteen years has a story been recognized by a juror. Looking back at the O. Henry Prize's beginning decades, other differences jump out at one. Originally, most of the stories chosen for the collection were by white, male writers, though occasionally O. Henry readers could enjoy the likes of Dorothy Parker, Eudora Welty, and Flannery O'Connor. Over the years, the O. Henry has become more welcoming of different voices. So long as a story was originally composed in English it is eligible for consideration, no matter the nationality of the author. So long as a magazine is distributed in North America, it is welcome to submit stories to the O. Henry. As a result, the annual collection is increasingly international. Readers will find that the 2019 collection offers stories from a variety of writers and set all over the world, from Maui to the American West, from New York to Laos to the east bank of the river Jordan. The magazines that published the stories in the present collection range from the venerable New Yorker , Kenyon Review , and Sewanee Review to small magazines such as LitMag (in its second year of publication), A Public Space , and ZYZZYVA . Not all submitting publications are print ones; for instance, there's a story this year from Granta 's online incarnation, Granta.com. With all the changes the decades have brought, there is a consistent goal: to find exemplary stories and to celebrate the short story form. It's been my privilege to be part of the O. Henry's history since the 2003, and editing the anniversary edition has been as exciting as ever. In its hundredth year, The O. Henry Prize Stories is alive, well, and faithful to its original purpose--to strengthen the art of the short story. --Laura Furman, Series Editor Excerpted from The O. Henry Prize Stories 2019: The Best Short Stories of the Year All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.